Re: Question about NDMP and TSM.

2014-07-16 Thread Grant Street

Hi

First check compatibility with IBM and EMC.

Ron has mentioned a solution that applies to NetApp that may not apply 
to EMC isilon eg. isilon does not have a vfiler concept.


I found that the restrictions of NDMP did not warrant the effort to use 
it on something like an isilon cluster.
The benefit of isilon is the size you can grow them to and the bandwidth 
you have to storage with multiple nodes.


Using NDMP negates all of this and reduces the functionality.
- you are limited to the bandwidth a single host(TSM server) and single 
isilon node can service.
- There is no incremental only differential. There is no snapdiff type 
functionality that NetApps have

- you can't use NDMP to back up part of it.
- The time it would take to do a full backup.
- The time it would take to do a restore.

One other niggle is that you need a windows machine to do a graphical 
restore (Web/Java UI).


That said if your data is small then these probably don't matter so much.


Grant

On 16/07/14 13:51, Gee, Norman wrote:

I found out that this is true a long time ago, but it does not stop you from 
manually doing a move data to empty out a tape volume.  It is just a very 
manual form of reclaim.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Steven 
Harris
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 6:48 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Question about NDMP and TSM.

And as a bonus, ndmp storage pools cannot be reclaimed and this means that
they hold tapes until the last data has expired.  TSM format storage pools
can be reclaimed, and if they are file storage pools can be deduped as well.


Regards

Steve

Steven Harris
TSM Admin
Canberra Australia



On 16 July 2014 05:38, Ron Delaware ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com wrote:


Ricky,

The configuration that you are referring to is what could be considered
the 'Traditional' implementation of NDMP.  As you have found for yourself,
there are a number of restrictions on how the data can be managed though.

If you configure the NDMP environment so that a Tivoli Storage Manager
controls the data flow instead of the NetApp Appliance, you have more
options


This configuration will allow you backup up to TSM storage pools (Disk,
VTL, Tape), send copies offsite, because the TSM Server controls the
destination.  You have the option to use a traditional TSM Client utilizing
the NDMP protocol or have the TSM server perform the backup and restores
using the BACKUP NODE and RESTORE NODE commands. It a table of contents
storage pool (disk based only highly recommended) you can perform single
file restores.  you can also create virtual filespace pointers to your
vfiler that will allow you to run simultaneous backups of the vfiler, that
could shorten your backup and restore times.





Best Regards,

_
* Ronald C. Delaware*
IBM Level 2 - IT Plus Certified Specialist – Expert
IBM Corporation | Tivoli Software
IBM Certified Solutions Advisor - Tivoli Storage
IBM Certified Deployment Professional
Butterfly Solutions Professional
916-458-5726 (Office
925-457-9221 (cell phone)

email: *ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com* ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com
*Storage Services Offerings*
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/tivoli/services/consulting/offers-storage-optimization.html





From:Schneider, Jim jschnei...@ussco.com
To:ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Date:07/15/2014 12:19 PM
Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] Question about NDMP and TSM.
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
--



Ricky,

The Isilon uses the OneFS file system and TSM views it as one huge file
system.  If backing up to disk, TSM will attempt to preallocate enough
space to back up the entire allocated space on the Isilon. Defining Virtual
File systems will not help because directory quota information is not
passed to TSM, and TSM only sees the total allocated space.

We were able to back up the Isilon to disk when we started on a test
system with little data on it, around 25 GB.  When we attempted to
implement the same backups on a second, well-populated Isilon we ran into
the space allocation problem.

When backing up to tape, TSM assumes you have unlimited storage available
and is able to run VFS backups.  We use Virtual File Space Mapping (VFS)
and back up to tape.

Refer to EMC SR#4646, TSM PMR 23808,122,000.

Jim Schneider
United Stationers

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Plair, Ricky
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 1:21 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Question about NDMP and TSM.

I have been asked to look into backing up our EMC Isilon using our TSM
server.

Everything I read,  seems to point to backing this NDMP device to tape.

Problem is, we do not use tape to backup production.

I have researched and found a few articles about backing the NDMP device
to tape but, there seem to 

Fwd: [ADSM-L] Lun versus logical volume for DB volumes

2014-07-16 Thread Steven Harris
Thanks Ron for the reply

Its actually moot as the back end is XIV behind SVCs.  But the SAN guys
like to allocate standard size luns and my DB luns are all a bit small for
their liking, so if I could get the same multithread effect by allocating
one big lun, with multiple AIX VGs on it, that would be happiness.

