Re: ReportDownloadError.ERROR_GETTING_RESPONSE_FROM_BACKEND
Hi Danial, it seems that last night nothing failed. I hope its a good sign. The timezone I missed is GMT+2. We will check if we can reduce the 300 requests in any way but we see less chances for it. Actually we do the retry direct after the failed request and put it not again at the end of the queue. We will check if it would help, when we changes that behavior. So right now we will just observer it for a while if the problem will occur again. Normally its no problem for us, if some request fail, because we will get the data with the retry or one day later, but if the same account always fails, then we have a problem, because we dont get the neccessary data at all. -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/b09f606f-eb9d-4e7b-9e4a-77021288c80c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Get UserList by AdWordsService.v201409.AdwordsUserListService
Hi, We have the same problem, we need to show users only lists which are eligible for search campaigns, and new adwords api v201502 doesn't seem to have any improvements in this area. Are there any plans to add it to api in some near future ? On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 3:51:38 PM UTC+1, Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team) wrote: Hi, Unfortunately, I don't think there's a way to get the equivalent of that value using the API. I'll pass this on to the team to see if this can be added in a future version of the API. Thanks, Josh, AdWords API Team On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 2:30:28 AM UTC-5, Linh Doan Manh wrote: Hi Josh, I have a problem like as Lee I need to identify* Display Only* user list before mutate audiences for campaigns with campaign type is Search Network only. Please help me how to check *Display Only* user list? Thansk, On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 5:42:19 AM UTC+7, Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team) wrote: Hi, On an API UserList https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201409/AdwordsUserListService.UserList object there are two fields each for *Search* and *Display*: - Search - SizeForSearch - SizeRangeForSearch - Display - Size - SizeRange The first field for each is a number, and the second is an enum value from the SizeRange enum https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201409/AdwordsUserListService.SizeRange. However, the *Display only* string will not appear in either field. Thanks, Josh, AdWords API Team On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 11:47:02 PM UTC-5, Lee Lee wrote: Hi Team, I use AdWordsService.v201409.AdwordsUserListService to get UserList. But I see * No. of search users* column in Adwords editor equal - or Display only when UserList.SizeForSearch == 0. I don't understand, how to discriminate when * No. of search users* = -, when * No. of search users* = Display only Thanks -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/369af312-2e97-4faf-8e4b-2ac781516d79%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: API to link Adwords and Merchant Center Accounts
Hello, Linking from the AdWords side is not currently supported. I'll log this as a request. -Danial, AdWords API Team. On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 4:19:26 AM UTC+3, mccaccou...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Is there a way to link the client merchant center account and the client adwords account using the API? I know that while creating the child merchant center account, one can provide the related adwords account for linking but that is only one-way linking. The link request needs to be accepted at the adwords end. Is there an API to do so? The ManagedCustomerService has a few methods but as much as I could understand, they are for extending and accepting invitations from and to adwords accounts only. Thanks in advance for all the help. -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/8cd08581-c89f-4a3e-af85-b50920610aaa%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Reporting - Data for Removed artifacts
Hello, Reporting filters out removed entries for the level of the report only. So, account level report will return stats for all objects (and you can't actually add CampaignStatus predicate while requesting it). In general, I see your point. We may want to take another look on how this is handled. -Danial, AdWords API Team. On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 2:59:53 PM UTC+3, AdWordsApiUser wrote: In the new version of the API, when using AdHoc reports, data for artifacts that are marked removed is not included by default, even if they had impressions, clicks etc. in the chosen date range. This makes the reports incorrect. If an entity was active in the past, its statistics should be included, irrespective of whether it is active or not now. This also makes me wonder - when I ask for an account performance report, would it not include data for campaigns that were deleted? Or, it would? Both cases create a discrepancy - the first one is obviously wrong, and in the second one, the campaign report does not add up to the account performance report, unless the special condition is included. This particular change in behavior has made the transition to the new version of the API particularly painful, and I have to remember to include WHERE CampaignStatus IN [ACTIVE, PAUSED, REMOVED] in all my awqls. It probably makes sense for most services, but not for reporting stats. -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/8deab6ac-4d5e-4cde-80b8-533bf9b82b25%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Testing Upgraded URLs
