[Bug 12249] Lenovo ThinkPad SL series: LCD brightness works in procfs, buggy in sysfs
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249 Peter Klotz peter.kl...@aon.at changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #20797|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #106 from Peter Klotz peter.kl...@aon.at 2009-04-07 06:00:01 --- Created an attachment (id=20850) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20850) dmesg output as requested in comment #104 I switched to kernel 2.6.29.1. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12011] battery status info dissapears in 2.6.27.5 - MSI GX700, EX600 laptops
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12011 --- Comment #131 from Unnamed_Hero uh.li...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 06:43:29 --- Bad news... Battery lost again after 25 minutes of uptime, with no errors in logs -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12249] Lenovo ThinkPad SL series: LCD brightness works in procfs, buggy in sysfs
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249 Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO --- Comment #107 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-04-07 06:47:56 --- From the dmesg output in comment #106, it seems that the ACPI brightness control is working perfectly on your box, doesn't it? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12998] S3 suspend: power shuts off completely every 20 or so suspends (T60)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12998 Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #16 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-04-07 06:55:38 --- what about this test: echo none /sys/power/pm_test for n in `seq 50`; do dmesg -c echo mem /sys/power/state dmesg dmesg-$n sleep 2 done when the S3 fails, please ttach the latest dmesg ouput. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13002] kernel 2.6.28 doesn't boot on a dell inspiron 2650
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13002 Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO CC||rui.zh...@intel.com --- Comment #4 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-04-07 07:00:12 --- what if you boot with pci=noacpi? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12270] Almost all my devices are not recongnized by kernel-2.6.27, 2.6-28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12270 --- Comment #51 from Anders Henke anders.he...@1und1.de 2009-04-07 08:20:51 --- Sigh - the various stalls from #49 seem to be related to some odd bios settings. After resetting the BIOS to defaults and reconfiguring the box to the same settings as before, the box no longer stalls during boot, but reverts to its old behaviour, described in bug #12976: without any patches or boot parameters, ACPI doesn't seem to correctly assign interrupts to the raid controller, so the box sees no root file system and panics. For future testing, I've saved /dev/nvram into a file, so I can revert my bios settings to some known state. I'll patch and compile various kernels and keep you posted ... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13023] PROBLEM: no backlight control on Amilo Pa 2548
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023 --- Comment #3 from Piotr W. Abramov piotr.ab...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 08:29:47 --- (In reply to comment #1) Will you please try to load the fujitsu-laptop driver and see whether the issue still exists? Will you please also attach the output of acpidump? thanks. I loaded the fujitsu-laptop driver and the issue still exists. It created the backlight interface under /sys/class/backlight but 'echo 5 /sys/class/backlight/fujitsu-laptop/brightness' doesn't do anything. /sys/class/backlight/fujitsu-laptop/uevent: /sys/class/backlight/fujitsu-laptop/bl_power: 0 /sys/class/backlight/fujitsu-laptop/brightness: 5 /sys/class/backlight/fujitsu-laptop/actual_brightness: 0 /sys/class/backlight/fujitsu-laptop/max_brightness: -1 /sys/class/backlight/fujitsu-laptop/power/wakeup: Output of acpidump is in the first post. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13023] PROBLEM: no backlight control on Amilo Pa 2548
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023 --- Comment #4 from Piotr W. Abramov piotr.ab...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 08:34:29 --- Created an attachment (id=20851) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20851) Content of /proc/interrupts before pressing the hotkeys -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13023] PROBLEM: no backlight control on Amilo Pa 2548
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023 --- Comment #5 from Piotr W. Abramov piotr.ab...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 08:35:19 --- Created an attachment (id=20852) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20852) Content of /proc/interrupts after pressing the hotkeys -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12270] Almost all my devices are not recongnized by kernel-2.6.27, 2.6-28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12270 --- Comment #54 from Anders Henke anders.he...@1und1.de 2009-04-07 08:50:25 --- Created an attachment (id=20854) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20854) serial console boot log of vanilla 2.6.29.1, using acpi=noirq Vanilla 2.6.29.1, this time using the boot option acpi=noirq. The kernel successfully loads. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12270] Almost all my devices are not recongnized by kernel-2.6.27, 2.6-28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12270 --- Comment #55 from Anders Henke anders.he...