Re: internal server error detected
Hi Eric, Is the Max Mount point high enough on the node definition ? If concurrent QVIPNBDORA01_02-ORC sessions run at the same time. Pierre Billaudeau Administrateur de stockage Livraison des infra serveurs -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM Envoyé : 31 janvier 2017 09:48 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] internal server error detected Hi Sasa (and all others who responded)! The issue seems to be on the Storage Agent side, all other clients and the server itself operate normally. So no errors are seen in the DB2 log. The STA was stopped and started, but to no avail. Everything was working fine on this client until this morning... On the server all drives and paths are online. The paths defined for the STA are also online. We have 1300 scratch tapes available in the library... I'm lost. Kind regards, Eric van Loon Air France/KLM Storage Engineering -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Sasa Drnjevic Sent: dinsdag 31 januari 2017 14:03 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: internal server error detected This log is almost always helpful: /home/instance_owner/sqllib/db2dump/db2diag.0.log Or it could be rotated into db2diag.n.log in the same directory. Regards, -- Sasa Drnjevic www.srce.unizg.hr On 31.1.2017. 13:56, Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM wrote: > Hi guys! > I have an Oracle client which backup failed with the following error in the > tdpoerror.log: > > 01/31/2017 09:08:35 ANS0278S The transaction will be aborted. > 01/31/2017 09:08:35 ANS0278S The transaction will be aborted. > 01/31/2017 09:08:35 TID<19506> ==> ANS0278S (RC157) The transaction will be > aborted. > 01/31/2017 09:08:35 ANS1312E Server media mount not possible > 01/31/2017 09:08:35 ANS1312E Server media mount not possible > 1/31/2017 09:08:35 TID<19506> ==> ANS1312E (RC12) Server media mount not > possible > > The TSM server shows the following error: > > 01/31/2017 09:08:32 ANR0530W Transaction failed for session 9302740 for node > QVIPNBDORA01_02-ORC (TDPO Linux86-64) - internal server error detected. > (SESSION: 9302740) > 01/31/2017 09:08:35 ANR0525W (Session: 7358241, Origin: QVIPNBDORA01) > Transaction failed for session 277695 for node QVIPNBDORA01_02-ORC (TDPO > Linux86-64) - storage media inaccessible. (SESSION: 7358241) > > The Oracle client is backing up through a storage agent and the 'internal > server error' seems to cause the scratch tape mount to fail which results in > the 'storage media inaccessible' message. Does anybody have an idea where to > look for the cause of the 'internal server error'? > Thanks for any help in advance! > Kind regards, > Eric van Loon > Air France/KLM Storage Engineering > > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential > and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the > addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may > be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to > this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you > have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by > return e-mail, and delete this message. > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its > employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of > this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch > Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered > number 33014286 > > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286
Re: client restore got ANS4035W - files unavailable
Hi Rick, This could be caused by a client-server version problem : http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IT15117 Pierre Billaudeau Administrateur de stockage Livraison des infra serveurs -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Rhodes, Richard L. Envoyé : 13 janvier 2017 09:17 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : [ADSM-L] client restore got ANS4035W - files unavailable Hi, Last night a DBA tried to do a restore of some files. He get returned 01/12/17 22:01:07 ANS4035W File 'xxx' currently unavailable on server. The client data is on tape. The tape drives and library are handled by a separate dedicated library manager instance. I see: on tsm server the client restore session the sessions to the library mgr instance (I think) on lib mgr the session which I believe would be for the mount (I think) on tsm server ANS4025 errors for all files for the restore Nowhere is there any indication of WHY the files are unavailable. Nowhere is there any indication of what volume(s) were trying to be used. I checked: there were tape drives free in the library all tape volumes are read/write or read-only no tape errors or hdwr errors Q) Any thoughts on why the files would be unavailable? Q) How can you tell specific volumes are needed for a client restore? The only thing I can think of is that the volumes are unavailable, but I can't figure out what volumes it wanted to use. Rick -The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message. -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit, à moins d'avoir obtenu le consentement du destinataire. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: Reg: datamover sessions hung for tsm/ve backups
We had a similar situation and we resolved it by halting and restarting TSM server. TSM/VE were taking longer and longer to complete and some Datamovers were hanging. Pierre Billaudeau SAQ -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Tom Alverson Envoyé : 5 juillet 2016 09:40 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] Reg: datamover sessions hung for tsm/ve backups Does anyone have a resolution for this yet? I have a PMR open with a level 2 tech and so far all he has said was to update VMware tools to 10.0.9. I did that on the datamovers which did not help at all. I am trying to get our VM team to update the VM's but that is a very slow process since they would all need to be rebooted. Last night half of our datamovers crashed with this error. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Tom Alversonwrote: > I am getting this error on three different TSM for VE VBS servers today. > Waiting 60 minutes for each VM is causing the schedule to run into the > next days schedule (the job runs for over 24 hours). I have to stop > and restart the service to snap it out of this mode and hope the next backup > runs OK. > > Tom > > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Srikanth Kola23 > wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> I am facing tsm/ve backups hung over some couple of weeks which is >> requiring manual intervention to reboot the datamover server then >> only I am able to get the backup sessions running fine. >> >> share your experience and fixes if any you come across for this issue >> >> tsm/ve version 7140 >> platform windows 2012 >> tsm server version 7.1.4.100 >> >> I do not find any errors in error log for the hungs when we had >> traces enabled so disabled them then the error log saying as below >> error.VE_POK11DM3.log >> 03/26/2016 22:29:37 ANS1717E A VMware vStorage web service task failed. >> 03/26/2016 23:07:17 ANS0361I DIAG: The VDDK Utility Thread may be >> hung processing another request. >> 03/26/2016 23:07:17 ANS0361I DIAG: Waiting up to another 360 >> milliseconds to process a request to VddkFullVMCloseVMDKs for vm >> 'pokcsmeta01'. >> 03/26/2016 23:07:24 ANS0361I DIAG: The VDDK Utility Thread may be >> hung processing another request. >> 03/26/2016 23:07:24 ANS0361I DIAG: Waiting up to another 360 >> milliseconds to process a request to VddkFullVMOpenCloseSingleVMDK >> for vm 'POKCBSAPAP62'. >> 03/26/2016 23:27:58 ANS0361I DIAG: The VDDK Utility Thread may be >> hung processing another request. >> 03/26/2016 23:27:58 ANS0361I DIAG: Waiting up to another 360 >> milliseconds to process a request to VddkFullVMCloseVMDKs for vm >> 'pokcsmetvm01'. >> 03/26/2016 23:28:20 ANS0361I DIAG: The VDDK Utility Thread may be >> hung processing another request. >> 03/26/2016 23:28:20 ANS0361I DIAG: Waiting up to another 360 >> milliseconds to process a request to VddkFullVMOpenCloseSingleVMDK >> for vm 'pokcdmetvm01'. >> 03/26/2016 23:28:25 ANS0361I DIAG: The VDDK Utility Thread may be >> hung processing another request. >> 03/26/2016 23:28:25 ANS0361I DIAG: Waiting up to another 360 >> milliseconds to process a request to VddkFullVMOpenCloseSingleVMDK >> for vm 'POKCDSAPAP31'. >> 03/26/2016 23:29:37 ANS0361I DIAG: The VDDK Utility Thread may be >> hung processing another request. >> 03/26/2016 23:29:37 ANS0361I DIAG: Waiting up to another 360 >> milliseconds to process a request to VddkFullVMCloseVMDKs for vm >> 'pokctcvs01'. >> 03/27/2016 00:07:17 ANS0361I DIAG: The VDDK Utility Thread may be >> hung processing another request. >> >> Thanks & Regards, >> >> *Srikanth kola* >> Backup & Recovery >> IBMIndiaPvt Ltd, Bangalore >> Mobile: +91 9885473450 >> > > -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit, à moins d'avoir obtenu le consentement du destinataire. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: DP Exchange Mailbox Restore
