Re: Sysback

2018-09-21 Thread David Beardsley
Latest I heard and is recent...

https://www.cristie.com/news/take-over-development-ibm-sysback-software/

Thanks
-Dave

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager  On Behalf Of Richard van 
Denzel
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 09:17
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Sysback

Hi All,

Does anyone know if Sysback/6000 (sending AIX mksysb to TSM) is still around 
for Spectrum Protect 7 or 8 and what's it called now?

Richard


Re: Sysback

2018-09-21 Thread Lee Miller
Yes, it sends its backup images to TSM.   This is true for all of 
SysBack's backup types (system, volume group, filesystem, local volume and 
file/directory)
Its called  IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for System Backup and Recovery 
(SysBack).

Recently the product was sold to Christie.  But IBM is still honoring all 
existing SysBack contracts with Tech support and maintenance. 

Lee Miller
IBM Spectrum Protect Server Development 
Phone: 817-874-7484



From:   Richard van Denzel 
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:   09/21/2018 08:19 AM
Subject:[ADSM-L] Sysback
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 



Hi All,

Does anyone know if Sysback/6000 (sending AIX mksysb to TSM) is still
around for Spectrum Protect 7 or 8 and what's it called now?

Richard


Re: sysback help needed !

2006-04-03 Thread Joe Pendergast
Perhaps I am reading this wrong, but here are some hints that I have
learned over the years:

1)  The bootp server must be at or above the oslevel of the restored
server:
AIX 5.3 can be used as a bootp server for AIX  5.2
AIX 5.2 cannot be used as a bootp server for AIX 5.3
This sounds like a show stopper till you are able to upgrade the NIM/bootp
server.

2) In order for sysback to restore on different hardware, the sysback
image must include all the device drivers for the restored machine.  I was
sure they fixed that during the upgrade to AIX 5.3 by loading ALL device
drivers during installation.  Just to be sure, you might try the following
steps:
a) install devices.* from the install media
b) recreate your sysback image
c) re-run your sysback restore

Question:  What is the LED shown for your 505 server?  The LED might also
indicate the problem.




goc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
04/03/2006 02:21 AM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
sysback help needed !






hi all,
i'm doing an test restore of rootvg from TSM via classic network boot
the communication is fine and everything seems okay except this ...
it simply hangs on following ...

---
 Type menu item number and press Enter or select Navigation key:1
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM STARTING SOFTWARE   IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBMPLEASE WAIT...   IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM
IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM IBM
IBM

BOOTP: chosen-network-type = ethernet,auto,rj45,auto
BOOTP: server   IP =10.243.122.10
BOOTP: requested filename =
BOOTP: client   IP =10.243.166.9
BOOTP: client   HW addr =   0 11 25 7e 4 4e
BOOTP: gateway  IP =10.243.166.1
BOOTP: device/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BOOTP: loc-code  U789A.001.AAA1094-P1-T1

BOOTP: wait 60 seconds for Spanning Tree ...

BOOTP R = 1 BOOTP S = 2
FILE: /tftpboot/axtprov2

BOOTP: chosen-network-type = ethernet,auto,rj45,auto
BOOTP: server   IP =10.243.122.10
BOOTP: requested filename =
BOOTP: client   IP =10.243.166.9
BOOTP: client   HW addr =   0 11 25 7e 4 4e
BOOTP: gateway  IP =10.243.166.1
BOOTP: device/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BOOTP: loc-code  U789A.001.AAA1094-P1-T1

BOOTP: wait 60 seconds for Spanning Tree ...

BOOTP R = 1 BOOTP S = 2
FILE: /tftpboot/axtprov2
FINAL Packet Count = 16673
FINAL File Size = 8536286 bytes.
load-base=0x4000
real-base=0xc0

Elapsed time since release of system processors: 16 mins 27 secs







---
Welcome to AIX.
   

Re: sysback backup procedure on TSM and client server

2005-08-24 Thread goc

hi,
what do you mean it doesnt work ?
you have to give us some clues, error messages and so on ...
i'm doing over 60 sysbacks to TSM via crontab scripts

goran


- Original Message -
From: Dksh Cssc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 11:24 AM
Subject: sysback backup procedure on TSM and client server



Dear all,

I manage to get OS backup via sysback done successfully for the first
time(manually using sysback).However when I try to arrange a schedule to
backup a sysback script, it doesn't work.

