[address-policy-wg] (no subject)

[mostafa shahdadi]

-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile

Re: [address-policy-wg] Fwd: [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE Policy Proposals - April Update

[Riccardo Gori]

Dear Sergiu,

about your example and its eventual realtionship with the proposal 2015-05:
Company X would have not limit in receive address space as described in 
transfert or allocation policies.
The limit described in 2015-05 would be applied to the LIR that assigned 
space to Company X and, as described in your example, later transfered 
the space in Company X registry.
This LIR is supposed to not need address space as it moved it outside 
its registry so it would not be able to request an additional /22 
allocation from pool outside 185/8 standing on 2015-05 proposal


On the other hand if Company X after its sing up as a new LIR after 18 
months need more space and there is enough space outside 185/8 would be 
able to request an additional /22 standing on  2015-05 proposal. The LIR 
that offered the first /22 to Company X as "assigned resource" could 
also request an additional /22 allocation if its registry is holding 
less than a /20 IPv4.


hope this help

regards

Riccardo


Il 29/04/2016 10:38, Sergiu IANCIUC ha scritto:

hello,

PLS, take in consideration the situation

Company  X  has  a  /22 from its LIR. The LIR can not offer more IPv4
spaces   and the Company X becomes a LIR to satisfy its needs. Now, it
is logical that the LIR (if agreed between these 2 LIRs) transfers the
space  allocated  to the Company X (now the new LIR) AND THIS have to
not be the part from the policy -

"requirements,  such  as  the LIR has not transferred any IPv4 address
space before."

What are you thinking about?


Best Regards,


-
Sergiu IANCIUC
SC ITNS.NET SRL


MD-2068, Moldova
or. Chisinau, str. Miron Costin 3/1
tel.: +373 22 877 877
fax : +373 22 44 11 73
mobile: +373 690 22 111
url: http://www.itns.md


Save a tree... Don't print this email unless you have to...








This is a forwarded message
From: Marco Schmidt 
To: ncc-annou...@ripe.net
Date: Friday, April 29, 2016, 11:18:23 AM
Subject: [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE Policy Proposals - April Update


===8<==Original message text===
Dear colleagues,

Here is our monthly overview of open policy proposals and their stage in
the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP).

If you wish to join the discussion about a particular proposal, please
do so on the relevant working group mailing list.

Proposals Open for Discussion:
2015-05, "Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria"

Proposals Awaiting Input:
2015-04, "RIPE Resource Transfer Policies"
2016-01, "Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy"


Proposal Overviews:

PROPOSAL: 2015-05, "Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria"
OVERVIEW: Aims to allow LIRs to request an additional /22 IPv4
allocation from the RIPE NCC every 18 months. The latest version of the
proposal suggests several requirements, such as the LIR cannot hold more
than a /20 IPv4, must document their IPv6 deployment and has not
transferred any IPv4 address space before.
STATUS: Discussion Phase
WHERE TO COMMENT: Address Policy Working Group: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
DEADLINE: 13 May 2016
FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05

=

The following proposals are awaiting input before they can go any
further in the PDP.

PROPOSAL: 2015-04, "RIPE Resource Transfer Policies"
OVERVIEW: Aims to create a single transfer policy with all relevant
information on the transfer of Internet number resources, replacing text
in several RIPE Policies. The proposal also introduces a 24-month
holding period for IPv4 addresses and 16-bit ASNs after any change of
holdership.
RIPE NCC IMPACT ANALYSIS: Includes the point how the 24-month holding
period for scarce resources will be applied.
STATUS: Review Phase – Awaiting decision from working group chair
FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-04

PROPOSAL: 2016-01, "Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the
Abuse-c Policy"
OVERVIEW: Aims for a mandatory abuse contact for Legacy Internet
Resource holders in the RIPE Database.
STATUS: Discussion Phase – Awaiting decision from proposer
FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-01


The RIPE NCC provides an overview of current RIPE Policy Proposals on
www.ripe.net:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/current-proposals/current-policy-proposals

We look forward to your involvement in the PDP.

Kind regards,

Marco Schmidt
RIPE Policy Development Officer
RIPE NCC



===8<===End of original message text===






--

Ing. Riccardo Gori
e-mail: rg...@wirem.net
Mobile:  +39 339 8925947
Mobile:  +34 602 009 437
Profile: https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943

WIREM Fiber Revolution
Net-IT s.r.l.
Via Cesare Montanari, 2
47521 Cesena (FC)
Tel +39 0547 1955485
Fax +39 0547 1950285


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons
above and may contain confidential