Yes , I realize those restores can only be done one at the time. The PMR I opened also confirms that. Thanks Del Pierre -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Del Hoobler Envoyé : 14 mars 2016 17:53 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] DP Exchange Mailbox Restore This is not possible concurrently using the same Exchange Server. You would need to perform the concurrent restore on a different Exchange Server or do them sequentially. Thank you, Del --- "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 03/14/2016 07:42:46 AM: > From: "Billaudeau, Pierre" <p.billaud...@saq.qc.ca> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 03/14/2016 07:43 AM > Subject: DP Exchange Mailbox Restore > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> > > Hi, > I know it is possible to restore multiple mailboxes > at the same time (within the same GUI interface command) but is it > possible to restore one specific mailbox at different dates > simultaneously (or at least conccurently). I tested two restores of > the same mailbox at 2 different dates and the second restore rapidly > failed. Looks like one cannot run 2 simultaneous restores from the > same Exchange DB (TSMRDB). Anyone has a solution to bypass this limitation ? > > Thanks, > Pierre Billaudeau > Administrateur de stockage > Livraison des infra serveurs > Tél : 514-254-6000 poste 6559 > > > -- -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit, à moins d'avoir obtenu le consentement du destinataire. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
DP Exchange Mailbox Restore
Hi, I know it is possible to restore multiple mailboxes at the same time (within the same GUI interface command) but is it possible to restore one specific mailbox at different dates simultaneously (or at least conccurently). I tested two restores of the same mailbox at 2 different dates and the second restore rapidly failed. Looks like one cannot run 2 simultaneous restores from the same Exchange DB (TSMRDB). Anyone has a solution to bypass this limitation ? Thanks, Pierre Billaudeau Administrateur de stockage Livraison des infra serveurs Tél : 514-254-6000 poste 6559 -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit, à moins d'avoir obtenu le consentement du destinataire. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: Bring back TSM Administrator's Guide
I fully agree !!! Pierre Billaudeau Admin stockage SAQ -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Roger Deschner Envoyé : 11 décembre 2015 20:39 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : [ADSM-L] Bring back TSM Administrator's Guide A great book is gone. The TSM Administrator's Guide has been obsoleted as of v7.1.3. Its priceless collection of how-to information has been scattered to the winds, which basically means it is lost. A pity, because this book had been a model of complete, well-organized, documentation. The "Solution Guides" are suitable only for planning a new TSM installation, and do not address existing TSM sites. Furthermore, they are much too narrow, and do not cover real-world existing TSM customers. For instance, we use a blended disk and tape solution (D2D2D2T) to create a good working compromise between faster restore and storage cost. Following links to topics in the online Information Center is a haphazard process at best, which is never repeatable. There is no Index or Table of Contents for the online doc - so you cannot even see what information is there. Unless you actually log in, there is no way to even leave a "trail of breadcrumbs". Browser bookmarks are useless here, due to IBM's habit of changing URLs frequently. This is an extremely inefficient use of my time in finding out how to do something in TSM. Search is not an acceptable replacement for good organization. Search is necessary, but it cannot stand alone. Building a "collection" is not an answer to this requirement. It still lacks a coherent Index or Table of Contents, so once my collection gets sizeable, it is also unuseable. And with each successive version, I will be required to rebuild my collection from scratch all over again. Despite the fact that it had become fairly large, I humbly ask that the Administrator's Guide be published again, as a single PDF, in v7.1.4. Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu ==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.= -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit, à moins d'avoir obtenu le consentement du destinataire. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: TDP4VE: How to delete old backups of excluded volumes
Hi Andreas, If your setup is like ours : One node which correspond to your Vcenter and 1 filespace per VM , you don't have the granularity to delete a specific drive within the filespace (1 per VM). You will have to wait expiration of older versions before you see some benefits in space usage. Pierre -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Francisco Javier Envoyé : 9 octobre 2015 10:37 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] TDP4VE: How to delete old backups of excluded volumes Use delete filespace ... best regards =) 2015-10-09 7:10 GMT-05:00 Andreas Boesler: > Hello, > > environment is windows with tsm 7.1.1.100 > > We do backups of vmware systems (IFIncremental). Now we want to > exclude some disks/volumes (D:, E:). > We also want to delete the old backups of this volumes to get free > space in the file device. > How to delete old backups of excluded vmware volumes? > Are there any tips or experience? > > Thanks for your help. > > Andreas > -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit, à moins d'avoir obtenu le consentement du destinataire. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: Upgrading BACLIENT to 7.1.2.2 broke TSM for VE ???
Hi Tom, It looks like you are not connecting to the Vcenter. You can reset your Vcenter user password and try again. Pierre Billaudeau Administrateur de stockage Livraison des infra serveurs SAQ -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Tom Alverson Envoyé : 28 juillet 2015 13:28 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : [ADSM-L] Upgrading BACLIENT to 7.1.2.2 broke TSM for VE ??? I had a backup issue with one particular VM (ANS9921E and ANS9919E) which I thought might be fixed (per a KB article) by upgrading the BACLIENT from 7.1.1.0 to 7.1.2.2. Not only did this not fix the issue but now when I run the GUI and click the + to expand the list of VM's to back up I get this error: ANS1403E Error loading a required library: vixDiskLib.dll, Win32 rc=126 DLL and ANS9266E Failure initializing virtual machine environment. Can not find vcbMounter.exe command RC=-303 So next I upgraded TSM for VE from 7.1.1.0 to 7.1.2.0 but I still get the same error. I searched the entire disk for vcbMounter.exe but could not find it. I then searched the entire disk of a different VBS server that was still working and did not find that command either. Does anyone know how to resolve this? I asked someone on our backup team to open a ticket with IBM but I would like to fix what I have broken quickly if possible before a ton of backup failure tickets are created tonight when this backup does not work. Tom -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit, à moins d'avoir obtenu le consentement du destinataire. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: Upgrading BACLIENT to 7.1.2.2 broke TSM for VE ???
