q vol Issue with _some_ drm volumes

2009-05-04 Thread Stephan Boldt
Hello everybody,

I wonder why _some_ of my dbsnapshot-type drmvolumes can be queried with q
vol and some don't (example ouput below). That occurres quite strange to
me. Any ideas what can be the cause?

kind reagards,
Stephan

 example output: ---

tsm: TSMq drm s=dbs

Volume NameState   Last Update   Automated
   Date/Time LibName
   -   ---

000302L2   Vault   04/30/2009 10:23:04
[...]
000330L2   Vault   04/30/2009 10:23:32

tsm: TSMq vol 000302L2

Volume Name   Storage  Device  EstimatedPct   Volume
  Pool NameClass Name   Capacity   Util   Status
  ---  --  -  -

000302L2  COPYPOOL_I-  LTO2  310.0 G   55.8Full
   BM3583

tsm: TSMq vol 000330L2
ANR2034E QUERY VOLUME: No match found using this criteria.
ANS8001I Return code 11.


Re: q vol Issue with _some_ drm volumes

2009-05-04 Thread Bos, Karel
Database back-up tapes don't belong to a storage pool, so won't show up
on a q vol command.

Regards,
K.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Stephan Boldt
Sent: maandag 4 mei 2009 13:20
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: q vol Issue with _some_ drm volumes

Hello everybody,

I wonder why _some_ of my dbsnapshot-type drmvolumes can be queried with
q vol and some don't (example ouput below). That occurres quite
strange to me. Any ideas what can be the cause?

kind reagards,
Stephan

 example output: ---

tsm: TSMq drm s=dbs

Volume NameState   Last Update   Automated
   Date/Time LibName
   -   ---

000302L2   Vault   04/30/2009 10:23:04
[...]
000330L2   Vault   04/30/2009 10:23:32

tsm: TSMq vol 000302L2

Volume Name   Storage  Device  EstimatedPct
Volume
  Pool NameClass Name   Capacity   Util
Status
  ---  --  -  -

000302L2  COPYPOOL_I-  LTO2  310.0 G   55.8
Full
   BM3583

tsm: TSMq vol 000330L2
ANR2034E QUERY VOLUME: No match found using this criteria.
ANS8001I Return code 11.

ÿþDit bericht is vertrouwelijk en kan 
geheime informatie bevatten enkel

bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien 
dit bericht niet voor u is bestemd,

verzoeken wij u dit onmiddellijk aan 
ons te melden en het bericht te

vernietigen.

Aangezien de integriteit van het 
bericht niet veilig gesteld is middels

verzending via internet, kan Atos 
Origin niet aansprakelijk worden 
gehouden

voor de inhoud daarvan.

Hoewel wij ons inspannen een virusvrij 
netwerk te hanteren, geven

wij geen enkele garantie dat dit 
bericht virusvrij is, noch aanvaarden 
wij

enige aansprakelijkheid voor de 
mogelijke aanwezigheid van een virus in 
dit

bericht.

 

Op al onze rechtsverhoudingen, 
aanbiedingen en overeenkomsten 
waaronder

Atos Origin goederen en/of diensten 
levert zijn met uitsluiting van alle

andere voorwaarden de 
Leveringsvoorwaarden van Atos Origin 
van toepassing.

Deze worden u op aanvraag direct 
kosteloos toegezonden.

 

This e-mail and the documents attached 
are confidential and intended solely

for the addressee; it may also be 
privileged. If you receive this e-mail

in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and destroy it.

As its integrity cannot be secured on 
the Internet, the Atos Origin group

liability cannot be triggered for the 
message content. Although the

sender endeavours to maintain a 
computer virus-free network, the sender

does not warrant that this transmission 
is virus-free and will not be

liable for any damages resulting from 
any virus transmitted.

 

On all offers and agreements under 
which Atos Origin supplies goods and/or

services of whatever nature, the Terms 
of Delivery from Atos Origin

exclusively apply. 

The Terms of Delivery shall be promptly 
submitted to you on your request.

 

Atos Origin Nederland B.V. / Utrecht

KvK 

Re: q vol Issue with _some_ drm volumes

2009-05-04 Thread Remco Post

q drm s=dbs lists database snapshots and copypool volumes, so you
found one of each.

