Re: Downloading reports concurrently returns corrupted report data. Please advise.

2014-05-15 Thread Oliver
This turned out to be a thread safety issue in one of the Java classes we 
use (NumberFormat) to parse the reports.  Apologies for the false alarm.

Oliver


On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:29:28 PM UTC+1, Josh Radcliff (AdWords API 
Team) wrote:

 Hi Oliver,

 Are you using a new instance of 
 ReportDownloaderhttps://github.com/googleads/googleads-java-lib/blob/831d8a73dbf686d34caa09b489a9515335b177ca/modules/ads_lib/src/main/java/com/google/api/ads/adwords/lib/utils/v201402/ReportDownloader.java#L52for
  each thread? As mentioned in that type's javadoc, instances are not 
 thread-safe.

 Thanks,
 Josh, AdWords API Team

 On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 5:39:30 AM UTC-4, Oliver wrote:

 I'd like to also mention that the multiple threads all handle *different 
 *accounts that belong to different root accounts i.e. there is no issue 
 here of the access token or Credential object being created and used 
 multiple times concurrently.  

 Looking forward to hearing back from you.

 Oliver


 On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 8:11:01 AM UTC+1, Oliver wrote:

 We have an app that downloads performance reports (csv) for Adgroups, 
 keywords, Ads, etc.  So far, we've been using one thread to download the 
 reports and everything has been working fine for a long time.

 In an attempt to speed up the download process, we want to use multiple 
 threads to download the various reports.  However, doing this causes most 
 of the reports data to be corrupted.  We're seeing columns with no value, 
 or an empty string, or even numbers with multiple decimal points e.g. 
 123.456.789

 We use the Java client library. API v201309

 Any ideas why this is happening? This is currently a showstopper for us.

 Thanks for your help.

 Oliver



-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


CONCURRENT MODIFICATION Error

2014-05-15 Thread Luca Fiaschi
Hi all,
I am getting quite often CONCURRENT MODIFICATION ERRORS when trying to 
upload KWs.

I have a long list of operations and my strategy is to batch the requests 
and then call the mutate method of the service for the batch.
Batch are uploaded in series therefore, there should not be any issue with 
multiple threads.

However I still get from time to time the CONCURRENT MODIFICATION error.
Reading the doc seems that this is due to the way google processes the 
requests. My understanding is that it may happen when I try to add multiple 
Kws to the same adgroup.

The question is :

- if I implement a more clever batching strategy: parsing the operations 
and creating batches which only add Kws to different adgroups, would it 
help?

In general I would not like to go for this solution since it is a bit 
complicated to implement ( I have hundred thousands requests) and it does 
not allow to handle different types of requests (not only Kws) in a more 
general fashion.

Anybody could comment on what would be the best option to handle this issue?




-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Using TargetingIdeaService to return the data for the actual search term provided.

2014-05-15 Thread Ray Tsang (AdWords API Team)
Jeremy,

The returned result are not expected to return the same search terms, but 
rather, keyword ideas.  I.e., for a given term, the idea may not always be 
the same as the original term.

Thanks,

Ray

On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 5:34:13 PM UTC+2, Jeremy Tremblay wrote:

 It should be the same value as what you have in setQuery(...)

 Yes, that is what I expect. But it does not come back in 
 my TargetingIdeaPage as a TargetingIdea for every search term I use. 

 For example when I use bakruptcy as my search term, I can find A 
 TargetingIdea in my TargetingIdeaPage with a KEYWORD_TEXT attribute of 
 bankrputcy, yet if I use adoption, I cannot. 

 Is this a paging issue? Should I be making multiple calls to 
 targetingIdeaService.get?

 On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:54:40 AM UTC-5, Ray Tsang (AdWords API Team) 
 wrote:

 Jeremy,

 The search terms field in the UI should be exactly the same string you 
 entered in the previous step (in the Your product or service field).  It 
 is an user input.

 It should be the same value as what you have in setQuery(...).

 Cheers,

 Ray

 On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:58:12 PM UTC+2, Jeremy Tremblay wrote:


 Ray, see attached. I am using the following to get a TargetingIdeaPage 
 which generally contains all the data in that screen snap under the 
 Keyword (by relevance) section. I'm having issues getting the data under 
 the Search Terms section to come though on the TargetingIdeaPage:


// Get the TargetingIdeaService.

 TargetingIdeaServiceInterface targetingIdeaService = 
 adWordsServices.get(session, TargetingIdeaServiceInterface.class);


 // Create category products and services search parameter

 CategoryProductsAndServicesSearchParameter 
 categoryProductsAndServicesSearchParameter = new 
 CategoryProductsAndServicesSearchParameter();

 categoryProductsAndServicesSearchParameter.setCategoryId(10018);


 // Create related to query search parameter.

 RelatedToQuerySearchParameter relatedToQuerySearchParameter = new 
 RelatedToQuerySearchParameter();

 relatedToQuerySearchParameter.setQueries(new String[] {searchTerm});


 //Location

 int locationsSize = locationIds.size();

 Location[] locations = new Location[locationsSize];


 for (int i = 0; i  locationsSize; i++) {

 Location location = new Location();

 location.setId(locationIds.get(i).longValue());

 locations[i] = location;

 }


 LocationSearchParameter locationSearchParameter = new 
 LocationSearchParameter();

 locationSearchParameter.setLocations(locations);


 //Google only

 NetworkSearchParameter networkSearchParameter = new 
 NetworkSearchParameter();

 networkSearchParameter.setNetworkSetting(new NetworkSetting(true, false, 
 false, false));


 // Create selector.

 TargetingIdeaSelector selector = new TargetingIdeaSelector();

 selector.setRequestType(RequestType.IDEAS);

 selector.setIdeaType(IdeaType.KEYWORD);

 selector.setSearchParameters(new SearchParameter[] 
 {relatedToQuerySearchParameter, categoryProductsAndServicesSearchParameter, 
 locationSearchParameter, networkSearchParameter});

 selector.setRequestedAttributeTypes(new AttributeType[] {

 AttributeType.KEYWORD_TEXT,

 AttributeType.COMPETITION,

 AttributeType.SEARCH_VOLUME,

 AttributeType.AVERAGE_CPC});


 //800 is the MAX here. 

 // Set selector paging (required for targeting idea service).

 Paging paging = new Paging();

 paging.setStartIndex(0);

 paging.setNumberResults(800);

 selector.setPaging(paging);

 TargetingIdeaPage page = targetingIdeaService.get(selector);
 I am using 
 On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 1:11:20 PM UTC-5, Ray Tsang (AdWords API Team) 
 wrote:

 Jeremy,

 To make sure I'm on the same page - could I trouble you to attach a 
 screenshot of the search term that you are referring to?