Hi , After upgrading to VSPhere 6.0, we had to upgrade TSm client from 7.1.1 to 7.1.2 and also have those 3 patches installed on VSPhere 6.0: 2116126 2116127 2116129 They all are related to backup and CBT operations. Pierre -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Gee, Norman Envoyé : 28 juillet 2015 13:52 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrading BACLIENT to 7.1.2.2 broke TSM for VE ??? I have just upgraded one of my servers from 7.1.1 to 7.1.2.2 because of the support needed for VSphere 6.0 and I am experiencing some of the same problems. I have open a PMR with IBM on this. I was attempting the backups manually with Dsmc -asnode=datacenter Backup vm a -vmbackuptype=fullvm It appears to backup but does not. It gave messages that hinted it did backup, but no statistical messages. I also try Dsmc -nodename=datacenter Backup vm a -vmbackuptype=fullvm It does backup, but this is not the correct way. I am waiting for IBM for an answer on this. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom Alverson Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 10:41 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Upgrading BACLIENT to 7.1.2.2 broke TSM for VE ??? I saw that article and already had tried that. I think I may have fixed it. I found in swg21580462 a hint that you may need to do a custom install of the BACLIENT and enable the VMWare Backup Tools option to fix the issue. In 7.1.2.2 there is nothing called VMware Backup Tools but there was another VMware option that was not enabled and now that I have added that feature I am able to expand the list of VM's to backup in the GUI. I will try a backup next and hopefully it will work (any maybe even fix my original problem) Thanks for your input! Tom On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Billaudeau, Pierre p.billaud...@saq.qc.ca wrote: Hi Tom, It looks like you are not connecting to the Vcenter. You can reset your Vcenter user password and try again. Pierre Billaudeau Administrateur de stockage Livraison des infra serveurs SAQ -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Tom Alverson Envoyé : 28 juillet 2015 13:28 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : [ADSM-L] Upgrading BACLIENT to 7.1.2.2 broke TSM for VE ??? I had a backup issue with one particular VM (ANS9921E and ANS9919E) which I thought might be fixed (per a KB article) by upgrading the BACLIENT from 7.1.1.0 to 7.1.2.2. Not only did this not fix the issue but now when I run the GUI and click the + to expand the list of VM's to back up I get this error: ANS1403E Error loading a required library: vixDiskLib.dll, Win32 rc=126 DLL and ANS9266E Failure initializing virtual machine environment. Can not find vcbMounter.exe command RC=-303 So next I upgraded TSM for VE from 7.1.1.0 to 7.1.2.0 but I still get the same error. I searched the entire disk for vcbMounter.exe but could not find it. I then searched the entire disk of a different VBS server that was still working and did not find that command either. Does anyone know how to resolve this? I asked someone on our backup team to open a ticket with IBM but I would like to fix what I have broken quickly if possible before a ton of backup failure tickets are created tonight when this backup does not work. Tom -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit, à moins d'avoir obtenu le consentement du destinataire. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci. -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit, à moins d'avoir obtenu le consentement du destinataire. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: How to tell what VM's are running backup in TSM for VE 7.1?
Hi Steve, As for what has completed, you can run this script (adapt date and time): select SUB_ENTITY,DATE(START_TIME) as DATE,TIME(START_TIME) as START,TIME(END_TIME) as END,ENTITY as DataMover,AS_ENTITY as DataCenter,AFFECTED as NB_VMDK,BYTES/1048576 as MB,SUCCESSFUL from SUMMARY_EXTENDED where ACTIVITY='BACKUP' and ACTIVITY_DETAILS='VMware' and SUCCESSFUL='YES' AND START_TIME between '2015-04-23 06:00:35' and '2015-04-24 06:00:34' order by start_time Pierre Billaudeau Administrateur stockage Équipe livraison des infrastructures serveurs -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Schaub, Steve Envoyé : 23 avril 2015 16:22 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : [ADSM-L] How to tell what VM's are running backup in TSM for VE 7.1? Running into some issues troubleshooting VE backups and hopefully I just don't know where to look. I came in this morning and was surprised to find that one of my datamovers was still running a schedule. There were 2 sessions in TSM, but of course they were using the datacenter name so I had no idea what was running, or what was still waiting to run. So what do I use to gain visibility into a running VE schedule? I want to know: 1. What is running 2. What has completed 3. What is waiting to run I tried deciphering it from dsmsched.log, but gave up looking for those needles in that haystack. I also went to the VE web UI hoping reports/recent tasks would help, but nothing showed up there. Surely there is some easy way to do this simple task that I have overlooked in the manual? Steve Schaub Systems Engineer II, Backup/Recovery Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee - Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail disclaimer: http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit, à moins d'avoir obtenu le consentement du destinataire. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: Aw: Re: [ADSM-L] Exchange Backup with Flashcopy Manager EXTREMELY slow
Hi John, I had a similar situation with Exchange 2010 TSM DP backups and the reason was the VM had been Vmotioned from one ESX to another. Lan speed went from 1Gbs to 100Gbs. You might want to check this. Pierre Billaudeau Administrateur stockage -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Jeanne Bruno Envoyé : 23 février 2015 15:43 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] Aw: Re: [ADSM-L] Exchange Backup with Flashcopy Manager EXTREMELY slow Hello. we skip integrity check as well. Backups stored on a DS3512 device -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of John Keyes Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 2:47 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Aw: Re: [ADSM-L] Exchange Backup with Flashcopy Manager EXTREMELY slow Thank you Chavdar Cholev and Jeanne Bruno for sharing. I forgot to tell, we do skip the integrity check, and there are only passive Databases on the server. Are your backups going to TSM server or to a local storage? Im interested either way. Best Regards, John Gesendet: Montag, 23. Februar 2015 um 20:20 Uhr Von: Chavdar Cholev chavdar.cho...@gmail.com An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Betreff: Re: [ADSM-L] Exchange Backup with Flashcopy Manager EXTREMELY slow We have ~ 2TB full exchange backup and it takes ~ 20 hours. There is exch db consistency check before backup which takes considerable amount of time. It can be switched off... but it is not recommnded On Monday, 23 February 2015, John Keyes ra...@gmx.net wrote: Hello fellow TSM Admins! I'm struggling with Exchange Backup which over the course of the last few Days (mainly since the last full backup this weekend) takes about 3-4 times as long as before. We have Exchange 2013 DAG with 48 Databases and a dedicaded VM to do the Backups (Flashcopy Manager 4.1.1, Backupdestination=local, on an IBM V7000 Storage). Right now even an incremental backup of 1 database takes ~12 minutes, but the volume is only 30GB big and has only 5GB (5000 x 1MB Files) on it. Two weeks ago this would only take 3 Minutes. A Full backup takes about half an hour (so I couldn't even complete a full backup for every database in one day). I also tried to full-backup the same database twice right after one another, with no difference. This can hardly be normal, can it? Has anyone had the same problems and maybe could point me in the right direction? Also it would be great if anyone could share how much time their backups take... Best regards, John -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: TSM Tape utilization Issue...
