Another approach to my problem...

2009-10-15 Thread Kurt Buff
All,

Thanks for your help on migration strategies. I think it's doable by
us (me, really) with only a few things to be ironed out.

However, I've also been asked to look at moving to a different
solution entirely.

Has anyone here been asked to do this? The new solution is yet to be
determined, though Ultrabac and Retrospect are high on my list.

My concern is that I don't want orphan the data I have on tape and
disk in TSM - including my archives and inactive data.

Any pointers to documentation on how I could get the data out of TSM
into another product?

Kurt


Migration for Windows-based installation

2009-10-12 Thread Kurt Buff
All,

We have a TSM server that's running out of steam, and nearing the end
of its expected reliable life. We have Version 5, Release 3, Level 4.6
installed, with various levels of clients installed on our servers.
The server has 1gb RAM, roughly 2tb of disk storage, but it's old/slow
PATA, and the OS is Win2k Pro. Definitely not ideal.

The tape robot is a Spectralogic T50, with two LTO3 drives and 25
slots, out of which we expect to get much more life.

We expect to replace the server with a new Dell server with 3tb of
SATA disk, 3gb RAM, Win2k3 (32bit), and use the current tape robot.

I'd like to get to the newest in the 5.x series on the new server,
since the talk on this list about moving to 6.x indicates to me that
we'd be better off staying at 5.x for now.

I've been casting about, and can't seem to find documentation on how
to migrate the setup to the new machine.

Does anyone have a pointer to good documentation on doing this?

Frankly, we've been given a quote by a VAR, and though the number of
hours they are quoting seem reasonable, the price they're asking to
work with us on this is beyond our budget.

Thanks

Kurt


Re: Migration for Windows-based installation

2009-10-12 Thread Kurt Buff
I'd prefer to be able to migrate server data as much as possible,
including the diskpool, but if it it would be an incredibly difficult
maneuver (or take inordinate amounts of time, say on the order of more
than a 4-day weekend) and/or the downside of losing the diskpool is
relatively minor, I could potentially live without it.

I would also contemplate keeping the current TSM server version on the
new machine and upgrading immediately after implementation if that
would be of benefit.

We back up fewer than 10 servers, but one is our Exchange 2003 server
at roughly 200gb and is a full backup every night, and the other is
our file server at over 2tb, though on a nightly  basis it normally
does around 25-50gb.

Does that answer your question?

Kurt

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:18, David McClelland t...@networkc.co.uk wrote:
 Are you looking purely at a lift and shift hardware change here, or at a 
 clean installation of TSM Server (at 5.5.3 for example) and migrating clients 
 into the new instance?

 Cheers,

 /David Mc
 London, UK

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Kurt 
 Buff
 Sent: 12 October 2009 18:54
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: [ADSM-L] Migration for Windows-based installation

 All,

 We have a TSM server that's running out of steam, and nearing the end
 of its expected reliable life. We have Version 5, Release 3, Level 4.6
 installed, with various levels of clients installed on our servers.
 The server has 1gb RAM, roughly 2tb of disk storage, but it's old/slow
 PATA, and the OS is Win2k Pro. Definitely not ideal.

 The tape robot is a Spectralogic T50, with two LTO3 drives and 25
 slots, out of which we expect to get much more life.

 We expect to replace the server with a new Dell server with 3tb of
 SATA disk, 3gb RAM, Win2k3 (32bit), and use the current tape robot.

 I'd like to get to the newest in the 5.x series on the new server,
 since the talk on this list about moving to 6.x indicates to me that
 we'd be better off staying at 5.x for now.

 I've been casting about, and can't seem to find documentation on how
 to migrate the setup to the new machine.

 Does anyone have a pointer to good documentation on doing this?

 Frankly, we've been given a quote by a VAR, and though the number of
 hours they are quoting seem reasonable, the price they're asking to
 work with us on this is beyond our budget.

 Thanks

 Kurt

 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.3/2415 - Release Date: 10/12/09 
 04:01:00



Re: Migration for Windows-based installation

2009-10-12 Thread Kurt Buff
So, what happens to all the tapes I have offsite at Iron Mountain, and
the archives I have stored in my basement vault, etc.

I'll be perusing the archives as you suggest, but this isn't exactly
crystalline to me just yet.

A complicating factor that I hadn't realized until I did a bit of
digging just now is that the current database holds references to a
*really* old set of 8mm (AIT2) tapes from a Spectralogic Treefrog that
we migrated from some years ago.

Would the procedure you're suggesting clean that up?

Kurt

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:10, Kelly Lipp l...@storserver.com wrote:
 Start from scratch.  Install TSM at the level you would like, move and 
 configure the library. Point the clients at the new server and go.  That 
 first backup will necessarily be a full.  Will take longer than usual, but 
 easy.