Is there any recommended advice to backup the OS using TSM scheduler
rather than cron job? Any good procedure to do a sysback backup?

I
Thanks and Warmest Regards,



Re: sysback backup procedure on TSM and client server

2005-08-24 Thread Lawrence Clark
Yeah, I haven't found the TSM integrated features of SYSBACK very
useful.

We do cron scheduled SYSBACKS to a common area on the sysback server,
then do a TSM scheduled archive delete of the area.

We stagger our sysbacks for our nodes over the days of the week to get
all of them done weekly.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/24/2005 9:22:08 AM 
hi,
what do you mean it doesnt work ?
you have to give us some clues, error messages and so on ...
i'm doing over 60 sysbacks to TSM via crontab scripts

goran


- Original Message -
From: Dksh Cssc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 11:24 AM
Subject: sysback backup procedure on TSM and client server


 Dear all,

 I manage to get OS backup via sysback done successfully for the
first
 time(manually using sysback).However when I try to arrange a schedule
to
 backup a sysback script, it doesn't work.

 Is there any recommended advice to backup the OS using TSM scheduler
 rather than cron job? Any good procedure to do a sysback backup?

 I
 Thanks and Warmest Regards,



Re: sysback backup procedure on TSM and client server

2005-08-24 Thread goc

well, i do ... :-)
it's simple and works very very good
directly to tape ... :-)

peace,
goran


- Original Message -
From: Lawrence Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: sysback backup procedure on TSM and client server



Yeah, I haven't found the TSM integrated features of SYSBACK very
useful.

We do cron scheduled SYSBACKS to a common area on the sysback server,
then do a TSM scheduled archive delete of the area.

We stagger our sysbacks for our nodes over the days of the week to get
all of them done weekly.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/24/2005 9:22:08 AM 

hi,
what do you mean it doesnt work ?
you have to give us some clues, error messages and so on ...
i'm doing over 60 sysbacks to TSM via crontab scripts

goran


- Original Message -
From: Dksh Cssc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 11:24 AM
Subject: sysback backup procedure on TSM and client server



Dear all,

I manage to get OS backup via sysback done successfully for the

first

time(manually using sysback).However when I try to arrange a schedule

to

backup a sysback script, it doesn't work.

Is there any recommended advice to backup the OS using TSM scheduler
rather than cron job? Any good procedure to do a sysback backup?

I
Thanks and Warmest Regards,





Re: sysback interaging to tsm restore question

2005-07-11 Thread goc

afaik this is okay , you have to choose network adapter which will be active
during restore, another words the net. adapter which was used when sysbackup
was made, after choosing the right net. adapter you will have option to
choose virtual tsm device

goran

- Original Message -
From: liming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 12:16 PM
Subject: sysback interaging to tsm restore question



Hi all,TSM server is 5.2.4(OS is aix 5.3 ml02,it's the instserver and
bootserver also),TSM client is 5.2.4(OS is aix 5.3 ml02 too,sysback is
5.6.6).I can boot this to sysback boot menu ,but from change installation
device option I can see all the ethernet adapters but can't see the
virtual TSM devices.I can't access change volume group logical volume
information and install the system with current settiongs options,the
error message is No install options on the server are available for the
rootvg volume group. You must select an install device or file for the
rootvg before continuing.The content of debug.out is:



# more /debug.out
 [sysinstall setupfiles: Mon Jul 11 14:58:11
2005] --
+ typeset -i numpvs
+ rm -f /tmp/inst_error
+ MAXPPS=1016
+ KSH=/bin/ksh
+ set -x
+ cd /
+ [ -z  ]
+ [ ! -f /usr/lib/methods/devices.cat -a 5 != 5 -a -z  ]
+ [ 5 = 3 -a ! -f /tmp/cd.extract ]
+ [[ ! -f /usr/sbin/umount ]]
+ [[ ! -f /usr/sbin/unmount ]]
+ [[ -n  ]]
+ 1 /tmp/pvinfo
+ getlvminfo -PN
+ VGname=
+ getlvminfo -VN
+ [ -z  ]
+ VGname=(free)
+ + getlvminfo -P hdisk0 -iI
PVid=00c41efe5b293c99
+ + getlvminfo -P hdisk0 -iX
Location=0B-08-00-4,0
+ [ -z 0B-08-00-4,0 ]
+ + lsdev -Cl hdisk0 -F description
desc=16 Bit LVD SCSI Disk Drive
+ print hdisk0 (free) 00c41efe5b293c99 0B-08-00-4,0 16 Bit LVD SCSI Disk
Drive
+ VGname=
+ getlvminfo -VN
+ [ -z  ]
+ VGname=(free)
+ + getlvminfo -P hdisk1 -iI
PVid=00c41efef44dfbe3
+ + getlvminfo -P hdisk1 -iX
Location=0B-08-00-5,0
+ [ -z 0B-08-00-5,0 ]
+ + lsdev -Cl hdisk1 -F description
desc=16 Bit LVD SCSI Disk Drive
+ print hdisk1 (free) 00c41efef44dfbe3 0B-08-00-5,0 16 Bit LVD SCSI Disk
Drive
+ [ ! -z  ]
+ [ ! -f /tmp/instdev ]
+ [ ! -z  ]
+ [ ! -z  ]
+ print /dev/ent0
+ 1 /tmp/instdev
+ + cat /tmp/instdev
INSTDEV=/dev/ent0
+ setdevdesc
+ + cat /tmp/instdev
DEVLIST=/dev/ent0
+ basename /dev/ent0
+ print Network [ent0]
+ 1 /tmp/instdevdesc
+ grep ^sbnet /etc/services
+ 1 /dev/null 2 1
+ test 1 -ne 0
+ print sbnet\t\t1239/tcp\t\t\t# Sysback Remote Backup/Install
+ 1 /etc/services
+ 1 /tmp/..buffer4
+ grep rmt
+ lsdev -Cctape -S Available
+ LANG=C
+ grep ^cd
+ lsdev -Cccdrom -S Available
+ LANG=C
+ grep ^tok
+ lsdev -Ccadapter
+ LANG=C
+ grep ^ent
+ lsdev -Ccadapter
+ LANG=C
+ grep ^fdd
+ lsdev -Ccadapter
+ LANG=C
+ exec
+ 4 /tmp/..buffer4
+ 1 /tmp/instdevinfo
+ read -u4 dev status loc desc
+ iscfg rmt0
+ device=rmt0
+ odmget CuDv
+ grep -p rmt0
+ read x x uniquetype
+ grep PdDvLn
+ [ -z tape/fcp/ost ]
+ + sed s///g
+ print tape/fcp/ost
uniquetype=tape/fcp/ost
+ odmget PdDv
+ grep -p tape/fcp/ost
+ read x x cfgfile
+ grep [ ]*Configure
+ [ -z /etc/methods/cfgscsitape ]
+ + sed s///g
+ print /etc/methods/cfgscsitape
cfgfile=/etc/methods/cfgscsitape
+ [ ! -f /etc/methods/cfgscsitape ]
+ return 0
+ printf /dev/%-8.8s %-35.35s  %s\n rmt0 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive 0E-08-02
+ read -u4 dev status loc desc
+ iscfg rmt1
+ device=rmt1
+ odmget CuDv
+ grep -p rmt1
+ read x x uniquetype
+ grep PdDvLn
+ [ -z tape/fcp/ost ]
+ + sed s///g
+ print tape/fcp/ost
uniquetype=tape/fcp/ost
+ odmget PdDv
+ grep -p tape/fcp/ost
+ read x x cfgfile
+ grep [ ]*Configure
+ [ -z /etc/methods/cfgscsitape ]
+ + sed s///g
+ print /etc/methods/cfgscsitape
cfgfile=/etc/methods/cfgscsitape
+ [ ! -f /etc/methods/cfgscsitape ]
+ return 0
+ printf /dev/%-8.8s %-35.35s  %s\n rmt1 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive 0E-08-02
+ read -u4 dev status loc desc
+ iscfg rmt2
+ device=rmt2
+ odmget CuDv
+ grep -p rmt2
+ read x x uniquetype
+ grep PdDvLn
+ [ -z tape/fcp/ost ]
+ + sed s///g
+ print tape/fcp/ost
uniquetype=tape/fcp/ost
+ odmget PdDv
+ grep -p tape/fcp/ost
+ read x x cfgfile
+ grep [ ]*Configure
+ [ -z /etc/methods/cfgscsitape ]
+ + sed s///g
+ print /etc/methods/cfgscsitape
cfgfile=/etc/methods/cfgscsitape
+ [ ! -f /etc/methods/cfgscsitape ]
+ return 0
+ printf /dev/%-8.8s %-35.35s  %s\n rmt2 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive 0E-08-02
+ read -u4 dev status loc desc
+ iscfg rmt3
+ device=rmt3
+ odmget CuDv
+ grep -p rmt3
+ read x x uniquetype
+ grep PdDvLn
+ [ -z tape/fcp/ost ]
+ + sed s///g
+ print tape/fcp/ost
uniquetype=tape/fcp/ost
+ odmget PdDv
+ grep -p tape/fcp/ost
+ read x x cfgfile
+ grep [ ]*Configure
+ [ -z /etc/methods/cfgscsitape ]
+ + sed s///g
+ print /etc/methods/cfgscsitape
cfgfile=/etc/methods/cfgscsitape
+ [ ! -f /etc/methods/cfgscsitape ]
+ return 0
+ printf /dev/%-8.8s %-35.35s  %s\n rmt3 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive 0E-08-02
+ read -u4 dev status loc desc
+ iscfg cd0
+ device=cd0
+ odmget CuDv
+ grep -p cd0
+ read x x uniquetype
+ grep 