@1und1.de 2009-04-07 08:51:52 --- Created an attachment (id=20855) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20855) serial console boot log of 2.6.29.1, using patch from comment #33 2.6.29.1 using the patch from comment #33, without any boot options. The kernel successfully boots, the system is completely usable. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12270] Almost all my devices are not recongnized by kernel-2.6.27, 2.6-28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12270 --- Comment #53 from Anders Henke anders.he...@1und1.de 2009-04-07 08:49:29 --- Created an attachment (id=20853) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20853) serial console boot log of vanilla 2.6.29.1 After reverting BIOS settings to defaults ... 2.6.29.1 without any patches or special boot options fails to boot: raid card not detected - no root fs found - panic. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13023] PROBLEM: no backlight control on Amilo Pa 2548
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023 --- Comment #7 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-04-07 08:56:15 --- _BQC method is not implemented in this BIOS, and the _BCL method provides indexed values. enabling the ACPI video extension support on this laptop seems to be difficult, sigh... I'll have a try once the previous 8 patches are upstream. please attach the lspci output -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12270] Almost all my devices are not recongnized by kernel-2.6.27, 2.6-28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12270 Anders Henke anders.he...@1und1.de changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #20832|0 |1 is obsolete|| -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12270] Almost all my devices are not recongnized by kernel-2.6.27, 2.6-28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12270 --- Comment #56 from Anders Henke anders.he...@1und1.de 2009-04-07 08:55:18 --- Created an attachment (id=20856) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20856) serial console boot log of 2.6.29.1, using patch from comment #44 2.6.29.1, using only the patch from comment #44. The kernel fails to boot the system, as the interrupt assignment for the raid controller is somehow broken. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12270] Almost all my devices are not recongnized by kernel-2.6.27, 2.6-28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12270 --- Comment #57 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-04-07 09:17:41 --- then what about the patch in comment #25? I think that one should work for you. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12270] Almost all my devices are not recongnized by kernel-2.6.27, 2.6-28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12270 --- Comment #52 from Anders Henke anders.he...@1und1.de 2009-04-07 08:45:58 --- The box has successfully been booted using 2.6.29.1 with the patch from comment #33 three times: three attempts to boot, all of them were successful. Using only the patch from comment #44 results in an interrupt assignment problem: [2.546673] 3ware Storage Controller device driver for Linux v1.26.02.002. [2.567389] 3w- :00:0d.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A [2.586514] 3w- :00:0d.0: PCI INT A: no GSI - using IRQ 11 [4.280028] scsi0 : 3ware Storage Controller [4.293356] 3w-: scsi0: Found a 3ware Storage Controller at 0xe800, IRQ: 11. [ 10.040056] scsi 0:0:0:0: WARNING: Command (0x12) timed out, resetting card. [ 31.750034] scsi 0:0:0:0: WARNING: Command (0x0) timed out, resetting card. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12908] acpi_ex_extract_from_field -- div by zero
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12908 --- Comment #8 from Jiri Slaby jirisl...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 10:57:26 --- I'm not quite convinced it is unrelated, it has the very same symptoms -- boot lockup around ACPI, few boot cycles to get rid of it. From the picture, I cannot utter whether it is related or not. What lead you to this conclusion? The exceptions present there are not usually in the kernel messages. Couldn't they mean some memory was overwritten by mess like at the pictures earlier? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13002] kernel 2.6.28 doesn't boot on a dell inspiron 2650
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13002 --- Comment #5 from Tiago Requeijo tiago.requeijo@gmail.com 2009-04-07 12:25:56 --- Booting with pci=noacpi works. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13023] PROBLEM: no backlight control on Amilo Pa 2548
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023 --- Comment #9 from ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-04-07 09:58:07 --- Hi, Piotr Will you please try the 2.6.28-xx kernel(for example: 2.6.28.3) and see whether there exists the backlight interface under the /sys/class/backlight/ ? It will be great if you can add the boot option of acpi.debug_layer=0x1000 acpi.debug_level=0x01f initcall_debug on the 2.6.28-xx kernel and attach the output of dmesg. Of course the CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG should be set in kernel configuration. if there exists the backlight interface under /sys/class/backlight, please confirm whether the backlight can be changed by using it. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13023] PROBLEM: no backlight control on Amilo Pa 2548
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023
--- Comment #6 from Piotr W. Abramov piotr.ab...@gmail.com 2009-04-07
08:41:10 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
2. My system doesn't have the backlight interface under /sys/class/backlight
and /proc/acpi/video. Module 'video' is loaded.
