PA 4 update release?
hi... there were some changes in kde-workspace in 4.11 that breaks the build of plasma-mobile. yet another person came into #active on irc tonight stumped by this. plasma-mobile’s master branch does build, however. i’d like to propose that we do an interim PA4 release based on what is in master right now so that it builds against 4.11 the packages being delivered on the most recent MerOS that sports Plasma Desktop and SDDM have a build from master iirc, anyways? Marco, what do you think? -- Aaron J. Seigo ___ Active mailing list Active@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
Re: PA 4 update release?
On Saturday 25 January 2014, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: hi... there were some changes in kde-workspace in 4.11 that breaks the build of plasma-mobile. yet another person came into #active on irc tonight stumped by this. plasma-mobile’s master branch does build, however. i’d like to propose that we do an interim PA4 release based on what is in master right now so that it builds against 4.11 the packages being delivered on the most recent MerOS that sports Plasma Desktop and SDDM have a build from master iirc, anyways? Marco, what do you think? It would be nice. For this I would like to try an experiment. Right now there are 8 packages that doesn't build correctly against 4.11. you can see it there https://build.merproject.org/project/monitor?project=kde%3Adevel%3Aux This really soulds like 8 Junior jobs to me. fixing the build of a package shouldn't be an huge job and less scary than creating a package from scratch Any takers? Cheers, Marco Martin ___ Active mailing list Active@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
Re: PA 4 update release?
On January 25, 2014 06:42:52 PM Marco Martin wrote: On Saturday 25 January 2014, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: hi... there were some changes in kde-workspace in 4.11 that breaks the build of plasma-mobile. yet another person came into #active on irc tonight stumped by this. plasma-mobile’s master branch does build, however. i’d like to propose that we do an interim PA4 release based on what is in master right now so that it builds against 4.11 the packages being delivered on the most recent MerOS that sports Plasma Desktop and SDDM have a build from master iirc, anyways? Marco, what do you think? It would be nice. For this I would like to try an experiment. Right now there are 8 packages that doesn't build correctly against 4.11. you can see it there https://build.merproject.org/project/monitor?project=kde%3Adevel%3Aux This really soulds like 8 Junior jobs to me. fixing the build of a package shouldn't be an huge job and less scary than creating a package from scratch Any takers? Cheers, Marco Martin I've started working through the build failures. I've fixed plasma-addons (and submitted a change request on obs), and will move on to kdepim next. -- Matthew smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Active mailing list Active@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
Re: PA 4 update release?
On January 25, 2014 06:42:52 PM Marco Martin wrote: Right now there are 8 packages that doesn't build correctly against 4.11. you can see it there https://build.merproject.org/project/monitor?project=kde%3Adevel%3Aux For NetworkManager-kde, should this be changed to use the new repository at plasma-nm? The failure is occurring as a warning that the repository is no longer updated. If the old repository is correct, it is easy enough to fix the issue. -- Matthew smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Active mailing list Active@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
Re: PA 4 update release?
On January 25, 2014 06:42:52 PM Marco Martin wrote: Right now there are 8 packages that doesn't build correctly against 4.11. you can see it there https://build.merproject.org/project/monitor?project=kde%3Adevel%3Aux For KAlgebra , the compile fails as the Analitza is from 4.9 and is missing functions relied upon in KAlgebra. As the tarballs are automatically created/uploaded, it appears Analitza needs to be added back into update process. For now, should I just grab a new tarball for Analitza and continue from there? -- Matthew smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Active mailing list Active@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
