[Bug 9643] /proc/acpi/alarm set error
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9643 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #14201|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| Attachment #14201|0 |1 is patch|| --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 00:21 --- (From update of attachment 14201) This is a patch. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9644] Superfulous counting and counting error in function acpi_system_write_alarm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9644 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 00:19 --- Created an attachment (id=14202) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14202action=view) Remove superfluous counting and fix counting error This patch removes unnecessary code and does with the aforementioned situation. Before applying this patch: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm 2007-12-00 00:00:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# echo -00-00 96:180:180 /proc/acpi/alarm [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm 0007-12-02 **:**:** [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# After applying this patch: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# echo 2007-12-00 00:00:00 /proc/acpi/alarm [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm 2007-12-00 00:00:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# echo -00-00 96:180:180 /proc/acpi/alarm [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm 0007-12-04 03:03:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9644] New: Superfulous counting and counting error in function acpi_system_write_alarm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9644 Summary: Superfulous counting and counting error in function acpi_system_write_alarm Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 KernelVersion: 2.6.24-rc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: Other AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Most recent kernel where this bug did not occur: none Distribution: FC8 Hardware Environment: All Software Environment: All Problem Description: In function acpi_system_write_alarm in file drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c, big sec, min, hr, mo, day and yr are counted twice to get reasonable values, that is very superfluous, we can do that only once. In additon, /proc/acpi/alarm can set a related value which can be specified as years MM months DD days HH hours MM minutes SS senconds, it isn't a date, so you can specify as +-00-00 96:00:00 , that means 3 days later, current code can't handle such a case. Steps to reproduce: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# echo 2007-12-00 00:00:00 /proc/acpi/alarm [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm 2007-12-00 00:00:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# echo -00-00 96:180:180 /proc/acpi/alarm [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm 0007-12-02 **:**:** [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9624] ACPI or radeon: spontaneous reboot regression
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9624 --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 01:46 --- Matt, Reversing the patch you've mentioned is like disabling interrupts -- sure it will 'cure' the broken interrupt handler by not calling it... By reverting the patch you disable notifications from embedded controller to all ACPI drivers -- thermal, battery and AC adapter at least. Could you please try to run the latest -rc kernel and disable modules mentioned above one by one? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9645] New: Changes in charge are not notified through uevent netlink
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9645 Summary: Changes in charge are not notified through uevent netlink Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 KernelVersion: 94545baded0bfbabdc30a3a4cb48b3db479dd6ef Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: Power-Battery AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #9494 +++ See bug #9494 for some information and dumps about what happens with userspace. This is not related to duplicate batteries. When disabling ACPI_PROCFS, here is what happens (or does not happen): When plugging or unplugging battery to AC, two events are received through uevent netlink. However, although the energy_now changes every once in a while, no more events are received. Then, udev, that does not use inotify to check for changes in sysfs attributes, but awaits them in uevent netlink, cannot notify HAL that the energy_now attribute has changed. So, gnome-power-manager or kpowersave will not be able to correctly report the charge to the user. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9645] Changes in charge are not notified through uevent netlink
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9645 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 06:01 --- Created an attachment (id=14204) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14204action=view) output of dmesg of Thinkpad R32 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9645] Changes in charge are not notified through uevent netlink
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9645 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 06:02 --- Created an attachment (id=14205) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14205action=view) Linux build config for Thinkpad R32 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9645] Changes in charge are not notified through uevent netlink
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9645 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 05:59 --- Created an attachment (id=14203) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14203action=view) ACPI Dump of Thinkpad R32 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9645] Changes in charge are not notified through uevent netlink
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9645 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 04:00 --- Could you please tell what HW are you using? acpidump and dmesg are needed at least. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9528] s2ram on Asus A8N-SLI (Nvidia NForce4) ceased to work from linux 2.6.21 to 2.6.22