Method (_BCL, 0, NotSerialized)
{
Return (Package (0x0A)
{
0x07,
0x00,
0x00,
0x01,
0x02,
0x03,
0x04,
0x05,
0x06,
0x07
})
}
Well, the backlight control method is buggy.
But this should be fixed by the new ACPI video fixes.
please do the test in comment #91 bug #12249, without step 1 and step 6, and
see if it helps
I applied all 8 patches but it doesn't help.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13036] New: ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x00000080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [Syst
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036 Summary: ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x0080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO] [20090320] Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Kernel Version: 2.6.29-git14 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: P1 Component: Platform-Drivers AssignedTo: acpi_platform-driv...@kernel-bugs.osdl.org ReportedBy: giovanni.peller...@gmail.com Regression: Yes ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x0080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO] [20090320] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\P8XH] (Node f7017900), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.EC__._Q58] (Node f701ab58), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x0080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO] [20090320] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\P8XH] (Node f7017900), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.EC__._Q59] (Node f701ab70), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x0080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO] [20090320] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\P8XH] (Node f7017900), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.EC__._Q58] (Node f701ab58), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x0080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO] [20090320] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\P8XH] (Node f7017900), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.EC__._Q59] (Node f701ab70), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x0080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO] [20090320] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\P8XH] (Node f7017900), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.EC__._Q25] (Node f701a348), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x0080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO] [20090320] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\P8XH] (Node f7017900), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.EC__._Q25] (Node f701a348), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x0080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO] [20090320] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\P8XH] (Node f7017900), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.EC__._Q25] (Node f701a348), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x0080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO] [20090320] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\P8XH] (Node f7017900), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.EC__._Q25] (Node f701a348), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x0080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO] [20090320] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\P8XH] (Node f7017900), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.EC__._Q25] (Node f701a348), AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements
[Bug 13038] New: APIC IRQ on Asus M3N WS
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13038 Summary: APIC IRQ on Asus M3N WS Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Kernel Version: 2.6.25 - 2.6.29 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: BIOS AssignedTo: acpi_b...@kernel-bugs.osdl.org ReportedBy: albe...@guerreroygonzalez.es Regression: No Excuse my english, it's poor. Can I write spanish? I have an Asus M3N WS motherboard (BIOS v.0501), with a OpenSuSE Linux 11.0 x86_64. Since I installed it I have been having some USB hungs (USB keyboard and mice). I noticed the fail occurs when there is a IRQ share between USB OHCI controller and other device, such integrated video card (I could see it un /proc/interrupts). This shares are ¿dynamical?, becouse I verified some times I reboot IRQ shares changes. I had to unplug all usb device except mouse and keyboard in order to minimize fail search variables and to improve system stability. I tried to change some devices interrupt mode to MSI, so these devices did no have fails any more (such Intel HDA). But I could't enable MSI mode on integrated video card (system hungs). If I pass 'noapic' paramenter to Kernel at boot, the system become stable at most times. But with 'noapic' I lost IRQ balance and others funtions for multi-core processor. I tried many kernels versions since 2.6.25 to 2.6.29, SuSE compiled and original 'vanilla' compiled by me, and I twice upgraded motherboard BIOS... Nothing to do. I think the ACPI BIOS is broken, because compilation of DST using intel AML compiler reports several warnings and errors. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12170] acpid takes 20-50% of cpu - Compal IFL90
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12170 --- Comment #29 from Francisco Pina Martins f.pinamart...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 09:59:56 --- I have finally installed Arch. I have everything configured under Gnome and got a 100% usable system. My uname -a reads: Linux MegalaptopII 2.6.28-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Mar 17 07:22:53 CET 2009 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux I am experiencing no issues with acpi or CPU usage. I'm guessing it must be specific to your config... Hope this info can be of some help. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12270] Almost all my devices are not recongnized by kernel-2.6.27, 2.6-28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12270 --- Comment #58 from Anders Henke anders.he...@1und1.de 2009-04-07 09:48:10 --- Created an attachment (id=20858) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20858) serial console boot log of 2.6.28.9, using patch from comment #25 2.6.28.9, using the patch from comment #25: box successfully boots and works as expected. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13023] PROBLEM: no backlight control on Amilo Pa 2548