Maybe it has something to do with your devclass definition (Device Class Name: DEVCLASS) . How did you define DEVCLASS ? Pierre Billaudeau SAQ, Montreal,qc,cdn -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Grigori Solonovitch Envoyé : 21 janvier 2015 07:06 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Tape utilization Issue... Try to move data volume if number of volumes is not big. Grigori Solonovitch, Senior Systems Architect, IT, Ahli United Bank Kuwait, www.ahliunited.com.kw -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Kiran Sent: 21 01 2015 1:59 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Tape utilization Issue... WE have kept QUIET in dsm.opt and how to go about this issue. Regards, Kiran M -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Erwann SIMON Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 4:22 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Tape utilization Issue... Ok, so I suspect uncommited data due to retries during archive. Check your client log files (if not in QUIET). -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: Kiran ki...@dqentertainment.com À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 21 Janvier 2015 11:50:00 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Tape utilization Issue... Yes. Archive tape directly. Regards, Kiran M -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Erwann SIMON Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 4:17 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Tape utilization Issue... Hello, Are you backing up (or archiving in this cas) to tape directly ? -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: Kiran ki...@dqentertainment.com À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Mercredi 21 Janvier 2015 11:44:42 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Tape utilization Issue... No, Not so. Not only this tape we have some tapes of same sort. I mentioned only a sample Regards, Kiran M -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Grigori Solonovitch Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 4:13 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Tape utilization Issue... Maybe delete archive data? Grigori Solonovitch, Senior Systems Architect, IT, Ahli United Bank Kuwait, www.ahliunited.com.kw -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Kiran Sent: 21 01 2015 1:38 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Tape utilization Issue... We don't have expiration for ARCHIVE data. We have set Retain Version=No limit . Regards, Kiran M -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Grigori Solonovitch Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 4:03 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Tape utilization Issue... Most possible some data has been expired from last write 01/06/2015 22:27:18 and reclamation process not started yet due to volume usage 72.9%. Grigori Solonovitch, Senior Systems Architect, IT, Ahli United Bank Kuwait, www.ahliunited.com.kw -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Kiran Sent: 21 01 2015 1:29 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM Tape utilization Issue... Hi , My TSM is not utilizing tape 100%, its making tape FULL state before it is 100% utilized. Check below is the newly assigned tape to TSM. But still its showing Pct. Reclaimable Space: 27.1. Why?? This is LTO5 Media. Volume Name: 000184L5 Storage Pool Name: ARCHIVE Device Class Name: DEVCLASS Estimated Capacity: 1.6 T Scaled Capacity Applied: Pct Util: 72.9 Volume Status: Full Access: Read/Write Pct. Reclaimable Space: 27.1 Scratch Volume?: No In Error State?: No Number of Writable Sides: 1 Number of Times Mounted: 30 Write Pass Number: 1 Approx. Date Last Written: 01/06/2015 22:27:18 Approx. Date Last Read: 01/08/2015 21:26:55 Date Became Pending: Number of Write Errors: 0 Number of Read Errors: 0 Volume Location: Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No Last Update by (administrator): XXX Last Update Date/Time: 12/22/2014 16:16:15 Begin Reclaim Period: End Reclaim Period: Drive Encryption Key Manager: None Logical Block Protected: No Regards, Kiran M Disclaimer: http://www.dqentertainment.com/e-mail_disclaimer.html Please consider the environment before printing this Email. CONFIDENTIALITY AND WAIVER: The information contained
Re: breaking up tsm for ve backups into different nodes
Hi David, Your primary storagepool has to be Collocate=filespace and I guess the target too if you want multiple threads. Pierre Billaudeau Administrateur stockage Équipe livraison des infrastructures serveurs -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de David Ehresman Envoyé : 16 décembre 2014 15:31 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] breaking up tsm for ve backups into different nodes Update stg STOAGEPOOL_NAME MIGPRocess=XXX where XXX is how many threads you want for your migration process. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee, Gary Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 3:04 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] breaking up tsm for ve backups into different nodes We are backing up our vmware environment (approximately 110 vms), using tsm for ve 6.4.2 tsmserver 6.2.5 under redhat 6.1. The backup destination is disk. Trouble is all data is owned by the datacenter node; consequently, migration has only one stream. I do not currently have enough tape drives to run directly to tape. Is there a solution I have missed? -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: TSM server appears to hang
Hi , AIX 6.1 TL6 and up and AIX 7.1 TL3 and up are known to bring those kind of problems : http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21587513 Pierre Billaudeau -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Matthew McGeary Envoyé : 16 juillet 2014 20:19 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] TSM server appears to hang We're having the exact same problem, have been for quite a few months now. It occurred on 6.3.4.100 and 7.1. Running on AIX 6.1 TL7 SP6 hosted on a P740. It gets so bad on ours that I'll have to halt the dsmserv process, perform a db2stop force and then restart TSM. Because it happens at random times and is totally infrequent, I've written a quick and dirty script to make sure that TSM is running and to do the shutdown/restart if the non-responsive behaviour kicks in again. I don't have a solution for you but we've been all the way up the developer chain without much success. What hardware are you running your server on? Matthew McGeary Technical Specialist PotashCorp - Saskatoon 306.933.8921 From: Rhodes, Richard L. rrho...@firstenergycorp.com To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 07/16/2014 09:08 AM Subject:[ADSM-L] TSM server appears to hang Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Hi Everyone, The past couple of days we're had a strange problem with one of our TSM instances (v6.2.5). At times it appears to hang. Last night (and the previous night) it had many servers that got a dozen or more sessions. This is really strange! This morning as I was looking at this, cmds like q vol and q stgpool hang - no response! Commands like q node and q proc work. The server was doing very little I/O. All of a sudden the hung cmds all ran through and the server I/O jumped to 200-400MB/s. Something was locking I/O. I think the many sessions are clients that retry because the server is not responding. In the TSM actlog there are no unusual messages about the time it un-stuck. The only strange entry in the actlog is a ANRD with lockwait error early the previous evening.There are no AIX errors. Any thought? Rick - The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message. -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: TSM server appears to hang
Hi Rick, From my experience, I had problem with an Expire inventory process (was hanging on a very large node in term of items 13 millions ) that froze TSM but it was on 6.1 version. Also, REORG can use a lot of resources an impact TSM. Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Rhodes, Richard L. Envoyé : 16 juillet 2014 11:08 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : [ADSM-L] TSM server appears to hang Hi Everyone, The past couple of days we're had a strange problem with one of our TSM instances (v6.2.5). At times it appears to hang. Last night (and the previous night) it had many servers that got a dozen or more sessions. This is really strange! This morning as I was looking at this, cmds like q vol and q stgpool hang - no response! Commands like q node and q proc work. The server was doing very little I/O. All of a sudden the hung cmds all ran through and the server I/O jumped to 200-400MB/s. Something was locking I/O. I think the many sessions are clients that retry because the server is not responding. In the TSM actlog there are no unusual messages about the time it un-stuck. The only strange entry in the actlog is a ANRD with lockwait error early the previous evening.There are no AIX errors. Any thought? Rick - The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message. -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: Drives stays IN USE after Library downtime