 Thanks,

 Ray

 On Monday, May 12, 2014 4:10:00 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Tremblay wrote:

 Currently I am using the TargetingIdeaService to provide a subset of 
 the functionality of the Keyword 
 Plannerhttps://adwords.google.com/ko/KeywordPlanner/Home?__c=2479277912__u=3596500112__o=cues
  by 
 providing a list of locations and a RelatedToQuerySearchParameter query 
 to TargetingIdeaService.get to get a list of keywords and their 
 associated 
 data, as one might in the Search for new keyword and ad group ideas 
 section of the tool.  The results returned by the tool on the Keyword 
 Ideas tab include the Search Term data as well as a list of Keywords 
 and their data. 

 My use of TargetingIdeaService.get is returning the list of Keywords 
 just fine, but I can't seem to get the Search Term data to come 
 through. 
 Does anyone know how I might go about doing that? Is it perhaps due to 
 the 
 paging limitations of TargetingIdeaService.get  and I need more than 800 
 results to get a TargetingIdeaPage that includes an entry where the 
 KEYWORD_TEXT matches the RelatedToQuerySearchParameter query Search 
 Term 
 exactly? 


 Any help is appreciated,

 -jt-



-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

Re: Changing the OAuth2 client secret

2014-05-15 Thread Ray Tsang (AdWords API Team)
Rob,

I've noted this down.  However, I'm only able to help resolving AdWords API 
issues.  This is more related to the accounts and 
authenticationshttps://developers.google.com/accounts/ in 
general.

Could I trouble you to reach out via Google Accounts API related 
forumshttps://developers.google.com/accounts/forum
?

Thanks,

Ray

On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:51:44 PM UTC+2, Rob wrote:

 Note that Bing Ads allow changing the client secret for a given ID in 
 their Developer Center... it shouldn't be that difficult for Google!

 On Wednesday, 14 May 2014 17:37:19 UTC+1, Rob wrote:

 Hi,

 Is there a way to change the OAuth2 client secret without changing the 
 client ID?

 From what I can see, the only option is to generate a new client ID and 
 secret together, meaning any refresh tokens obtained against the old client 
 ID are effectively useless.

 If that is the case, what's the point of having a separate ID and secret? 
 Surely they should just be a single property of the application.

 This appears to be a design flaw with separating authentication from 
 authorization. I can't periodically change the client secret as a security 
 best practice (like changing your password on a regular basis) without 
 having to get all my clients to re-authorize me.



-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Changing the OAuth2 client secret

2014-05-15 Thread Rob
Thanks Ray, I've posted a question there...

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23679229/generating-a-new-client-secret

Rob.

On Thursday, 15 May 2014 11:59:04 UTC+1, Ray Tsang (AdWords API Team) wrote:

 Rob,

 I've noted this down.  However, I'm only able to help resolving AdWords 
 API issues.  This is more related to the accounts and 
 authenticationshttps://developers.google.com/accounts/ in 
 general.

 Could I trouble you to reach out via Google Accounts API related 
 forumshttps://developers.google.com/accounts/forum
 ?

 Thanks,

 Ray

 On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:51:44 PM UTC+2, Rob wrote:

 Note that Bing Ads allow changing the client secret for a given ID in 
 their Developer Center... it shouldn't be that difficult for Google!

 On Wednesday, 14 May 2014 17:37:19 UTC+1, Rob wrote:

 Hi,

 Is there a way to change the OAuth2 client secret without changing the 
 client ID?

 From what I can see, the only option is to generate a new client ID and 
 secret together, meaning any refresh tokens obtained against the old client 
 ID are effectively useless.

 If that is the case, what's the point of having a separate ID and 
 secret? Surely they should just be a single property of the application.

 This appears to be a design flaw with separating authentication from 
 authorization. I can't periodically change the client secret as a security 
 best practice (like changing your password on a regular basis) without 
 having to get all my clients to re-authorize me.



-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: PHP Client Library: An error has occurred: [QuotaCheckError.INCOMPLETE_SIGNUP @ ; trigger:'null']

2014-05-15 Thread edmund
I am also getting the same type of error as the OP, and I have followed the 
exact same steps.

I have also tried troubleshooting via error guide. Could you please take a 
look, Ray?

Production MCC ID: 307-898-0570
Test MCC ID: 203-909-5769
AdWords account inside Test MCC: 279-058-2489

On Thursday, April 10, 2014 6:22:36 PM UTC-4, Ray Tsang (AdWords API Team) 
wrote:

 Hi all,

 If you are receiving INCOMPLETE_SIGNUP 
 errorhttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/common-errors#QuotaCheckError,
  
 please carefully review the common error guide on how to resolve 
 thishttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/common-errors#QuotaCheckError
 .

 Cheers,

 Ray

 On Monday, April 7, 2014 1:13:11 PM UTC-4, Ray Tsang (AdWords API Team) 
 wrote:

 Gabriel,

 I've replied to you on the other thread in private.  Please take a look.

 Cheers,

 Ray

 On Thursday, April 3, 2014 6:28:34 PM UTC-4, Gabriel Kung wrote:

 Having the exact same problem.
 Production MCC Customer ID is: 565-672-9383
 Test MCC Customer ID is: 899-817-0069
 Test MCC Adwords Account: 460-090-3879

 If you have a solution, please let me know.
 Thanks,
 Gabriel



-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: AdWords API Re: Upgrading from V6 to V9

2014-05-15 Thread Jack Kidder
Michael this is your brother Jack, could you give me a call or text 
352-444-4111

On Monday, April 16, 2007 12:01:35 PM UTC-4, Michael Waites wrote:

 Do a search for wsdl.exe. You will find that post I told you about and
 in there Cali laid out a pretty descriptive version on using the
 WSDL.exe including code paths. His example used an older version, but
 once you see how they name the path, it will make sense to you where the
 new version is. As well, in that post, another person talked about using
 an XML file as a parameter to the WSDL.exe.

  
 Michael R. Waites, Jr.
 Sr. Software Developer
 SendTec, Inc.

 -Original Message-
 From: adwor...@googlegroups.com javascript: [mailto:
 adwor...@googlegroups.com javascript:]
 On Behalf Of a...@babyage.com javascript:
 Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:48 AM
 To: AdWords API Forum
 Subject: AdWords API Re: Upgrading from V6 to V9


 Well, I know that my predeccessor did infact use the WSDL to create
 the code, I am just unsure where to get the source to do it. (Not the
 WSDL.EXE, but the actual codebase for the API), I will have to poke
 around.

 On Apr 16, 11:45 am, Michael Waites mwai...@sendtec.com wrote:
  You need to either add Google's WSDL's path to your project as a web
  reference or build the stub code on your own. My college has
 previously
  spoken on how to do this with wsdl.exe; you may want to search this
  forum for wsdl.exe.
 
  Otherwise, do read the API's documentation, it is well laid out.
  Additionally, poke around a bit, there is sample code to be had and
 even
  better, some classes that can be used outright.
 