Re: sysback interaging to tsm restore question

2005-07-11 Thread liming
Thank goran,the network adapter for sysback is en0,but in sysback boot menu all 
the adapters are inactive,and I didn't find a way to make it active.
- Original Message - 
From: goc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] sysback interaging to tsm restore question


 afaik this is okay , you have to choose network adapter which will be active
 during restore, another words the net. adapter which was used when sysbackup
 was made, after choosing the right net. adapter you will have option to
 choose virtual tsm device
 
 goran
 
 - Original Message -
 From: liming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 12:16 PM
 Subject: sysback interaging to tsm restore question
 
 
 Hi all,TSM server is 5.2.4(OS is aix 5.3 ml02,it's the instserver and
 bootserver also),TSM client is 5.2.4(OS is aix 5.3 ml02 too,sysback is
 5.6.6).I can boot this to sysback boot menu ,but from change installation
 device option I can see all the ethernet adapters but can't see the
 virtual TSM devices.I can't access change volume group logical volume
 information and install the system with current settiongs options,the
 error message is No install options on the server are available for the
 rootvg volume group. You must select an install device or file for the
 rootvg before continuing.The content of debug.out is:



 # more /debug.out
  [sysinstall setupfiles: Mon Jul 11 14:58:11
 2005] --
 + typeset -i numpvs
 + rm -f /tmp/inst_error
 + MAXPPS=1016
 + KSH=/bin/ksh
 + set -x
 + cd /
 + [ -z  ]
 + [ ! -f /usr/lib/methods/devices.cat -a 5 != 5 -a -z  ]
 + [ 5 = 3 -a ! -f /tmp/cd.extract ]
 + [[ ! -f /usr/sbin/umount ]]
 + [[ ! -f /usr/sbin/unmount ]]
 + [[ -n  ]]
 + 1 /tmp/pvinfo
 + getlvminfo -PN
 + VGname=
 + getlvminfo -VN
 + [ -z  ]
 + VGname=(free)
 + + getlvminfo -P hdisk0 -iI
 PVid=00c41efe5b293c99
 + + getlvminfo -P hdisk0 -iX
 Location=0B-08-00-4,0
 + [ -z 0B-08-00-4,0 ]
 + + lsdev -Cl hdisk0 -F description
 desc=16 Bit LVD SCSI Disk Drive
 + print hdisk0 (free) 00c41efe5b293c99 0B-08-00-4,0 16 Bit LVD SCSI Disk
 Drive
 + VGname=
 + getlvminfo -VN
 + [ -z  ]
 + VGname=(free)
 + + getlvminfo -P hdisk1 -iI
 PVid=00c41efef44dfbe3
 + + getlvminfo -P hdisk1 -iX
 Location=0B-08-00-5,0
 + [ -z 0B-08-00-5,0 ]
 + + lsdev -Cl hdisk1 -F description
 desc=16 Bit LVD SCSI Disk Drive
 + print hdisk1 (free) 00c41efef44dfbe3 0B-08-00-5,0 16 Bit LVD SCSI Disk
 Drive
 + [ ! -z  ]
 + [ ! -f /tmp/instdev ]
 + [ ! -z  ]