Regards

Steve.


On 16 July 2014 13:05, Ron Delaware ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com wrote:

 Steven,

 The logical volumes are not dedicated disks in most cases, which means
 that other applications may be using the same disks at the same time. With
 our new TSM Server Blueprint standards, TSM database's over 1TB require
 16 luns.

 You can go to this link to find out more


 https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home?lang=en#!/wiki/Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager/page/NEW%20-%20Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager%20Blueprint%20-%20%20Improve%20the%20time-to-value%20of%20your%20deployments



 Best Regards,

 _
 * Ronald C. Delaware*
 IBM Level 2 - IT Plus Certified Specialist – Expert
 IBM Corporation | Tivoli Software
 IBM Certified Solutions Advisor - Tivoli Storage
 IBM Certified Deployment Professional
 Butterfly Solutions Professional
 916-458-5726 (Office
 925-457-9221 (cell phone)

 email: *ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com* ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com

 From:Steven Harris st...@stevenharris.info
 To:ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
 Date:07/15/2014 06:55 PM
 Subject:[ADSM-L] Lun versus logical volume for DB volumes
 Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
 --



 Hi,

 I've specced a design for a new TSM server and as recommended have
 specified multiple luns for the database.  The folklore is that DB2 will
 start one thread per lun so for a big database you use 8 luns and hence get
 8 threads.

 My AIX guy is asking whether I really need 8 luns or will 8 AIX logical
 volumes have the same effect.

 Does anyone know or can tell me where to look?

 Thanks

 Steve.

 Steven Harris
 TSM Admin
 Canberra Australia





Re: Lun versus logical volume for DB volumes

2014-07-16 Thread Rhodes, Richard L.
 allocating one big lun, with multiple AIX VGs on it
In AIX, a lun is part of a vg.  A single lun can only be part of a single vg.

Our experience with big databases is with Oracle on AIX.

AIX has 2 levels of queues:  
   - on the hba (lsattr -El fcsX   | grep num_cmd_elems)
   - on the lun (lsattr -El hdiskY | grep queue_depth) 

Your backend with SVC/XIV means that you shouldn't hit disk hot spots on the 
storage array.  This is really good.

One problem you can hit is to max out the queue of the host hba, SVC hba or XIV 
hba. The AIX fcs depth can be seen in the above lsattr cmd.  If the AIX fcs 
queue is full, AIX waits.  If the queue at the SVC/XIV is full, that system 
sends a cmd back to the host saying to stop sending.  This causes a slowdown.  
Since multiple servers probably share the SVC ports, there can be a problem if 
the aggregate server I/O's fill the SVC  port queue.  AIX iostat has a stat for 
tracking if this occurs (sqfull???).  This is one reason for having multiple 
hba's on a server into the SAN, feeding multiple ports on the SVC, into 
multiple ports on the XIV is really helpful.  Be sure the luns are set to 
algorithm round-robin to make use of multiple paths to the lun.  I assume the 
SVC has the same idea for the backend I/O's to the XIV via multiple paths.

There is also a queue for each lun.  If your AIX application (DB2, Oracle, 
whatever) pounds a single lun (hdisk), you can max out this queue.  So while 
you may have lots of backend IOPS in the SVC/XIV, you may not be able to get 
I/O's through to them.  This is why a single big lun in AIX isn't really good.  
You can raise the queue size of the lun.  You can also spread your 
database/application across multiple luns.  For our big systems we allocate 
lots of luns and spread the AIX VG physical partitions across all the luns 
(maximum parm of the vg).  When we add a lun to a server like this, we then do 
a reorgvg to re-spread the physical partitions so that all luns are performing 
I/O.  (If you have a hot spot that fits within a single physical partition, 
there's not much you can do about it!)  Think of a lun as having two 
characteristics:  capacity and IOPS.  Capacity is easy to get and use up, IOPS 
can be much harder to get and use.

With your SVC in the middle you have 3 levels of virtualization to figure out 
and handle:  AIX LVM (vg's and lv's), the SVC (IOGROUPS, pools, mdisks???, not 
sure what all), and finally the XIV (different heads and extents spread across 
all disks).This multiple levels of stripping is called a PLAID.  It's 
really good for random workloads, but can be bad for sequential processing!   
Interesting . . . doesn't DB2 do some kind of stripping across the separate 
filesystems you can give the db, and, has limits on concurrent I/O's per 
filesystem  That would make a 4th levels of stripping and tuning!! 