  Michael R. Waites, Jr.
  Sr. Software Developer
  SendTec, Inc.
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: adwor...@googlegroups.com javascript:
 [mailto:adwor...@googlegroups.com javascript:]
 
  On Behalf Of a...@babyage.com
  Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:23 AM
  To: AdWords API Forum
  Subject: AdWords API Re: Upgrading from V6 to V9
 
  I cannot find any code to upgrade with, I did not implament the
  original V6 API, so I am a bit unsure how the new V9 is even supposed
  to be implamented.
 
  On Apr 16, 10:27 am, Michael Waites mwai...@sendtec.com wrote:
   We recently did this as well. First, become aware that two big main
   objects have been removed. CreativeService and Creative. I will get
   credit where credit is due, and Google's AdWords API Developer's
 Guide
   does a good job of documenting what is deprecated and removed and
 how
  to
   overcome the issue.
 
   The place to start in the documentation is the Release notes for
  V9:http://www.google.com/apis/adwords/developer/releasenotes.html
 
   The real big helper is the API Difference table at the bottom of the
   page, you can click the deprecated items and you will be directed to
   suggestions on what you should use instead.
 
   I think you will find that your code will upgrade pretty easy. I
 found
   that where we had used CreativeService and Creative objects, a few
  extra
   lines of code were needed, but nothing overly difficult.
 
   Hope this helps,
 
   Michael R. Waites, Jr.
   Sr. Software Developer
   SendTec, Inc.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: adwor...@googlegroups.com javascript:
  [mailto:adwor...@googlegroups.com javascript:]
 
   On Behalf Of a...@babyage.com
   Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 10:17 AM
   To: AdWords API Forum
   Subject: AdWords API Upgrading from V6 to V9
 
   We have an implamentation of V6 API, and I cannot figure out how to
   upgrade this to V9!  We have a VB.NET Implamentation of the API, and
 I
   am trying to figure out how to upgrade to V9, any ideas and
   suggestions would be most helpful!  Thank You.- Hide quoted text -
 
   - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
 
  - Show quoted text -



-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: campaign conversion count greater than summed adgroup conversion count?

2014-05-15 Thread Omar El-Domeiri
The campaign I'm looking at is set to Search Network Only.


On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 1:28:06 PM UTC-5, Josh Radcliff (AdWords API 
Team) wrote:

 Hi,

 Are any of the campaigns involved *Search  Display Networks*, *Search 
 Network with Display Select*, or *Display Network Only* campaigns, or are 
 any of the ads *Dynamic Search Ads*?

 Thanks,
 Josh, AdWords API Team

 On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 5:12:08 PM UTC-4, Omar El-Domeiri wrote:

 I've found that number of conversions reported in the 
 CAMPAIGN_PERFORMANCE_REPORT is greater than the sum of conversions in the 
 ADGROUP_PERFORMANCE_REPORT.  

 Similarly for, the sum of the conversions column for the 
 KEYWORD_PERFORMANCE_REPORT is less than the sum for the 
 ADGROUP_PERFORMANCE_REPORT.  

 Why would this be the case?  Shouldn't every conversion be tied to a 
 keyword?



-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Adding campaigns and kws multiple times

2014-05-15 Thread Anash P. Oommen (AdWords API Team)
Hi Luca,

The keyword will be added only once. I'm not sure why such a difference 
exists in this behaviour, I guess AdWords throws error on duplicate 
campaign name because it enforces that condition, whereas you could add a 
keyword, delete it, add it back again and so on, so throwing an error for 
trying to add a duplicate keyword doesn't make sense.

I'll ask the API team to take a look.

Cheers,
Anash P. Oommen,
AdWords API Advisor.

On Thursday, May 15, 2014 6:02:22 AM UTC-4, Luca Fiaschi wrote:

 Hi,
 I would like a little clarification regarding adding an object (campaign, 
 adgroup, kw ... ) multiple times:

 For example when I try to add a campaign with the same name 2 times I get 
 an error (existing campaign). However this error does not occur when 
 readding a kw with the same text.

 What is the logic behind this? Will the Kw be duplicated or added only 
 once?


-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: CONCURRENT MODIFICATION Error

2014-05-15 Thread Anash P. Oommen (AdWords API Team)
Hi Luca,

Your approach of batching keyword operations by adgroups is fine, but you 
can also try staggering the batches such that successive API calls don't go 
to a single adgroup. That should reduce the frequency of CONCURRENT 
MODIFICATION errors.

Cheers,
Anash P. Oommen,
AdWords API Advisor.

On Thursday, May 15, 2014 5:37:33 AM UTC-4, Luca Fiaschi wrote:

 Hi all,
 I am getting quite often CONCURRENT MODIFICATION ERRORS when trying to 
 upload KWs.

 I have a long list of operations and my strategy is to batch the requests 
 and then call the mutate method of the service for the batch.
 Batch are uploaded in series therefore, there should not be any issue with 
 multiple threads.

 However I still get from time to time the CONCURRENT MODIFICATION error.
 Reading the doc seems that this is due to the way google processes the 
 requests. My understanding is that it may happen when I try to add multiple 
 Kws to the same adgroup.

 The question is :

 - if I implement a more clever batching strategy: parsing the operations 
 and creating batches which only add Kws to different adgroups, would it 
 help?

 In general I would not like to go for this solution since it is a bit 
 complicated to implement ( I have hundred thousands requests) and it does 
 not allow to handle different types of requests (not only Kws) in a more 
 general fashion.

 Anybody could comment on what would be the best option to handle this 
 issue?






-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


About 'SizeLimitError.RESPONSE_SIZE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED'

2014-05-15 Thread 柴崎友哉
I got 'SizeLimitError.RESPONSE_SIZE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED' when downloading a 
performance report.
Please tell me the standard value of this 'SIZE_LIMIT'.

-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: ERROR_GETTING_RESPONSE_FROM_BACKEND when including CampaignId in PLACEHOLDER_FEED_ITEM_REPORT

2014-05-15 Thread Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team)
Hi Jeremy,

Could you provide the complete report request after removing any sensitive 
information? I just successfully ran the PLACEHOLDER_FEED_ITEM_REPORT with 
the fields mentioned below. I'd like to see which fields and predicates you 
are using -- it may be that you found certain combinations that aren't 
working.

Thanks,
Josh, AdWords API Team

On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:52:10 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Aube wrote:

 I'm trying to get a PLACEHOLDER_FEED_ITEM_REPORT that includes CampaignId, 
 but so far I keep getting this error:

 AdwordsApi::Errors::ReportXmlError - HTTP code: 500, error type: 
 'ReportDownloadError.ERROR_GETTING_RESPONSE_FROM_BACKEND', trigger: 'Unable 
 to read report data', field path: '':

 The report works just fine if I remove the CampaignId field. Other fields 
 like CampaignName, AdGroupId, and AdGroupName result in the same error. 

 Other attribute fields are working fine. For example, I can include 
 AttributeValues, FeedId, or FeedItemId without any problems. 

 I saw another post where the issue seemed to have something to do with not 
 including any metrics, but I am requesting metrics. There was also another 
 post regarding an implied campaign_id, but I don't think that applies here.