If you want to find only snapshots, use q volhist t=dbs

On 4 mei 2009, at 13:19, Stephan Boldt wrote:


Hello everybody,

I wonder why _some_ of my dbsnapshot-type drmvolumes can be queried
with q
vol and some don't (example ouput below). That occurres quite
strange to
me. Any ideas what can be the cause?

kind reagards,
Stephan

 example output: ---

tsm: TSMq drm s=dbs

Volume NameState   Last Update   Automated
  Date/Time LibName
   -   ---

000302L2   Vault   04/30/2009 10:23:04
[...]
000330L2   Vault   04/30/2009 10:23:32

tsm: TSMq vol 000302L2

Volume Name   Storage  Device  Estimated
Pct   Volume
 Pool NameClass Name   Capacity   Util
Status
  ---  --  -  -

000302L2  COPYPOOL_I-  LTO2  310.0 G
55.8Full
  BM3583

tsm: TSMq vol 000330L2
ANR2034E QUERY VOLUME: No match found using this criteria.
ANS8001I Return code 11.


--
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 24821 622


Re: q vol Issue with _some_ drm volumes

2009-05-04 Thread Stephan Boldt
Shame on me, you're right. 000302L2 is no dbs... q volhist t=dbs is what I
intended to query...

Subsequent question:
Is there a way to do move a dbsnapshot from one volume to another? I want to
get rid of a tape which we identified as the cause of library problems
(barcode sometimes unreadable, slot assumed as empty, library tried to put
other tapes into the tape's slot). Unfortunately it is currently in the
vault with a dbsnapshot still on it. Is there a way to put to move the
dbsnapshot  to another tape, so I can get rid of the error prone tape right
now and not having to wait for its snapshot to expire? (And probably missing
the day it gets back into the lib and is being reused for eventually a
dbsnapshot again)

kind regards,
Stephan

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Remco Post remco.p...@gmail.com wrote:

 q drm s=dbs lists database snapshots and copypool volumes, so you
 found one of each.

 If you want to find only snapshots, use q volhist t=dbs


 On 4 mei 2009, at 13:19, Stephan Boldt wrote:

  Hello everybody,

 I wonder why _some_ of my dbsnapshot-type drmvolumes can be queried
 with q
 vol and some don't (example ouput below). That occurres quite
 strange to
 me. Any ideas what can be the cause?

 kind reagards,
 Stephan

  example output: ---

 tsm: TSMq drm s=dbs

 Volume NameState   Last Update   Automated
  Date/Time LibName
    -   ---
 
 000302L2   Vault   04/30/2009 10:23:04
 [...]
 000330L2   Vault   04/30/2009 10:23:32

 tsm: TSMq vol 000302L2

 Volume Name   Storage  Device  Estimated
 Pct   Volume
 Pool NameClass Name   Capacity   Util
 Status
   ---  --  -  -
 
 000302L2  COPYPOOL_I-  LTO2  310.0 G
 55.8Full
  BM3583

 tsm: TSMq vol 000330L2
 ANR2034E QUERY VOLUME: No match found using this criteria.
 ANS8001I Return code 11.


 --
 Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind regards,

 Remco Post
 r.p...@plcs.nl
 +31 6 24821 622



LANFree to disk restore from deduplicated storage pool

2009-05-04 Thread Bill Mansfield
Suppose I do a LANFree backup to a GPFS sequential disk storage pool,
then deduplicate that pool. On restore, is the storage agent smart
enough to access the deduplicated data, or will this turn into a LAN
restore?

 

Bill Mansfield

 


Re: LANFree to disk restore from deduplicated storage pool

2009-05-04 Thread Remco Post

On 4 mei 2009, at 14:33, Bill Mansfield wrote:


Suppose I do a LANFree backup to a GPFS sequential disk storage pool,
then deduplicate that pool. On restore, is the storage agent smart
enough to access the deduplicated data, or will this turn into a LAN
restore?



good question. The answer is that, yes, the LANfree client is mart
enough to do a LAN-free restore (so I've been told by IBM).




Bill Mansfield




--
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl


Linux Operating System excludes?