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO --- Comment #56 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 09:08 --- I have uploaded a new patchset, containing patches that should fix this problem (patches 28-34), into http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/hibernation_and_suspend/2.6.24-rc6/patches/ . Can you test it, please? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9528] s2ram on Asus A8N-SLI (Nvidia NForce4) ceased to work from linux 2.6.21 to 2.6.22
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528 --- Comment #57 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 09:52 --- Tested here and working fine. Feel free to tack this onto any relevant patches if you want someone to blame/ experiment on later: Tested-by: Carlos Corbacho [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9642] backlight regration from kernel 2.6.22 to 2.6.23
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9642 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Regression|0 |1 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9585] s2ram regression
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|9243| nThis|| Component|Hibernation/Suspend |network-wireless Product|Power Management|Drivers Regression|1 |0 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9585] s2ram regression
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |drivers_network- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||bugs.osdl.org Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 13:30 --- (In reply to comment #16) (In reply to comment #15) (In reply to comment #14) Please verify if suspend works for you with the rt2x00 driver unloaded. I mean, with unmodified 2.6.24-rc6 (or a later kernel). It works with latest git and rt2x00 unloaded! OK, thanks for the confirmation. Technically, this is not a regression, since the rt2x00 driver was not present in 2.6.23, so this is a new breakage. I'll reassign the bug to the wireless team, but if no one picks it up, I'll have a closer look at it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9585] s2ram regression
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585 --- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 13:31 --- For now, as a workaround, please unload the rt2x00 module before suspend. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9528] s2ram on Asus A8N-SLI (Nvidia NForce4) ceased to work from linux 2.6.21 to 2.6.22
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528 --- Comment #59 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 14:17 --- (In reply to comment #58) (In reply to comment #56) I have uploaded a new patchset, containing patches that should fix this problem (patches 28-34), into http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/hibernation_and_suspend/2.6.24-rc6/patches/ . Can you test it, please? Tested with following results: Thanks for testing. runlevel 3 (console): s2ram -f -a 1 works, but forgets to restore console, i.e. after resume I need to type commands while monitor is in power save mode or log in via network. What's your kernel command line in this configuration? s2disk works, including resume. Fine. runlevel 5: with Xorg and nv driver: s2disk works OK s2ram suspends fine, but after resume Xorg runs at 100% CPU and monitor stays in powersave mode. Well, it seems we're not handling the graphics appropriately. You may try to pass some other options to s2ram. with Xorg and nvidia (14.19 and 169.07) binary drivers: s2ram suspends fine, but after resume Xorg runs at 100% CPU and monitor stays in powersave mode. Same as above, the NVidia driver doesn't seem to help. Forgot to test s2disk. Production system (2.6.21.7) runs with Nvidia 14.19 binary driver. Please try to compile the kernel with CONFIG_PM_DEBUG set and do: # echo core /sys/power/pm_test # echo mem /sys/power/state (that will run through the entire suspend sequence without entering the system sleep state - busy waiting for 5 sec. instead - and through the resume sequence). If that works, the problem is most probably related to the graphics not being initialized appropriately after the suspend. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9645] Changes in charge are not notified through uevent netlink
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9645 --- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 14:40 --- as you could see in acpi_battery_notify, there is no filtering of events. So if you receive some, but not others, there is a good chance they are not sent by battery at all. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9645] Changes in charge are not notified through uevent netlink
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9645 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 14:31 --- Let me repeat myself. I receive events when I plug or unplug AC power to my Thinkpad R32. I do not receive events for changing in energy. Should I be able to receive them? I have removed ACPI_PROCFS support from my build. But, perhaps, that isn't the problem. I receive the same events from the generic netlink support in battery module. So, acpi_battery_notify is working, it just not notifies of changes in energy_now, which are only refreshed when I read sysfs attributes. By my reading of the code, enabling ACPI_PROCFS again and reading /proc/acpi/events won't work either. I will try older versions, perhaps even use bisect. But before I run on doing those things, should I really see events for changes in energy_now? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9528] s2ram on Asus A8N-SLI (Nvidia NForce4) ceased to work from linux 2.6.21 to 2.6.22
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528 --- Comment #58 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 13:50 --- (In reply to comment #56) I have uploaded a new patchset, containing patches that should fix this problem (patches 28-34), into http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/hibernation_and_suspend/2.6.24-rc6/patches/ . Can you test it, please? Tested with following results: runlevel 3 (console): s2ram -f -a 1 works, but forgets to restore console, i.e. after resume I need to type commands while monitor is in power save mode or log in via network. s2disk works, including resume. runlevel 5: with Xorg and nv driver: s2disk works s2ram suspends fine, but after resume Xorg runs at 100% CPU and monitor stays in powersave mode. with Xorg and nvidia (14.19 and 169.07) binary drivers: s2ram suspends fine, but after resume Xorg runs at 100% CPU and monitor stays in powersave mode. Forgot to test s2disk. Production system (2.6.21.7) runs with Nvidia 14.19 binary driver. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9642] backlight regration from kernel 2.6.22 to 2.6.23