-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Modifying CPC bid accross multiple ads by a common factor

2014-05-15 Thread Anash P. Oommen (AdWords API Team)
Hi Dominic,

If work hours is something that decides how many operators your client has 
at a given point, then you could consider using AdSchedules instead. You 
can set bid modifiers on them, at campaign level. 
See 
https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201402/CampaignCriterionService.CampaignCriterion#bidModifier
 
for details.

Cheers,
Anash P. Oommen,
AdWords API Advisor.

On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:30:47 PM UTC-4, Dominic wrote:

 Hi Josh,

 Thanks for the reply, but unfortunately I don't think this will suit my 
 client. They have a PPC expert who is advising them and creating 
 campaigns by tweaking the CPC at the ad level, so I don't think I'm gong to 
 be able to convince them to switch to any of the flexible bid strategies.

 I'd come up with an alternate solution where they will duplicate their 
 campaigns and manually adjust the the CPC on each ad in each duplicated 
 campaign. This way you would have a standard campaign, a low rate campaign 
 and a high rate campaign, then use the API to switch between these 
 campaigns based on the number of operators they have available.

 I was thinking that I could even create a simple script to duplicate a 
 campaign and adjust all CPC bids by a fixed percentage.

 Thanks,

 Dom

 On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:33:46 PM UTC+1, Josh Radcliff (AdWords API 
 Team) wrote:

 Hi Dom,

 Have you considered creating a Shared Bid 
 Strategyhttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/guides/bidding#shared-strategies
  that 
 you could use across all of your campaigns? The 
 TargetSpendBiddingSchemehttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201402/BiddingStrategyService.TargetSpendBiddingScheme
  may 
 be a good fit for your use case.

 Also, since you are looking at limiting the *spend* you might want to 
 consider using Shared 
 Budgetshttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/guides/shared-budgets.
  
 With a shared budget you could adjust the spend for all campaigns 
 associated with the budget at once.

 Cheers,
 Josh, AdWords API Team

 On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 7:41:51 PM UTC-4, Dominic wrote:

 Hi,

 I'm new to both adwords and the API, so please excuse me if I use terms 
 incorrectly.

 My clients runs several campaigns with a CPC set at the ad level. I 
 would like to adjust their spend based on the number of call handlers they 
 have to available to process new clients. Ideally I would like to allow 
 them to keep the fine grained control and use a multiplier to adjust their 
 spend.

 Ad group level bid modifiers would be ideal for what I want to do, but 
 they are only available for mobile and I need something across all 
 platforms.

 One solution I'm considering is querying their account, getting the CPC 
 for each ad, then modifying them all by a fixed percentage and then locally 
 storing the change, so that I can modify them back again later. I can see 
 two problems with this - firstly I'm sure rounding errors will creep in and 
 compound and secondly if my client changes the CPC for an ad after I've 
 made a global adjustment then that ad will have a price that is out of sync 
 with the other ads.

 If anyone can suggest a solution or point me to and API call I'd 
 overlooked then I'd appreciate it.

 Thanks,

 Dom



-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: ERROR_GETTING_RESPONSE_FROM_BACKEND when including CampaignId in PLACEHOLDER_FEED_ITEM_REPORT

2014-05-15 Thread Anash P. Oommen (AdWords API Team)
Hi Jeremy,

ERROR_GETTING_RESPONSE_FROM_BACKEND usually happens when the amount of data 
being requested is very large, and there is a timeout between the API 
server and stats server. Try reducing the size of the report by removing 
some columns, or restricting the report to a shorter date range / fewer 
campaigns. Let me know if that doesn't work, and I'll investigate this 
further.

Cheers,
Anash P. Oommen,
AdWords API Advisor.

On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:52:10 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Aube wrote:

 I'm trying to get a PLACEHOLDER_FEED_ITEM_REPORT that includes CampaignId, 
 but so far I keep getting this error:

 AdwordsApi::Errors::ReportXmlError - HTTP code: 500, error type: 
 'ReportDownloadError.ERROR_GETTING_RESPONSE_FROM_BACKEND', trigger: 'Unable 
 to read report data', field path: '':

 The report works just fine if I remove the CampaignId field. Other fields 
 like CampaignName, AdGroupId, and AdGroupName result in the same error. 

 Other attribute fields are working fine. For example, I can include 
 AttributeValues, FeedId, or FeedItemId without any problems. 

 I saw another post where the issue seemed to have something to do with not 
 including any metrics, but I am requesting metrics. There was also another 
 post regarding an implied campaign_id, but I don't think that applies here.


-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Modifying CPC bid accross multiple ads by a common factor

2014-05-15 Thread Dominic
Hi Anash,

Hours do determine how many operators are working, but not how many are 
available, as the time of day doesn't predict when operators will be 
handling a call and when they'll be available. I really need fine grained 
control, perhaps even on a minute by minute basis.

What I really need is to be able to set a global percentage bid modifier 
for the campaign, in the same way that you can for mobile, but I think this 
just isn't possible with the adwords API.

Thanks,

Dominic

On Thursday, May 15, 2014 3:50:29 PM UTC+1, Anash P. Oommen (AdWords API 
Team) wrote:

 Hi Dominic,

 If work hours is something that decides how many operators your client has 
 at a given point, then you could consider using AdSchedules instead. You 
 can set bid modifiers on them, at campaign level. See 
 https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201402/CampaignCriterionService.CampaignCriterion#bidModifierfor
  details.

 Cheers,
 Anash P. Oommen,
 AdWords API Advisor.

 On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:30:47 PM UTC-4, Dominic wrote:

 Hi Josh,

 Thanks for the reply, but unfortunately I don't think this will suit my 
 client. They have a PPC expert who is advising them and creating 
 campaigns by tweaking the CPC at the ad level, so I don't think I'm gong to 
 be able to convince them to switch to any of the flexible bid strategies.

 I'd come up with an alternate solution where they will duplicate their 
 campaigns and manually adjust the the CPC on each ad in each duplicated 
 campaign. This way you would have a standard campaign, a low rate campaign 
 and a high rate campaign, then use the API to switch between these 
 campaigns based on the number of operators they have available.

 I was thinking that I could even create a simple script to duplicate a 
 campaign and adjust all CPC bids by a fixed percentage.

 Thanks,

 Dom

 On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:33:46 PM UTC+1, Josh Radcliff (AdWords API 
 Team) wrote:

 Hi Dom,

 Have you considered creating a Shared Bid 
 Strategyhttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/guides/bidding#shared-strategies
  that 
 you could use across all of your campaigns? The 
 TargetSpendBiddingSchemehttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201402/BiddingStrategyService.TargetSpendBiddingScheme
  may 
 be a good fit for your use case.

 Also, since you are looking at limiting the *spend* you might want to 
 consider using Shared 
 Budgetshttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/guides/shared-budgets.
  