A, things are so simple!  (not)




Rick




-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Steven 
Harris
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 8:43 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Fwd: [ADSM-L] Lun versus logical volume for DB volumes

Thanks Ron for the reply

Its actually moot as the back end is XIV behind SVCs.  But the SAN guys like to 
allocate standard size luns and my DB luns are all a bit small for their 
liking, so if I could get the same multithread effect by allocating one big 
lun, with multiple AIX VGs on it, that would be happiness.

Regards

Steve.


On 16 July 2014 13:05, Ron Delaware ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com wrote:

 Steven,

 The logical volumes are not dedicated disks in most cases, which means 
 that other applications may be using the same disks at the same time. 
 With our new TSM Server Blueprint standards, TSM database's over 1TB 
 require
 16 luns.

 You can go to this link to find out more


 https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home?lang=en#!/wiki
 /Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager/page/NEW%20-%20Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager%
 20Blueprint%20-%20%20Improve%20the%20time-to-value%20of%20your%20deplo
 yments



 Best Regards,

 _
 * Ronald C. Delaware*
 IBM Level 2 - IT Plus Certified Specialist – Expert IBM Corporation | 
 Tivoli Software IBM Certified Solutions Advisor - Tivoli Storage IBM 
 Certified Deployment Professional Butterfly Solutions Professional
 916-458-5726 (Office
 925-457-9221 (cell phone)

 email: *ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com* ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com

 From:Steven Harris st...@stevenharris.info
 To:ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
 Date:07/15/2014 06:55 PM
 Subject:[ADSM-L] Lun versus logical volume for DB volumes
 Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
 --



 Hi,

 I've specced a design for a new TSM server and as recommended have 
 specified multiple luns for the database.  The folklore is that DB2 
 will start one thread per lun so for a big database you 

TSM server appears to hang

2014-07-16 Thread Rhodes, Richard L.
Hi Everyone,

The past couple of days we're had a strange problem with one of our TSM 
instances (v6.2.5).  At times it appears to hang.

Last night (and the previous night) it had many servers that got a dozen or 
more sessions.  This is really strange!  This morning as I was looking at this, 
cmds like q vol and q stgpool hang - no response!  Commands like q node 
and q proc work.  The server was doing very little I/O.  All of a sudden the 
hung cmds all ran through and the server I/O jumped to 200-400MB/s.  Something 
was locking I/O.  I think the many sessions are clients that retry because the 
server is not responding.

In the TSM actlog there are no unusual messages about the time it un-stuck.  
The only strange entry in the actlog is a ANRD with lockwait error early 
the previous evening.There are no AIX errors.

Any thought?

Rick






-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and 
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.


Re: TSM server appears to hang

2014-07-16 Thread Billaudeau, Pierre
Hi Rick,
From my experience, I had problem with an Expire inventory process (was 
hanging on a very large node in term of items  13 millions  )  that froze TSM 
but it was on 6.1 version. Also, REORG can use a lot of resources an impact TSM.

Pierre Billaudeau
Analyste en stockage
Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs
Société des Alcools du Québec
514-254-6000 x 6559

-Message d'origine-
De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de 
Rhodes, Richard L.
Envoyé : 16 juillet 2014 11:08
À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Objet : [ADSM-L] TSM server appears to hang

Hi Everyone,

The past couple of days we're had a strange problem with one of our TSM 
instances (v6.2.5).  At times it appears to hang.

Last night (and the previous night) it had many servers that got a dozen or 
more sessions.  This is really strange!  This morning as I was looking at this, 
cmds like q vol and q stgpool hang - no response!  Commands like q node 
and q proc work.  The server was doing very little I/O.  All of a sudden the 
hung cmds all ran through and the server I/O jumped to 200-400MB/s.  Something 
was locking I/O.  I think the many sessions are clients that retry because the 
server is not responding.

In the TSM actlog there are no unusual messages about the time it un-stuck.  
The only strange entry in the actlog is a ANRD with lockwait error early 
the previous evening.There are no AIX errors.

Any thought?

Rick






-

The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and 
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.