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023 --- Comment #10 from Piotr W. Abramov piotr.ab...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 11:05:11 --- Created an attachment (id=20860) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20860) Output of dmesg of kernel 2.6.28.7 with acpi debug and parameters: acpi.debug_layer=0x1000 acpi.debug_level=0x01f initcall_debug Also there are no backlight interface under /sys/class/backlight and /proc/acpi/video. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13036] ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x00000080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036 Giovanni Pellerano giovanni.peller...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|All |i386 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13023] PROBLEM: no backlight control on Amilo Pa 2548
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023 --- Comment #8 from Piotr W. Abramov piotr.ab...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 09:27:15 --- Created an attachment (id=20857) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20857) Output of lspci -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13036] ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x00000080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036 Giovanni Pellerano giovanni.peller...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||giovanni.peller...@gmail.co ||m -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12700] poweroff hang unless nolapic_timer - Acer 4520 laptop, NVidia MCP67, Turion X2 processor
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12700 tiago irc...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||CODE_FIX -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12908] acpi_ex_extract_from_field -- div by zero
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12908
--- Comment #9 from Robert Moore robert.mo...@intel.com 2009-04-07 16:05:55
---
The photo shows an AE_ALREADY_EXISTS error. The interpreter is marking the
method as 'serialized' in order to attempt to recover from a problem in the
BIOS AML code. I don't see anything related to a memory/object overwrite issue
in that particular snapshot.
Here is the recovery code:
/* Check for possible multi-thread reentrancy problem */
if ((Status == AE_ALREADY_EXISTS)
(!WalkState-MethodDesc-Method.Mutex))
{
ACPI_INFO ((AE_INFO,
Marking method %4.4s as Serialized because of AE_ALREADY_EXISTS
error,
WalkState-MethodNode-Name.Ascii));
/*
* Method tried to create an object twice. The probable cause is
* that the method cannot handle reentrancy.
*
* The method is marked NotSerialized, but it tried to create
* a named object, causing the second thread entrance to fail.
* Workaround this problem by marking the method permanently
* as Serialized.
*/
WalkState-MethodDesc-Method.MethodFlags |= AML_METHOD_SERIALIZED;
WalkState-MethodDesc-Method.SyncLevel = 0;
}
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12249] Lenovo ThinkPad SL series: LCD brightness works in procfs, buggy in sysfs
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249 --- Comment #108 from Peter Klotz peter.kl...@aon.at 2009-04-07 19:55:23 --- From a kernel point of view this may be true. However Gnome shows quite erratic behavior. echo 10 /proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCD/brightness no longer shows an error message which is definitely better than before. Iterating through all values in /proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCD/brightness works perfectly and changes the brightness as expected (10=lowest, 100=highest). This scenario however shows odd behavior: * Set maximum brightness: echo 100 /proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCD/brightness * r...@asus:/proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCDD# cat brightness levels: 10 16 21 27 33 39 45 51 57 63 69 74 81 87 93 100 current: 100 * r...@asus:/proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCDD# grep . /sys/class/backlight/*/* /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/actual_brightness:0 /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/bl_power:0 /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness:15 /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/max_brightness:15 * Reducing the brightness level by one using the corresponding brightness key * The brightness stays very high (I would assume 93) * r...@asus:/proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCDD# cat brightness levels: 10 16 21 27 33 39 45 51 57 63 69 74 81 87 93 100 current: 16 * r...@asus:/proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCDD# grep . /sys/class/backlight/*/* /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/actual_brightness:1 /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/bl_power:0 /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness:14 /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/max_brightness:15 * Pressing the brightness key a few more times does not change anything, but then abruptly minimum brightness is set * r...@asus:/proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCDD# cat brightness levels: 10 16 21 27 33 39 45 51 57 63 69 74 81 87 93 100 current: 10 * r...@asus:/proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCDD# grep . /sys/class/backlight/*/* /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/actual_brightness:15 /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/bl_power:0 /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness:0 /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/max_brightness:15 Do these values look sane to you? It seems strange that manually executing echo 16 /proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCD/brightness results in a dark screen whereas setting brightness with Gnome results in a very bright screen. In both cases /proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCD/brightness contains current: 16. Is /proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCD/brightness a reliable source for the current brightness value or should /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness be used instead? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 10699] Wrong battery information on MSI S271 laptop with msi-laptop module loaded - 2.6.23 regression