Hi Bjoern, I had a similar problem recently on a physical library (tape showing dismounting on the library manager and IDLE on the library client). I had to stop/start the library client instance to solve the problem. Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Nachtwey, Bjoern Envoyé : 30 juin 2014 15:28 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : [ADSM-L] Drives stays IN USE after Library downtime Dear All, after an error at one of our libraries (Quantum i6000, robotics became offline, we did a reboot instead of driving to the remote location to re-enable it) the library manager still shows one tape in a drive beeing IN USE. but neither the library client who should own this tape / drive at the momten nor the library itself reports the same: for the libclient the tape is not mounted for the library the drive is empty I tried to do an library audit, this fails immediatly then i restartet first the library manager instance later the whole physical server, the libmanager stiil reports the drive IN USE with the tape, even if there no session from the library client :-( starting a library audit then, took much longer, I canceled this after about three hours dismount vol does not work either Any idea what to do? a little bit off-topic: an IBM 3584 can do an internal inventory run, does anyone know something similar for the i6k? Thanks in advance best regards, Bjørn Bjørn Nachtweymailto:bjoern.nacht...@gwdg.de Arbeitsgruppe IT-Infrastruktur Tel. +49 551 201-2181 - G W D G Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH Göttingen Am Fassberg 11, 37077 Göttingen E-Mail: g...@gwdg.de Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-1510 URL:http://www.gwdg.de Fax:+49 (0)551 201-2150 Geschäftsführer:Prof. Dr. Ramin Yahyapour Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Dipl.-Kfm. Markus Hoppe Sitz der Gesellschaft: Göttingen Registergericht:Göttingen Handelsregister-Nr. B 598 -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: Enabling Encryption in TS3500/E06 Drives
Hi Zoltan, Is the drive encryption enabled at the OS level. On E05 drives, I had to update our AIX server drive definition: chdev -l 'rmt6' -a wrt_encryption='on' I did not have to change anything to our new E07 drive, I guess they were set OK. Pierre Billaudeau SAQ Montreal -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Zoltan Forray Envoyé : 3 septembre 2013 11:15 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] Enabling Encryption in TS3500/E06 Drives Well, contrary to the response I received about this being as simple as changing the devclass value, I can not get encryption to work. I changed the devclass to DRIVEENCRYPTION=ON and the first attempt to write a new tape fails with: 9/3/2013 9:59:03 AM ANR8985E The drive 7876475 (/dev/lin_tape/by-serial/07876475) in library TS3500-COPY is using an encryption method that is incompatible with the current server settings. So, I figured I would check the hardware settings of the TS1130 -E06 drives. They were all set to NO ENCRYPTION. I changed this to APPLICATION and figured that would take care of it. No such luck. Same errors. Tried resetting/cycling the drives - still nothing. Tried taking all drives and paths offline, figuring this might reset/retrieve the new drive setting - still nothing - same errors. Is there some library (TS3500) setting that may be blocking this? So, what I am missing? On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Zoltan Forray zfor...@vcu.edu wrote: Well, the saga is coming to a conclusion and I am going to active encryption of offsite tapes, via AME/TSM. Is there anything more I need to do besides update the DEVCLASS to DRIVEENCRYPTION=ALLOW on all of my TSM servers? When I check the drive details via the TS3500 interface, is says encryption is disabled? Do I need to go to each drive and enable it? -- *Zoltan Forray* TSM Software Hardware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html -- *Zoltan Forray* TSM Software Hardware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: Implementing Encryption
Hi Zoltan, We used TSM encryption (Application base on AIX TSM servers) and here are the steps we had to implement: 1. On TSM server : Update DEVCLASS 3592CLASS2 drivee=on 2. On AIX : chdev -l 'rmt6' -a wrt_encryption='on' chdev -l 'rmt13' -a wrt_encryption='on' chdev -l 'rmt14' -a wrt_encryption='on' ('on' replaces the value 'custom') 3. Change at the hardware level : Enable Application at the drive level : CE Drv Options Drive encryption Method config Application Pierre Billaudeau -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Zoltan Forray Envoyé : 4 avril 2013 09:41 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : [ADSM-L] Implementing Encryption I know this sounds strange, but we need to implement encryption on our TS1130 tapes. Never having done this, I need some help/suggestions/war-stories/etc on how to basically turn encryption on. Is there a quick-and-dirty book on the subject? I understand the first thing would be to change the devclass for the tape drives to encryption=yes for ALL of my servers (currently, 2 of 7 are library managers). Then I saw something about EKM to manage the keys. Is this also implemented on all TSM servers? -- *Zoltan Forray* TSM Software Hardware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Latest Linux/X86 32 bit client
Hi, From what I see on TSM FTP download site, Linux/X86 32 bit client are not available from version 6.3 and 6.4 . Is it correct that the latest TSM Linux client for 32bit OS is 6.2.2 ? Thanks Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: Latest Linux/X86 32 bit client
I just downloaded 6.2.4.4 . Thanks a lot -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Zoltan Forray Envoyé : 18 février 2013 13:48 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] Latest Linux/X86 32 bit client Correction - for latest patches, 6.2.4.4 Linux client is latest 2013/2/18 Zoltan Forray zfor...@vcu.edu Actually, 6.2.4 is the latest. 2013/2/18 Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl On 18 feb. 2013, at 19:42, Billaudeau, Pierre p.billaud...@saq.qc.ca wrote: Hi, From what I see on TSM FTP download site, Linux/X86 32 bit client are not available from version 6.3 and 6.4 . Is it correct that the latest TSM Linux client for 32bit OS is 6.2.2 ? yes. Thanks Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci. -- Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind regards, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl +31 6 24821622 -- *Zoltan Forray* TSM Software Hardware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html -- *Zoltan Forray* TSM Software Hardware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: TDP SQL 6.4
Hi Robert, When you have 2 different backups or 2 different SQL databases on a server, you can create 2 icons pointing to your optionfiles (in this case they are on different drives). You need both the optionfiles and the configfile: Eg: C:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\TDPSql\tdpsql.exe /configfile=g:\tsm\tdpsql\tdpsql.cfg /tsmoptfile=g:\tsm\tdpsql\dsm.opt C:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\TDPSql\tdpsql.exe /configfile=e:\tsm\tdpsql\tdpsql.cfg /tsmoptfile=e:\tsm\tdpsql\dsm.opt Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Robert Ouzen Envoyé : 7 février 2013 04:59 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : [ADSM-L] TDP SQL 6.4 Hello I implanted the new TDP for SQL version 6.4 in our environment without any problems , working fine ... I need now to create another dsm.opt for DRM named DRM.opt , from the tdpsqlc.exe (command line) I succeed to run commands. But how to load the GUI (dashboard) when I loaded it I got only the node form the dsm.opt , I need to load the node from the DRM.opt to make restore etc etc ? T.I.A Regards Robert -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: Reclamation of Virtual Tapes