 + [ ! -z  ]
 + print /dev/ent0
 + 1 /tmp/instdev
 + + cat /tmp/instdev
 INSTDEV=/dev/ent0
 + setdevdesc
 + + cat /tmp/instdev
 DEVLIST=/dev/ent0
 + basename /dev/ent0
 + print Network [ent0]
 + 1 /tmp/instdevdesc
 + grep ^sbnet /etc/services
 + 1 /dev/null 2 1
 + test 1 -ne 0
 + print sbnet\t\t1239/tcp\t\t\t# Sysback Remote Backup/Install
 + 1 /etc/services
 + 1 /tmp/..buffer4
 + grep rmt
 + lsdev -Cctape -S Available
 + LANG=C
 + grep ^cd
 + lsdev -Cccdrom -S Available
 + LANG=C
 + grep ^tok
 + lsdev -Ccadapter
 + LANG=C
 + grep ^ent
 + lsdev -Ccadapter
 + LANG=C
 + grep ^fdd
 + lsdev -Ccadapter
 + LANG=C
 + exec
 + 4 /tmp/..buffer4
 + 1 /tmp/instdevinfo
 + read -u4 dev status loc desc
 + iscfg rmt0
 + device=rmt0
 + odmget CuDv
 + grep -p rmt0
 + read x x uniquetype
 + grep PdDvLn
 + [ -z tape/fcp/ost ]
 + + sed s///g
 + print tape/fcp/ost
 uniquetype=tape/fcp/ost
 + odmget PdDv
 + grep -p tape/fcp/ost
 + read x x cfgfile
 + grep [ ]*Configure
 + [ -z /etc/methods/cfgscsitape ]
 + + sed s///g
 + print /etc/methods/cfgscsitape
 cfgfile=/etc/methods/cfgscsitape
 + [ ! -f /etc/methods/cfgscsitape ]
 + return 0
 + printf /dev/%-8.8s %-35.35s  %s\n rmt0 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive 0E-08-02
 + read -u4 dev status loc desc
 + iscfg rmt1
 + device=rmt1
 + odmget CuDv
 + grep -p rmt1
 + read x x uniquetype
 + grep PdDvLn
 + [ -z tape/fcp/ost ]
 + + sed s///g
 + print tape/fcp/ost
 uniquetype=tape/fcp/ost
 + odmget PdDv
 + grep -p tape/fcp/ost
 + read x x cfgfile
 + grep [ ]*Configure
 + [ -z /etc/methods/cfgscsitape ]
 + + sed s///g
 + print /etc/methods/cfgscsitape
 cfgfile=/etc/methods/cfgscsitape
 + [ ! -f /etc/methods/cfgscsitape ]
 + return 0
 + printf /dev/%-8.8s %-35.35s  %s\n rmt1 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive 0E-08-02
 + read -u4 dev status loc desc
 + iscfg rmt2
 + device=rmt2
 + odmget CuDv
 + grep -p rmt2
 + read x x uniquetype
 + grep PdDvLn
 + [ -z tape/fcp/ost ]
 + + sed s///g
 + print tape/fcp/ost
 uniquetype=tape/fcp/ost
 + odmget PdDv
 + grep -p tape/fcp/ost
 + read x x cfgfile
 + grep [ ]*Configure
 + [ -z /etc/methods/cfgscsitape ]
 + + sed s///g
 + print /etc/methods/cfgscsitape
 cfgfile=/etc/methods/cfgscsitape
 + [ ! -f /etc/methods/cfgscsitape ]
 + return 0
 + printf /dev/%-8.8s %-35.35s  %s\n rmt2 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive 0E-08-02
 + read -u4 dev status loc desc
 + iscfg rmt3
 + device=rmt3
 + odmget CuDv
 + grep -p rmt3
 + read x x uniquetype
 + grep PdDvLn
 + [ -z 

