RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell
Title: Message More annoying, at least to me,are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. Irecently replied to a mail from a few months ago and re-launched a mini-debate. I'd reversed the chronological order while looking for a particular email,forgot tochange it back, spotted a subject I'd only just been reading about.I only noticed the date a wee while later! :))) Danny
[ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery
Guys , another question One of My RID master is crashed before transfering of FSMO role to other DC on the network , is that any possiblities to make an another domain as RID master ( backup is failed so i can not restore the failed RID master DC now) Thanks in advance Almeida Pinto, Jorge de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 11:18 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master also see: RID Master FSMO explained http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/25/1040.aspx cheers,jorge From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 18:11 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of object created in AD Thanks in advance joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 08:36 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :) There have been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic and of great use. joe [1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :) [2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC replicates. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Cerino Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell I have a hell of a sense of humor (as I’m sure a lot of geeks here do) this just isn’t the place for it when people come here for help. /just sayin From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akomolafe, Deji Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 10:58 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell Nah.it looks more like the sender mistook this list for some other lists. On other lists, this would have been a engendered more rapid-fire flame war to the sender's satisfaction, even though the joke itself is very old and has outlived its useful shelf life. I'm sure he's disappointed that this list is so geeky and full of maroons with no sense of
RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery
Hi, Use NTDSUTIL http://support.microsoft.com/kb/255504/ Cheers Rob Robert Rutherford QuoStar Solutions Limited T: +44 (0) 8456 440 331 F: +44 (0) 8456 440 332 M: +44 (0) 7974 249 494 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.quostar.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 September 2006 13:03 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery Guys , another question One of My RID master is crashed before transfering of FSMO role to other DC on the network , is that any possiblities to make an another domain as RID master ( backup is failed so i can not restore the failed RID master DC now) Thanks in advance Almeida Pinto, Jorge de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 11:18 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master also see: RID Master FSMO explained http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/25/1040.aspx cheers,jorge From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 18:11 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of object created in AD Thanks in advance joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 08:36 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :) There have been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic and of great use. joe [1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :) [2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC replicates. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Cerino Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell I have a
RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery
in that case you would need to seize it also see: http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/01/05/373.aspx From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 14:03To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery Guys , another question One of My RID master is crashed before transfering of FSMO role to other DC on the network , is that any possiblities to make an another domain as RID master ( backup is failed so i can not restore the failed RID master DC now) Thanks in advance "Almeida Pinto, Jorge de" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 11:18 AM Please respond toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master also see: RID Master FSMO explained http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/25/1040.aspx cheers,jorge From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 18:11To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of object created in AD Thanks in advance "joe" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 08:36 AM Please respond toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :) There have been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic and of great use. joe [1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :) [2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC replicates. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third
RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery
To seize the role. Rob Robert Rutherford QuoStar Solutions Limited T: +44 (0) 8456 440 331 F: +44 (0) 8456 440 332 M: +44 (0) 7974 249 494 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.quostar.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Rutherford Sent: 05 September 2006 13:19 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery Hi, Use NTDSUTIL http://support.microsoft.com/kb/255504/ Cheers Rob Robert Rutherford QuoStar Solutions Limited T: +44 (0) 8456 440 331 F: +44 (0) 8456 440 332 M: +44 (0) 7974 249 494 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.quostar.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 September 2006 13:03 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery Guys , another question One of My RID master is crashed before transfering of FSMO role to other DC on the network , is that any possiblities to make an another domain as RID master ( backup is failed so i can not restore the failed RID master DC now) Thanks in advance Almeida Pinto, Jorge de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 11:18 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master also see: RID Master FSMO explained http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/25/1040.aspx cheers,jorge From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 18:11 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of object created in AD Thanks in advance joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 08:36 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :) There have been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic and of great use. joe [1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :) [2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how
RE: [ActiveDir] Completely OT: Maroons
And one mustn't forget Eskimo Pie Head. Steve Comeau IT Manager Rutgers Athletics 83 Rockefeller Road Piscataway, NJ 08854 732-445-7802 732-445-4623 (fax) www.scarletknights.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 3:49 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Completely OT: Maroons You must not get Bugs Bunny over there in the UK... http://www.wavsite.com/sounds/57075/bugs10.wav Laura -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 3:17 AM To: ActiveDir.org Subject: Re: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell What's a maroon? -Original Message- From: Akomolafe, Deji [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 19:58:16 To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell Nah.it looks more like the sender mistook this list for some other lists. On other lists, this would have been a engendered more rapid-fire flame war to the sender's satisfaction, even though the joke itself is very old and has outlived its useful shelf life. I'm sure he's disappointed that this list is so geeky and full of maroons with no sense of humors. Sincerely, _ (, / | /) /) /) /---| (/_ __ ___//_ // _ ) /|_/(__(_) // (_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_ (_/ /) (/ Microsoft MVP - Directory Services x-excid://3277/uri:http://www.akomolafe.com www.akomolafe.com - we know IT -5.75, -3.23 Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon From: Laura A. Robinson Sent: Sun 9/3/2006 5:41 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell Okay, has anybody considered the possibility that this was an accident? I know I've accidentally sent mail to the wrong addresses before by letting autofill kick in an not paying attention to what actually got autofilled, and this seems like a very strange thing to send to this list intentionally. Laura -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Cerino Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 8:49 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell Yup and this list (especially with no OT marking) is the place for that right? Bring it to an OT list, mark your postings that have no bearing on technical matter with an OT or something. Otherwise, you're just another spammer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon Pierce Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 1:14 AM To: Brandon Pierce Subject: [ActiveDir] W. in hell George Bush has a heart attack and dies. He goes to hell, where the Devil is waiting for him. I'm not sure what to do, says the Devil. You're on my list, but I have no room for you. As you definitely have to stay here, I'm going to have to let someone else go. I've got three folks here who weren't quite as bad as you. I'll let you decide who leaves. George thought that sounded pretty good, so he agreed. The Devil opened the first room. In it were Richard Nixon and a large pool of hot water. He kept diving in and climbing out, over and over. Such was his fate in hell. No! said George. I don't think so, I'm not a good swimmer and don't think I could stay in hot water all day. The Devil led him to the next room. In it was Tony Blair with a sledgehammer and a room full of rocks. All he did was swing the hammer, time after time. No! I've got this problem with my shoulder. I would be in constant agony if all I could do was break rocks all day. commented George. The Devil opened the third door. In it, George saw Bill Clinton lying on the floor with his arms staked over his head, and his legs staked in a spread-eagle pose. Bent over him was Monica Lewinsky, doing what she does best. George Bush looked at this in disbelief for a while, and finally said Yeah, I can handle this. The Devil smiled and said, OK, Monica, you're free to go! List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx .Š†ÿÁŠŠƒ²§²B§Ã¶v®Š§²rz§Ã¶v®—± List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive:
Re: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery
Use NTDSUTIL to seize the role(s) - kb255504. Follow the steps in kb216498 to clean AD (metadata and FRS objects) and DNS. --Paul - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:02 PM Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery Guys , another question One of My RID master is crashed before transfering of FSMO role to other DC on the network , is that any possiblities to make an another domain as RID master ( backup is failed so i can not restore the failed RID master DC now) Thanks in advance "Almeida Pinto, Jorge de" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 11:18 AM Please respond toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master also see: RID Master FSMO explained http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/25/1040.aspx cheers,jorge From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 18:11To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of object created in AD Thanks in advance "joe" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 08:36 AM Please respond toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :) There have been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic and of great use. joe [1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :) [2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC replicates. -- O'Reilly Active Directory
Re: [ActiveDir] Rid Master
Then I'm sure that replying to this one might give you fits of laughter if Tony doesn't beat me upside the head for it. ;-)On 9/4/06, joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personally I think replying to that message to statethis question wasin the realm of ironic...Almost reaching tongue in cheek. :) -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Al MulnickSent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:47 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Rid Master Typically, you don't want to post a new question by replying to an older one and just changing the subject. That leaves the thread information still intact. Role master information: http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/9a353810-8e3a-4023-a557-db1a686d8ec81033.mspx?mfr=true I think as you read this, you'll see how to get the rid information as well. If not, please do respond and let us know. Al On 9/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of object created in AD Thanks in advance joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 08:36 AM Please respond toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :) There have been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic and of great use. joe [1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :) [2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC replicates. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Craig CerinoSent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hellI have a hell of a sense of humor (as I'm sure a lot of geeks here do) this just isn't the place for it when people come here for help. /just sayin From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL
RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery
I seized the domain, still the same problem any alternative solution , The other dc have becom other fsmo but not taking over RID role Robert Rutherford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/05/2006 05:18 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery Hi, Use NTDSUTIL http://support.microsoft.com/kb/255504/ Cheers Rob Robert Rutherford QuoStar Solutions Limited T: +44 (0) 8456 440 331 F: +44 (0) 8456 440 332 M: +44 (0) 7974 249 494 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.quostar.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 September 2006 13:03 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery Guys , another question One of My RID master is crashed before transfering of FSMO role to other DC on the network , is that any possiblities to make an another domain as RID master ( backup is failed so i can not restore the failed RID master DC now) Thanks in advance Almeida Pinto, Jorge de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 11:18 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master also see: RID Master FSMO explained http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/25/1040.aspx cheers,jorge From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 18:11 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of object created in AD Thanks in advance joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/04/2006 08:36 AM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :) There have been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic and of great use. joe [1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :) [2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC replicates. -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ActiveDir] Distribution list Maintenance. Policy dilemma
Hi, I have Department managers asking me to create DL in exchange of people who dont work in the company There is not technical problem to do that, but I am finding out, that the previous guy was doing that via contacts in AD. The problem is that in this business, a consultant will work one day for you and next to your competitor. My question is, what is the common practice in terms DL. Does anyone know a good way of maintaining them? Most of the time, I dont get notified when we no longer work with a consultant. How do you guys deal with DL maintenance? .Any suggestion?
RE: [ActiveDir] Distribution list Maintenance. Policy dilemma
Youve got to use an automated system (web based usually) where an employee requests the contractor account/contact and puts an expiration on it. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ramon Linan Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 12:26 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Distribution list Maintenance. Policy dilemma Hi, I have Department managers asking me to create DL in exchange of people who dont work in the company There is not technical problem to do that, but I am finding out, that the previous guy was doing that via contacts in AD. The problem is that in this business, a consultant will work one day for you and next to your competitor. My question is, what is the common practice in terms DL. Does anyone know a good way of maintaining them? Most of the time, I dont get notified when we no longer work with a consultant. How do you guys deal with DL maintenance? .Any suggestion?