I noticed a serious performance drop when our backup primary tapes to copypool runs at night (VTL Quantum DXi8500 to TS1140 tapes). The throughput of backups to VTL drops when the DXi rehydrates the deduplicated/compressed virtual tapes. I can imagine the reclamation process does the same thing. There is a need to adjust maintanance schedules to avoid the situation. Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Schneider, Jim Envoyé : 27 décembre 2012 11:18 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] Reclamation of Virtual Tapes Our primary (and only) storage is a Data Domain. Be careful when reclaiming virtual tapes. It works perfectly but servers backing up to the Data Domain have their bandwidth throughput drop from 85% to 5% during reclamation. This was determined by watching Windows Task Manager network utilization with reclamation running and then cancelled. Our reclamation threshold is set at 95% and runs for about 20 minutes. The SQL storage pool that holds 1.1 TB files is set at 99% to effectively prevent reclamation. We had a bad weekend where reclamation started Friday at 5 PM and was 60% complete Monday morning before being cancelled. All of those weekend backups were slowed and the database backup ran 5 hours instead of 1.75 hours. Don't make my mistakes! Jim Schneider -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ehresman,David E. Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 2:38 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Reclamation of Virtual Tapes We reclaim our virtual tapes. They have the same waste patterns as physical tape and are certainly as expensive. David -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee, Gary Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 2:10 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Reclamation of Virtual Tapes Sounds like someone set the reclaim storage pool on the virtual tape pool to the physical tape pool. I know of no reason why not to reclaim virtual tapes. Wish I had one to play with. Gary Lee Senior System Programmer Ball State University phone: 765-285-1310 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Welton, Charles Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 11:10 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Reclamation of Virtual Tapes Hello: We have a TSM instance that uses virtual tapes as our primary backup data pool. The data on the virtual tapes are eventually migrated to tape. We are currently down to 3 virtual scratch tapes and 6 physical scratch tapes. I noticed that we are not running any reclamation processes on our virtual tape pool. It seems we have a hand-full of under-utilized virtual tapes. I went ahead and ran a manual reclamation on the virtual tape pool and I noticed the output tape pool is a physical tape. I assumed that the virtual tape would reclaim to another virtual tape. Is that not the case? Could there be a reason why reclamation shouldn't be ran on a virtual tape pool? Thank you... Charles This email contains information which may be PROPRIETARY IN NATURE OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE and is intended only for the use of the addresses(s) named above. If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately. ** Information contained in this e-mail message and in any attachments thereto is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message, delete any copies held on your systems, notify the sender immediately, and refrain from using or disclosing all or any part of its content to any other person. -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: TDP for Domino on Linux keeps telling me API not installed
Michael, I ran into a similar problem with TDP for Exchange 5.2.1.1 (to reproduce a problem in Lab). I had to uninstall, the TSM baclient 6.3 and install TSM 5.4.1.4 in order to get the TSM API installed. I guess you will need to go back to a version 5 baclient. Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Michael Roesch Envoyé : 31 juillet 2012 05:09 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : [ADSM-L] TDP for Domino on Linux keeps telling me API not installed Hi all, I'm trying to install TDP for Domino 5.5.3 on Linux openSuSE 12.1 x64. I already installed the BA client version 6.3.0.15 and also installed the TSM API. The problem is, when I run the TDP installer, it tells me The Tivoli Storage Manager Client API v5.5.1 or higher is not installed. Any ideas where the problem could be? Thanks in advance Regards, Michael Roesch -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: Deployment Engine Failed to initialize
Now, I guess that means with 6.1.3.3 installed since 2010, I can't see the light even going to 6.2 or 6.3 with tablespace in db2 9.5 format. A fellow DBA suggested that if the 6.1.3.3 database was really migrated to 6.2 db2 9.7 , tablespace could be converted to 9.7 format. Do I really want to go into that ??? No, I am seriously thinking about starting a brand new TSM server with 6.3 and let 6.1 die... Thanks for all this info. Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU Envoyé : 28 février 2012 09:39 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] Deployment Engine Failed to initialize WOW - such harsh words about 6.1 ! I don't agree..my main production 6.x system is 6.1.5.10 with no issues. At least it hasn't had this wacky, problem my other 6.2.x servers have had with a DB backup randomly, intermittently failing with no discernible reason(note, there are docs that say you really need to be at least at 6.1.4.1 to resolve some big problems, especially with reorgs) Zoltan Forray TSM Software Hardware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html From: Prather, Wanda wprat...@icfi.com To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 02/28/2012 05:57 AM Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] Deployment Engine Failed to initialize Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU What Remco said. Nothing Good will Happen on 6.1. I finally got a production system stable on 6.1.3 by disabling reorgs, but that was Windows. I wouldn't even think of doing it on Linux. W -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Remco Post Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 5:10 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Deployment Engine Failed to initialize Hi, do not use TSM server 6.1, not even if you have no other options. 6.1 does not even begin to approach alpha quality software. IBM should never have shipped it. I can't think of a single good reason to install 6.1. Go with 6.2.3 or newer or 6.3 something. On 27 feb. 2012, at 22:57, George Huebschman wrote: We are getting the Deployment Engine Failed to Initialize when running ./install.bin for TSM Server 6.1 on a clean new RHEL server. I see lots of noise out here about this error, in and out of the TSM world. (We have another TSM installation of TSM 6.3 on a VM that isn't even QA as such, just a practice install.) Documetation specifies that there be 2GB available in the home directory. We only have 1.6 GB, BUT so does the successful 6.3 install. We had the error on the first and subsequent 3 attempts to run the install. We did not find any .lock or .lck files. I am told that SELINUX is set to permissive. Except for the home directory, the other space guidelines were met. The install is being done as root. Looking at the TSM related posts about this issue, I didn't notice any for releases after 6.1. Is that because I didn't look hard enough? Or, was documentation improved, or was a bug fixed? Should I talk someone into 6.2 to get past this? Most of my experience has been with 5.* I have read the install guide (most of it) for 6.2, which is what I thought we were installing. Do I need to step back in documentation? -- George Huebschman When you have a choice, spend money where you would prefer to work if you had NO choice. -- Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl +31 6 248 21 622 -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: Disk storage pool 100% utilized but NOT cached
