Re: Forming an ActiveMQ PPMC

[Brian McCallister]

On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:32 AM, James Strachan wrote:


On 8/16/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The ActiveMQ committers have decided to aim for TLP status (1), as
such we need to get a PPMC in place. Thus far we have been working
under a committer votes all count style (really, everyone's vote
counts, it is on a public list without any of the mine is binding
stuff that has become popular), so I would like to open the
discussion of formalizing the PPMC as all current committers on
ActiveMQ.


FWIW we've had a PPMC in place for some time ;) which was mostly the
committers plus anyone from Incubator/Geronimo PMCs who wanted to help
too. (Brian search your mailbox for activemq-ppmc or activemq-private
which is the latest name of the mailing list - I've seen at least 2
posts from you :)


Hah, you are right! Okay, I feel stupid.

/me is going to find a *lot* more coffee

:-)

RE: Forming an ActiveMQ PPMC

[Noel J. Bergman]

James Strachan wrote:
 Brian McCallister wrote:
  The ActiveMQ committers have decided to aim for TLP status (1)

OK

  we need to get a PPMC in place.  Thus far we have been working
  under a committer votes all count style

 FWIW we've had a PPMC in place for some time ;)

As James notes, you've already had a PPMC.  And, the only votes that ever
count are those from PMC members, in this case Incubator PMC members.  So
those would be you, Jason, James, etc.

--- Noel