--


Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y 
est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; 
il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. 
Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout 
examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de 
ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous 
n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur 
par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre 
système. Merci.


Re: TSM server appears to hang

2014-07-16 Thread Rhodes, Richard L.
We use to have problem with expiration hangs on v5, but haven't seen this on 
v6.  Will check out if expiration was running overnight or early this morning.

The REORG stuff.  Is there any way to know when TSm is performing unusual stuff 
on the db?  If this is occurring, I'm not seeing anything in the actlog to 
indicate this, but maybe it doesn't log anything.  


Thanks

Rick



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Billaudeau, Pierre
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 11:19 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM server appears to hang

Hi Rick,
From my experience, I had problem with an Expire inventory process (was 
hanging on a very large node in term of items  13 millions  )  that froze TSM 
but it was on 6.1 version. Also, REORG can use a lot of resources an impact TSM.

Pierre Billaudeau
Analyste en stockage
Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs
Société des Alcools du Québec
514-254-6000 x 6559

-Message d'origine-
De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de 
Rhodes, Richard L.
Envoyé : 16 juillet 2014 11:08
À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Objet : [ADSM-L] TSM server appears to hang

Hi Everyone,

The past couple of days we're had a strange problem with one of our TSM 
instances (v6.2.5).  At times it appears to hang.

Last night (and the previous night) it had many servers that got a dozen or 
more sessions.  This is really strange!  This morning as I was looking at this, 
cmds like q vol and q stgpool hang - no response!  Commands like q node 
and q proc work.  The server was doing very little I/O.  All of a sudden the 
hung cmds all ran through and the server I/O jumped to 200-400MB/s.  Something 
was locking I/O.  I think the many sessions are clients that retry because the 
server is not responding.

In the TSM actlog there are no unusual messages about the time it un-stuck.  
The only strange entry in the actlog is a ANRD with lockwait error early 
the previous evening.There are no AIX errors.

Any thought?

Rick






-

The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and 
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.

--


Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y 
est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; 
il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. 
Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout 
examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de 
ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous 
n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur 
par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre 
système. Merci.


-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and 
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.


Re: TSM server appears to hang

2014-07-16 Thread David Bronder
Rick,

Take a look at APARs IC99934  IT02590 (though supposedly only IT02590
applies to 6.2).  Two different issues with similar symptoms; it took close
to 7 months to get both issues identified.  There are still no patch or
maintenance releases with the fixes yet.  If your symptoms seem to match one
of those APARs, you'll need to open a case with support to get a developer
build of your server version with the fix(es) applied.  (If one of these
issues is what you hit, you were quite lucky that the server recovered on its
own!  I had to halt or externally kill the server almost every time.)

=Dave


On 07/16/2014 10:07 AM, Rhodes, Richard L. wrote:
 Hi Everyone,

 The past couple of days we're had a strange problem with one of our TSM 
 instances (v6.2.5).  At times it appears to hang.

 Last night (and the previous night) it had many servers that got a dozen or 
 more sessions.  This is really strange!  This morning as I was looking at 
 this, cmds like q vol and q stgpool hang - no response!  Commands like q 
 node and q proc work.  The server was doing very little I/O.  All of a 
 sudden the hung cmds all ran through and the server I/O jumped to 
 200-400MB/s.  Something was locking I/O.  I think the many sessions are 
 clients that retry because the server is not responding.

 In the TSM actlog there are no unusual messages about the time it un-stuck.  
 The only strange entry in the actlog is a ANRD with lockwait error early 
 the previous evening.There are no AIX errors.

 Any thought?

 Rick

--
Hello World.David Bronder - Systems Architect
Segmentation Fault  ITS-EI, Univ. of Iowa
Core dumped, disk trashed, quota filled, soda warm.   david-bron...@uiowa.edu


Re: TSM server appears to hang

2014-07-16 Thread Mitchell, Ruth Slovik
Hi Rick,

Have you tried pinpointing the problem using some of the show commands? I'd 
take a look at:

show resq  (to see if there are any waiters)

Try to correlate a particular session with the problem using the following:
show threads
show locks
show txnt

(I believe those are fairly well discussed in past threads on this list.)

