[Bug 9477] bogus temperature value and critical temperature reached - medion 8800
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9477 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acpi- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||et Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Component|ACPICA-Core |Power-Thermal Summary|bogus temperature value and |bogus temperature value and |critical temperature reached|critical temperature reached |on medion 8800 |- medion 8800 --- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 00:15 --- As Jean had found that the underlying sensor is giving bogus data, this doesn't appear to be a bug in Linux's ACPI code. As Thomas suggests... It would be great if you can see what Windows detects for the temperature. If that gives bogus values too, then that suggests this is either a defective motherboard design, or a hardware sample defect. It would be interesting if Windows sees the negative temperatures but lives with it. If so, then we have to make Linux more robust, okay, perhaps just make it more bug compatible... Re: HWMON vs ACPI possibly causing the critical shutdown Please let us know if you see the issue still when CONFIG_HWMON=n Note also that there are a number of ways to disable parts of the ACPI thermal support. Start with thermal.nocrt=1, which will simply disable the action of shutting the system down when a critical temperature is seen. You can disable critical threshold checking entirely with thermal.crt=-1, and you can disable the thermal module entirely with thermal.off=1. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9528] s2ram on Asus A8N-SLI (Nvidia NForce4) ceased to work from linux 2.6.21 to 2.6.22
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528 --- Comment #60 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 03:41 --- Created an attachment (id=14215) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14215action=view) dmesg output on 2.6.24rc6 w/ PM patches -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9528] s2ram on Asus A8N-SLI (Nvidia NForce4) ceased to work from linux 2.6.21 to 2.6.22
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528 --- Comment #61 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 03:43 --- (In reply to comment #59) (In reply to comment #58) (In reply to comment #56) Thanks for testing. runlevel 3 (console): s2ram -f -a 1 works, but forgets to restore console, i.e. after resume I need to type commands while monitor is in power save mode or log in via network. What's your kernel command line in this configuration? from grub/menu.lst: kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.24-rc6-default \ root=/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_ST...-part1 resume=/dev/sdb2 showopts [...] s2ram suspends fine, but after resume Xorg runs at 100% CPU and monitor stays in powersave mode. Well, it seems we're not handling the graphics appropriately. You may try to pass some other options to s2ram. Ok, I'll try the complete set of suggestions in the s2ram manual, just can't do that right now. with Xorg and nvidia (14.19 and 169.07) binary drivers: s2ram suspends fine, but after resume Xorg runs at 100% CPU and monitor stays in powersave mode. Same as above, the NVidia driver doesn't seem to help. One more addition to that: in all cases, killing Xorg and restarting it after resume doesn't solve the problem, the new Xorg process also runs at 100% CPU w/o diplaying anything. [...] Please try to compile the kernel with CONFIG_PM_DEBUG set and do: # echo core /sys/power/pm_test # echo mem /sys/power/state Worked fine, even without breaking the console. dmesg output is attached. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 --- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 03:56 --- Created an attachment (id=14216) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14216action=view) dmesg with acpi/cpufreq debug enabled -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 --- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 07:12 --- Created an attachment (id=14217) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14217action=view) acpidump (BIOS v305) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 --- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 07:13 --- Created an attachment (id=14218) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14218action=view) dmesg (BIOS v305, acpi and cpufreq debug enabled) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9167] ACPI (thermal) problems with Acer Aspire 5720
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9642] backlight regration from kernel 2.6.22 to 2.6.23
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9642 --- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 07:36 --- (In reply to comment #5) it isn't clear from your description exactly what was working in 2.6.22 that isn't working in 2.6.23. backlight, is that clear ? Or has this always been an issue? no , just in 2.6.23. The other associates issues has hibernate and suspend, which worked in some kernels. For hibernation the list is 2.6.15 and 16 works, 17 and 18 no , 19 and 20 yes, 21 22 no and 23 yes suspend the list is 23 no , 23 yes -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9642] backlight regration from kernel 2.6.22 to 2.6.23
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9642 --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 08:48 --- (In reply to comment #5) if you boot the system with acpi=off, and you close and then open the lid, does the backlight work then? yes, backlight works normally if I boot with acpi=off on kernel 2.6.23.9. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9169] Fan not working after resume from hibernate but ok after s2ram
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9169 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO --- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 12:42 --- Can you test 2.6.24-rc6 with the patches from: http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/hibernation_and_suspend/2.6.24-rc6/patches/ applied, please? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9642] no backlight on lid open starting in 2.6.23 - nx6110
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9642 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acpi- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||et Summary|backlight regration from|no backlight on lid open |kernel 2.6.22 to 2.6.23 |starting in 2.6.23 - nx6110 --- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 20:07 --- On lid open/close actions, does /proc/interrupts show an ACPI interrupt for each action? If you kill acpid and cat /proc/acpi/event, do you see lid events on each lid action? What do you see under /proc/acpi/button/lid/C1E9/state -- does it update correctly to the new state on each lid action? BTW. acpi_osi=!Linux This should be a NOP on this system, as the AML in comment #1 does not contain any invocations of _OSI(Linux). If the kernel did find the AML asking _OSI(Linux), you'd see an additional dmesg line about it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 7229] iasl disassembler gets arguments of external methods wrong
