Re: [address-policy-wg] New Proposal for IPv4 Allocations
Hello, The proposal is that once an LIR has received one /22 from 185/8, LIRs are eligible to apply for another /22, and that the blocks ranges are used that IANA has redistributed so far today is: 45.128.0.0 - 45.159.255.255 45.8.0.0 - 45.15.255.255 45.80.0.0 - 45.95.255.255 and that these allocations are governed by the policy 2015-01 as well. You know what I mean? ( I'm sorry for my English ). Regards. IPTV Europe El 2015-08-14 13:47, Carsten Schiefner escribió: Dear David, On 14.08.2015 09:09, r...@europeiptv.net wrote: Hello, I wonder what you think the community ripe to propose a new policy for IPv4 addressing, the proposal would be something like having another RIR as APNIC. We all know that RIPE currently has in place the policy for the last /8, the proposal is correct but, because it does not make eligible LIRs for another /22? The new /22 It would address that IANA has redistributed to RIPE. 45.128.0.0 - 45.159.255.255 45.8.0.0 - 45.15.255.255 45.80.0.0 - 45.95.255.255 and 2015-01 policy active, no transfer for next 24 months after allocation, and it is found necessary to use this new allocation, so it would prevent requested to speculate. I hope your views regarding this even after having re-read this a couple of times I have not the slightest clue what you are aiming at. I am sorry. Best, -C.
Re: [address-policy-wg] New Proposal for IPv4 Allocations
Hello Carsten, What I think David is trying to say is to make LIRs elegible for another /22 out from the 185/8. And He gives as example the recieved blocks from IANA: 45.128.0.0 - 45.159.255.255 45.8.0.0 - 45.15.255.255 45.80.0.0 - 45.95.255.255 This is a good example of a discussion that can happens out of the list and if a proposal comes then here is the place to discuss it. Now will happen a lot of -1 or +1 in the mail list for something that is NOT a proposal. PS: David, what you are trying to say have been discussed here and the answer is no. Regards, --Daniel El 14/08/2015 a las 14:47, Carsten Schiefner escribió: Dear David, On 14.08.2015 09:09, r...@europeiptv.net wrote: Hello, I wonder what you think the community ripe to propose a new policy for IPv4 addressing, the proposal would be something like having another RIR as APNIC. We all know that RIPE currently has in place the policy for the last /8, the proposal is correct but, because it does not make eligible LIRs for another /22? The new /22 It would address that IANA has redistributed to RIPE. 45.128.0.0 - 45.159.255.255 45.8.0.0 - 45.15.255.255 45.80.0.0 - 45.95.255.255 and 2015-01 policy active, no transfer for next 24 months after allocation, and it is found necessary to use this new allocation, so it would prevent requested to speculate. I hope your views regarding this even after having re-read this a couple of times I have not the slightest clue what you are aiming at. I am sorry. Best, -C.
Re: [address-policy-wg] New Proposal for IPv4 Allocations
Dear David, On 14.08.2015 09:09, r...@europeiptv.net wrote: Hello, I wonder what you think the community ripe to propose a new policy for IPv4 addressing, the proposal would be something like having another RIR as APNIC. We all know that RIPE currently has in place the policy for the last /8, the proposal is correct but, because it does not make eligible LIRs for another /22? The new /22 It would address that IANA has redistributed to RIPE. 45.128.0.0 - 45.159.255.255 45.8.0.0 - 45.15.255.255 45.80.0.0 - 45.95.255.255 and 2015-01 policy active, no transfer for next 24 months after allocation, and it is found necessary to use this new allocation, so it would prevent requested to speculate. I hope your views regarding this even after having re-read this a couple of times I have not the slightest clue what you are aiming at. I am sorry. Best, -C.