Check what's going on on the DB2 side. In most cases you'll need to be the 
instance owner. Here are a few things to check, but I'm sure it's not 
exhaustive:

-Look at the db2diag.log for errors and warnings.
-Use 'db2pd -d yourdbname -utilities' and 'db2pd -d yourdbname -reorg' to see 
if you have any runstats or reorgs running; the output will show the state of 
anything out there.
-Use 'db2top -d yourdbname' , particularly using the 'B' option to view 
bottlenecks, and the 'U' option to see locks.

There's some reasonable  documentation on the db2 commands in the Knowledge 
Center:

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEPGG_9.8.0/com.ibm.db2.luw.admin.trb.doc/doc/c0054595.html?lang=en

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEPGG_9.8.0/com.ibm.db2.luw.admin.cmd.doc/doc/r0025222.html?lang=en


HTH,
Ruth Mitchell
U of I, Urbana

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Rhodes, Richard L.
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 10:08 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM server appears to hang

Hi Everyone,

The past couple of days we're had a strange problem with one of our TSM 
instances (v6.2.5).  At times it appears to hang.

Last night (and the previous night) it had many servers that got a dozen or 
more sessions.  This is really strange!  This morning as I was looking at this, 
cmds like q vol and q stgpool hang - no response!  Commands like q node 
and q proc work.  The server was doing very little I/O.  All of a sudden the 
hung cmds all ran through and the server I/O jumped to 200-400MB/s.  Something 
was locking I/O.  I think the many sessions are clients that retry because the 
server is not responding.

In the TSM actlog there are no unusual messages about the time it un-stuck.  
The only strange entry in the actlog is a ANRD with lockwait error early 
the previous evening.There are no AIX errors.

Any thought?

Rick






-

The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and 
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.


Odpověď: [ADSM-L] TSM server appears to hang

2014-07-16 Thread Josef Hlaves
Hello, 
seems like I have been facing the same experience with one of my TSM 
server (v.6.2.5).  I have been quite lucky until now because the server 
has recovered on its own. I opened a case  in this matter with support a 
few month ago. I was told to focus on setting a time window for reorg 
activity. 
Their recommendation: 
Please find the day of time when the server is not under a heavy 
workload, if some processes are running it is not a problem. Avoid the 
time period expire or reclamation.
I haven’t  done it, yet. The server in question is busy all day long every 
day.
Josef




Od: Rhodes, Richard L. rrho...@firstenergycorp.com
Komu:   ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Datum:  16.07.2014 17:08
Předmět:[ADSM-L] TSM server appears to hang
Odeslal:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU



Hi Everyone,

The past couple of days we're had a strange problem with one of our TSM 
instances (v6.2.5).  At times it appears to hang.

Last night (and the previous night) it had many servers that got a dozen 
or more sessions.  This is really strange!  This morning as I was looking 
at this, cmds like q vol and q stgpool hang - no response!  Commands 
like q node and q proc work.  The server was doing very little I/O. 
All of a sudden the hung cmds all ran through and the server I/O jumped to 
200-400MB/s.  Something was locking I/O.  I think the many sessions are 
clients that retry because the server is not responding.

In the TSM actlog there are no unusual messages about the time it 
un-stuck.  The only strange entry in the actlog is a ANRD with 
lockwait error early the previous evening.There are no AIX errors.

Any thought?

Rick






-

The information contained in this message is intended only for the 
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the 
reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent 
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that you have received this document in error and that any 
review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 
please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.




Re: TSM server appears to hang

2014-07-16 Thread Rhodes, Richard L.
We will be looking at all these things.  Right now we did the normal 
shutdown/reboot just to be sure (not sure of what!).

Rick



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Mitchell, Ruth Slovik
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 11:34 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM server appears to hang

Hi Rick,

Have you tried pinpointing the problem using some of the show commands? I'd 
take a look at:

show resq  (to see if there are any waiters)

Try to correlate a particular session with the problem using the following:
show threads
show locks
show txnt

(I believe those are fairly well discussed in past threads on this list.)

Check what's going on on the DB2 side. In most cases you'll need to be the 
instance owner. Here are a few things to check, but I'm sure it's not 
exhaustive:

-Look at the db2diag.log for errors and warnings.
-Use 'db2pd -d yourdbname -utilities' and 'db2pd -d yourdbname -reorg' to see 
if you have any runstats or reorgs running; the output will show the state of 
anything out there.
-Use 'db2top -d yourdbname' , particularly using the 'B' option to view 
bottlenecks, and the 'U' option to see locks.

