Re: TDP oracle to new domain policy - error deleting old backups from old domain

2006-02-01 Thread Peter Hitchman
Hi,
I believe what you said about the management classes is true. What rman errors 
are you getting? Did you change the nodename? Doing that upsets the combination 
of rman and tdp in finding backups.

Regards

Pete

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Tae Kim
Sent: 30 January 2006 17:27
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TDP oracle to new domain policy - error deleting old
backups from old domain


Got a question for you all.

Just move a tdp for oracle node to a different domain policy. this domain
policy does not have management class of the same name that the node was
using for the backup from its old domain policy.  It is my understanding
that once the node gets moved to a new domain, it would look for
management class of the same name that it has bind its backups to and use
that management class. If that management class does not exists, it would
use the default management class.  Is this true?  Also we are having
issues with deleting older DB from RMAN. what can cause these issues? Also
the default management class of the new policy domain has different
retention time. Would it help if I created the same management class with
same backup copy group as the old one in the new policy domain?

TIA,
Tae


Here is the env.
TSM 5.2.4.4 on AIX 5.2 ML5
TDP for Oracle 5.2 on AIX 5.2 ML5

config of the node

  Platform: TDP Oracle AIX
   Client OS Level: 5.2
Client Version: Version 5, Release 2, Level 2.5
Policy Domain Name: FI_FIRST_DOM
 Last Access Date/Time: 01/30/06 12:15:13
Days Since Last Access: 1
Password Set Date/Time: 03/23/04 13:45:27
   Days Since Password Set: 678
 Invalid Sign-on Count: 0
   Locked?: No
   Contact:
   Compression: Client
   Archive Delete Allowed?: Yes
Backup Delete Allowed?: Yes
Registration Date/Time: 03/22/04 11:56:24
 Registering Administrator:
Last Communication Method Used: Tcp/Ip
   Bytes Received Last Session: 4.50 M
   Bytes Sent Last Session: 17,599
  Duration of Last Session: 0.67
   Pct. Idle Wait Last Session: 18.32
  Pct. Comm. Wait Last Session: 60.21
  Pct. Media Wait Last Session: 0.00
 Optionset:
   URL:
 Node Type: Client
Password Expiration Period: 9,999 Day(s)
 Keep Mount Point?: No
  Maximum Mount Points Allowed: 2
Auto Filespace Rename : No
 Validate Protocol: No
   TCP/IP Name:
TCP/IP Address:
Globally Unique ID:
 Transaction Group Max: 0
   Data Write Path: ANY
Data Read Path: ANY
Session Initiation: ClientOrServer
High-level Address:
 Low-level Address:

+=+
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged
information.  If you are not the addressee or authorized to
receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,
disclose or take any action based on this message or any
information herein.  If you have received this message in
error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.
+=+


DB2 expire script for TSM

2006-02-01 Thread Jacques Van Den Berg
Hi all,



I am looking for a script to expire my DB2 backups from TSM after 3
months. Does anyone have such a script?



Regards,



Jacques van den Berg
Pick 'n Pay IT
Email   : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone  : 021-658 1694

Mobile  : 082 - 653 8164

Dis altyd lente in die hart van die mens wat God
en sy medemens liefhet (John Vianney).





Read our disclaimer at: http://www.picknpay.co.za/pnp/view/pnp/en/page5093?
If you don't have web access, the disclaimer can be mailed to you on request.
Disclaimer requests to be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



question on Tivoli reinstall agent

2006-02-01 Thread Timothy Hughes
Troy thanks again for your response!


How to find out backupversions for datasets with special extensio n

2006-02-01 Thread VOJTA Othmar
Hi to all,
has anybody a sql-query for datasets with extension for example JPG or MP3.
Output ideally with filesize?!

thanks


migration doesn't seem to be ending

2006-02-01 Thread Timothy Hughes
Hello all,

After viewing our Backup Disk Pool,  I noticed that migration
doesn't seem to be stopping. The below percentages don't seem
right since I have the following settings. Anyone else see
this as odd or am I missing something?  If so what could be
causing this?