2009-05-04 Thread Shawn Drew
It seems that /dev is excluded on all of our Linux clients (but not
Solaris or AIX)
The directory doesn't even show in the GUI when attempting a backup.
(Normally if it is excluded, it is listed, but with an X).  However a
command line backup of /dev does work.The q inclexcl doesn't show
anything excluded.
On Windows, a q inclexcl shows the OS excluded files, but nothing on
linux.  Does anyone know a list of what is excluded and how?

Client: 5.5.1 on Linux

a dsmc q inclexcl shows:

*** FILE INCLUDE/EXCLUDE ***
Mode Function  Pattern (match from top down)  Source File
 - -- -
No exclude filespace statements defined.
Excl Directory /.../.TsmCacheDir  TSM
No include/exclude statements defined.
No DFS include/exclude statements defined.


PS The $LANG is set to en_US, so it's not a character limitation thing




Regards,
Shawn

Shawn Drew


This message and any attachments (the message) is intended solely for
the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error,
please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord
with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial,
is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the
integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will)
not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain
functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.


Re: Moving a dbsnapshot from one volume to another

2009-05-04 Thread Shawn Drew
You can't move it.
You have to either
- delete it from the volhistory and discard the tape.  (losing the data on
there)
- Wait for it to expire.

I would just put it in your desk, label it as destroy when expired.  It
won't mix in with the rest of the tapes, you have it just-in-case, and
you'll find it eventually when you clean your desk.(Or take it home if
you have an offsite requirement.)


Regards,
Shawn

Shawn Drew





Internet
stephan.boldt+ads...@gmail.com

Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
05/04/2009 10:21 AM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L
cc

Subject
[ADSM-L] Moving a dbsnapshot from one volume to another






Hello,

is there a way to do move a dbsnapshot from one volume to another? I want
to
get rid of a tape which we identified as the cause of library problems
(barcode sometimes unreadable, slot mistakenly assumed as empty, library
tried to put other tapes into the tape's slot). Unfortunately it is
currently in the vault with a dbsnapshot still on it. Is there a way to
put
to move the dbsnapshot  to another tape, so I can get rid of the error
prone
tape right now and not having to wait for its snapshot to expire? (And
probably missing the day it gets back into the lib and is being reused for
eventually a dbsnapshot again)

kind regards,
Stephan



This message and any attachments (the message) is intended solely for
the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error,
please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord
with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial,
is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the
integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will)
not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain
functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.


Re: Linux Operating System excludes?

2009-05-04 Thread Remco Post

On 4 mei 2009, at 16:15, Shawn Drew wrote:


It seems that /dev is excluded on all of our Linux clients (but not
Solaris or AIX)


df will probably show you something like:

Filesystem   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
udev 1024084 10156   1% /dev

As you can see, /dev is not even a normal filesystem (unlike Solaris
and AIX), so making backups is of little use. It is generated on the
fly by the kernel. It is important to backup /etc/udev/



The directory doesn't even show in the GUI when attempting a backup.
(Normally if it is excluded, it is listed, but with an X).
However a
command line backup of /dev does work.The q inclexcl doesn't show
anything excluded.
On Windows, a q inclexcl shows the OS excluded files, but nothing on
linux.  Does anyone know a list of what is excluded and how?

Client: 5.5.1 on Linux

a dsmc q inclexcl shows:

*** FILE INCLUDE/EXCLUDE ***
Mode Function  Pattern (match from top down)  Source File
 - -- -
No exclude filespace statements defined.
Excl Directory /.../.TsmCacheDir  TSM
No include/exclude statements defined.
No DFS include/exclude statements defined.


PS The $LANG is set to en_US, so it's not a character limitation thing




Regards,
Shawn

Shawn Drew


This message and any attachments (the message) is intended solely
for
the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in
error,
please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in
accord
with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or
partial,
is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee
the
integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall
(will)
not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note
that certain
functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP
Paribas RCC, Inc.