There's some reasonable  documentation on the db2 commands in the Knowledge 
Center:

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEPGG_9.8.0/com.ibm.db2.luw.admin.trb.doc/doc/c0054595.html?lang=en

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEPGG_9.8.0/com.ibm.db2.luw.admin.cmd.doc/doc/r0025222.html?lang=en


HTH,
Ruth Mitchell
U of I, Urbana

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Rhodes, Richard L.
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 10:08 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM server appears to hang

Hi Everyone,

The past couple of days we're had a strange problem with one of our TSM 
instances (v6.2.5).  At times it appears to hang.

Last night (and the previous night) it had many servers that got a dozen or 
more sessions.  This is really strange!  This morning as I was looking at this, 
cmds like q vol and q stgpool hang - no response!  Commands like q node 
and q proc work.  The server was doing very little I/O.  All of a sudden the 
hung cmds all ran through and the server I/O jumped to 200-400MB/s.  Something 
was locking I/O.  I think the many sessions are clients that retry because the 
server is not responding.

In the TSM actlog there are no unusual messages about the time it un-stuck.  
The only strange entry in the actlog is a ANRD with lockwait error early 
the previous evening.There are no AIX errors.

Any thought?

Rick






-

The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and 
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.


-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and 
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.


Windows 2012 native Dedupe

2014-07-16 Thread Rick Adamson
Anyone backing up a Win2012 system that is using its native deduplication ?

I took a quick scan of the BA client doc (7.1) and did not see any mention of 
it.

Any information/feedback/references would be appreciated.

Thanks

Rick Adamson


Re: Windows 2012 native Dedupe

2014-07-16 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Hi Rick,

You can use the backup-archive client to back up files on volumes that are
deduplicated by Windows. The files are backed up in their rehydrated
(non-deduplicated) state. (Note: The files are not rehydrated on the
volume, but the rehydration occurs transparently as the file is read by TSM
for backup.)

During restore, the volume will need to have enough space to contain the
non-deduplicated files until Windows can re-deduplicate them.

TSM 6.4 client users will want to make sure they have the fix for IC92388
(6.4.1 or later) installed. This APAR does not occur in 7.1.

Best regards,

- Andy



Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead |
stor...@us.ibm.com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links:
Product support:
http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager

Online documentation:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
+Documentation+Central/page/Tivoli+Storage+Manager
Product Wiki:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
+Storage+Manager/page/Home

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu wrote on 2014-07-16
16:30:33:

 From: Rick Adamson rickadam...@biloholdings.com
 To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
 Date: 2014-07-16 16:31
 Subject: Windows 2012 native Dedupe
 Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu

 Anyone backing up a Win2012 system that is using its native
deduplication ?

 I took a quick scan of the BA client doc (7.1) and did not see any
 mention of it.

 Any information/feedback/references would be appreciated.

 Thanks

 Rick Adamson


Re: TSM server appears to hang

2014-07-16 Thread Matthew McGeary
We're having the exact same problem, have been for quite a few months now.
 It occurred on 6.3.4.100 and 7.1.  Running on AIX 6.1 TL7 SP6 hosted on a
P740.  It gets so bad on ours that I'll have to halt the dsmserv process,
perform a db2stop force and then restart TSM.  Because it happens at
random times and is totally infrequent, I've written a quick and dirty
script to make sure that TSM is running and to do the shutdown/restart if
the non-responsive behaviour kicks in again.

I don't have a solution for you but we've been all the way up the
developer chain without much success.  What hardware are you running your
server on?

Matthew McGeary
Technical Specialist
PotashCorp - Saskatoon
306.933.8921



From:   Rhodes, Richard L. rrho...@firstenergycorp.com
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:   07/16/2014 09:08 AM
Subject:[ADSM-L] TSM server appears to hang
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU



Hi Everyone,

The past couple of days we're had a strange problem with one of our TSM
instances (v6.2.5).  At times it appears to hang.

Last night (and the previous night) it had many servers that got a dozen
or more sessions.  This is really strange!  This morning as I was looking
at this, cmds like q vol and q stgpool hang - no response!  Commands
like q node and q proc work.  The server was doing very little I/O.
All of a sudden the hung cmds all ran through and the server I/O jumped to
200-400MB/s.  Something was locking I/O.  I think the many sessions are
clients that retry because the server is not responding.