Thanks for any suggestions, help!

update stgpool backuppool highmig=0 lowmig=0

update stgpool backuppool highmig=70 lowmig=40


Disk storage pools : BACKUPPOOL


Storage Pool Name BACKUPPOOL
Storage Pool Type PRIMARY
Device Class Name DISK
Estimated Capacity 1013760.0
Space Trigger Util 17.6
Pct Util 17.6
Pct Migr 16.3
Pct Logical 100.0
High Mig Pct 70
Low Mig Pct 40
Migration Processes 14
Next Storage Pool H3592POOL
Maximum Size Threshold -
Access READWRITE
Description Disk Backup Pool
Overflow Location -
Cache Migrated Files? NO
Collocate? -
Reclamation Threshold -
Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed -
Number of Scratch Volumes Used -
Delay Period for Volume Reuse -
Migration in Progress? NO
Amount Migrated (MB) -
Elapsed Migration Time (seconds) 632871
Reclamation in Progress? -
Last Update Date/Time 2006-01-31 11:00:14.00
Last Update by (administrator)
Reclaim Storage Pool -
Migration Delay 0
Migration Continue YES
Storage Pool Data Format Native
Copy Storage Pool(s) -
Continue Copy on Error? -
CRC Data YES
Reclamation Processes -
Offsite Reclamation Limit -
Reclamation Type THRESHOLD


TSM 5.3.2.1
AIX 5.3
RS/6000


AW: [ADSM-L] migration doesn't seem to be ending

2006-02-01 Thread Thomas Rupp
Hi,

See http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.funcdir, keyword: MIGRATION
Occurs with one process per node
(regardless of the MIGPRocess value),
choosing the node with the largest
amount of data in the storage pool and
moving *all* of that node's data before
embarking upon the same processing for
other nodes - or before again checking
the LOwmig value.
When you change the LOWMIG value TSM waits till it has moved *all* files of the
node it is currently working on.
So this might take some time if you have nodes with many, many files.

HTH
Thomas Rupp


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Timothy 
Hughes
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 01. Februar 2006 15:34
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: [ADSM-L] migration doesn't seem to be ending


Hello all,

After viewing our Backup Disk Pool,  I noticed that migration
doesn't seem to be stopping. The below percentages don't seem
right since I have the following settings. Anyone else see
this as odd or am I missing something?  If so what could be
causing this?

Thanks for any suggestions, help!

update stgpool backuppool highmig=0 lowmig=0

update stgpool backuppool highmig=70 lowmig=40


Disk storage pools : BACKUPPOOL


Storage Pool Name BACKUPPOOL
Storage Pool Type PRIMARY
Device Class Name DISK
Estimated Capacity 1013760.0
Space Trigger Util 17.6
Pct Util 17.6
Pct Migr 16.3
Pct Logical 100.0
High Mig Pct 70
Low Mig Pct 40
Migration Processes 14
Next Storage Pool H3592POOL
Maximum Size Threshold -
Access READWRITE
Description Disk Backup Pool
Overflow Location -
Cache Migrated Files? NO
Collocate? -
Reclamation Threshold -
Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed -
Number of Scratch Volumes Used -
Delay Period for Volume Reuse -
Migration in Progress? NO
Amount Migrated (MB) -
Elapsed Migration Time (seconds) 632871
Reclamation in Progress? -
Last Update Date/Time 2006-01-31 11:00:14.00
Last Update by (administrator)
Reclaim Storage Pool -
Migration Delay 0
Migration Continue YES
Storage Pool Data Format Native
Copy Storage Pool(s) -
Continue Copy on Error? -
CRC Data YES
Reclamation Processes -
Offsite Reclamation Limit -
Reclamation Type THRESHOLD


TSM 5.3.2.1
AIX 5.3
RS/6000


Backup Error

2006-02-01 Thread LeBlanc, Patricia
 We've just upgraded to TSM client 5.3 on windows.and I'm now seeing
the error below on the systemstate, systemservices...

I understand that vss is used to do the system state backup.but does
anyone know why this error shows up??


02/01/2006 03:00:29 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT BEGIN DEV03BKUP 02/01/2006
03:00:00
02/01/2006 03:00:30 Incremental backup of volume '\\lm-server-03\c$'
02/01/2006 03:00:30 Incremental backup of volume '\\lm-server-03\d$'
02/01/2006 03:00:30 Incremental backup of volume '\\lm-server-03\e$'
02/01/2006 03:00:30 Incremental backup of volume 'SYSTEMSTATE'
02/01/2006 03:00:39 ANS1959W Removing previous incomplete group
'\SYSSTATE' Id:0-681213062
02/01/2006 03:00:41 Incremental backup of volume 'SYSTEMSERVICES'
02/01/2006 03:00:45 ANS1959W Removing previous incomplete group '\WMI'
Id:0-681213066
02/01/2006 03:00:45 ANS1959W Removing previous incomplete group
'\EVENTLOG' Id:0-681213067
02/01/2006 03:00:46 ANS1959W Removing previous incomplete group '\IIS'
Id:0-681213068
02/01/2006 03:02:39 Successful incremental backup of '\\lm-server-03\e$'
02/01/2006 03:26:31 Successful incremental backup of '\\lm-server-03\c$'


Re: AW: [ADSM-L] migration doesn't seem to be ending

2006-02-01 Thread Andy Huebner
Also, backups running during the migration time can prevent the pool from 
reaching 0.  We use 1 to get around that problem.

Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Rupp
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 8:41 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] migration doesn't seem to be ending

Hi,

See http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.funcdir, keyword: MIGRATION
Occurs with one process per node
(regardless of the MIGPRocess value),
choosing the node with the largest
amount of data in the storage pool and
moving *all* of that node's data before
embarking upon the same processing for
other nodes - or before again checking
the LOwmig value.
When you change the LOWMIG value TSM waits till it has moved *all* files of the
node it is currently working on.
So this might take some time if you have nodes with many, many files.

HTH
Thomas Rupp


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Timothy 
Hughes
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 01. Februar 2006 15:34
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: [ADSM-L] migration doesn't seem to be ending


Hello all,

After viewing our Backup Disk Pool,  I noticed that migration
doesn't seem to be stopping. The below percentages don't seem
right since I have the following settings. Anyone else see
this as odd or am I missing something?  If so what could be
causing this?

Thanks for any suggestions, help!

update stgpool backuppool highmig=0 lowmig=0

update stgpool backuppool highmig=70 lowmig=40


Disk storage pools : BACKUPPOOL


Storage Pool Name BACKUPPOOL
Storage Pool Type PRIMARY
Device Class Name DISK
Estimated Capacity 1013760.0
Space Trigger Util 17.6
Pct Util 17.6
Pct Migr 16.3
Pct Logical 100.0
High Mig Pct 70
Low Mig Pct 40
Migration Processes 14
Next Storage Pool H3592POOL
Maximum Size Threshold -
Access READWRITE
Description Disk Backup Pool
Overflow Location -
Cache Migrated Files? NO
Collocate? -
Reclamation Threshold -
Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed -
Number of Scratch Volumes Used -
Delay Period for Volume Reuse -
Migration in Progress? NO
Amount Migrated (MB) -
Elapsed Migration Time (seconds) 632871
Reclamation in Progress? -
Last Update Date/Time 2006-01-31 11:00:14.00
Last Update by (administrator)
Reclaim Storage Pool -
Migration Delay 0
Migration Continue YES
Storage Pool Data Format Native
Copy Storage Pool(s) -
Continue Copy on Error? -
CRC Data YES
Reclamation Processes -
Offsite Reclamation Limit -
Reclamation Type THRESHOLD


TSM 5.3.2.1
AIX 5.3
RS/6000


This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized 
representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying 
or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments.
Thank you.


Re: AW: [ADSM-L] migration doesn't seem to be ending

2006-02-01 Thread Timothy Hughes
Thanks Thomas and Andy!

Andy Huebner wrote:

 Also, backups running during the migration time can prevent the pool from 
 reaching 0.  We use 1 to get around that problem.

 Andy Huebner
 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas 
 Rupp
 Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 8:41 AM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] migration doesn't seem to be ending

 Hi,

 See http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.funcdir, keyword: MIGRATION
 Occurs with one process per node
 (regardless of the MIGPRocess value),
 choosing the node with the largest
 amount of data in the storage pool and
 moving *all* of that node's data 
 before
 embarking upon the same processing for
 other nodes - or before again checking
 the LOwmig value.
 When you change the LOWMIG value TSM waits till it has moved *all* files of 
 the
 node it is currently working on.
 So this might take some time if you have nodes with many, many files.

 HTH
 Thomas Rupp

 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Timothy 
 Hughes
 Gesendet: Mittwoch, 01. Februar 2006 15:34
 An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Betreff: [ADSM-L] migration doesn't seem to be ending

 Hello all,

 After viewing our Backup Disk Pool,  I noticed that migration
 doesn't seem to be stopping. The below percentages don't seem
 right since I have the following settings. Anyone else see
 this as odd or am I missing something?  If so what could be
 causing this?