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10699 --- Comment #37 from Mike Trim mike.t...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 19:05:51 --- Created an attachment (id=20863) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20863) dmesg output with patch from comment #36 I have tested with v2.6.29 + the patch from comment #36. It behaves exactly as with v2.6.29, i.e. /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/state shows 'unknown' status all the time after loading msi-laptop. The only difference I noticed in dmesg is that the message ACPI: EC: missing confirmations, switch off interrupt mode. no longer appears. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13041] New: OQO 01+ doesn't power off since 2.6.24
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13041 Summary: OQO 01+ doesn't power off since 2.6.24 Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Kernel Version: 2.6.28.2+ Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: Power-Off AssignedTo: acpi_power-...@kernel-bugs.osdl.org ReportedBy: j...@lentin.co.uk Regression: Yes Since 2.6.24, my OQO 01+ will not enter S5. There are no abnormal messages, however the device sits in the halted state. Weirdly, S3 S4 are fine. Using git bisect, the commit that caused S5 to stop working is:- http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/aegl/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=c95d47a868f35cd47643d116a3c680cdaa954df8 ACPI: Separate invocations of _GTS and _BFS from _PTS and _WAK In particular, the call to GTS in acpi_enter_sleep_state is upsetting something. I have tried the following:- * Moving the GTS method call to the beginning of acpi_enter_sleep_state(), this has no effect. * Removing the GTS method call entirely results in working S5---obviously I won't be submitting this patch but keeps me happy for now. Any suggestions as to what to try next for a better fix? Basic debug info can be found here:- acpidump: http://jamie.lentin.co.uk/hardware/oqo_01plus/acpidump.txt dmidecode: http://jamie.lentin.co.uk/hardware/oqo_01plus/dmidecode.txt dmesg (2.6.28.2): http://jamie.lentin.co.uk/hardware/oqo_01plus/dmesg.txt Thanks for any help -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13036] ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x00000080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036 Giovanni Pellerano giovanni.peller...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||malat...@linux.it --- Comment #1 from Giovanni Pellerano giovanni.peller...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 21:10:08 --- i've forgot to say -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13036] ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x00000080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036 Giovanni Pellerano giovanni.peller...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||len.br...@intel.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13036] ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x00000080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036 --- Comment #2 from Giovanni Pellerano giovanni.peller...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 21:11:54 --- I've forgot to say, i've a Sony Vaio SR 19XN; i'm going to attach the acpi dump. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13036] ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x00000080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036 --- Comment #3 from Giovanni Pellerano giovanni.peller...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 21:21:58 --- Created an attachment (id=20866) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20866) acpi dump sony vaio sr19xn -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13036] ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x00000080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036 Len Brown len.br...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|Platform-Drivers|ACPICA-Core AssignedTo|acpi_platform-driv...@kerne |acpi_acpica-c...@kernel-bug |l-bugs.osdl.org |s.osdl.org --- Comment #4 from Len Brown len.br...@intel.com 2009-04-07 21:26:26 --- This Sony has lots of writes to debug port 0x80. However, the AML is doing this with 32-bit writes rather than a 1-byte write. Linux is detecting the illegal access to ports 81-83, blocking them, and complaining. My guess is that Windows would allow a 1-byte write to port 80, but silently block a 4-byte write to port 80. The DSDT in this sony is full of debug writes to method P8XH, so you'll get these whenever the BIOS developer wanted to write to the 7-segment debug port on their prototype -- over 60 calls... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13036] ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x00000080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036 --- Comment #5 from Giovanni Pellerano giovanni.peller...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 21:37:31 --- is there something i can do to help you? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13036] ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x00000080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036 Len Brown len.br...