 This method allows you go clean up your database.

 Keep the old server around until the data expires.

 Clearly, there are more details, especially since you are going to re-use the 
 library on the new STORServer (oops, I mean TSM Server).  The overall concept 
 is sound. For sites of your size I like this method as it is simple and gets 
 me a brand new, pristine database.  This will become important next year when 
 you migrate to TSM 6.2.  Besides, a clean start is always a good thing.

 This topic has been covered earlier and in much more detail.  You might 
 peruse the archives to see what you can find.  My name will show up along 
 with others like Wanda who have been through this many times.

 Thanks,

 Kelly Lipp
 Chief Technical Officer
 www.storserver.com
 719-266-8777 x7105
 STORServer solves your data backup challenges.
 Once and for all.


 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Kurt 
 Buff
 Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 1:02 PM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Migration for Windows-based installation

 I'd prefer to be able to migrate server data as much as possible,
 including the diskpool, but if it it would be an incredibly difficult
 maneuver (or take inordinate amounts of time, say on the order of more
 than a 4-day weekend) and/or the downside of losing the diskpool is
 relatively minor, I could potentially live without it.

 I would also contemplate keeping the current TSM server version on the
 new machine and upgrading immediately after implementation if that
 would be of benefit.

 We back up fewer than 10 servers, but one is our Exchange 2003 server
 at roughly 200gb and is a full backup every night, and the other is
 our file server at over 2tb, though on a nightly  basis it normally
 does around 25-50gb.

 Does that answer your question?

 Kurt

 On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:18, David McClelland t...@networkc.co.uk wrote:
 Are you looking purely at a lift and shift hardware change here, or at a 
 clean installation of TSM Server (at 5.5.3 for example) and migrating 
 clients into the new instance?

 Cheers,

 /David Mc
 London, UK

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of 
 Kurt Buff
 Sent: 12 October 2009 18:54
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: [ADSM-L] Migration for Windows-based installation

 All,

 We have a TSM server that's running out of steam, and nearing the end
 of its expected reliable life. We have Version 5, Release 3, Level 4.6
 installed, with various levels of clients installed on our servers.
 The server has 1gb RAM, roughly 2tb of disk storage, but it's old/slow
 PATA, and the OS is Win2k Pro. Definitely not ideal.

 The tape robot is a Spectralogic T50, with two LTO3 drives and 25
 slots, out of which we expect to get much more life.

 We expect to replace the server with a new Dell server with 3tb of
 SATA disk, 3gb RAM, Win2k3 (32bit), and use the current tape robot.

 I'd like to get to the newest in the 5.x series on the new server,
 since the talk on this list about moving to 6.x indicates to me that
 we'd be better off staying at 5.x for now.

 I've been casting about, and can't seem to find documentation on how
 to migrate the setup to the new machine.

 Does anyone have a pointer to good documentation on doing this?

 Frankly, we've been given a quote by a VAR, and though the number of
 hours they are quoting seem reasonable, the price they're asking to
 work with us on this is beyond our budget.

 Thanks

 Kurt

 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.3/2415 - Release Date: 10/12/09 
 04:01:00




Re: Migration for Windows-based installation

2009-10-12 Thread Kurt Buff
Disk for the current TSM server is IDE/PATA in a RAID5 array internal
to the machine - though the OS is on a (eep!) single IDE/PATA drive
connected to the motherboard.

Kurt

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 13:19, David McClelland t...@networkc.co.uk wrote:
 Okay, another fun question for you Kurt, investigating some alternative lines 
 of simply migrating your current TSM server instance to new hardware: is the 
 disk upon which your current TSM database/recovery log/storage pool live 
 internal to your old server, or is it instead hosted upon external disk and 
 thus (potentially) relatively feasible to 'introduce' to your new hardware?

 /DMc

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Kurt 
 Buff
 Sent: 12 October 2009 21:09
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Migration for Windows-based installation

 So, what happens to all the tapes I have offsite at Iron Mountain, and
 the archives I have stored in my basement vault, etc.

 I'll be perusing the archives as you suggest, but this isn't exactly
 crystalline to me just yet.

 A complicating factor that I hadn't realized until I did a bit of
 digging just now is that the current database holds references to a
 *really* old set of 8mm (AIT2) tapes from a Spectralogic Treefrog that
 we migrated from some years ago.

 Would the procedure you're suggesting clean that up?

 Kurt

 On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:10, Kelly Lipp l...@storserver.com wrote:
 Start from scratch.  Install TSM at the level you would like, move and 
 configure the library. Point the clients at the new server and go.  That 
 first backup will necessarily be a full.  Will take longer than usual, but 
 easy.

 This method allows you go clean up your database.

 Keep the old server around until the data expires.