 Thanks for any suggestions, help!

 update stgpool backuppool highmig=0 lowmig=0

 update stgpool backuppool highmig=70 lowmig=40

 Disk storage pools : BACKUPPOOL

 Storage Pool Name BACKUPPOOL
 Storage Pool Type PRIMARY
 Device Class Name DISK
 Estimated Capacity 1013760.0
 Space Trigger Util 17.6
 Pct Util 17.6
 Pct Migr 16.3
 Pct Logical 100.0
 High Mig Pct 70
 Low Mig Pct 40
 Migration Processes 14
 Next Storage Pool H3592POOL
 Maximum Size Threshold -
 Access READWRITE
 Description Disk Backup Pool
 Overflow Location -
 Cache Migrated Files? NO
 Collocate? -
 Reclamation Threshold -
 Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed -
 Number of Scratch Volumes Used -
 Delay Period for Volume Reuse -
 Migration in Progress? NO
 Amount Migrated (MB) -
 Elapsed Migration Time (seconds) 632871
 Reclamation in Progress? -
 Last Update Date/Time 2006-01-31 11:00:14.00
 Last Update by (administrator)
 Reclaim Storage Pool -
 Migration Delay 0
 Migration Continue YES
 Storage Pool Data Format Native
 Copy Storage Pool(s) -
 Continue Copy on Error? -
 CRC Data YES
 Reclamation Processes -
 Offsite Reclamation Limit -
 Reclamation Type THRESHOLD

 TSM 5.3.2.1
 AIX 5.3
 RS/6000

 This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally 
 privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized 
 representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, 
 copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If 
 you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately 
 by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments.
 Thank you.


Re: AW: [ADSM-L] migration doesn't seem to be ending

2006-02-01 Thread Bos, Karel
TSM 5.3.2.1 server. Why don't you use the new migrate stg backuppool low=40 
dur=XX option instead of the upd stg?

Regards,

Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy 
Hughes
Sent: woensdag 1 februari 2006 19:06
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: AW: [ADSM-L] migration doesn't seem to be ending

Thanks Thomas and Andy!

Andy Huebner wrote:

 Also, backups running during the migration time can prevent the pool from 
 reaching 0.  We use 1 to get around that problem.

 Andy Huebner
 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
 Of Thomas Rupp
 Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 8:41 AM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] migration doesn't seem to be ending

 Hi,

 See http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.funcdir, keyword: MIGRATION
 Occurs with one process per node
 (regardless of the MIGPRocess value),
 choosing the node with the largest
 amount of data in the storage pool and
 moving *all* of that node's data 
 before
 embarking upon the same processing for
 other nodes - or before again checking
 the LOwmig value.
 When you change the LOWMIG value TSM waits till it has moved *all* 
 files of the node it is currently working on.
 So this might take some time if you have nodes with many, many files.

 HTH
 Thomas Rupp

 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag 
 von Timothy Hughes
 Gesendet: Mittwoch, 01. Februar 2006 15:34
 An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Betreff: [ADSM-L] migration doesn't seem to be ending

 Hello all,

 After viewing our Backup Disk Pool,  I noticed that migration doesn't 
 seem to be stopping. The below percentages don't seem right since I 
 have the following settings. Anyone else see this as odd or am I 
 missing something?  If so what could be causing this?

 Thanks for any suggestions, help!

 update stgpool backuppool highmig=0 lowmig=0

 update stgpool backuppool highmig=70 lowmig=40

 Disk storage pools : BACKUPPOOL

 Storage Pool Name BACKUPPOOL
 Storage Pool Type PRIMARY
 Device Class Name DISK
 Estimated Capacity 1013760.0
 Space Trigger Util 17.6
 Pct Util 17.6
 Pct Migr 16.3
 Pct Logical 100.0
 High Mig Pct 70
 Low Mig Pct 40
 Migration Processes 14
 Next Storage Pool H3592POOL
 Maximum Size Threshold -
 Access READWRITE
 Description Disk Backup Pool
 Overflow Location -
 Cache Migrated Files? NO
 Collocate? -
 Reclamation Threshold -
 Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed -
 Number of Scratch Volumes Used -
 Delay Period for Volume Reuse -
 Migration in Progress? NO
 Amount Migrated (MB) -
 Elapsed Migration Time (seconds) 632871 Reclamation in Progress? - 
 Last Update Date/Time 2006-01-31 11:00:14.00 Last Update by 
 (administrator) Reclaim Storage Pool - Migration Delay 0 Migration 
 Continue YES Storage Pool Data Format Native Copy Storage Pool(s) - 
 Continue Copy on Error? - CRC Data YES Reclamation Processes - Offsite 
 Reclamation Limit - Reclamation Type THRESHOLD

 TSM 5.3.2.1
 AIX 5.3
 RS/6000

 This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally 
 privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized 
 representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, 
 copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If 
 you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately 
 by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments.
 Thank you.