 With a shared budget you could adjust the spend for all campaigns 
 associated with the budget at once.

 Cheers,
 Josh, AdWords API Team

 On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 7:41:51 PM UTC-4, Dominic wrote:

 Hi,

 I'm new to both adwords and the API, so please excuse me if I use terms 
 incorrectly.

 My clients runs several campaigns with a CPC set at the ad level. I 
 would like to adjust their spend based on the number of call handlers they 
 have to available to process new clients. Ideally I would like to allow 
 them to keep the fine grained control and use a multiplier to adjust their 
 spend.

 Ad group level bid modifiers would be ideal for what I want to do, but 
 they are only available for mobile and I need something across all 
 platforms.

 One solution I'm considering is querying their account, getting the CPC 
 for each ad, then modifying them all by a fixed percentage and then 
 locally 
 storing the change, so that I can modify them back again later. I can see 
 two problems with this - firstly I'm sure rounding errors will creep in 
 and 
 compound and secondly if my client changes the CPC for an ad after I've 
 made a global adjustment then that ad will have a price that is out of 
 sync 
 with the other ads.

 If anyone can suggest a solution or point me to and API call I'd 
 overlooked then I'd appreciate it.

 Thanks,

 Dom



-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Keywords and Ads Added to the Account with CustomerSyncService

2014-05-15 Thread Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team)
Hi Ben,

The typical use case for the *CustomerSyncService *is an application that 
stores a local copy of a subset of information from the account, and the 
application uses the service to determine which objects have changed since 
it last checked. Depending on the type of changed/deleted object, the 
application will then either use another service (e.g., 
AdGroupCriterionServicehttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201402/AdGroupCriterionService)
 
or structure 
reportshttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/guides/structure-reports
 to 
retrieve the relevant objects and compare them to its local copy of each 
object. The service just returns IDs because the alternative of including 
all of the details behind each changed object would mean that the 
CampaignChangeDatahttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201402/CustomerSyncService.CampaignChangeData
 would 
have to essentially replicate the entire campaign object graph of AdWords 
(twice if it contained before and after values for every possible object 
and attribute).

In the case of keywords, the 
changedCriteriahttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201402/CustomerSyncService.AdGroupChangeData#changedCriteria
 and 
deletedCriteriahttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201402/CustomerSyncService.AdGroupChangeData#deletedCriteria
 fields 
on AdGroupChangeData will give you the IDs of any keywords (or other 
criteria) that changed. Each ID will correspond to the modified 
AdGroupCriterionService.Criterion.idhttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201402/AdGroupCriterionService.Criterion#id,
 
and you can use that in conjunction with the 
AdGroupChangeData.adGroupIdhttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201402/CustomerSyncService.AdGroupChangeData#adGroupId
 to 
issue an additional reporting or 
AdGroupCriterionServicehttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201402/AdGroupCriterionService
 request 
to retrieve further information.

Best regards,
Josh, AdWords API Team

On Thursday, May 15, 2014 9:03:20 AM UTC-4, Ben Pate wrote:

 Hi, I am trying to use the CustomerSyncService to find the number of 
 keywords or ads that have been added to an account. For the newly added 
 keywords I also want to know the match type.

 It doesn't seem like this is possible with the CustomerSyncService because 
 I can only see that as Ad Group field has changed but I can not determine 
 exactly what such as:

 5 Keywords added, 4 of exact match and 1 of broad match
 2 Ads created

 At this point, we are leaning towards forcing the user to download XML 
 change history report and then parse that information in order to get at 
 the information we seek. We are trying to get some aggregate stats of 
 changes made to the account like the example I gave.

 It would be greatly appreciated if someone could point me in the right 
 direction if this is possible.


-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Issues with adding production partition in shopping campaign with API

2014-05-15 Thread Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team)
Hi,

When you created the campaign, did you create it through the AdWords user 
interface or by running our 
AddShoppingCampaignhttps://github.com/googleads/googleads-java-lib/blob/master/examples/adwords_axis/src/main/java/adwords/axis/v201402/shoppingcampaigns/AddShoppingCampaign.java
 example? 
If you used the UI, please try creating the campaign via the API and post 
back if you still have trouble with the partition tree.

Thanks,
Josh, AdWords API Team

On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:38:45 PM UTC-4, Peijun Xu wrote:

 We'are implementing the code to call the adwords api for shopping 
 campaign. We want to use the feature for product partition under the 
 adgroup criterion service. 

 I created the campaign with shopping type and created the adgroup under 
 the campaign. And then, I tried to run the example code in 
 AddProductPartitionTree.java. It returns the error 
 PRODUCT_PARTITION_ALREADY_EXISTS. I thought it is because of the default 
 production partition had already been created as 'All products'. But this 
 criterion is not removable. 

 Then I tried to use that default product partition as the parent criterion 
 to create new partition under that. But it returns the error as 
 PRODUCT_PARTITION_UNIT_CANNOT_HAVE_CHILDREN. The default one is a UNIT not 
 a SUBDIVISION. 

 Also I tried to update the partition type for the default partition to 
 SUBDIVISION. But after running the mutate for update, it's still a unit. 

 I can manually add product partition under the default one on adwords UI 
 then it could be changed to SUBDIVISION type. 

 I'm wondering is there any runnable example for the shopping campaign 
 case. 

 Thanks!


-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Using TargetingIdeaService to return the data for the actual search term provided.

2014-05-15 Thread Jeremy Tremblay
Which brings me back to my original question: How do I get the data for the 
Search Term??

If you look at the screenshot I provided, there is data in the Search 
terms section. How do I use the API to get that data? The Keyword Tool 
provides data in that section no matter what Search Term I use. I need to 
replicate this behavior using the API. How do I do that? 

-jt-


On Thursday, May 15, 2014 5:29:35 AM UTC-5, Ray Tsang (AdWords API Team) 
wrote:

 Jeremy,

 The returned result are not expected to return the same search terms, 
 but rather, keyword ideas.  I.e., for a given term, the idea may not always 
 be the same as the original term.

 Thanks,

 Ray

 On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 5:34:13 PM UTC+2, Jeremy Tremblay wrote:

 It should be the same value as what you have in setQuery(...)

 Yes, that is what I expect. But it does not come back in 
 my TargetingIdeaPage as a TargetingIdea for every search term I use. 

 For example when I use bakruptcy as my search term, I can find A 
 TargetingIdea in my TargetingIdeaPage with a KEYWORD_TEXT attribute of 
 bankrputcy, yet if I use adoption, I cannot. 

 Is this a paging issue? Should I be making multiple calls to 
 targetingIdeaService.get?

 On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:54:40 AM UTC-5, Ray Tsang (AdWords API Team) 
 wrote:

 Jeremy,

 The search terms field in the UI should be exactly the same string you 
 entered in the previous step (in the Your product or service field).  It 
 is an user input.

 It should be the same value as what you have in setQuery(...).