 Clearly, there are more details, especially since you are going to re-use 
 the library on the new STORServer (oops, I mean TSM Server).  The overall 
 concept is sound. For sites of your size I like this method as it is simple 
 and gets me a brand new, pristine database.  This will become important next 
 year when you migrate to TSM 6.2.  Besides, a clean start is always a good 
 thing.

 This topic has been covered earlier and in much more detail.  You might 
 peruse the archives to see what you can find.  My name will show up along 
 with others like Wanda who have been through this many times.

 Thanks,

 Kelly Lipp
 Chief Technical Officer
 www.storserver.com
 719-266-8777 x7105
 STORServer solves your data backup challenges.
 Once and for all.


 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of 
 Kurt Buff
 Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 1:02 PM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Migration for Windows-based installation

 I'd prefer to be able to migrate server data as much as possible,
 including the diskpool, but if it it would be an incredibly difficult
 maneuver (or take inordinate amounts of time, say on the order of more
 than a 4-day weekend) and/or the downside of losing the diskpool is
 relatively minor, I could potentially live without it.

 I would also contemplate keeping the current TSM server version on the
 new machine and upgrading immediately after implementation if that
 would be of benefit.

 We back up fewer than 10 servers, but one is our Exchange 2003 server
 at roughly 200gb and is a full backup every night, and the other is
 our file server at over 2tb, though on a nightly  basis it normally
 does around 25-50gb.

 Does that answer your question?

 Kurt

 On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:18, David McClelland t...@networkc.co.uk wrote:
 Are you looking purely at a lift and shift hardware change here, or at a 
 clean installation of TSM Server (at 5.5.3 for example) and migrating 
 clients into the new instance?

 Cheers,

 /David Mc
 London, UK

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of 
 Kurt Buff
 Sent: 12 October 2009 18:54
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: [ADSM-L] Migration for Windows-based installation

 All,

 We have a TSM server that's running out of steam, and nearing the end
 of its expected reliable life. We have Version 5, Release 3, Level 4.6
 installed, with various levels of clients installed on our servers.
 The server has 1gb RAM, roughly 2tb of disk storage, but it's old/slow
 PATA, and the OS is Win2k Pro. Definitely not ideal.

 The tape robot is a Spectralogic T50, with two LTO3 drives and 25
 slots, out of which we expect to get much more life.

 We expect to replace the server with a new Dell server with 3tb of
 SATA disk, 3gb RAM, Win2k3 (32bit), and use the current tape robot.

 I'd like to get to the newest in the 5.x series on the new server,
 since the talk on this list about moving to 6.x indicates to me that
 we'd be better off staying at 5.x for now.

 I've been casting about, and can't seem to find documentation on how
 to migrate

Re: Migration for Windows-based installation

2009-10-12 Thread Kurt Buff
Yeah, as I dig into this it becomes more complicated.

We have a number of pools:
 Disk Pools:
  diskpool
 Sequential Access Storage Pools:
  ltopool
  8mmpool1 (which needs to die)
  archivepool
  ltoarchive
  reclaimpool
 Copy Storage pools:
  copypool
  ltocopy

We have several devclasses, too:
 Disk Device Class
  Disk
 File Device Class
  ReclaimClass
 8MM Device Clases
  8mmclass1
 LTO Device Class
  LTO

The 8mm stuff really needs to go away, I think, especially since
Treefrog we had was traded in to get the T50.

We also have data that is archived on the LTO tapes, and that we'll
need for at least 4 more years - financial stuff, doncha know.

Kurt


On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 13:24, Bob Levad ble...@winnebagoind.com wrote:
 When we migrated to a new server and LTO4 from LTO1, we installed all of the
 new stuff and tested the hardware with the TSM version we were running.
 When that was working well, we drained all of the disk pools, backed up the
 database from the existing server, shut it down, attached the old tape
 drives to the new server, restored the database, brought it up, deleted all
 of the old disk pools, defined new disk pools for the new hardware, defined
 the new tape drives, set up new devclasses and storage pools, changed the
 domains to point to the new devices and migration hierarchy, tested backups
 and restores, and set up move data jobs to move data from the LTO1's back to
 disk pools where it would then migrate to the new LTO4s.  Once the LTO1's
 were empty, we detached the library and recycled the old tapes.  The upgrade
 to a newer TSM could occur on the old server or the new, but best probably
 not at the same time as the hardware cutover.

 Starting from scratch was not an option for us as we have files with
 multi-year retentions.

 Bob.

 PS - If you have references to tapes that no longer exist, there are methods
 (google is your friend) to delete references to them.  The method of
 deletion may depend on how the data was stored
 (primary/copypool/backupset/db backup/other).  Once the references are gone,
 you should delete the storage pools and device classes that are obsolete.