Re: Sysback version 5.6.5

2005-06-13 Thread William Sherrill
Paul,

You want IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for System Backup and Recovery,
GC32-9076-02.  Sysback is installed on the system that you want to run it
on and then you tie into the TSM api to store the backup to TSM.  The book
above explains the how to.

Bill Sherrill


Re: Sysback version 5.6.5

2005-06-13 Thread Giglio, Paul
I don't see the link.
However if I get this correct
You say to install the product onto the client not the TSM server correct?
Then configure it through smit as unusual

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
William Sherrill
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 12:01 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Sysback version 5.6.5


Paul,

You want IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for System Backup and Recovery,
GC32-9076-02.  Sysback is installed on the system that you want to run it
on and then you tie into the TSM api to store the backup to TSM.  The book
above explains the how to.

Bill Sherrill


- 




Music from EMI

This e-mail including any attachments is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. If you have received it in error please advise the sender 
immediately by return email and then delete it from your system. The 
unauthorised use, distribution, copying or alteration of this email is strictly 
forbidden. If you need assistance please contact us on +44 20 7795 7000.

This email is from a unit or subsidiary of EMI Group plc.

Registered Office: 27 Wrights Lane, London W8 5SW

Registered in England No 229231.


- 


Re: Sysback and 32-bit client

2004-01-30 Thread Paul Ripke
From my experience, the whole 32 bit vs 64 bit thing on AIX comes down
to what the process is doing. For Oracle, 64 bit makes sense on a large
memory system, since you can then throw heaps of RAM at its SGA, and
hopefully experience a higher cache hit ratio. For something like TSM
client, the performance difference between 32 and 64 bit should be
fairly
minimal. Even for the AIX kernel, IBM recommends running 32 bit unless
you have more than 16 GB of RAM (not sure where the reference is for
that). Indeed, some processes will even slow down going from 32 bit
to 64 bit. Also, 64 bit applications are often about 30% larger than
their 32 bit counterparts, which, in itself, means a performance hit.
On Friday, Jan 30, 2004, at 04:30 Australia/Sydney, David E Ehresman
wrote:
I don't disagree with any of what you wrote in your latest note but
that
is hardly the same as Currently we are forced to use the sysback
remote
server utilities
instead of the TSM integration feature as it only supports the 32-bit
TSM api which is what you orginially wrote.  The 32 bit api does work.
 But today the choice is using the TSM integration with all its
benefits
via the 32 bit api or not using the TSM integration because the api
isn't 64.  The later seems to me a choice of making ones life more
difficult than it needs to be just to prove a point to a large
organization which could care less about your individual stand.  I am
confident that as the Sysback TSM integration matures, it will support
the then current api.
David

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/29/2004 12:16:56 PM 
Hi,

I would assume that the 64-bit client is faster, smaller, better
(otherwise why create a 64-bit client) and as almost all of my systems
are 64-bit, that is the client that is loaded on them.  To me, running
a
32-bit client on a 64-bit OS/Hardware is like running the 32-bit
version
of Oracle on a 64-bit OS/Hardware (ie. It is gimping yourself some).
Also the future (whether IBM likes to admit it or not) is 64-bit
computing (Alpha's have been there for 10 years now..).
By only supporting the 32-bit client, it seems that IBM is saying that
we kind of support your bare metal solution.  I was just wondering if
anyone has seen any kind of timetable regarding changes to this
feature.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
David E Ehresman
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sysback and 32-bit client
Why does the 32-bit TSM api prevent you from using the feature?  the
32-bit api does run on 64 bit machines and will work with servers
running in 64 bit mode.
David