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9642 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 16:13 --- ah! and maybe the most visible bug , when close lid , backlight doesn't work. but after an suspend to disk and resume, when close lid backlight works. I like to remember from kernel-2.6.20 to kernel-2.6.22, hibernation was broken, http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8592 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9645] Changes in charge are not notified through uevent netlink
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9645 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 17:17 --- There was no events in /proc/acpi/event for changes in charge. Tried 2.6.22 from Debian and got the same behaviour. I thought I have covered the userspace well, but, then, I've found that HAL polls for /proc/acpi/battery/* but do not do the same for /sys/class/power_supply/*. So, there is no bug here, since there is no deviation from events from /proc/acpi/event in older versions (before power_supply class) and netlink uevent in the most recent versions. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9147] atkbd.c: Unknown key released when 'ac' and/or 'battery' and/or 'thermal' modules are loaded
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9643] /proc/acpi/alarm set error
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9643 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |bugs.osdl.org | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9643] /proc/acpi/alarm set error
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9643 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||CODE_FIX --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 18:56 --- patch in comment #3 applied to acpi test tree. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9643] /proc/acpi/alarm set error
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9643 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 19:03 --- If you consider apply this patch, much better to apply the patch in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5833 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9644] Superfulous counting and counting error in function acpi_system_write_alarm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9644 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |bugs.osdl.org | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9644] Superfulous counting and counting error in function acpi_system_write_alarm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9644 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||CODE_FIX --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 19:05 --- patch in comment #1 applied to acpi test branch -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9487] buggy firmware expects four-byte IRQ resource descriptor (was: Serial port disappears after Suspend on Toshiba R25)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 19:26 --- Your patch looks reasonable. One comment: I suggest not adding IORESOURCE_IRQ_DESCRIPTOR_4_BYTES in generic header, as this is quite ACPI specific. You can set resource's descriptor_length in 'pnpacpi_type_resources'. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9574] 'acpi_osi=Linux' made a PCI device window available.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9574
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 19:49 ---
Besides the PCI dmesg diff above, do you notice
any functional difference with and without acpi_osi=Linux?
Device (PCI0)
{
Name (_HID, EisaId (PNP0A03))
Name (_ADR, 0x00)
Name (_UID, 0x01)
Name (_BBN, 0x00)
Method (_INI, 0, NotSerialized)
{
If (CondRefOf (\_OSI, Local0))
{
If (\_OSI (Linux))
{
Store (0x00, ECDY)
}
}
ECDY is accessed in multiple places in AML, most notably
in the Embedded Controller interface, and the battery code.
Do you notice any difference in the battery info or
battery function with and without acpi_osi=Linux?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9535] pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO resources: 24
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9535 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Regression|1 |0 --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 20:31 --- pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO resources: 24 a7839e960675b549f06209d18283d5cee2ce9261 (PNP: increase the maximum number of resources) increased PNP_MAX_PORT to 24 from 8 and added this warning. So I don't believe that this falls in the regression category, even though there is an additional line in dmesg. Indeed, it is easier to argue that the new line is a feature, as it is pointing out a potential problem that Linux was too ignorant to complain about before... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9535] pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO resources: 24
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9535
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 20:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=14212)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14212action=view)
patch vs 2.6.24-rc6 to increase PNP_MAX_PORT to 40
The 15 dmesg lines were presumably from the 39 - 24 = 15
IO resources here:
Device (MBRD)
{
Name (_HID, EisaId (PNP0C02))
Name (_UID, 0x1F)
Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate ()
{
IO (Decode16,
0x0010, // Range Minimum
0x0010, // Range Maximum
0x01, // Alignment
0x10, // Length
)
IO (Decode16,
0x0024, // Range Minimum
0x0024, // Range Maximum
0x01, // Alignment
0x02, // Length
)
Please confirm that this patch to up PNP_MAX_PORT to 40
makes the messages go away and causes no additional
issues on the Acer.