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
 Kurt Buff
 Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 3:09 PM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Migration for Windows-based installation

 So, what happens to all the tapes I have offsite at Iron Mountain, and the
 archives I have stored in my basement vault, etc.

 I'll be perusing the archives as you suggest, but this isn't exactly
 crystalline to me just yet.

 A complicating factor that I hadn't realized until I did a bit of digging
 just now is that the current database holds references to a
 *really* old set of 8mm (AIT2) tapes from a Spectralogic Treefrog that we
 migrated from some years ago.

 Would the procedure you're suggesting clean that up?

 Kurt

 On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:10, Kelly Lipp l...@storserver.com wrote:
 Start from scratch.  Install TSM at the level you would like, move and
 configure the library. Point the clients at the new server and go.  That
 first backup will necessarily be a full.  Will take longer than usual, but
 easy.

 This method allows you go clean up your database.

 Keep the old server around until the data expires.

 Clearly, there are more details, especially since you are going to re-use
 the library on the new STORServer (oops, I mean TSM Server).  The overall
 concept is sound. For sites of your size I like this method as it is simple
 and gets me a brand new, pristine database.  This will become important next
 year when you migrate to TSM 6.2.  Besides, a clean start is always a good
 thing.

 This topic has been covered earlier and in much more detail.  You might
 peruse the archives to see what you can find.  My name will show up along
 with others like Wanda who have been through this many times.

 Thanks,

 Kelly Lipp
 Chief Technical Officer
 www.storserver.com
 719-266-8777 x7105
 STORServer solves your data backup challenges.
 Once and for all.


 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf
 Of Kurt Buff
 Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 1:02 PM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Migration for Windows-based installation

 I'd prefer to be able to migrate server data as much as possible,
 including the diskpool, but if it it would be an incredibly difficult
 maneuver (or take inordinate amounts of time, say on the order of more
 than a 4-day weekend) and/or the downside of losing the diskpool is
 relatively minor, I could potentially live without it.

 I would also contemplate keeping the current TSM server version on the
 new machine and upgrading immediately after implementation if that
 would be of benefit.

 We back up fewer than 10 servers

Re: Migration for Windows-based installation

2009-10-12 Thread Kurt Buff
I'll have to work through a fair amount to understand what you've
outlined, but it seems doable. I think pruning volhist and devconfig
first might be a good idea, if for no other reason than to cut down on
the confusion.

Thanks for the input. I'll most likely be back for more information.

Kurt

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 14:03, Ochs, Duane duane.o...@qg.com wrote:
 For my last migration to new hardware I built a new system and used 
 export/import server to server.
 Worked very well. Doesn’t work if you have only one library though.

 However, you are looking for an alternate method.

 I'd recommend upgrading to TSM 5.5 first. Especially if you run into problems 
 and have to call IBM for support.


 This is a really simplified step by step.
 Build your new system:
 Install the same version of TSm that you have on the old system.
 On old server:
 Perform a DB backup to a blank tape. Two for redundancy.
 Backup volhist.
 Backup devconfig
 Take down TSM on your old TSM server
 Document all tape drive/library information and drivers.

 Copy db files to the new system, reclog volumes and diskpool volumes.
 If you are really familiar with TSM you can minimize the amount of diskpool 
 volumes to be copied first.
 Copy the contents of your server directory to the new system.

 Verify that your copied dsmserv.dsk file reflects the new location of the DB 
 files and log files.

 If everything was done correctly and verified properly you should be able to 
 start up your TSM database.

 Then you will have to redefine your library and drives.


 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Kurt 
 Buff
 Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 3:37 PM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: Migration for Windows-based installation

 Disk for the current TSM server is IDE/PATA in a RAID5 array internal
 to the machine - though the OS is on a (eep!) single IDE/PATA drive
 connected to the motherboard.

 Kurt

 On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 13:19, David McClelland t...@networkc.co.uk wrote:
 Okay, another fun question for you Kurt, investigating some alternative 
 lines of simply migrating your current TSM server instance to new hardware: 
 is the disk upon which your current TSM database/recovery log/storage pool 
 live internal to your old server, or is it instead hosted upon external disk 
 and thus (potentially) relatively feasible to 'introduce' to your new 
 hardware?

 /DMc

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of 
 Kurt Buff
 Sent: 12 October 2009 21:09
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Migration for Windows-based installation

 So, what happens to all the tapes I have offsite at Iron Mountain, and
 the archives I have stored in my basement vault, etc.

 I'll be perusing the archives as you suggest, but this isn't exactly
 crystalline to me just yet.

 A complicating factor that I hadn't realized until I did a bit of
 digging just now is that the current database holds references to a
 *really* old set of 8mm (AIT2) tapes from a Spectralogic Treefrog that
 we migrated from some years ago.