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/29/2004 11:13:28 AM 
Hi,

We use sysback as our bare metal solution for our AIX servers.
Currently we are forced to use the sysback remote server utilities
instead of the TSM integration feature as it only supports the 32-bit
TSM api. Does anyone know what IBM's plans for changing this
requirement
are?  The solution isn't horrible currently, but could I would really
like to take advantage of some of the expiration features, etc in TSM.
Michael

This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is
subject
to protection under state and federal law. This information is
intended
to be for the use of the individual named above. If you are not the
intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying,
distribution
or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be
punishable by law. If you have received this electronic transmission
in
error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply).
This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject
to protection
under state and federal law. This information is intended to be for the
use of the
individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware
that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information is prohibited
and may be punishable by law. If you have received this electronic
transmission in
error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply).

--
Paul Ripke
Unix/OpenVMS/TSM/DBA
I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.
-- Douglas Adams


Re: Sysback and 32-bit client

2004-01-29 Thread David E Ehresman
Why does the 32-bit TSM api prevent you from using the feature?  the
32-bit api does run on 64 bit machines and will work with servers
running in 64 bit mode.

David

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/29/2004 11:13:28 AM 
Hi,

We use sysback as our bare metal solution for our AIX servers.
Currently we are forced to use the sysback remote server utilities
instead of the TSM integration feature as it only supports the 32-bit
TSM api. Does anyone know what IBM's plans for changing this
requirement
are?  The solution isn't horrible currently, but could I would really
like to take advantage of some of the expiration features, etc in TSM.


Michael


This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject
to protection
under state and federal law. This information is intended to be for the
use of the
individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware
that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information is prohibited
and may be punishable by law. If you have received this electronic
transmission in
error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply).


Re: Sysback and 32-bit client

2004-01-29 Thread Wheelock, Michael D
Hi,

I would assume that the 64-bit client is faster, smaller, better
(otherwise why create a 64-bit client) and as almost all of my systems
are 64-bit, that is the client that is loaded on them.  To me, running a
32-bit client on a 64-bit OS/Hardware is like running the 32-bit version
of Oracle on a 64-bit OS/Hardware (ie. It is gimping yourself some).
Also the future (whether IBM likes to admit it or not) is 64-bit
computing (Alpha's have been there for 10 years now..).  

By only supporting the 32-bit client, it seems that IBM is saying that
we kind of support your bare metal solution.  I was just wondering if
anyone has seen any kind of timetable regarding changes to this feature.


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David E Ehresman
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sysback and 32-bit client

Why does the 32-bit TSM api prevent you from using the feature?  the
32-bit api does run on 64 bit machines and will work with servers
running in 64 bit mode.

David

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/29/2004 11:13:28 AM 
Hi,

We use sysback as our bare metal solution for our AIX servers.
Currently we are forced to use the sysback remote server utilities
instead of the TSM integration feature as it only supports the 32-bit
TSM api. Does anyone know what IBM's plans for changing this requirement
are?  The solution isn't horrible currently, but could I would really
like to take advantage of some of the expiration features, etc in TSM.


Michael


This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject
to protection under state and federal law. This information is intended
to be for the use of the individual named above. If you are not the
intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution
or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be
punishable by law. If you have received this electronic transmission in
error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply).

This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject to protection 
under state and federal law. This information is intended to be for the use of the 
individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is 
prohibited 
and may be punishable by law. If you have received this electronic transmission in 
error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply).


Re: Sysback and 32-bit client

2004-01-29 Thread David E Ehresman
I don't disagree with any of what you wrote in your latest note but that
is hardly the same as Currently we are forced to use the sysback remote
server utilities
instead of the TSM integration feature as it only supports the 32-bit
TSM api which is what you orginially wrote.  The 32 bit api does work.
 But today the choice is using the TSM integration with all its benefits
via the 32 bit api or not using the TSM integration because the api
isn't 64.  The later seems to me a choice of making ones life more
difficult than it needs to be just to prove a point to a large
organization which could care less about your individual stand.  I am
confident that as the Sysback TSM integration matures, it will support
the then current api.