 Cheers,

 Ray

 On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:58:12 PM UTC+2, Jeremy Tremblay wrote:


 Ray, see attached. I am using the following to get a TargetingIdeaPage 
 which generally contains all the data in that screen snap under the 
 Keyword (by relevance) section. I'm having issues getting the data under 
 the Search Terms section to come though on the TargetingIdeaPage:


// Get the TargetingIdeaService.

 TargetingIdeaServiceInterface targetingIdeaService = 
 adWordsServices.get(session, TargetingIdeaServiceInterface.class);


 // Create category products and services search parameter

 CategoryProductsAndServicesSearchParameter 
 categoryProductsAndServicesSearchParameter = new 
 CategoryProductsAndServicesSearchParameter();

 categoryProductsAndServicesSearchParameter.setCategoryId(10018);


 // Create related to query search parameter.

 RelatedToQuerySearchParameter relatedToQuerySearchParameter = new 
 RelatedToQuerySearchParameter();

 relatedToQuerySearchParameter.setQueries(new String[] {searchTerm});


 //Location

 int locationsSize = locationIds.size();

 Location[] locations = new Location[locationsSize];


 for (int i = 0; i  locationsSize; i++) {

 Location location = new Location();

 location.setId(locationIds.get(i).longValue());

 locations[i] = location;

 }


 LocationSearchParameter locationSearchParameter = new 
 LocationSearchParameter();

 locationSearchParameter.setLocations(locations);


 //Google only

 NetworkSearchParameter networkSearchParameter = new 
 NetworkSearchParameter();

 networkSearchParameter.setNetworkSetting(new NetworkSetting(true, 
 false, false, false));


 // Create selector.

 TargetingIdeaSelector selector = new TargetingIdeaSelector();

 selector.setRequestType(RequestType.IDEAS);

 selector.setIdeaType(IdeaType.KEYWORD);

 selector.setSearchParameters(new SearchParameter[] 
 {relatedToQuerySearchParameter, 
 categoryProductsAndServicesSearchParameter, 
 locationSearchParameter, networkSearchParameter});

 selector.setRequestedAttributeTypes(new AttributeType[] {

 AttributeType.KEYWORD_TEXT,

 AttributeType.COMPETITION,

 AttributeType.SEARCH_VOLUME,

 AttributeType.AVERAGE_CPC});


 //800 is the MAX here. 

 // Set selector paging (required for targeting idea service).

 Paging paging = new Paging();

 paging.setStartIndex(0);

 paging.setNumberResults(800);

 selector.setPaging(paging);

 TargetingIdeaPage page = targetingIdeaService.get(selector);
 I am using 
 On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 1:11:20 PM UTC-5, Ray Tsang (AdWords API Team) 
 wrote:

 Jeremy,

 To make sure I'm on the same page - could I trouble you to attach a 
 screenshot of the search term that you are referring to?

 Thanks,

 Ray

 On Monday, May 12, 2014 4:10:00 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Tremblay wrote:

 Currently I am using the TargetingIdeaService to provide a subset of 
 the functionality of the Keyword 
 Plannerhttps://adwords.google.com/ko/KeywordPlanner/Home?__c=2479277912__u=3596500112__o=cues
  by 
 providing a list of locations and a RelatedToQuerySearchParameter query 
 to TargetingIdeaService.get to get a list of keywords and their 
 associated 
 data, as one might in the Search for new keyword and ad group ideas 
 section of the tool.  The results returned by the tool on the Keyword 
 Ideas tab include the Search Term data as well as a list of 
 Keywords 
 and their data. 

 My use of TargetingIdeaService.get is returning the list of 
 Keywords just fine, but 

Re: Issues with adding production partition in shopping campaign with API

2014-05-15 Thread Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team)
Hi,

I just ran a few quick tests and found that you *can* remove the default 
product partition created when you create the ad group through the UI. 
Simply issue an 
AdGroupCriterionService.mutatehttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201402/AdGroupCriterionService#mutate
 and 
pass it a single 
AdGroupCriterionOperationhttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201402/AdGroupCriterionService.AdGroupCriterionOperation
 where 
the operand is the default product partition and the operator is *REMOVE*. 
After that, you should be able to run 
AddProductPartitionTree.javahttps://github.com/googleads/googleads-java-lib/blob/master/examples/adwords_axis/src/main/java/adwords/axis/v201402/shoppingcampaigns/AddProductPartitionTree.java
 successfully.

Cheers,
Josh, AdWords API Team

On Thursday, May 15, 2014 11:08:00 AM UTC-4, Josh Radcliff (AdWords API 
Team) wrote:

 Hi,

 When you created the campaign, did you create it through the AdWords user 
 interface or by running our 
 AddShoppingCampaignhttps://github.com/googleads/googleads-java-lib/blob/master/examples/adwords_axis/src/main/java/adwords/axis/v201402/shoppingcampaigns/AddShoppingCampaign.java
  example? 
 If you used the UI, please try creating the campaign via the API and post 
 back if you still have trouble with the partition tree.

 Thanks,
 Josh, AdWords API Team

 On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:38:45 PM UTC-4, Peijun Xu wrote:

 We'are implementing the code to call the adwords api for shopping 
 campaign. We want to use the feature for product partition under the 
 adgroup criterion service. 

 I created the campaign with shopping type and created the adgroup under 
 the campaign. And then, I tried to run the example code in 
 AddProductPartitionTree.java. It returns the error 
 PRODUCT_PARTITION_ALREADY_EXISTS. I thought it is because of the default 
 production partition had already been created as 'All products'. But this 
 criterion is not removable. 

 Then I tried to use that default product partition as the parent 
 criterion to create new partition under that. But it returns the error as 
 PRODUCT_PARTITION_UNIT_CANNOT_HAVE_CHILDREN. The default one is a UNIT not 
 a SUBDIVISION. 

 Also I tried to update the partition type for the default partition to 
 SUBDIVISION. But after running the mutate for update, it's still a unit. 

 I can manually add product partition under the default one on adwords UI 
 then it could be changed to SUBDIVISION type. 

 I'm wondering is there any runnable example for the shopping campaign 
 case. 

 Thanks!



-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: About 'SizeLimitError.RESPONSE_SIZE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED'

2014-05-15 Thread Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team)
Hi,

From our Reporting Basics 
guidehttps://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/guides/reporting
:

The report download request will time out after ten minutes of idle time 
 (no data transmitted) or one hour total elapsed time. There is no 
 explicit data size limit; however, due to a variety of factors, the server 
 may return an error if the report is too large.


Are you already requesting one of the gzipped formats (GZIPPED_CSV or 
GZIPPED_XML)? If not, I'd give that a try. Otherwise, you may need to break 
up your report request into multiple requests date and/or ID subsets. For 
example, if you're running a Campaign Performance Report on an account with 
50 campaigns, you could run the report 5 times, with each request 
containing 10 of the campaign IDs in the predicate.