Re: [ActiveDir] Seperate forest migration notes
Thank you, Al! I will provide an updated outline of our plan based on your suggestions.One question, though: Does anyone know what ADMT v3 is not capable of migrating in the environment I outlined? On 8/29/06, Al Mulnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Overall, that's pretty good for the plan. If you haven't already seen it, there's a migration cookbook available on Microsoft's website. Some things to pay attention to: name resolution for the clients - it's important :) Trust configurations - if a recent enough version, there are some security components that you'll want to be aware of - specifically quarrantine and sidfiltering. Be sure those are configured appropriately for your environment. Order of migration: Be sure to understand the impacts of the order that you migrate the users.I don't know enough about the versions of Exchange, but it would make sense to move the users after or before you move the mailboxes. All the users or all the mailboxes pretty much. If you try to do both at the same time, it can be difficult to troubleshoot and you'll slow your migration down trying to chase the issues. That leads to expectations: Be sure that nobody expects to stay in the partially-migrated state for very long while you chase down integration issues. Once you start, be prepared to sprint to the finish line. Co-existence sucks. No doubts about that. If you try to continue on with migration and coexistence and new projects and...etc you'll be torn to the winds. Your best bet is to continue to push regardless of the issues once you begin (post pilot of course). Did I mention name resolution? That's important, so I don't mind mentioning it twice. Planning is your friend when it comes to migrations. I imagine that Guido might chime in here. I hear he's done this once or twice. :) On 8/29/06, Danny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A company was acquired. Seperate 2000/2003 forest, now a two-way trust exists, but we are looking at migrating their users, mailboxes, computers, and servers into our forest.Working on a plan to test moving a user, mailbox, computer, and server into our forest. Plan: Select test users and computersInstall ADMTTest user migration via ADMTTest computer migration via RDP manaully or script (must locate)Test mailbox migration via Exchange Migration WizardLogin as user and test services/access Am I missing anything? Any tips?Thanks,...D -- CPDE - Certified Petroleum Distribution EngineerCCBC - Certified Canadian Beer Consumer -- CPDE - Certified Petroleum Distribution EngineerCCBC - Certified Canadian Beer Consumer
[ActiveDir] OT:How to delete corrupted and hidden rules from a single mailbox in Outlook 2003:
How to delete corrupted and hidden rules from a single mailbox in Outlook 2003: http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=924297 -- Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? http://www.threatcode.com If you are a SBSer and you don't subscribe to the SBS Blog... man ... I will hunt you down... http://blogs.technet.com/sbs List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
RE: [ActiveDir] Distribution list Maintenance. Policy dilemma
Thats an idea although I am not very concern about getting the request for adding a new account/contact to a DL. My concern is to maintain the DL, in most of the cases the DL would have contacts not AD users, and you cant put expiration on contacts. So, how do I force/remind the managers to notify me whenever a contact should not longer be in the DL? Rezuma From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:38 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Distribution list Maintenance. Policy dilemma Youve got to use an automated system (web based usually) where an employee requests the contractor account/contact and puts an expiration on it. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ramon Linan Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 12:26 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Distribution list Maintenance. Policy dilemma Hi, I have Department managers asking me to create DL in exchange of people who dont work in the company There is not technical problem to do that, but I am finding out, that the previous guy was doing that via contacts in AD. The problem is that in this business, a consultant will work one day for you and next to your competitor. My question is, what is the common practice in terms DL. Does anyone know a good way of maintaining them? Most of the time, I dont get notified when we no longer work with a consultant. How do you guys deal with DL maintenance? .Any suggestion?
RE: [ActiveDir] Distribution list Maintenance. Policy dilemma
Store the expiration in a SQL database, ADAM, whatever. Have a process that runs every night and mashes all the data together and generates reports/emails. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ramon Linan Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 4:21 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Distribution list Maintenance. Policy dilemma Thats an idea although I am not very concern about getting the request for adding a new account/contact to a DL. My concern is to maintain the DL, in most of the cases the DL would have contacts not AD users, and you cant put expiration on contacts. So, how do I force/remind the managers to notify me whenever a contact should not longer be in the DL? Rezuma From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:38 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Distribution list Maintenance. Policy dilemma Youve got to use an automated system (web based usually) where an employee requests the contractor account/contact and puts an expiration on it. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ramon Linan Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 12:26 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Distribution list Maintenance. Policy dilemma Hi, I have Department managers asking me to create DL in exchange of people who dont work in the company There is not technical problem to do that, but I am finding out, that the previous guy was doing that via contacts in AD. The problem is that in this business, a consultant will work one day for you and next to your competitor. My question is, what is the common practice in terms DL. Does anyone know a good way of maintaining them? Most of the time, I dont get notified when we no longer work with a consultant. How do you guys deal with DL maintenance? .Any suggestion?