The alternatives to this patch are:
1. delete the message (and ignore the issue) like we did before 2.6.24
2. change pnp to use resource lists rather than arrays
I do not advocate #1 -- hiding a potentially serious problem
would be a mistake. Rather, I'm inclined to ship this simple fix now
and look for #2 (a memory size optimization) in a future release.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9535] pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO resources: 24
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9535 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||CODE_FIX -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9642] backlight regration from kernel 2.6.22 to 2.6.23
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9642 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 21:00 --- if you boot the system with acpi=off, and you close and then open the lid, does the backlight work then? it isn't clear from your description exactly what was working in 2.6.22 that isn't working in 2.6.23. Or has this always been an issue? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9614] Duplicate video device for Toshiba Satellite A100-847
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9614 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acpi- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||et AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |bugs.osdl.org | Status|NEEDINFO|NEW -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9624] ACPI or radeon: spontaneous reboot regression
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9624 --- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 21:11 --- So 2.6.23-rc3 and before worked fine, but 2.6.23-rc4 and later (eg 2.6.23, 2.6.24-rc6) all fail this way? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |m | Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED --- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 21:16 --- Hi, Giovanmi Will you please boot with the option of acpi.debug_layer=0x0100 acpi.debug_level=0x1f cpufreq.debug=7 and attach the output of dmesg? Please try it on the broken bios and it is noted that the debug function of acpi and cpufreq should be enabled in kernel configuration. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 --- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 21:20 --- Hi, Fabien Will you please attach the output of acpidump ? It will be great if you can do the test in comment #18. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9624] ACPI or radeon: spontaneous reboot regression
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9624 --- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 21:19 --- Yes, bisection shows kernels shortly after 23-rc3 failing. Will try to fiddle with thermal, battery, and AC settings tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9513] cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/temperature hangs with new BIOS
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9513
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
||et
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
Summary|cat |cat
|/proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM|/proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM
|/temperature hangs |/temperature hangs with new
||BIOS
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 21:49 ---
With the working BIOS, please paste the output from
more /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/* | cat
And for the failing BIOS, please do the same,
except exclude access to the problematic temperature file.
Can you attach the dmesg from the working 1102 BIOS?
I don't see anything special in the 1202 dmesg in attachment
in comment #1, but maybe the original dmesg will give some clues.
It looks like there is a bug in the AML of BIOS 1202.
They re-named CPU0 to be C000, in both the DSDT
and the SSDT, but didn't update the reference to
it from the thermal zone. (which is why iasl created
an External reference to the missing symbol)
I don't know if this causes the hang or not, but
it is certainly curious and it is in the same neck
of the woods...
$ cat DSDT.dsl.diff
5c5
* Disassembly of DSDT.dat, Fri Dec 28 00:18:35 2007
---
* Disassembly of DSDT.dat, Fri Dec 28 00:18:48 2007
10c10
* Length 0x78E1 (30945)
---
* Length 0x7908 (30984)
19a20,21
External (\_PR_.CPU0)
22,23c24,27
Processor (\_PR.CPU0, 0x00, 0x, 0x00) {}
Processor (\_PR.CPU1, 0x01, 0x, 0x00) {}
---
Processor (\_PR.C000, 0x00, 0x, 0x00) {}
Processor (\_PR.C001, 0x01, 0x, 0x00) {}
Processor (\_PR.C002, 0x02, 0x, 0x00) {}
Processor (\_PR.C003, 0x03, 0x, 0x00) {}
2949c2953
0x80, // Length
---
0x02, // Length
$ cat SSDT.dsl.diff
5c5
* Disassembly of SSDT.dat, Fri Dec 28 00:18:35 2007
---
* Disassembly of SSDT.dat, Fri Dec 28 00:18:48 2007
20,21c20,21
External (\_PR_.CPU1, DeviceObj)
External (\_PR_.CPU0, DeviceObj)
---
External (\_PR_.C001, DeviceObj)
External (\_PR_.C000, DeviceObj)
23c23
Scope (\_PR.CPU0)
---
Scope (\_PR.C000)
91c91
Scope (\_PR.CPU1)
---
Scope (\_PR.C001)
While in the DSDT, there is still an access to CPU0 in _PSL:
ThermalZone (THRM)
{
Name (_AL0, Package (0x01)
{
FAN
})
Method (_INI, 0, NotSerialized)
{
}
Method (_AC0, 0, NotSerialized)
{
If (Or (PLCY, PLCY, Local7))
{
Return (KELA (TP2H))
}
Else
{
Return (KELA (TP1H))
}
}
Name (_PSL, Package (0x01)
{
\_PR.CPU0
})
The other change was the size of a system IO resource shrunk
from 0x80 to 0x02:
IO (Decode16,
0x0800, // Range Minimum
0x0800, // Range Maximum
0x01, // Alignment
0x02, // Length
I have no idea what this resource is used for.
