Re: Error in deleting filespace
Hi, The TSM server 5.1 on AIX 5 and TSM client 5.1.5 on Windows 2000. Thanks, Zosi Noriega -Original Message- From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 12:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Error in deleting filespace Hi Zosi! When posting a question to this list, please supply your TSM software level, maybe then we are able to assist you. Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Zosimo Noriega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 06:42 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Error in deleting filespace Hi all, I got the error in deleting filespace, please see the log from activity log. I hope everybody can help me. thanks. Zosi Noriega 07/23/03 08:33:59 ANR2017I Administrator ZBN3669 issued command: DELETE FILESPACE SAPPLIBP1 3 NAMETYPE=FSID TYPE=ANY DATA=ANY WAIT=NO 07/23/03 08:33:59 ANR0984I Process 2546 for DELETE FILESPACE started in the BACKGROUND at 08:33:59. 07/23/03 08:33:59 ANR0802I DELETE FILESPACE Registries (fsId=3) (backup/arc- hive data) for node SAPPLIBP1 started. 07/23/03 08:33:59 ANR0800I DELETE FILESPACE Registries (fsId=3) for node SAPPLIBP1 started as process 2546. 07/23/03 08:33:59 ANR0609I DELETE FILESPACE started as process 2546. 07/23/03 08:33:59 ANR0104E imutil.c(7529): Error 2 deleting row from table Expiring.Objects. 07/23/03 08:33:59 ANRD imfsdel.c(1863): ThreadId79 Error 19 deleting group leader 0 48984968. 07/23/03 08:33:59 ANR0985I Process 2546 for DELETE FILESPACE running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at 08:33:59. ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. ** This e-mail may contain confidential and/or priviledged information. If you are not the intended recepient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.
Which message is causing which RC
hi, i'am searching a documentation for the TSM client 5.x, which TSM message is causing which returncode for the TSM client commandline interface. within the available messages-documentation there is no info about the resulting RC (0 or 4 or 8 or 12). does someone know where i can find such a docu. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Uwe Schreiber
Re: Can anyone help? - yes, go to tivoli-jobs
Techies, you can skip this. Recruiters/HR info only! A year ago to put aside the same problem, the maintainer of [tme10] mailing list created new one named tivoli-jobs. You can find more about it on http://www.freelists.org/webpage/tivoli-jobs You can ask there but be more specific. Tivoli is the name of the company and is selling over 30 products. You are not looking for an employee but are having specific requirements. Post to ADSM-L list might mean you are looking for a ADSM/TSM/ITSM administrator, describe it. On tivoli-jobs you can find people dealing with Tivoli Enterprise Console, Inventory, Monitoring, all of them, etc. From your signature it look like you are related to hiring, thus tivoli-jobs might help you more in the future. ADSM-L list is technically oriented and the only value I can imagine for you might be evaluation of a person you are going to interview. You can dig list archives and verify is the person more a question poster or respondent. But it is better to be checked by a technically skilled person, because I have even seen people posting erroneous and misleading responces. Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant Bartel, Heather [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21.07.2003 22:44 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Can anyone help? Hello. I don't know much about this list, other than I'm told those who utilize Tivoli are subscribed to it. I'm wondering if there is anyone out there who may be seeking Tivoli work and may be interested in a contract-to-hire situation for our premier client in Auburn Hills, MI. We are seeking a Tivoli Administrator. If you may be interested or know someone who may be, please let me know and I can provide all the details. Regards, Heather L. Bartel Technical Recruiter CDI Professional Services A division of CDI Corporation 1960 Research Drive Suite 200 Troy, MI 48083 Phone: (248) 786-5922 Fax: (248) 786-5722 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Check us out on the web at www.cdicorp.com http://www.cdicorp.com/ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information on a proactive email security service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
disk storage pool access
Hi All A couple of questions about the way in which disk storage pools are used. I had a quick look in the manuals but couldn't find an answer basically, i want to know if more than once backup session can access a disk pool volume at a time also if i have three disk pool volumes and 4 migrations processes running will i get contention on disk with two of the migration processes fighting over a disk volume. i have 270 GB (RAID5 which i know is not the best but cannot be changed at the moment), which is presented as 1 LUN, of SAN attached disk storage pool at the moment. This is split into 2 x 100Gb and 1 x 70Gb storage pool volumes. I'm thinking I should have more smaller disk volumes instead. comments?? TIA _ Sign-up for a FREE BT Broadband connection today! http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband
urgent: installing tdpr3 v332
Hi when installing tdpr3 on AIX i get the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # ./web_tdpr3_ora_aix43_32bit.bin InstallShield-Assistent Initializing InstallShield-Assistent... Searching for Java(tm) Virtual Machine... Error writing file = 21 There may not be enough temporary disk space. Try using -is:tempdir to use a temporary directory on a partition with more disk space. Illegal instruction(coredump) note. there is enough space !!! has anyone any idea ??? thnks. Ruud van Ruler, SAP R/3 Alliance Technical Support - DGE41 Shell Information Technology International B.V Room 1A/G03 Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4011, Mobile +31 (0)6-55127646 Email Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Drives work concurrently
Tao, It maybe obivious but did you check your maxscrath volumes parameter on your seqeuntial storagepool... You should check volumes in as scracht and give a max scratch to controle how many volumes might be used bij your tapepools. Cheers, Koen Willems From: Tao Jiang [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Drives work concurrently Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 17:39:11 -0500 Hi, TSMers' My LTO has two drivers/3583, I issued two command files to archive files simultaneously to Library/3580. set dsm_dir=c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\baclient set dsm_opt=c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\baclient\dsm.opt set dsm_config=c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\baclient\dsm.opt pushd PATH c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\baclient\dsmc archive filename nodename=servername password=x But the second one does not go through, Message is Server media mount not possible I set up LTO dev class Mount Limit=Drives or Mount Limit=2 TSM5.1.5/Windows 2000 Server. Any info will be appreciated Tao Jiang _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Re: TSM 5.2 AIX 4.3.3
Hi, On top of that, if you'd try the install (like I did on my test server) you'd notice that tsm server 5.2 requires bos.rte 5 Then again, since aix 4.3.3 is eol end of this your, you'd probably wnat to upgrade anyway... On vrijdag, jul 25, 2003, at 20:37 Europe/Amsterdam, Andrew Raibeck wrote: See http://www-3.ibm.com/software/tivoli/products/storage-mgr/ platforms.html for information on supported platforms. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. rh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/25/2003 11:30 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:TSM 5.2 AIX 4.3.3 Is TSM 5.2 supported on AIX 4.3.3? Is anyone running this setup? Thanks, R Hroblak ADP __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams
Re: Which message is causing which RC
i'am searching a documentation for the TSM client 5.x, which TSM message is causing which returncode for the TSM client commandline interface. within the available messages-documentation there is no info about the resulting RC (0 or 4 or 8 or 12). does someone know where i can find such a docu. The B/A client manual explains that the return code is based upon the severity code letter (last letter of the message id). Richard Sims, BU
Re: Which message is causing which RC
yes, thats right. but there's no detailed information which messages will cause RC 4. thats my major problem. regards Uwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 26.07.2003 14:06 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: Which message is causing which RC i'am searching a documentation for the TSM client 5.x, which TSM message is causing which returncode for the TSM client commandline interface. within the available messages-documentation there is no info about the resulting RC (0 or 4 or 8 or 12). does someone know where i can find such a docu. The B/A client manual explains that the return code is based upon the severity code letter (last letter of the message id). Richard Sims, BU
Re: Which message is causing which RC
Uwe Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED] but there's no detailed information which messages will cause RC 4. Hello, from the admin command line tsm: TSM01HELP QUERY EVENT [...] Result Specifies the return code from the client that identifies whether the schedule has processed successfully. If the return code is other than a zero, examine the client's error log and schedule log. Return Code Explanation 0 All operations completed successfully. 4 The operation completed successfully, but some files were not processed. 8 The operation completed with at least one warning message. 12 The operation completed with at least one error message (except for error messages for skipped files). [...] cheers David Sniper Rigaudiere TSM Admin - Perl advocacy
Re: Export order