RE: [ActiveDir] Distribution list Maintenance. Policy dilemma
This is more of an internal policy/procedure thing than anything else.. in my view. I have seen packages which Brian mentioned but cannot remember a name of a single one. Useful am I not? J Rob Robert Rutherford QuoStar Solutions Limited T: +44 (0) 8456 440 331 F: +44 (0) 8456 440 332 M: +44 (0) 7974 249 494 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.quostar.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ramon Linan Sent: 05 September 2006 21:21 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Distribution list Maintenance. Policy dilemma Thats an idea although I am not very concern about getting the request for adding a new account/contact to a DL. My concern is to maintain the DL, in most of the cases the DL would have contacts not AD users, and you cant put expiration on contacts. So, how do I force/remind the managers to notify me whenever a contact should not longer be in the DL? Rezuma From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:38 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Distribution list Maintenance. Policy dilemma Youve got to use an automated system (web based usually) where an employee requests the contractor account/contact and puts an expiration on it. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ramon Linan Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 12:26 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Distribution list Maintenance. Policy dilemma Hi, I have Department managers asking me to create DL in exchange of people who dont work in the company There is not technical problem to do that, but I am finding out, that the previous guy was doing that via contacts in AD. The problem is that in this business, a consultant will work one day for you and next to your competitor. My question is, what is the common practice in terms DL. Does anyone know a good way of maintaining them? Most of the time, I dont get notified when we no longer work with a consultant. How do you guys deal with DL maintenance? .Any suggestion?
[ActiveDir] Sharepoint access after user AD migration
Apologies if this is not the most appropriate forum for this question. The situation is an NT4.0 domain with 18,000 users. Migrating to AD Win2k. Two-way trust and sIDHistory filtering is disabled. There's a Sharepoint server in the legacy NT4.0 domain. The NT4.0 users can access the Sharepoint just fine. The users, after being migrated, are not able to access the Sharepoint using their new AD accounts until after the Sharepoint admins add their new AD account to the Sharepoint security. Isn't Sharepoint supposed to be able to take advantage of sIDHistory and, if so, is there some setting we need to change? Thanks,Mike
Re: [ActiveDir] [OT]The last departmental picnic [list owner]
Not sure what's going on so I have temporarily suspended his subscription. Tony List owner and humourless [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent via the WebMail system at mail.activedir.org List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
RE: [ActiveDir] Sharepoint access after user AD migration
What Sharepoint servicepack are you running? You need at least one and a hotfix.. cant remember which. Ill look through my old KB to see if I can find the hotfix. Cheers Rob Robert Rutherford QuoStar Solutions Limited T: +44 (0) 8456 440 331 F: +44 (0) 8456 440 332 M: +44 (0) 7974 249 494 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.quostar.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Baudino Sent: 05 September 2006 21:58 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Sharepoint access after user AD migration Apologies if this is not the most appropriate forum for this question. The situation is an NT4.0 domain with 18,000 users. Migrating to AD Win2k. Two-way trust and sIDHistory filtering is disabled. There's a Sharepoint server in the legacy NT4.0 domain. The NT4.0 users can access the Sharepoint just fine. The users, after being migrated, are not able to access the Sharepoint using their new AD accounts until after the Sharepoint admins add their new AD account to the Sharepoint security. Isn't Sharepoint supposed to be able to take advantage of sIDHistory and, if so, is there some setting we need to change? Thanks, Mike
Re: [ActiveDir] W. in hell [List owner]