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7229 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acpi- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||et Status|ASSIGNED|REJECTED Resolution||DOCUMENTED --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 20:16 --- iASL issues should be filed in the (newly public) acpica bugzilla, http://acpica.org/bugzilla/ rather than here in the kernel.org (Linux kernel specific) bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 7229] iasl disassembler gets arguments of external methods wrong
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7229 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REJECTED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9642] no backlight on lid open starting in 2.6.23 - nx6110
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9642 --- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 21:26 --- (In reply to comment #8) On lid open/close actions, does /proc/interrupts show an ACPI interrupt for each action? watch -n 1 cat /proc/interrupts says no. ACPI interrupt don't change when press lid button. If you kill acpid and cat /proc/acpi/event, do you see lid events on each lid action? cat /proc/acpi/event seems about: 40 in 40 seconds show a lid message like this: video C055 0080 button/lid C1E9 0080 0259 and dmesg says: video bus notify Not understanding when neither why. I just know that I don't had press the lid button in last 10 minutes and still have messages of button/lid. What do you see under /proc/acpi/button/lid/C1E9/state -- does it update correctly to the new state on each lid action? cat /proc/acpi/button/lid/C1E9/state state: closed Always says that is closed, when I'm pressing or not in the id button. Hope that can help -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 6138] 8139too stops working aster ~5 minutes - NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6138 --- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 21:31 --- Vitaly (as you seem to be the sole surviving reporter) please collect he dmesg using dmesg -s64000 so it will go back the beginning. please _attach_ it to the bug report rather than pasting it. so far, i don't see any suggestion that this is an ACPI interrupt configuration issue. It may be a generic Linux IOAPIC issue that is seen on specific hardware, or a driver issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 6712] CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y prevents poweroff -- it reboots instead - tyan s2882
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6712 --- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 21:44 --- If 2.6.24-rc5 still fails, then we still have a problem, for the fix to https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299882 9c1c6a1ba786d58bd03e27ee49f89a5685e8e07b (ACPI: sleep: Fix GPE suspend cleanup) shipped in Linux-2.6.24-rc1-git6, which precedes 2.6.24-rc5 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 8714] boot hang at setting up timer on NForce C51, unless nolapic
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8714 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED Resolution||INSUFFICIENT_DATA --- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 21:55 --- no response since 2007-10-12, please re-open if this is still an issue with the latest upstream kernel.org kernel. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9445] CPU falis APIC tests - Gigabyte P35-DQ6 + Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9445 --- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 22:05 --- how was the original APIC failure observed, did you boot a Linux installation CDROM or something? if yes, you should have the opportunity to add kernel boot parameters (such as acpi=off) to the boot cmdline before the kernel is launched. Sometimes there is a window for them, and sometimes you get a GRUB menu, where you need to type e to edit a boot entry on the menu and b to boot it when done. Can you describe the failure in more detail -- screen capture, console log, or specific error messages or error behavior. Is windows or some other OS currently running properly on this system? Does it see and use all the CPUs? What is its interrupt configuration? please don't reply to this message with an HTML message. If your mailer has no option, then please go to the web page and type your comments directly into the bug report. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 8980] Slow CPU fan, warm system - no TOS1900 driver - Toshiba Satellite L30-113a laptop
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8980 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |REJECTED Resolution||DOCUMENTED Summary|Slow CPU fan, warm system - |Slow CPU fan, warm system - |Toshiba Satellite L30-113a |no TOS1900 driver - |laptop |Toshiba Satellite L30-113a ||laptop --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 22:12 --- Per above, this system is designed to require a platform specific driver. Toshiba has not supplied such a driver for Linux, nor provided the Linux community with documentation sufficient to create one. Closed as DOCUMENTED. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 5303] AMD64 Erratum: Should not enable C2 when using APIC
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5303 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CODE_FIX --- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 22:37 --- a re-worked version of Alexey's patch in comment #27 shipped in linux-2.6.24-rc4. c1c306344669ca40255e36192b101060ffbb1271 (ACPI: Set max_cstate to 1 for early Opterons.) yes, Bertro, this always disables C2 on your box, in favor of fixing the interrupt issue. no, i don't understand Andi's comment #28 either, as i've seen no indication that timers different than the lapic timer are immune from the issue. (if they were, you could have used nolapic for a workaround) closed. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 5303] AMD64 Erratum: Should not enable C2 when using APIC
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5303 --- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-28 22:45 --- I will be on vacation from December 15th 2007 until January 3rd 2008. I will respond to all emails when I return. In my absence, refer Linux issues to the OSRC at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal email should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Mark Langsdorf Operating System Research Center AMD !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN HTML HEAD META HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type CONTENT=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 META NAME=Generator CONTENT=MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7652.24 TITLEOut of Office AutoReply: [Bug 5303] AMD64 Erratum: Should not enable C2 when using APIC/TITLE /HEAD BODY !-- Converted from text/plain format -- PFONT SIZE=2I will be on vacation from December 15th 2007 until January 3rd 2008.nbsp; I will respond to all emails when I return.BR BR In my absence, refer Linux issues to the OSRC at [EMAIL PROTECTED]nbsp; Personal email should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]nbsp;BR BR -Mark LangsdorfBR Operating System Research CenterBR AMDBR /FONT /P /BODY /HTML -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