But it would be interesting if you could correct the DSDT
and boot with a DSDT override to see if either the CPU0
or the resource size changes make the hang go away.
How to Build a custom DSDT into the kernel
--
Get original DSDT:
# cp /proc/acpi/dsdt DSDT
or
# acpidump acpidump.out
$ acpixtract DSDT acpidump DSDT.dat
Disassemble it
$ iasl -d DSDT.dat
Make your changes:
$ vi DSDT.dsl
Build it:
$ iasl -tc DSDT.dsl
Put it where the kernel build can include it:
$ cp DSDT.hex $SRC/include/
Add this to the kernel .config:
CONFIG_STANDALONE=n
CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT=y
CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_FILE=DSDT.hex
Make the kernel and off you go!
You should see in dmesg:
Table [DSDT] replaced by host OS
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
[Bug 9516] Battery issues on HP Compaq nx6325
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9516 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acpi- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||et Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED Resolution||UNREPRODUCIBLE --- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 23:35 --- I have access to an HP nx6325 and I do not see this issue. I'm running Fedora Core 8, and have tested with both the 2.6.23.9-85.fc8 kernel, as well as the kernel.org 2.6.23.12 kernel. dmidecode describes the BIOS as Version: 68TT2 Ver. F.02 with Release Date: 07/06/2006 In both cases the output from cat /proc/acpi/ac_adapter/C1BD/state /proc/acpi/battery/C1BF/state makes sense and it notices changes in AC/DC status, and the battery status icon in the gnome GUI does as well. If you can reproduce this issue with a kernel.org kernel, please re-open this report and attach the .config. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9517] To low fan speed on HP Compaq nx6325
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9517 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 23:48 --- I have access to an HP nx6325 and do not see this problem running Linux-2.6.23.12. Though I do not run Windows on the box, I use this system primarily to test ACPI based fan control on Linux. I have verified that the fan speed kicks in at the temperatures prescribed by the BIOS -- and also that the fan slows down at the thresholds prescribed by the BIOS. I generally do this by running watch cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/TZ1/* setting not supported polling disabled state: active[3] temperature: 48 C critical (S5): 105 C passive: 95 C: tc1=1 tc2=2 tsp=100 devices=C000 C001 active[0]: 75 C: devices=C34F active[1]: 65 C: devices=C350 active[2]: 55 C: devices=C351 active[3]: 40 C: devices=C352 and then add some load, say via $ cat /dev/zero /dev/null $ cat /dev/zero /dev/null and blocking the vents with tape, unblocking them, killing the load etc and watching the temperature change, the active state change, and listening to the fan on changes between states. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9517] To low fan speed on HP Compaq nx6325
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9517 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |REJECTED Resolution||UNREPRODUCIBLE --- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 23:49 --- If you can reproduce this issue using a kernel.org kernel, please re-open this report, attach the kernel .config, and describe how I can reproduce and observe the failure. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9487] buggy firmware expects four-byte IRQ resource descriptor (was: Serial port disappears after Suspend on Toshiba R25)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|power- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]| |bugs.osdl.org | Component|Other |ACPICA-Core --- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-27 23:55 --- as a patch is attached that is intended to address the problem, I'm setting this report to RESOLVED, so it will be noticed for review and testing. Also setting sub-category to ACPICA-Core since this proposes a change to the generic ACPICA resource code. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