Hi Zoltan, Is it possible you had a very large (or several) backup running using the remaining 66% (over 4 tb) of your backup pool ? Current backups freezes backup data space on the disk pool so it is not eligible for migration. Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU Envoyé : 13 septembre 2011 10:23 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : [ADSM-L] Disk storage pool 100% utilized but NOT cached I think I know the answer to this question but figured it would be a good question to ask, This morning I was getting reports that backups were failing due to backups not being able to get space in the disk stgpool. When I did a Q STG, this is what I get: 9:25:34 AM MOON : q stg Storage Device EstimatedPctPct High Low Next Stora- Pool NameClass NameCapacity Util Migr Mig Mig ge Pool Pct Pct --- -- -- - - --- --- ARCHIVEPOOL DISK 205 G0.30.390 70 TS1130 BACKUPPOOL DISK 6,369 G 100.0 33.990 70 TS1130 Why would a disk storage pool be 100% Utilized and only 34% migratable when I don't have Caching turned on? Zoltan Forray TSM Software Hardware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: Probleme with TS3200 and Redhat
Hi Grégory, Did you run a checkin command to have your scratch tapes recognized by your TSM instance: Checkin LIBVolume newlib??? SEARCH=Yes volrange=nn,nn Status=SCRATCH Checklabel=no devtype=devtype Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de molin gregory Envoyé : 11 juillet 2011 12:41 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : [ADSM-L] Probleme with TS3200 and Redhat Hello, I installed a new server, a new robot on a backup site. TSM 6.1.4.3 - Redhat 5.4 - TS3200 The bands are visible in the robot and the console. When I do a query drive I get the serial numbers and WWN. When I did a query library I get no serial number but not the WWN. No band is detected by an audit library checkl = bar / yes If anyone has an idea, I'm interested Cordialement, Grégory Molin Tel : 0141628162 gregory.mo...@afnor.org ATTENTION. Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à l'attention exclusive de leur destinataire (aux adresses spécifiques auxquelles il a été adressé). Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce message, vous devez immédiatement en avertir l'expéditeur et supprimer ce message et les pièces jointes de votre système. This message and any attachments are confidential and intended to be received only by the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify immediately the sender by reply and delete the message and any attachments from your system. -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: Expiration causes backups to hang
Hi Hans, We are still having problem with the expiration on some filesystem node but instead of hanging, the DB is growing at an incredible pace then TSM crashes. This is with 6.1.3 and cancel expiration command would not respond. We identified some Windows 2008 servers (Systemstate filesystem) that was so big (14M entries) and excluded them from Expiration process. Expiration runs very fine since then and we were hoping 6.2.2 would solve the problem but from what you experience it does not look good. Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Hans Christian Riksheim Envoyé : 13 avril 2011 04:18 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : [ADSM-L] Expiration causes backups to hang Hi, anyone else have this problem? Running 6.2.2 on AIX 6.1. Submitting a PMR on this in parallell. When I say hang I mean a complete hang. All incoming backups stops. Traffic is resumed when we cancel expiration. Hans Chr. -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: TDP for Exchange (2010)
Hi Del, I just tried this and I get this message: C:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\TDPExchangeTDPEXCC QUERY EXCHANGE /EXCSERVER=CTELPME115.SAQ.QC.CA IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Mail: Data Protection for Microsoft Exchange Server Version 6, Release 1, Level 3.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1998, 2010. All rights reserved. ACN0101E Invalid argument: QUERY EXCHANGE /EXCSERVER=CTELPME115.SAQ.QC.CA You are right when you say there must be something particular in my environment. My PMR has been escalated to level 2. Merci beaucoup, Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] De la part de Del Hoobler Envoyé : 1 février 2011 09:23 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] TDP for Exchange (2010) Bonjour Pierre, We have not seen this. One thing to try: TDPEXCC QUERY EXCHANGE /EXCSERVER=servername.domain Other than that, there is no way to feed the domain name into TSM. TSM will use the domain that the machine is in. There must be something unique to your configuration. Opening the PMR with IBM was a good way to proceed. Merci, Del ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu wrote on 01/31/2011 01:49:49 PM: From: Billaudeau, Pierre p.billaud...@saq.qc.ca To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Date: 01/31/2011 01:51 PM Subject: TDP for Exchange (2010) Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Hi, I get this message after installing TDP for Exchange Client on a Windows 2008 R2 64bit server. I can do a TDPEXCC QUERY TSM and QUERY TDP with no problem but when I do QUERY EXCHANGE I get this : C:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\TDPExchangetdpexcc query exchange IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Mail: Data Protection for Microsoft Exchange Server Version 6, Release 1, Level 2.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1998, 2010. All rights reserved. Querying Exchange Server to gather component information, please wait... Connecting to remote server failed with the following error message : The WSMan client cannot process the request. Proxy is not supported under HTTP transport. Change the transport to HTTPS and specify valid proxy information and try again . For more information, see the about_Remote_Troubleshooting Help topic. This points to WINRM and when I do : C : WINRM id -r :servername I get the same error : WSManFault Message = The WSMan client cannot process the request. Proxy is not supporte d under HTTP transport. Change the transport to HTTPS and specify valid proxy i nformation and try again. Error number: -2147024891 0x80070005 Access is denied. When I add the domain (it works): C : WINRM id -r :servername.domain name IdentifyResponse ProtocolVersion = http://schemas.dmtf.org/wbem/wsman/1/wsman.xsd ProductVendor = Microsoft Corporation ProductVersion = OS: 6.1.7600 SP: 0.0 Stack: 2.0 Using the domain name help for this WinRM command but I wonder how to pass this parameter to TSM. This problem appeared following implementing Exchange 2010 Sp1 update rollup 2 (from rollup 1). If anyone of you encountered and resolved this problem, I would really appreciate your help. I have a PMR opened at IBM too. Thanks, Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci. -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
TDP for Exchange (2010)
Hi, I get this message after installing TDP for Exchange Client on a Windows 2008 R2 64bit server. I can do a TDPEXCC QUERY TSM and QUERY TDP with no problem but when I do QUERY EXCHANGE I get this : C:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\TDPExchangetdpexcc query exchange IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Mail: Data Protection for Microsoft Exchange Server Version 6, Release 1, Level 2.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1998, 2010. All rights reserved. Querying Exchange Server to gather component information, please wait... Connecting to remote server failed with the following error message : The WSMan client cannot process the request. Proxy is not supported under HTTP transport. Change the transport to HTTPS and specify valid proxy information and try again . For more information, see the about_Remote_Troubleshooting Help topic. This points to WINRM and when I do : C : WINRM id -r :servername I get the same error : WSManFault Message = The WSMan client cannot process the request. Proxy is not supporte d under HTTP transport. Change the transport to HTTPS and specify valid proxy i nformation and try again. Error number: -2147024891 0x80070005 Access is denied. When I add the domain (it works): C : WINRM id -r :servername.domain name IdentifyResponse ProtocolVersion = http://schemas.dmtf.org/wbem/wsman/1/wsman.xsd ProductVendor = Microsoft Corporation ProductVersion = OS: 6.1.7600 SP: 0.0 Stack: 2.0 Using the domain name help for this WinRM command but I wonder how to pass this parameter to TSM. This problem appeared following implementing Exchange 2010 Sp1 update rollup 2 (from rollup 1). If anyone of you encountered and resolved this problem, I would really appreciate your help. I have a PMR opened at IBM too. Thanks, Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -- Information confidentielle : Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: Anybody seen this? 6.1.3.3 ADM14001C An unexpected and critical error has occurred: DBMarkedBad.