In the TSM actlog there are no unusual messages about the time it
un-stuck.  The only strange entry in the actlog is a ANRD with
lockwait error early the previous evening.There are no AIX errors.

Any thought?

Rick






-

The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this document in error and that any
review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.


Re: Question about NDMP and TSM.

2014-07-16 Thread Prather, Wanda
Interesting point about NDMP and dedup.
Do you have any experience with it?  What kind of dedup ratios did you see?


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Steven 
Harris
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:48 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Question about NDMP and TSM.

And as a bonus, ndmp storage pools cannot be reclaimed and this means that they 
hold tapes until the last data has expired.  TSM format storage pools can be 
reclaimed, and if they are file storage pools can be deduped as well.


Regards

Steve

Steven Harris
TSM Admin
Canberra Australia



On 16 July 2014 05:38, Ron Delaware ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com wrote:

 Ricky,

 The configuration that you are referring to is what could be 
 considered the 'Traditional' implementation of NDMP.  As you have 
 found for yourself, there are a number of restrictions on how the data can be 
 managed though.

 If you configure the NDMP environment so that a Tivoli Storage Manager 
 controls the data flow instead of the NetApp Appliance, you have more 
 options


 This configuration will allow you backup up to TSM storage pools 
 (Disk, VTL, Tape), send copies offsite, because the TSM Server 
 controls the destination.  You have the option to use a traditional 
 TSM Client utilizing the NDMP protocol or have the TSM server perform 
 the backup and restores using the BACKUP NODE and RESTORE NODE 
 commands. It a table of contents storage pool (disk based only highly 
 recommended) you can perform single file restores.  you can also 
 create virtual filespace pointers to your vfiler that will allow you 
 to run simultaneous backups of the vfiler, that could shorten your backup and 
 restore times.





 Best Regards,

 _
 * Ronald C. Delaware*
 IBM Level 2 - IT Plus Certified Specialist – Expert IBM Corporation | 
 Tivoli Software IBM Certified Solutions Advisor - Tivoli Storage IBM 
 Certified Deployment Professional Butterfly Solutions Professional
 916-458-5726 (Office
 925-457-9221 (cell phone)

 email: *ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com* ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com *Storage 
 Services Offerings* 
 http://www-01.ibm.com/software/tivoli/services/consulting/offers-stor
 age-optimization.html





 From:Schneider, Jim jschnei...@ussco.com
 To:ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
 Date:07/15/2014 12:19 PM
 Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] Question about NDMP and TSM.
 Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
 --



 Ricky,

 The Isilon uses the OneFS file system and TSM views it as one huge 
 file system.  If backing up to disk, TSM will attempt to preallocate 
 enough space to back up the entire allocated space on the Isilon. 
 Defining Virtual File systems will not help because directory quota 
 information is not passed to TSM, and TSM only sees the total allocated space.

 We were able to back up the Isilon to disk when we started on a test 
 system with little data on it, around 25 GB.  When we attempted to 
 implement the same backups on a second, well-populated Isilon we ran 
 into the space allocation problem.

 When backing up to tape, TSM assumes you have unlimited storage 
 available and is able to run VFS backups.  We use Virtual File Space 
 Mapping (VFS) and back up to tape.

 Refer to EMC SR#4646, TSM PMR 23808,122,000.

 Jim Schneider
 United Stationers

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 
 ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Plair, Ricky
 Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 1:21 PM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: [ADSM-L] Question about NDMP and TSM.

 I have been asked to look into backing up our EMC Isilon using our TSM 
 server.

 Everything I read,  seems to point to backing this NDMP device to tape.

 Problem is, we do not use tape to backup production.

 I have researched and found a few articles about backing the NDMP 
 device to tape but, there seem to be more cons than pros.

 Is there anybody backing up a NDMP device to disk that can give me 
 some pros and,  how they are using disk for this task.


 I appreciate your time!



 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
 _ _ _ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any 
 attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
 contain confidential and privileged information and/or Protected 
 Health Information (PHI) subject to protection under the law, 
 including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 
 1996, as amended (HIPAA). If you are not the intended recipient or the 
 person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, 
 be advised that you have received this email in error and that any 
 use, disclosure, distribution, forwarding, printing, or copying of 
 this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in 
 error, please notify the sender 

Re: Question about NDMP and TSM.