Andy, I understand that given TSM's current functionality the source code probably runs 10s of millions of lines. And I certainly don't expect anyone to read or memorize that. But there are some common operating techniques built into TSM that haven't changed much over the years. Round-robin'ing drives within a library is one example. Volume sequencing is another. Was this info critical? No. But it would certainly be useful. In this case I have a 40-slot production library of which I can devote 1/2 to the export job. The other half is required to support routine operations. I know from the volume usage that my export will read 75 tapes. So being able to preload the first 20 tapes or so confident that I had the right tapes meant the export would go more efficiently and I would rely less upon the current 26 hour mount wait. From the forum I expected an answer only if anyone else had actually gone through that, since it isn't documented anywhere. I wasn't expecting IBM SW Support to take three hours to send me the long version haven't a clue. In the meantime, using Excel and my ODBC connection, I created three lists: 1) the volume usage of the node in volume label order; Then, since volumeusage does not include any volume-specific properties, I got the other two lists from the volumes table: 2) volume list sorted by Last Write Date; 3) volume list sorted by quantity of data, as Est_cap x Pct_util. I figured that the first tape requested would be at one end or the other of one of those three lists, and I was right. The first tape requested was the oldest tape on list #2. By the time it had asked for seven tapes, the pattern was clear. I then preloaded the next fourteen tapes comprising the next few batches from the volume data, and allowed it to run overnight. I'm writing this on Saturday because I came in expecting to swap several batches of source tapes but found the process aborted due to a jammed tape in the output drive. But that's another issue. The jam has been fixed, the export process restarted, and I *know* that the first 18 tapes needed by the export process are already in the library. Thanks for all your help. Tab Trepagnier TSM Administrator Laitram LLC Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/25/2003 02:46 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Export order Tab, For better or worse, this is an undocumented facet of TSM operation (just like we don't document how we pick the management class to which directories are bound if more than one class happens to have the same longest RETONLY setting). It's not that *IBM* (the company) can't tell you the answer... it's just a matter of getting to the right person who might happen to know this bit of information. And even then, some of the code has been written so long ago, someone would have to go back through the code to refresh their memory. That said, your question isn't unreasonable. If this is critical information for you to have (please forgive me, but I forget the history behind this thread), then they need to move this up the support chain until they get to server development, which is where the buck stops. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. Tab Trepagnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/25/2003 12:13 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Export order Wanda, OK. Based on the first seven tapes out of 75, it appears that TSM asks for source tapes in order that they were FIRST WRITTEN, from old to new. Since there is no queryable field that reports first write date, if tapes are used in batches, as these were, then the LAST write date is a suitable substitute and will at least identify the order of the batches. In other words, in my case each batch of tapes consists of about four tapes. I know the order of the batches, but I don't necessarily know the order within each batch. So as long as I check in complete batches, I ensure that the export will process all files from that batch without ever asking for a tape from outside the library. The tape currently being read is from the June 2001 batch. All of the tapes from that batch are already checked into the library. If I check in all four tapes from the July 2001 batch, TSM will be able to continue when it finishes with June, even though I don't know which July tape will be loaded first. Note that I opened a PMR on this yesterday and IBM couldn't tell me the answer either! Random indeed. Tab Trepagnier TSM Administrator Laitram
Re: Which message is causing which RC
See the client manual chapter on Automating tasks. There is a section therein that discusses the return codes.and their meanings. Let me know if there is something there that needs clarification. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. Uwe Schreiber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/26/2003 06:01 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Which message is causing which RC yes, thats right. but there's no detailed information which messages will cause RC 4. thats my major problem. regards Uwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 26.07.2003 14:06 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: Which message is causing which RC i'am searching a documentation for the TSM client 5.x, which TSM message is causing which returncode for the TSM client commandline interface. within the available messages-documentation there is no info about the resulting RC (0 or 4 or 8 or 12). does someone know where i can find such a docu. The B/A client manual explains that the return code is based upon the severity code letter (last letter of the message id). Richard Sims, BU