Cheers,
Josh, AdWords API Team

On Thursday, May 15, 2014 4:23:34 AM UTC-4, 柴崎友哉 wrote:

 I got 'SizeLimitError.RESPONSE_SIZE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED' when downloading a 
 performance report.
 Please tell me the standard value of this 'SIZE_LIMIT'.


-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: QueryError.INVALID_DURING_CLAUSE For CALL_METRICS_CALL_DETAILS_REPORT

2014-05-15 Thread Anash P. Oommen (AdWords API Team)
Hi Boric,

You don't need to specify the date clause for this report. That said, let 
me check once with the team whether date columns were intentionally 
excluded from this report type.

Cheers,
Anash P. Oommen,
AdWords API Advisor.

On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 3:00:40 AM UTC-4, Boris Savic wrote:

 So how can I get this report just for today?


-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Zero Impressions but non-zero clicks in SEARCH_QUERY_PERFORMANCE_REPORT

2014-05-15 Thread Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team)
Thanks - I just came across the following post related to the same question:

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/adwords-api/V5ZjQaPJl80/BVIqOJZPgLQJ

I think that explains the results you're seeing (which I just confirmed 
also match the results in the AdWords UI).

Cheers,
Josh, AdWords API Team

On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:43:34 PM UTC-4, AdWordsApiUser wrote:

 Just did. Thanks for your quick reply :-)

 On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 11:21:18 PM UTC+5:30, Josh Radcliff (AdWords 
 API Team) wrote:

 Hi MG,

 Could you send the following *only to me* by clicking *Reply to Author*?

- Customer ID for the reporting request
- The exact report requests you sent (you indicated that you ran this 
report at least twice: once with *Impressions = 0* and once without 
it)
- Any report output you captured, especially any before and after 
output that shows there was a change in behavior

 Thanks,
 Josh, AdWords API Team

 On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 1:19:15 PM UTC-4, AdWordsApiUser wrote:

 I found today that the query:

 SELECT Query, KeywordId, AdGroupId, CampaignId, Impressions, Clicks, Ctr 
  FROM SEARCH_QUERY_PERFORMANCE_REPORT WHERE MatchTypeWithVariant IN 
 [PHRASE, EXPANDED, BROAD_SESSION, BROAD, AUTO]  AND Impressions = 0 AND 
 Clicks 0 DURING LAST_30_DAYS

 is returning rows. The Ctr is set to 0.00. We found this as our 
 condition was set to Clicks  0 only, and while calculating Ctr, we got a 
 divide by 0 error and internal debugging revealed this.

 Could someone from the API team comment on this? I believe that this is 
 a recent regression.

 Thanks!
 MG



-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: OAuth2 Campaign update issue (c#)

2014-05-15 Thread Anash P. Oommen (AdWords API Team)
Hi Abhijit,

You need to use OAuth2 as authentication mechanism instead of authToken. 
AdWords API no longer supports ClientLogin as of v201402. From your code 
snippet, it doesn't look like you are using the AdWords API client library, 
so you need to use a third party library like http://dotnetopenauth.net/ to 
add OAuth2 support to your application, and set Authorization: Bearer 
ACCESS_TOKEN on the outgoing HTTP request header. It's unfortunately not 
that simple to do that on a Soap service, see 
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4661627/how-to-set-http-headers-from-client-class-inherited-from-soaphttpclientprotocol?rq=1
 
for suggestions on how this may be done.

Just wondering, is there any reason why you chose not to use the AdWords 
API .NET library?

Cheers,
Anash P. Oommen,
AdWords API Advisor.

On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:38:53 AM UTC-4, abhijit chaudhari wrote:

 Hi Richard,

 I am facing issues while getting campaigns, My application is ASP.NET MVC 
 and i need to fetch all campaigns but how i can send authtoken while making 
 request. below is sample code which i am using. SoapHeader do not have 
 propert authtoken in v201402 version. can please she some info. we are 
 migrating to v201402 version.

 campServiceClient1 = new CampaignServiceInterfaceClient();
 Gateway.Google.CampaignService.SoapHeader RequestHeader = 
 new Gateway.Google.CampaignService.SoapHeader();
 RequestHeader.developerToken = 
 connectionInfo.DeveloperToken.Trim();
 RequestHeader.userAgent = UserAgent;
 //RequestHeader.*authToken *= authtoken.Trim();
 RequestHeader.clientCustomerId = GoAccountId.ToString();
   
///setting selector to download campaigns for the entire account
 CampaignService.Selector selector = new 
 CampaignService.Selector();
 selector.fields = new string[] { Id, Name, Status };

 CampaignPage cp = new CampaignPage();

 Gateway.Google.CampaignService.SoapResponseHeader res = 
 campServiceClient1.get(RequestHeader, selector, out cp);

 On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 02:34:08 UTC+5:30, Richard wrote:

 ok I got it working now. one question, when I use CampaignService.get() 
  I got the entire list of campaigns. 
 Is there a way to select just one campaign based on campaignID?
 thanks,
 Richard


 On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:59:12 AM UTC-5, Anash P. Oommen (AdWords 
 API Team) wrote:

 Hi Richard,

 You need to

 1. Retrieve the budget id using CampaignService.get(). Use BudgetId as 
 the selector field.
 2. Set the budget using BudgetService.mutate(). 

 My understanding is that you cannot update the budget using 
 CampaignService.mutate any longer.

 Cheers,
 Anash

 On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 10:48:07 AM UTC-4, Richard wrote:

 Any idea? the update campaign budget worked on v201309 without budget 
 id but now failed on v201402, is there any parameter I need to set? thanks!



-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: ERROR_GETTING_RESPONSE_FROM_BACKEND when including CampaignId in PLACEHOLDER_FEED_ITEM_REPORT

2014-05-15 Thread Jeremy Aube
I tried reducing the size of the request, but I'm still getting the same 
error. Here's the report definition I just tried:

reportDefinition
  selector
fieldsCampaignId/fields
fieldsClicks/fields
predicates
  fieldClickType/field
  operatorIN/operator
  valuesSITELINKS/values
/predicates
predicates
  fieldIsSelfAction/field
  operatorIN/operator
  valuestrue/values
/predicates
predicates
  fieldStatus/field
  operatorIN/operator
  valuesACTIVE/values
/predicates
predicates
  fieldCampaignId/field
  operatorIN/operator
  values39258782/values
/predicates
  /selector
  reportNamePlaceholder+Feed+Item+Report/reportName
  reportTypePLACEHOLDER_FEED_ITEM_REPORT/reportType
  dateRangeTypeYESTERDAY/dateRangeType
  downloadFormatCSV/downloadFormat
  includeZeroImpressionstrue/includeZeroImpressions
/reportDefinition

On Thursday, May 15, 2014 10:52:50 AM UTC-4, Anash P. Oommen (AdWords API 
Team) wrote:

 Hi Jeremy,

 ERROR_GETTING_RESPONSE_FROM_BACKEND usually happens when the amount of 
 data being requested is very large, and there is a timeout between the API 
 server and stats server. Try reducing the size of the report by removing 
 some columns, or restricting the report to a shorter date range / fewer 
 campaigns. Let me know if that doesn't work, and I'll investigate this 
 further.