2014-07-16 Thread Ron Delaware
Wanda,

this document will give a bit of insight to deduped NAS data.

http://www-05.ibm.com/de/events/breakfast/pdf/TSM_Dedup_Best_Practices_v1_0.pdf


 
Best Regards,
_
Ronald C. Delaware
IBM Level 2 - IT Plus Certified Specialist – Expert
IBM Corporation | Tivoli Software
IBM Certified Solutions Advisor - Tivoli Storage
IBM Certified Deployment Professional
Butterfly Solutions Professional
916-458-5726 (Office
925-457-9221 (cell phone)
email: ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com
Storage Services Offerings


 



From:   Prather, Wanda wanda.prat...@icfi.com
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Date:   07/16/2014 07:53 PM
Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] Question about NDMP and TSM.
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu



Interesting point about NDMP and dedup.
Do you have any experience with it?  What kind of dedup ratios did you 
see?


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Steven Harris
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:48 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Question about NDMP and TSM.

And as a bonus, ndmp storage pools cannot be reclaimed and this means that 
they hold tapes until the last data has expired.  TSM format storage pools 
can be reclaimed, and if they are file storage pools can be deduped as 
well.


Regards

Steve

Steven Harris
TSM Admin
Canberra Australia



On 16 July 2014 05:38, Ron Delaware ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com wrote:

 Ricky,

 The configuration that you are referring to is what could be 
 considered the 'Traditional' implementation of NDMP.  As you have 
 found for yourself, there are a number of restrictions on how the data 
can be managed though.

 If you configure the NDMP environment so that a Tivoli Storage Manager 
 controls the data flow instead of the NetApp Appliance, you have more 
 options


 This configuration will allow you backup up to TSM storage pools 
 (Disk, VTL, Tape), send copies offsite, because the TSM Server 
 controls the destination.  You have the option to use a traditional 
 TSM Client utilizing the NDMP protocol or have the TSM server perform 
 the backup and restores using the BACKUP NODE and RESTORE NODE 
 commands. It a table of contents storage pool (disk based only highly 
 recommended) you can perform single file restores.  you can also 
 create virtual filespace pointers to your vfiler that will allow you 
 to run simultaneous backups of the vfiler, that could shorten your 
backup and restore times.





 Best Regards,

 _
 * Ronald C. Delaware*
 IBM Level 2 - IT Plus Certified Specialist – Expert IBM Corporation | 
 Tivoli Software IBM Certified Solutions Advisor - Tivoli Storage IBM 
 Certified Deployment Professional Butterfly Solutions Professional
 916-458-5726 (Office
 925-457-9221 (cell phone)

 email: *ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com* ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com *Storage 
 Services Offerings* 
 http://www-01.ibm.com/software/tivoli/services/consulting/offers-stor
 age-optimization.html





 From:Schneider, Jim jschnei...@ussco.com
 To:ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
 Date:07/15/2014 12:19 PM
 Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] Question about NDMP and TSM.
 Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
 --



 Ricky,

 The Isilon uses the OneFS file system and TSM views it as one huge 
 file system.  If backing up to disk, TSM will attempt to preallocate 
 enough space to back up the entire allocated space on the Isilon. 
 Defining Virtual File systems will not help because directory quota 
 information is not passed to TSM, and TSM only sees the total allocated 
space.

 We were able to back up the Isilon to disk when we started on a test 
 system with little data on it, around 25 GB.  When we attempted to 
 implement the same backups on a second, well-populated Isilon we ran 
 into the space allocation problem.

 When backing up to tape, TSM assumes you have unlimited storage 
 available and is able to run VFS backups.  We use Virtual File Space 
 Mapping (VFS) and back up to tape.

 Refer to EMC SR#4646, TSM PMR 23808,122,000.

 Jim Schneider
 United Stationers

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 
 ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Plair, Ricky
 Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 1:21 PM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: [ADSM-L] Question about NDMP and TSM.

 I have been asked to look into backing up our EMC Isilon using our TSM 
 server.

 Everything I read,  seems to point to backing this NDMP device to tape.

 Problem is, we do not use tape to backup production.

 I have researched and found a few articles about backing the NDMP 
 device to tape but, there seem to be more cons than pros.

 Is there anybody backing up a NDMP device to disk that can give me 
 some pros and,  how they are using disk for this task.


 I appreciate your time!



 _ _ _ _ _ _