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||CODE_FIX -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13036] ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x00000080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036 --- Comment #6 from Len Brown len.br...@intel.com 2009-04-07 21:37:45 --- Created an attachment (id=20867) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20867) patch vs 2.6.29-git14 Please verify that this patch makes the error messages go away. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13036] ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x00000080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036 --- Comment #7 from Rodrigo L. Batista rodr...@gus-mg.org 2009-04-08 00:32:57 --- Created an attachment (id=20872) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20872) acpidump vgn-fw235j -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13036] ACPI Error (hwvalid-0186): Denied AML access to port 0x00000080/4 (DMA1 0x0081-0x0083) [20090320] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, Returned by Handler for [SystemIO]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036 Rodrigo L. Batista rodr...@gus-mg.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rodr...@gus-mg.org --- Comment #8 from Rodrigo L. Batista rodr...@gus-mg.org 2009-04-08 01:14:06 --- This patch works. There is no more errors. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12270] Almost all my devices are not recongnized by kernel-2.6.27, 2.6-28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12270 Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED CC||shaohua...@intel.com Resolution||CODE_FIX --- Comment #59 from Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com 2009-04-08 01:24:19 --- comment #58 mentioned patch from comment #25 fixed the issue. Rui, will you push the patch? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12270] Almost all my devices are not recongnized by kernel-2.6.27, 2.6-28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12270 --- Comment #60 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-04-08 01:45:16 --- done. patch already available at http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/16983/ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13041] OQO 01+ doesn't power off since 2.6.24
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13041 Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shaohua...@intel.com AssignedTo|acpi_power-...@kernel-bugs. |rui.zh...@intel.com |osdl.org| -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13038] APIC IRQ on Asus M3N WS
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13038 Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shaohua...@intel.com --- Comment #1 from Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com 2009-04-08 01:56:08 --- please attach the output of 'dmesg', 'acpidump' and 'lspci -vvv', so we can analyze the issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13038] APIC IRQ on Asus M3N WS
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13038 Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|acpi_b...@kernel-bugs.osdl. |yakui.z...@intel.com |org | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13002] kernel 2.6.28 doesn't boot on a dell inspiron 2650
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13002 --- Comment #6 from ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-04-08 01:33:52 --- Sorry that I gave the incorrect boot option. Will you please try the boot option of noapic and see whether the box can be booted? Please also attach the output of dmesg on the 2.6.27-xx working kernel. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12994] Thinkpad R51e is overheating even when idle
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12994 Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shaohua...@intel.com --- Comment #11 from Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com 2009-04-08 01:39:04 --- did you see any abnormal of the system, like high interrupt rate? you can run 'vmstat 1' for some time and give us the output. And also the output of /proc/interrupts -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 13023] PROBLEM: no backlight control on Amilo Pa 2548
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023 --- Comment #11 from ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-04-08 02:28:26 --- Hi, Piotr From the acpidump we know that there is no _DOS object, which is required for brightness control. In such case we have no generic ACPI backlight I/F. At the same time there is no ACPI device for fujitsu driver, which means that the backlight I/F registered by fujitsu driver is meaningless. Of course the brightness can't be controlled by it. When the system is booted with ACPI disabled, the brightness can be controlled by hotkey. Maybe this is handled in SMI mode. But this is different with ACPI. From the above analysis it seems that this issue is related with BIOS. And this had better be fixed by BIOS upgrading. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12936] Fastboot Breaks Resume from S3.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936 Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shaohua...@intel.com --- Comment #19 from Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com 2009-04-08 02:44:26 --- How about boot option 'libata.noacpi'? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 12249] Lenovo ThinkPad SL series: LCD brightness works in procfs, buggy in sysfs
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249 Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #20844|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #109 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-04-08 05:49:12 --- Created an attachment (id=20874) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20874) debug patch v2 well. this is another BIOS problem, sigh... please apply this debug patch instead of the previous one and see if it helps. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