 Would the procedure you're suggesting clean that up?

 Kurt

 On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:10, Kelly Lipp l...@storserver.com wrote:
 Start from scratch.  Install TSM at the level you would like, move and 
 configure the library. Point the clients at the new server and go.  That 
 first backup will necessarily be a full.  Will take longer than usual, but 
 easy.

 This method allows you go clean up your database.

 Keep the old server around until the data expires.

 Clearly, there are more details, especially since you are going to re-use 
 the library on the new STORServer (oops, I mean TSM Server).  The overall 
 concept is sound. For sites of your size I like this method as it is simple 
 and gets me a brand new, pristine database.  This will become important 
 next year when you migrate to TSM 6.2.  Besides, a clean start is always a 
 good thing.

 This topic has been covered earlier and in much more detail.  You might 
 peruse the archives to see what you can find.  My name will show up along 
 with others like Wanda who have been through this many times.

 Thanks,

 Kelly Lipp
 Chief Technical Officer
 www.storserver.com
 719-266-8777 x7105
 STORServer solves your data backup challenges.
 Once and for all.


 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of 
 Kurt Buff
 Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 1:02 PM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Migration for Windows-based installation

 I'd prefer to be able to migrate server data as much as possible,
 including the diskpool, but if it it would be an incredibly difficult
 maneuver (or take inordinate amounts of time, say on the order of more
 than a 4-day weekend) and/or the downside of losing the diskpool is
 relatively minor, I could potentially live without it.

 I would also contemplate

Sunbelt File Archiver Experience?

2009-02-23 Thread Kurt Buff
All,

We're contemplating purchasing this product, which seems to be an HSM,
along with some data deduplication.

Link here: http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/Sunbelt-File-Archiver/

Does anyone on this list have experience with it, especially how it
integrates (or doesn't!) with TSM?

I'm going to be talking to their support engineers to see what they
have to say, but any knowledge I can gain here would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Kurt


Re: Backup Windows Eventlog / Systemlog for 2 years

2008-11-18 Thread Kurt Buff
I suggest psloglist.exe - it's a free MSFT utility, from the
Sysinternals guys. The whole suite of tools is nearly mandatory for
inclusion in a Windows administration toolkit.

http://www.microsoft.com/sysinternals 

Kurt

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 On Behalf Of Wanda Prather
 Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 06:23
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup Windows Eventlog / Systemlog for 2 years
 
 There is a Windows utility (unfortunately I forget the name; 
 I think it's from one of the older Windows resource kits) 
 that lets you extract the event log to a flat file.
 
 I'd run that every day, then have TSM archive the flat file 
 and delete from the hard drive.
 
 
 
 
 On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:31 AM, Herrmann, Boris 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
 
  Hello all,
 
  today we got the request to daily backup the windows event 
 and windows 
  system log and keep them for 2 years (from Windows 2003 Server). Is 
  there a way to do this with the TSM Client to only backup this part 
  from Systemstate / Systemservices and bound this to a special 
  ManagementClass?
 
  Any help is appreciate,
  Boris
 
 


Re: Forecasting Windows client workloads

2008-03-03 Thread Kurt Buff
http://gnuwin32.sf.net - you'll find good tools there, including wc and other 
core unix utils.

To find the number of files, a better incantation for your dir command is 

 dir /s /b | wc -l

This will give a better line/file count. You could also pipe this to an output 
file, and put together a batch file or perl script to give you the size of each 
file and sum them.

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Behalf Of
 Thomas Denier
 Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 13:16
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: [ADSM-L] Forecasting Windows client workloads
 
 
 People who want TSM coverage for new systems at our site are asked
 to provide reasonably accurate estimates for the following:
 
 1.Aggregate size of files on the system
 2.Number of files on the system
 3.Aggregate size of files that will be backed up each day
 3.Number of files that will be backed up each day
 
 Nobody has a problem with number 1, but Windows administrators are
 constantly complaining about how difficult it is to obtain the other
 three. Some of them insist that it is impossible to obtain this
 information.
 
 So far, the least ugly option I have found for counting files on a
 volume is to open a command line window, change to the root folder,
 and execute the following command:
 
 dir /s | find File(s)
 
 The Search facility on the Start menu can search for files modified
 within a day, which should give a reasonable idea of what daily
 backups will look like. The result windows lists the modified files
 and reports the number of files. Size information is shown for each
 file listed, but the sum of the sizes is not calculated automatically,
 and the window seems to have been designed so that it is impossible
 to transfer the size information to another program.
 
 Are there better ways for Windows administrators to get the
 information we are asking for?
 


Re: Windows Client question...

2008-01-18 Thread Kurt Buff
I would suggest not backing up PST files, if the environment is running 
Exchange. Exchange is the proper store for email in that case, as PST files are 
much more fragile than the Exchange store. 