In case nobody figured it out, this was a mistake. Brandon hasn't been receiving anything from the activedir list. Apparently he's been banned or something. (in case you didn't figure the rest out, I know him and asked if he was the same OP Brandon, which he confirmed) He accidentally added the activedir list to a DL. I can understand blocking someone from sending until something like this is resolved, but he hasn't been receiving anything from the list either. Apparently this is a zero tolerance zone. Oddly enough, that's not in the FAQ, maybe it should be added. MattOn 9/3/06, Tony Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey BrandonAmusing though it is, the list is not really the place for this.Tony (list owner)-- Original Message --From: Brandon Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgDate:Sat, 2 Sep 2006 23:13:41 -0600George Bush has a heart attack and dies.He goes to hell, where the Devil is waiting for him.I'm not sure what to do, says the Devil.You're on my list, but I haveno room for you.As you definitely have to stay here, I'm going to have tolet someone else go.I've got three folks here who weren't quite as bad as you.I'll let you decide who leaves.George thought that sounded pretty good, so he agreed.The Devil opened the first room.In it were Richard Nixon and a large poolof hot water.He kept diving in and climbing out, over and over.Such was his fate in hell.No! said George.I don't think so, I'm not a good swimmer and don'tthink I could stay in hot water all day.The Devil led him to the next room.In it was Tony Blair with a sledgehammer and a room full of rocks.All he did was swing the hammer,time after time.No! I've got this problem with my shoulder.I would be in constant agony ifall I could do was break rocks all day. commented George. The Devil opened the third door.In it, George saw Bill Clinton lying onthe floor with his arms staked over his head, and his legs staked in aspread-eagle pose.Bent over him was Monica Lewinsky, doing what she does best.George Bush looked at this in disbelief for a while, and finally said Yeah,I can handle this.The Devil smiled and said, OK, Monica, you're free to go! List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspxList FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspxList archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspxSent via the WebMail system at mail.activedir.orgList info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspxList FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspxList archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] W. in hell [List owner]
Hi Matt It's not a zero tolerance zone, but given that there have now been two posts with joke content and no other communication from Brandon it struck me as sensible to temporaraily unsubscribe his address from the list. If he was not getting posts from the list he could have contacted me directly about that too. Tony -- Original Message -- From: Matt Hargraves [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:28:27 -0600 In case nobody figured it out, this was a mistake. Brandon hasn't been receiving anything from the activedir list. Apparently he's been banned or something. (in case you didn't figure the rest out, I know him and asked if he was the same OP Brandon, which he confirmed) He accidentally added the activedir list to a DL. I can understand blocking someone from sending until something like this is resolved, but he hasn't been receiving anything from the list either. Apparently this is a zero tolerance zone. Oddly enough, that's not in the FAQ, maybe it should be added. Matt On 9/3/06, Tony Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Brandon Amusing though it is, the list is not really the place for this. Tony (list owner) -- Original Message -- From: Brandon Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 23:13:41 -0600 George Bush has a heart attack and dies. He goes to hell, where the Devil is waiting for him. I'm not sure what to do, says the Devil. You're on my list, but I have no room for you. As you definitely have to stay here, I'm going to have to let someone else go. I've got three folks here who weren't quite as bad as you. I'll let you decide who leaves. George thought that sounded pretty good, so he agreed. The Devil opened the first room. In it were Richard Nixon and a large pool of hot water. He kept diving in and climbing out, over and over. Such was his fate in hell. No! said George. I don't think so, I'm not a good swimmer and don't think I could stay in hot water all day. The Devil led him to the next room. In it was Tony Blair with a sledgehammer and a room full of rocks. All he did was swing the hammer, time after time. No! I've got this problem with my shoulder. I would be in constant agony if all I could do was break rocks all day. commented George. The Devil opened the third door. In it, George saw Bill Clinton lying on the floor with his arms staked over his head, and his legs staked in a spread-eagle pose. Bent over him was Monica Lewinsky, doing what she does best. George Bush looked at this in disbelief for a while, and finally said Yeah, I can handle this. The Devil smiled and said, OK, Monica, you're free to go! List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx Sent via the WebMail system at mail.activedir.org List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx Sent via the WebMail system at mail.activedir.org List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
Re: [ActiveDir] [OT]The last departmental picnic [list owner]
Yeah, I just let him know he messed up on this one. Can't argue with banning him after 2 messups. :(On 9/5/06, Tony Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Not sure what's going on so I have temporarily suspended his subscription. TonyList owner and humourless [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent via the WebMail system at mail.activedir.org List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspxList FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