 Cheers,
 Anash P. Oommen,
 AdWords API Advisor.

 On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:52:10 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Aube wrote:

 I'm trying to get a PLACEHOLDER_FEED_ITEM_REPORT that includes 
 CampaignId, but so far I keep getting this error:

 AdwordsApi::Errors::ReportXmlError - HTTP code: 500, error type: 
 'ReportDownloadError.ERROR_GETTING_RESPONSE_FROM_BACKEND', trigger: 'Unable 
 to read report data', field path: '':

 The report works just fine if I remove the CampaignId field. Other fields 
 like CampaignName, AdGroupId, and AdGroupName result in the same error. 

 Other attribute fields are working fine. For example, I can include 
 AttributeValues, FeedId, or FeedItemId without any problems. 

 I saw another post where the issue seemed to have something to do with 
 not including any metrics, but I am requesting metrics. There was also 
 another post regarding an implied campaign_id, but I don't think that 
 applies here.



-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Using TargetingIdeaService to return the data for the actual search term provided.

2014-05-15 Thread Jeremy Tremblay
Forget it, I got it. 

I need a separate call to TargetingIdeaServiceInterface.get with 

selector.setRequestType(RequestType.STATS);

instead of IDEAS

and 

Paging paging = new Paging();

paging.setStartIndex(0);

paging.setNumberResults(1);

selector.setPaging(paging);


Thanks for your help again Ray!


-jt-

On Thursday, May 15, 2014 10:07:53 AM UTC-5, Jeremy Tremblay wrote:

 Which brings me back to my original question: How do I get the data for 
 the Search Term??

 If you look at the screenshot I provided, there is data in the Search 
 terms section. How do I use the API to get that data? The Keyword Tool 
 provides data in that section no matter what Search Term I use. I need to 
 replicate this behavior using the API. How do I do that? 

 -jt-


 On Thursday, May 15, 2014 5:29:35 AM UTC-5, Ray Tsang (AdWords API Team) 
 wrote:

 Jeremy,

 The returned result are not expected to return the same search terms, 
 but rather, keyword ideas.  I.e., for a given term, the idea may not always 
 be the same as the original term.

 Thanks,

 Ray

 On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 5:34:13 PM UTC+2, Jeremy Tremblay wrote:

 It should be the same value as what you have in setQuery(...)

 Yes, that is what I expect. But it does not come back in 
 my TargetingIdeaPage as a TargetingIdea for every search term I use. 

 For example when I use bakruptcy as my search term, I can find A 
 TargetingIdea in my TargetingIdeaPage with a KEYWORD_TEXT attribute of 
 bankrputcy, yet if I use adoption, I cannot. 

 Is this a paging issue? Should I be making multiple calls to 
 targetingIdeaService.get?

 On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:54:40 AM UTC-5, Ray Tsang (AdWords API 
 Team) wrote:

 Jeremy,

 The search terms field in the UI should be exactly the same string 
 you entered in the previous step (in the Your product or service field). 
  It is an user input.

 It should be the same value as what you have in setQuery(...).

 Cheers,

 Ray

 On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:58:12 PM UTC+2, Jeremy Tremblay wrote:


 Ray, see attached. I am using the following to get a TargetingIdeaPage 
 which generally contains all the data in that screen snap under the 
 Keyword (by relevance) section. I'm having issues getting the data 
 under 
 the Search Terms section to come though on the TargetingIdeaPage:


// Get the TargetingIdeaService.

 TargetingIdeaServiceInterface targetingIdeaService = 
 adWordsServices.get(session, TargetingIdeaServiceInterface.class);


 // Create category products and services search parameter

 CategoryProductsAndServicesSearchParameter 
 categoryProductsAndServicesSearchParameter = new 
 CategoryProductsAndServicesSearchParameter();

 categoryProductsAndServicesSearchParameter.setCategoryId(10018);


 // Create related to query search parameter.

 RelatedToQuerySearchParameter relatedToQuerySearchParameter = new 
 RelatedToQuerySearchParameter();

 relatedToQuerySearchParameter.setQueries(new String[] {searchTerm});


 //Location

 int locationsSize = locationIds.size();

 Location[] locations = new Location[locationsSize];


 for (int i = 0; i  locationsSize; i++) {

 Location location = new Location();

 location.setId(locationIds.get(i).longValue());

 locations[i] = location;

 }


 LocationSearchParameter locationSearchParameter = new 
 LocationSearchParameter();

 locationSearchParameter.setLocations(locations);


 //Google only

 NetworkSearchParameter networkSearchParameter = new 
 NetworkSearchParameter();

 networkSearchParameter.setNetworkSetting(new NetworkSetting(true, 
 false, false, false));


 // Create selector.

 TargetingIdeaSelector selector = new TargetingIdeaSelector();

 selector.setRequestType(RequestType.IDEAS);

 selector.setIdeaType(IdeaType.KEYWORD);

 selector.setSearchParameters(new SearchParameter[] 
 {relatedToQuerySearchParameter, 
 categoryProductsAndServicesSearchParameter, 
 locationSearchParameter, networkSearchParameter});

 selector.setRequestedAttributeTypes(new AttributeType[] {

 AttributeType.KEYWORD_TEXT,

 AttributeType.COMPETITION,

 AttributeType.SEARCH_VOLUME,

 AttributeType.AVERAGE_CPC});


 //800 is the MAX here. 

 // Set selector paging (required for targeting idea service).

 Paging paging = new Paging();

 paging.setStartIndex(0);

 paging.setNumberResults(800);

 selector.setPaging(paging);

 TargetingIdeaPage page = targetingIdeaService.get(selector);
 I am using 
 On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 1:11:20 PM UTC-5, Ray Tsang (AdWords API 
 Team) wrote:

 Jeremy,

 To make sure I'm on the same page - could I trouble you to attach a 
 screenshot of the search term that you are referring to?

 Thanks,

 Ray

 On Monday, May 12, 2014 4:10:00 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Tremblay wrote:

 Currently I am using the TargetingIdeaService to provide a subset of 
 the functionality of the Keyword 
 Plannerhttps://adwords.google.com/ko/KeywordPlanner/Home?__c=2479277912__u=3596500112__o=cues
  by 
 providing a list of locations and a RelatedToQuerySearchParameter query 
 to 

Programatically getting available fields for AWQL to service calls (and reports too I suppose)

2014-05-15 Thread Ian Knox
I'm in the process of writing a simplified wrapper for the Adwords API 
client lib and it would be really helpful if there was some way to get a 
list of AWQL fields for service calls other than copy/pasting them from 
this website: 

https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/appendix/selectorfields#v201402-AdGroupAdService

Is there a call I'm missing somewhere that would provide this data?

-- 
-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.