David

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/29/2004 12:16:56 PM 
Hi,

I would assume that the 64-bit client is faster, smaller, better
(otherwise why create a 64-bit client) and as almost all of my systems
are 64-bit, that is the client that is loaded on them.  To me, running
a
32-bit client on a 64-bit OS/Hardware is like running the 32-bit
version
of Oracle on a 64-bit OS/Hardware (ie. It is gimping yourself some).
Also the future (whether IBM likes to admit it or not) is 64-bit
computing (Alpha's have been there for 10 years now..).

By only supporting the 32-bit client, it seems that IBM is saying that
we kind of support your bare metal solution.  I was just wondering if
anyone has seen any kind of timetable regarding changes to this
feature.


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
David E Ehresman
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sysback and 32-bit client

Why does the 32-bit TSM api prevent you from using the feature?  the
32-bit api does run on 64 bit machines and will work with servers
running in 64 bit mode.

David

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/29/2004 11:13:28 AM 
Hi,

We use sysback as our bare metal solution for our AIX servers.
Currently we are forced to use the sysback remote server utilities
instead of the TSM integration feature as it only supports the 32-bit
TSM api. Does anyone know what IBM's plans for changing this
requirement
are?  The solution isn't horrible currently, but could I would really
like to take advantage of some of the expiration features, etc in TSM.


Michael


This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is
subject
to protection under state and federal law. This information is
intended
to be for the use of the individual named above. If you are not the
intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying,
distribution
or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be
punishable by law. If you have received this electronic transmission
in
error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply).

This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject
to protection
under state and federal law. This information is intended to be for the
use of the
individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware
that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information is prohibited
and may be punishable by law. If you have received this electronic
transmission in
error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply).


Re: Sysback

2003-12-30 Thread Bill Boyer
There's a nice redbook IBM Tivoli Storage Manager: Bare Machine Recovery
for AIX with SYSBACK. Go to http://www.rebooks.ibm.com and search on
sysback. Right now it's just a redpiece, but dated 10/30/03.

Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Valeriano Bassi
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 6:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sysback


Hi there,
we are evaluating the use of Sysback to do Bare Metal Restore of our AIX
boxes.

I have two questions for you:
1) will Sysback work with an S/390 TSM Server?
2) do I need to use NIM or may I start recovery operations
booting from a CD, for example?

Your help will be very appreciated
TIA
Valeriano Bassi [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Sysback/6000 vs. mksysb for TSM DR restore

2002-03-07 Thread Miles Purdy

One quick thought, just install the needed drivers on the H70.
Miles


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07-Mar-02 11:19:12 AM 
Hi,

We have been using Sysback/6000 for years as our backup recovery tool for
our AIX systems. We are now merging many of those servers, and the
collection of non-AIX systems is proliferating so we are migrating to a TSM
backup/recovery mechanism. The TSM server is an AIX based NSM box.

I am in the process of learning the ins and outs of DR with a TSM and the
first step is to restore the TSM server itself. The first method tried was
the IBM standard mksysb. Because the box I am restoring onto is a different
model, size and slightly newer architecture with newer cards and I/O
subsystems, it took a while to figure out the right combination of CD's,
mksysb tape, and procedures to get the DR test system working. For example,
the boot disk requires drivers that do not exist on the H70, and they have
to be installed after the mksysb restore, but before we can actually use the
restored system. Once I got the restored system into a usable state, I still
faced the task of cleaning up and recreating the storage pool volume group
and it's associated logical volumes and filesystems. The DR test box also
has a very different set of hdisks onto which to restore the disk storage
pools.

It occurred to me, and has been mentioned on this mailing list, that using
Sysback/6000 would afford me the option of having the Sysback restore
rebuild those other LVM objects in a familiar way. The questions I have have
to do with the disparate hardware and driver requirements: Would the extra
driver restore procedures be required? Assuming they would, would I need
more of them or does the Sysback restore pull some of that from the AIX
install disks the way mksysb is supposed to? Then, if I need them, would
they work?

I should be able to test this next month some time, but any help or gotcha's
would be appreciated.

Werner Kliewer
Manitoba Public Insurance