[ActiveDir] seeAlso
Does anyone know if the seeAlso attribute is used by any specific application or is it up for grabs? I'm thinking about using it to store an alternate contact for a user. List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
Re: [ActiveDir] seeAlso
I've not seen it used by any specific app. Bear in mind that it is: multivalued not indexed not a member of the partial attribute set (i.e. not replicated via GC) Tony PS. I've always wanted to extend the schema with a new attribute named tracesOfPeanuts, simply so I can see May Contain: tracesOfPeanuts. :-) -- Original Message -- From: Isenhour, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:29:01 -0700 Does anyone know if the seeAlso attribute is used by any specific application or is it up for grabs? I'm thinking about using it to store an alternate contact for a user. List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx Sent via the WebMail system at mail.activedir.org List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
[ActiveDir] DNS Entries --Laptop Users--
Hi, Problem is i have 2 different records of each laptop (Using VPN Connection) in my DNS. I have secure updates configured in my DNS Conf. we are using DHCP. Laptop users getting a specific VLAN IP Address for there wireless connection which is getting registered in my DNS. This is good. But the Problem is that when these Laptop users login from home using VPN, they get a new IP Address from my VPN Box which is also getting registered in my DNS. I have no clue why this is happening. i m suspecting on DNS conf on local machine under Advanced Tcp Ip settings. I am not sure i am heading right way or not. here is the snapshot attached for same. -- RD attachment: DNS.JPG
Re: [ActiveDir] seeAlso
Tony Murray wrote: Tony PS. I've always wanted to extend the schema with a new attribute named tracesOfPeanuts, simply so I can see May Contain: tracesOfPeanuts. :-) ROTFL -- Tomasz Onyszko http://www.w2k.pl/ - (PL) http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/tomek/ - (EN) List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
RE: [ActiveDir] seeAlso
I wouldn't be able to work on those objects. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Murray Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 7:01 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] seeAlso I've not seen it used by any specific app. Bear in mind that it is: multivalued not indexed not a member of the partial attribute set (i.e. not replicated via GC) Tony PS. I've always wanted to extend the schema with a new attribute named tracesOfPeanuts, simply so I can see May Contain: tracesOfPeanuts. :- ) -- Original Message -- From: Isenhour, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:29:01 -0700 Does anyone know if the seeAlso attribute is used by any specific application or is it up for grabs? I'm thinking about using it to store an alternate contact for a user. List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx Sent via the WebMail system at mail.activedir.org List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Entries --Laptop Users--
How would you propose to change that setting exactly and still have it work? Another question: is your DHCP configured to update/remove addresses for you? Is it running on a DC? Is it running under some other credentials? How about the VPN machine? How's it configured with regards to registration? From your description, there are a couple of things going on, but I think the clarifying questions should help. On 9/5/06, Ravi Dogra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,Problem is i have 2 different records of each laptop (Using VPNConnection) in my DNS. I have secure updates configured in my DNS Conf.we are using DHCP. Laptop users getting a specific VLAN IP Address forthere wireless connection which is getting registered in my DNS. Thisis good.But the Problem is that when these Laptop users login from home using VPN, they get a new IP Address from my VPN Box which is also gettingregistered in my DNS.I have no clue why this is happening.i m suspecting on DNS conf on local machine under Advanced Tcp Ip settings. I am not sure i am heading right way or not. here is thesnapshot attached for same.--RD
[ActiveDir] A dialog box appears and unattended removal fails when you try to use the Active Directory Installation Wizard
FIX: A dialog box appears and unattended removal fails when you try to use the Active Directory Installation Wizard command line tool together with the /forceremoval switch in Windows Server 2003: http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=903654 -- Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? http://www.threatcode.com If you are a SBSer and you don't subscribe to the SBS Blog... man ... I will hunt you down... http://blogs.technet.com/sbs List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