Dit bericht is vertrouwelijk en kan geheime informatie bevatten enkel
bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien dit bericht niet voor u is bestemd,
verzoeken wij u dit onmiddellijk aan ons te melden en het bericht te
vernietigen.
Aangezien de integriteit van het bericht niet veilig gesteld is middels
verzending via internet, kan Atos Origin niet aansprakelijk worden gehouden
voor de inhoud daarvan.
Hoewel wij ons inspannen een virusvrij netwerk te hanteren, geven
wij geen enkele garantie dat dit bericht virusvrij is, noch aanvaarden wij
enige aansprakelijkheid voor de mogelijke aanwezigheid van een virus in dit
bericht.
 
Op al onze rechtsverhoudingen, aanbiedingen en overeenkomsten waaronder
Atos Origin goederen en/of diensten levert zijn met uitsluiting van alle
andere voorwaarden de Leveringsvoorwaarden van Atos Origin van toepassing.
Deze worden u op aanvraag direct kosteloos toegezonden.
 
This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely
for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail
in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it.
As its 

schedlogretention.

2006-02-01 Thread Ochs, Duane
TSM client 5.3.1.1
OS linux RH 3.0
TSM server 5.3.1.2
 
On all three of my archive only Linux servers the schedlogretention and
errorlogretention parameters in the dsm.sys are not being used. The
contents in the logs date back to 10-12-05. The dsm.sys has not been
changed since 9-12-2005.
An archive process is scheduled to run every 12 hours.
 
errorlogretention 7 d
schedlogretention 7 d
errorlogname /another_directory/dsmerror.log
schedlogname /another_directory/dsmsched.log

Has anybody seen this before ?
 

Duane Ochs

Information Systems - Enterprise Computing

 

Quad/Graphics Inc.

 

Sussex, Wisconsin

414-566-2375 phone

414-566-4010 pin# 2375 beeper 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.QG.com outbind://8/www.QG.com 

 


Re: schedlogretention.

2006-02-01 Thread Gee, Norman
Have your restarted the scheduler?  The scheduler only reads the dsm.sys
file on startup. 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Stapleton
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 12:49 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: schedlogretention.

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 02/01/2006
01:44:00 PM:
 TSM client 5.3.1.1
 OS linux RH 3.0
 TSM server 5.3.1.2

 On all three of my archive only Linux servers the schedlogretention
and
 errorlogretention parameters in the dsm.sys are not being used. The
 contents in the logs date back to 10-12-05. The dsm.sys has not been
 changed since 9-12-2005.
 An archive process is scheduled to run every 12 hours.

 errorlogretention 7 d
 schedlogretention 7 d
 errorlogname /another_directory/dsmerror.log
 schedlogname /another_directory/dsmsched.log

 Has anybody seen this before ?

Curiousity: have you tried adding it to the relevant client option set
on
the server? I for one would be interested as to whether that did the job
better.

Another curiousity: does log retention work on archives only? I always
see
the trimming going on at the end of a scheduled backup. You might try a
single scheduled backup on one box to see if that trims the logs.

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
MR Backup and Recovery Management
262.790.3190


--
Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains
information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications
privacy laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you
are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally
prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise
disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the
sender that you have received this communication in error, and then
immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

==


Re: schedlogretention.

2006-02-01 Thread Mark Stapleton
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 02/01/2006
01:44:00 PM:
 TSM client 5.3.1.1
 OS linux RH 3.0
 TSM server 5.3.1.2

 On all three of my archive only Linux servers the schedlogretention and
 errorlogretention parameters in the dsm.sys are not being used. The
 contents in the logs date back to 10-12-05. The dsm.sys has not been
 changed since 9-12-2005.
 An archive process is scheduled to run every 12 hours.

 errorlogretention 7 d
 schedlogretention 7 d
 errorlogname /another_directory/dsmerror.log
 schedlogname /another_directory/dsmsched.log

 Has anybody seen this before ?

Curiousity: have you tried adding it to the relevant client option set on
the server? I for one would be interested as to whether that did the job
better.

Another curiousity: does log retention work on archives only? I always see
the trimming going on at the end of a scheduled backup. You might try a
single scheduled backup on one box to see if that trims the logs.

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
MR Backup and Recovery Management
262.790.3190

--
Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains 
information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy 
laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from 
retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this 
information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have 
received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you 
in advance for your cooperation.
==