--
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl


Moving a dbsnapshot from one volume to another

2009-05-04 Thread Stephan Boldt
Hello,

is there a way to do move a dbsnapshot from one volume to another? I want to
get rid of a tape which we identified as the cause of library problems
(barcode sometimes unreadable, slot mistakenly assumed as empty, library
tried to put other tapes into the tape's slot). Unfortunately it is
currently in the vault with a dbsnapshot still on it. Is there a way to put
to move the dbsnapshot  to another tape, so I can get rid of the error prone
tape right now and not having to wait for its snapshot to expire? (And
probably missing the day it gets back into the lib and is being reused for
eventually a dbsnapshot again)

kind regards,
Stephan


Re: Linux Operating System excludes?

2009-05-04 Thread Shawn Drew
In this case, /dev is just a subdirectory of /

[r...@tsmtest1 ~]# df
Filesystem   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
  74053032   5427680  64802968   8% /
/dev/sda1   101086 16765 79102  18% /boot
tmpfs   36 036   0% /dev/shm


Regards,
Shawn

Shawn Drew





Internet
r.p...@plcs.nl

Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
05/04/2009 10:23 AM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L
cc

Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] Linux Operating System excludes?






On 4 mei 2009, at 16:15, Shawn Drew wrote:

 It seems that /dev is excluded on all of our Linux clients (but not
 Solaris or AIX)

df will probably show you something like:

Filesystem   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
udev 1024084 10156   1% /dev

As you can see, /dev is not even a normal filesystem (unlike Solaris
and AIX), so making backups is of little use. It is generated on the
fly by the kernel. It is important to backup /etc/udev/


 The directory doesn't even show in the GUI when attempting a backup.
 (Normally if it is excluded, it is listed, but with an X).
 However a
 command line backup of /dev does work.The q inclexcl doesn't show
 anything excluded.
 On Windows, a q inclexcl shows the OS excluded files, but nothing on
 linux.  Does anyone know a list of what is excluded and how?

 Client: 5.5.1 on Linux

 a dsmc q inclexcl shows:

 *** FILE INCLUDE/EXCLUDE ***
 Mode Function  Pattern (match from top down)  Source File
  - -- -
 No exclude filespace statements defined.
 Excl Directory /.../.TsmCacheDir  TSM
 No include/exclude statements defined.
 No DFS include/exclude statements defined.


 PS The $LANG is set to en_US, so it's not a character limitation thing




 Regards,
 Shawn
 
 Shawn Drew


 This message and any attachments (the message) is intended solely
 for
 the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in
 error,
 please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in
 accord
 with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or
 partial,
 is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee
 the
 integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall
 (will)
 not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note
 that certain
 functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP
 Paribas RCC, Inc.

--
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl


tsm sql question

2009-05-04 Thread eric wonderley
i run:
SELECT activity, count(entity) as SESSIONS,
cast(float(sum(bytes))/1024/1024/1024 as dec(8,2)) as GB FROM summary
where end_timecurrent_timestamp-48 hours GROUP BY activity

why is it that tape mount and expiration sessions are 0?

--
eric.wonder...@vt.edu
Systems Engineering and Admin
Virginia Tech
1700 Pratt Drive
Blacksburg, VA  24061
Ph: 540-231-4385 Fx: 540-231-7413


Re: tsm sql question

2009-05-04 Thread Richard Sims

In working with table fields, you have to watch out for values which
can be null.
Change your count(entity) to count(*).

   Richard Sims


DR at cold site, best software FASTBACK?

2009-05-04 Thread Orin Rehorst
We were advised the best option for TSM and disaster recovery at a cold site is 
to use Fastback.

We have about 6 physical and 12 VMware Windows guests to restore from tape.

Please advise.

Regards,
Orin Rehorst


Re: DR at cold site, best software FASTBACK?

2009-05-04 Thread Remco Post

On May 4, 2009, at 20:54 , Orin Rehorst wrote:


We were advised the best option for TSM and disaster recovery at a
cold site is to use Fastback.

We have about 6 physical and 12 VMware Windows guests to restore
from tape.



I'm quite a fan of Cristie's TMBR, because Cristie has great features
for restoring to dissimilar hardware, using your normal TSM backups.
OTOH, FastBack might give you faster recovery to a functional point.
In VMware environments, I like STORServer's VCB agent a lot (I'm
biassed though!).


Please advise.

Regards,
Orin Rehorst


--
Met vriendelijke groeten,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622