If the environment is so small that they are not using Exchange, then IMHO TSM 
is probably not a good fit for their environment anyway.

On a semi-related note, this MSFT KB article 
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/297019

and especially this blog post

http://blogs.technet.com/askperf/archive/2007/01/21/network-stored-pst-files-don-t-do-it.aspx

explain why PST storage on file servers is a bad idea.

Kurt

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Behalf Of
 Elana Samuels
 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 17:28
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Windows Client question...
 
 
 So how would you recommend to backup open PST files?  
 Unfortunately in the
 SMB space, most desktops are running Outlook and the users 
 typically leave
 their mail open at night.
 
 
 Elana Samuels
 Tier 1 Data Solutions Inc.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 On Behalf Of
 Wanda Prather
 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 7:26 PM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Windows Client question...
 
 Agreed.
 I tell my customers NOT to install OFS unless they have a 
 reason, and only
 on systems where they know what the reason is.
 It triggers a LOT of unncessary and pretty unintelligible VSS 
 errors, and is
 usually doing nothing worthwhile.
 
 Look at your TSM daily reporter output on clients without OFS 
 installed,
 check the missed file details.  You'll find that 90% of the 
 files that are
 missed are in the category of usual suspects.  You may want 
 to sit down
 with a Windows admin and get them to help you identify the 
 missed files.
 
 Many will be ntuser.dat or ntuser.log files, or other parts 
 of the user
 profile.  You rarely need backups of these unless you are backing up
 desktops, and then the profiles are included in teh backup of 
 System State.
 
 
 Most of the rest will be files that are clearly identifiable 
 as DB parts
 belonging to apps like SQL or Oracle.  OFS support does not 
 necessarily give
 you good backups of a data base, because there is no 
 interface with the DB
 journal/logs.  So even if people THINK they are getting 
 backups this way,
 you probably shouldn't count on using them - the appropriate 
 solution for
 DB's is using a TDP client.
 
 Once you identify the missed files, you'll usually find there 
 is nothing on
 the client that needs the OFS support - exception would be a locally
 developed application.  But I still wouldn't count on OFS 
 being the answer,
 until somebody explains to me how the app works and what kind 
 of backups
 will give you appropriate restore and DR capability.  (ANd 
 then TEST to make
 sure the restored version is viable.)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 On 1/16/08, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  FWIW, I don't think it has ever been installed on any of 
 our  200 Windows
  systems we backup.
 
  FYI, installing either of these WILL REQUIRE a reboot since 
 it installs a
  service/low-level driver.
 
  
  Zoltan Forray
  Virginia Commonwealth University
  Office of Technology Services
  University Computing Center
  e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  voice: 804-828-4807
 
 
 
  Ben Bullock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
  01/16/2008 12:15 PM
  Please respond to
  ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 
 
  To
  ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
  cc
 
  Subject
  [ADSM-L] Windows Client question...
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Howdy,
 I recently switched jobs and now am managing TSM in a 
 mostly Windows
  environment (instead of the Unix world where I am 
 comfortable). A new
  challenge... anyways
 
  On the Windows TSM client, there is the option to install 
 the Open file
  support and the Image Backup support. Does everyone 
 install these?
  Does it depend on what kind of DR you might have to do on 
 the windows
  host? Forgive my Windows ignorance,
 
  I've read the manuals and it looks like the upside is the ability to
  backup open files, but the downside I am seeing is that 
 there seems to
  be a lot of errors with the way it interfaces with the 
 Windows native
  VSS service. It also looks like if these are installed and 
 you want to
  upgrade the TSM client, it requires a reboot of the Windows 
 client to
  get it done. Nobody wants to reboot a production server to 
 upgrade its
  backup software.
 
  So what is everyone's opinion?:
  - The Open file support is worth the hassle and should be 
 installed on
  all TSM clients
  - The Open file support should be installed on certain 
 systems (if so,
  what is your criteria).
  - The open file support is to much pain and should not be 
 installed.
 
  Thanks,
  Ben
 
  The Blue Cross of Idaho Email Firewall 

Re: HELP NEEDED ASAP!!

2006-12-07 Thread Kurt Buff
This won't help you now, but it may help someone else before crisis hits

1) As part of the documentation of the server, use either the natvie 'net
share' command, or rmtshare.exe from the Windows Resource Kit to document
your shares. Create a batch file that creates the shares and copy it off
somewhere.

2) Potentially, periodically use the native xcopy command (xcopy /t /e) to
create your (empty) directory structure elsewhere and then zip it down into
a single file and back that up. Should take minimal space, and when
unzipped, voila.