Hi Wanda, TSM 6.1.2.0 crashed twice in our environment (AIX 6.1) but each time it was due to a process (expiration once and delete filespace the other time) that was working on a very large node (in term of number of files 6 millions). TSM DB ran out of space and TSM crashed on a DB2 space exhausted error message. Restart went just fine and a lot of space was released. Your message is very different but I thought this could bring somtehing to the discussion. Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] De la part de Prather, Wanda Envoyé : 15 décembre 2010 18:56 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : [ADSM-L] Anybody seen this? 6.1.3.3 ADM14001C An unexpected and critical error has occurred: DBMarkedBad. Win2k3 TSM server 6.1.3. Found my TSM server comatose. Had stopped writing to actlog 12 hours ago. Q session showed many sessions just sitting in RUN state, no processes, no tape mounts. DB2 seems to have died out from underneath. Nothing in the activity log, nothing in db2diag.log. But found the messages messages below in the Windows event log. Found one hit on DBMarkedBad : http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=0q1=1426627uid=swg21426627loc=en_UScs=utf-8cc=uslang=en But that refers to an SQL error initializing the TSM DB after this failure, and my TSM restarted just fine. Also can run a DB backup without errors. So I don't know if anything is actually bad, or not, or I have corruption in the DB. Event log errors: +++ ADM7518C TSMDB1 marked bad. 12/14/2010 11:28:15 PM SERVER1 Error None 4 N/A VDCTSM1 2010-12-14-23.28.15.921000 Instance:SERVER1 Node:000 PID:2604(db2syscs.exe) TID:6856 Appid:*LOCAL.SERVER1.101215034202 base sys utilities sqeLocalDatabase::MarkDBBad Probe:10 Database:TSMDB1 ADM14001C An unexpected and critical error has occurred: DBMarkedBad. The instance may have been shutdown as a result. Automatic FODC (First Occurrence Data Capture) has been invoked and diagnostic information has been recorded in directory C:\DOCUME~1\ALLUSE~1\APPLIC~1\IBM\DB2\DB2TSM1\SERVER1\FODC_DBMarkedBad_2010-12 -14-23.28.15.890001\. Please look in this directory for detailed evidence about what happened and contact IBM support if necessary to diagnose the problem. 12/14/2010 11:28:15 PM SERVER1 Error None 4 N/A VDCTSM1 2010-12-14-23.28.15.421000 Instance:SERVER1 Node:000 PID:2604(db2syscs.exe) TID:6856 Appid:*LOCAL.SERVER1.101215034202 relation data serv sqlrr_dump_ffdc Probe:200 Database:TSMDB1 ADM0001C A severe error has occurred. Examine the administration notification log and contact IBM Support if necessary. Wanda Prather | Senior Technical Specialist | wprat...@icfi.commailto:wprat...@icfi.com | www.jasi.comwww.jasi.com%20 ICF Jacob Sundstrom | 401 E. Pratt St, Suite 2214, Baltimore, MD 21202 | 410.539.1135 ___ Information confidentielle: Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Expiration and Delete Filespace causing TSM DB to grow and crash
Hi TSMers, Our TSM 6.1.3.3. has a Windows 2008 (R2 64bits) client node that contains over 14 millions files (95% being SystemState backup files) and when either the expiration process or a delete filespace command is run against it, TSM DB is growing at the rate of 1 gb/hour until DB2 DB gets a space exhausted message and TSM crashes. Of course we removed that node from the daily expiration process but we'd like to clean those entries from the DB before doing a DB2 REORG of some Index tables that became huge over the last year. By the way, under TSM 5.5, our TSM DB was 85gb (1 year ago) and it now reach over 400gb (more than 50% being Index table fragmentation we were told by IBM). Any thoughts on how to get rid of those entries (Export node was not a success too but cause no DB increase) ? Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 ___ Information confidentielle: Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: Expiration and Delete Filespace causing TSM DB to grow and crash
Wanda - Client is 6.1.3.0 and I am upgrading it right now to 6.2.1 . Richard - Most of the backup data is collocated to 1-2 tapes. I will try the delete vol discard=yes . Thanks for the help, Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] De la part de Prather, Wanda Envoyé : 23 novembre 2010 15:40 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] Expiration and Delete Filespace causing TSM DB to grow and crash Also, have you upgraded your Win2K8 to 6.2.1? That client version does true incremental backups of Win2K8, that is backing up only the system state files that have actually changed. That should help with the problem over time. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Sims Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 2:46 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Expiration and Delete Filespace causing TSM DB to grow and crash It is often the case that such backups are segregated on their own volumes, where that allows you to perform a Delete Volume to dispose of the stuff in a meta manner. Richard Sims ___ Information confidentielle: Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
DocAve TSM for Microsoft SharePoint
Hi, Has anyone of you have TDP for SharePoint widely installed in your TSM environment ? I could only get feedback from 2008 experiences and it was not so positive. As our Microsoft Sharepoint is growing, we need a solution for TSM backup other then the TDP for SQL backup. So my question is do you consider TSM TDP DocAve for Microsoft SharePoint a good solution for SP backup ? Thanks, Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 ___ Information confidentielle: Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
Re: TSM 6 database space performance question
Hi John, We are running TSM 6.1.3.3 on AIX 6.1 and we already increased TSM DB2 Database space twice using the same Filesystem (directory). TSM documentation only mention the use of a new filesystem to increase the size of the DB using EXTEND DBSPACE new_filesystem . I don't think extending TSM DB across 2-3-4 filesystem would spread the I/O more then using only one filesystem based on the fact that it is the number of disk your DB is spread across that will make the difference. Your LUNs need to be spread across different raid groups in order to provide the best performance. I really think one directory can be as efficient as 2 or 3. Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] De la part de John D. Schneider Envoyé : 11 mai 2010 16:21 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet : [ADSM-L] TSM 6 database space performance question Greetings, I have a customer running TSM 6.1.3 on a Linux RedHat 5.4 server. They are using high-performance SAN attached disk for the TSM database and logs. They have created the TSM database all in one directory under one filesystem. Recently then needed to add more space, and they carved out a lun from another RAID group, and then added that lun to the existing filesystem. TSM shows that it now has the additional space, but it is still all under one directory. In reading the Performance Guide and Admin Guide, they both recommend spreading the data out over multiple directories, putting each directory behind separate disks/luns. This certainly makes sense to spread the I/O out over multiple luns, and I get that. But is there anything wrong with the way my customer has done it? They are using multiple luns from different RAID groups, but they are all put together behind one directory. Is this going to become a problem as they add more and more load to this instance? If TSM has lots of separate directories and they are across multiple luns, does TSM do it's database I/O differently? Best Regards, John D. Schneider The Computer Coaching Community, LLC Cell: (314) 750-8721 ___ Information confidentielle: Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.
TSM 6.1.2.1 to 6.1.3.3 (AIX 6.1)
Hi, In order to resolve problems we have with the current version of TSM (6.1.2.1) : - Expiration fails on one large node (14Million entries for one filespace). - Database increase 1gb per day. - Retrieve file on WEB or GUI takes over 30 minutes to list files (once again for large node). - Incremental backup very slow for directories having over 5 million entries (Workaround was to run JBB). IBM recommends to go from 6.1.2.1 to 6.1.3.0 and the to 6.1.3.3. Has anyone done a similar upgrade on a AIX server and any recommendation you can make is welcome. We plan to do this change this coming Monday. Thanks Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des Infrastructures Serveurs Société des Alcools du Québec 514-254-6000 x 6559 ___ Information confidentielle: Le présent message, ainsi que tout fichier qui y est joint, est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le destinataire prévu que tout examen, réacheminement, impression, copie, distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre système. Merci.