3) If permissions are important, my favorite tool is fileacl.exe - google
for it, it's truly wonderful. The most wonderful thing about it is that it
can create its own batch file to document and reapply permissions to a
directory structure.

Kurt

| -Original Message-
| From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Behalf Of
| Dearman, Richard
| Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 10:53
| To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
| Subject: [ADSM-L] HELP NEEDED ASAP!!
|
|
| One of oour main windows 2003 server crahsed today and the san disk it
| turs out is corrupted and we need to restore 2TB of user
| files to a new
| server.
|
| The users cannot login to their workstations because this
| server is used
| in our login process and each user maps a home directory to a share on
| that server when they login.  I am in the process of creating
| a backupset
| so the restore can go quickly but our management needs the users to at
| least be able to login even if there data is not restored yet.
|
| So if I start a restore will TSM recreate all the folders
| with permissions
| first then start putting the data back last?  If we can get the folder
| structure back first we can at least let people login.
|
| Does anyone know if TSM will put the folder structure back first with
| permissions?
|
| Thanks
|


Errors moving file from disk to tape

2006-11-15 Thread Kurt Buff
All,

Running TSM 5.3.x on our Win2k machine, which is backing up data from our
Win2k3 file serer.

I've recently started dumping a database to the file server that's around
61gb in size, and the Win2k box seems to be choking while moving the file
from disk to tape internally. The disk array for the Win2k box is not quite
2tb, on a 3ware array of 8 PATA drives.

The database file is a full dump each night, given the same name each time.

I'm not seeing errors in the event log that look interesting or relevant to
this problem.

Any thoughts? More info available if needed.

Here are the error messages we're seeing:

--Begin Log Snippet--
ANR1330E The server has detected possible corruption in an object being
restored or moved. The actual values for the incorrect frame are: magic
8F0DA670 hdr version 37816 hdr length  62476 sequence number 101823309 data
length 370C5960 server id 1536713424 segment id 532075705290595 crc
C6B42145.

ANR1331E Invalid frame detected.  Expected magic 53454652 sequence number

00148128 server id  segment id 53513180.

ANR1330E The server has detected possible corruption in an object being
restored or moved. The actual values for the incorrect frame are: magic
66371DED hdr version 31706 hdr length  48550 sequence number -1501832601
data length 7BDA67BD server id -630735450 segment id 13665746297275917947
crc A67BDA67.

ANR1331E Invalid frame detected.  Expected magic 53454652 sequence number
0077 server id  segment id 53517615.

ANR1330E The server has detected possible corruption in an object being
restored or moved. The actual values for the incorrect frame are: magic
A4ECEAA6 hdr version 29637 hdr length  22108 sequence number 2145482599 data
length D29CEB93 server id 426614096 segment id 15022471743897101349 crc
96D9D54C.

ANR1331E Invalid frame detected.  Expected magic 53454652 sequence number
0112 server id  segment id 53600878.

ANR1001I Migration process 27 ended for storage pool DISKPOOL.

ANR0986I Process 27 for MIGRATION running in the BACKGROUND processed 124562
items for a total of 22,930,460,672 bytes with a completion state of FAILURE
at 13:04:18.
--End Log Snippet--


Thanks,


Kurt Buff
Lead Network Administrator
Zetron, Inc.
425.820.6363 x463
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PO Box 97004
Redmond, WA 98073


Re: How to calculate the thoughput on the network

2006-11-14 Thread Kurt Buff
This will mostly be a function of the [avg latency/hop in WAN] and [# of
hops in WAN] and [max throughput of slowest link in WAN] and [efforts made
to tune packet size to avoid fragmentation - that is, adjusting packet MTU
size to match WAN limitations]. For the last factor, if you're using
Windows, or just for general information, see web pages that discuss DRTCP,
a free Windows utility that allows easy access to various Windows settings
in the Registry that control the TCP stack.

Here's the fun part: Latency of any given hop in WAN will vary depending on
load. If you have a exclusive link (like a point-to-point T1 or fiber link),
then you have a much better chance of getting that reliable stats on latency
than if you've got an IPSec VPN going over an Internet connection, because
over the Internet you have no way of predicting load, unless you have an SLA
with each entity between you and your destination.

If your link is over an IPSec (or other) VPN over the Internet, I'd suggest
multiple traceroutes over a period of time (days to weeks) to determine most
likely route, including number and latency of hops. There's a tool called
smokeping to automate and graph this, if you care to work with Open Source
tools.

Murugan, Palani said:
| Hi
|
| I need to configure a node for backup through WAN.
|
| And they want to know the throughput on the network
|
| The data on the node = 20GB
|
| Could any of you tell how to calculate the throughput on the network ?


Re: Batch script in Windows to create filelist

2006-08-21 Thread Kurt Buff
| -Original Message-
| From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Behalf Of
| Richard Mochnaczewski
| Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 08:07
| To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
| Subject: [ADSM-L] Batch script in Windows to create filelist
|
|
| Hi,
|
| I need to create a filelist of files that exist in a
| directory that have been updated in the past 7 days and have
| the list of files backed up by TSM. Does anyone know how tis
| can be done be commands native to Windows without requiring
| any third party software ?
|
| Rich
|


This will get you most of the way there, though something in vbscript might
be better.

Also, check the delimiters in the 'for' statement - I assume that you're
using -mm-dd for the regional seetings for your date format - it may not
be compatible with the input needed for the xcopy command.

-Begin Batch File-
@echo off

for /F tokens=1-4 delims=-  %%i in ('date /t') do (
set DayOfWeek=%%i
set Year=%%j
set Month=%%k
set Day=%%l
set Date=%%i %%j-%%k-%%l
)

cd %%mydirectory%%

xcopy *.* /l /e /d:%%k-%%l-%%j  c:\output.txt
-End Batch File-


Re: Power saving and TSM backups

2006-08-17 Thread Kurt Buff
Any way to integrate Wake-on-LAN to boot/shutdown systems?

| -Original Message-
| From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Behalf Of
| Paul Zarnowski
| Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 19:02
| To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
| Subject: [ADSM-L] Power saving and TSM backups
|
|
| One way we are looking to save energy is to turn computers off at
| night.  As we typically run backups at night, this presents a
| problem.  We
| would like to see a way that users could initiate a
| backup/auto-shutdown as
| they leave work for the day so that their computers aren't left on all
| night.  We estimate that the energy savings would be
| substantial.  Some
| other backup products provide this capability.
|
| Has anyone else figured out a way to do this with TSM on
| Windows, MacOS,
| and Linux?
|
| Has anyone else wished that TSM had a way to do this?
|
| ..Paul
|


Re: Keeping files in diskpools

2005-06-10 Thread Kurt Buff
Wanda Prather said...
 Well, the straightforward TSM way to keep files in a diskpool, is to
 remove the NEXTSTGPOOL value from the definition of the
 storage pool (so
 that the files have no place to migrate to), or set the
 HIGHMIG stgpool
 pool property to 100%, so that migration will never start.

That's a possible but unlikely strategy, unless I can arrange to get that
data to tape in an alternate fashion for offsite storage.

 The most practical way to do that, is to split your storage pools so
 that the client data you want to stay to disk all goes to one
 disk pool,
 and the other clients go to another pool that DOES migrate.

Seems like segregating the storage pools by client is a good thing to do
regardless.

 You can split the clients up by putting them in different
 domains, or by
 using management classes.

Something to learn - I'll peruse the docs for that. I don't believe that
we're doing anything like that at the moment.

 If you don't want to do that, but you want to know when your disk pool
 is getting full, you can use TSM Operational Reporter.
 You can add a line to the custom summary to tell you the disk pool
 utilization, based on a select statement:

 select pct_utilized from stgpools where stgpool_name='BACKUPDISK'

 And you can set a threshold for that value so that TOR runs every nn
 minutes, and sends you an email if pct_utilized is greater than, say,
 90%.

This does sound promising - more docs to read!

 Hope some of that is what you are looking for...

Definitely

 Wanda Prather
 I/O, I/O, It's all about I/O  -(me)


Thanks very much for taking the time. I'm sure I'll have more questions
later

Kurt


Keeping files in diskpools

2005-06-08 Thread Kurt Buff
All,

First time poster, fairly new to the whole thing, so help much appreciated.

We've got a TSM server on which we've just upgraded the disk array, from 1TB
to 2TB. It also has a Spectralogic Treefrog unit with two AIT2 drives and a
15-slot robot.

We're looking to keep the current generation of files from our main file
server in the diskpools, so that we (in the event of a meltdown of the
fileserver) won't have to resort to tape. The amount of storage on the file
server is roughly 1TB - the other servers are only a small fraction of that.

We've kept the old diskpools, and created new ones to catch new data.

The file server currently has its storage divided into two partitions. I'm
reconfiguring the array on the file server to add space, and I'm going to
switch to a single large partition, and change the drive letter so that the
TSM server will pick up all of the files on the reconfigured array as new.
(I've got a copy of the data on a test machine, done with robocopy, to
retain all of the ACL information, and will be copying the data back after
the production file server is reconfigured.)

Is there some way 1) to fix those files in their diskpools, or 2)  get
notification if they start to migrate to tape and/or 3) get notification if
space in the diskpools is such that files from the file server are likely to
migrate to tape?

The version for TSM shown at the CLI interface is Version 5, Release 1,
Level 5.0.

Thanks,

Kurt Buff
Sr. Network Administrator
Zetron, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]