Realistically, a UI is not particularly useful at scale - it would be more useful to have an api for retrieving an entity's fully resolved URL On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 1:47:10 PM UTC-5, Anash P. Oommen (AdWords API Team) wrote: Hi Hans, That's a UI feature request; could you open a thread on the product forum https://www.en.adwords-community.com/? Cheers, Anash P. Oommen, AdWords API Advisor. On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 12:28:32 PM UTC-4, HK wrote: Hi, Anash Getting your ads to serve with a live account isn't always that easy when you are developing. It means you need a live account with everything set up correctly and you have to pay Google for every click you make while testing. I really hope Google will consider building a test UI soon where developers can force ads to serve without going through all the before mentioned work. Especially now that the simplicity of destination URLs is gone and many more factors come into play in building the URL the user ends up triggering. Thanks, Hans -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/73e467fb-1ac7-4469-bda0-94f95d8778a4%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Reporting - Data for Removed artifacts
Hello MG, We normally avoid making changes into launched API versions. Scripts users (those specifying API version) should not be affected, unless they didn't read the release notes when migrated to v201502. Please note while we are going to discuss this issue, I can't promise this change will be implemented. -Danial. On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 4:57:31 PM UTC+3, AdWordsApiUser wrote: Hi Danial, Thanks for your quick response. Is there a chance that this might change in v201502? If yes, then we'd like to hold off the internal upgrade waiting for this to happen. My guess is must already be affecting scripts, and as this is pretty much a silent change, script users might not even realize that the data they are fetching is not complete anymore. Cheers, MG On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 9:08:26 AM UTC-3, Danial Klimkin wrote: Hello, Reporting filters out removed entries for the level of the report only. So, account level report will return stats for all objects (and you can't actually add CampaignStatus predicate while requesting it). In general, I see your point. We may want to take another look on how this is handled. -Danial, AdWords API Team. On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 2:59:53 PM UTC+3, AdWordsApiUser wrote: In the new version of the API, when using AdHoc reports, data for artifacts that are marked removed is not included by default, even if they had impressions, clicks etc. in the chosen date range. This makes the reports incorrect. If an entity was active in the past, its statistics should be included, irrespective of whether it is active or not now. This also makes me wonder - when I ask for an account performance report, would it not include data for campaigns that were deleted? Or, it would? Both cases create a discrepancy - the first one is obviously wrong, and in the second one, the campaign report does not add up to the account performance report, unless the special condition is included. This particular change in behavior has made the transition to the new version of the API particularly painful, and I have to remember to include WHERE CampaignStatus IN [ACTIVE, PAUSED, REMOVED] in all my awqls. It probably makes sense for most services, but not for reporting stats. -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/415b8dc8-376c-4891-9c86-ce1afb828437%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: get campaign ip exclusions with api
Hello Andras,
Try getting the IP address information out of *KeywordText*:
$selector-fields = array('Id', 'CriteriaType', 'KeywordText');
When retrieving information, you need to make sure to specify what you want
in the selector.
Best,
Nadine, AdWords API Team
On Thursday, April 16, 2015 at 8:13:14 PM UTC-4, Andras Kende wrote:
Hi Nadine,
I'm getting the results of IP_BLOCK [id] but the [ipAddress] is empty :(
See my code and results :
?php
$path = dirname(__FILE__) . '/src';
set_include_path(get_include_path() . PATH_SEPARATOR . $path);
require_once 'Google/Api/Ads/AdWords/Lib/AdWordsUser.php';
$user = new AdWordsUser();
$user-SetClientCustomerId('111-222-');
$campaignId = '123456789';
$campaignCriterionService = $user-GetService('CampaignCriterionService',
'v201502');
$selector = new Selector();
$selector-fields = array('Id', 'CriteriaType');
$selector-predicates[] = new Predicate('CampaignId', 'IN',
array($campaignId));
$selector-predicates[] = new Predicate('CriteriaType', 'IN',
array('IP_BLOCK'));
$selector-paging = new Paging(0, AdWordsConstants::RECOMMENDED_PAGE_SIZE);
$page = $campaignCriterionService-get($selector);
print_r($page);
?
CampaignCriterionPage Object
(
[entries] = Array
(
[0] = NegativeCampaignCriterion Object
(
[campaignId] = 123456789
[isNegative] = 1
[criterion] = IpBlock Object
(
[ipAddress] =
[id] = 20471658932
[type] = IP_BLOCK
[CriterionType] = IpBlock
[_parameterMap:Criterion:private] = Array
(
[Criterion.Type] = CriterionType
)
)
[bidModifier] =
[forwardCompatibilityMap] =
[CampaignCriterionType] = NegativeCampaignCriterion
[_parameterMap:CampaignCriterion:private] = Array
(
[CampaignCriterion.Type] =
CampaignCriterionType
)
)
Thank you,
Andras
On Thursday, April 16, 2015 at 9:01:23 AM UTC-7, Nadine Sundquist (AdWords
API Team) wrote:
Hi Andras,
In the PHP CampaignCriterionService, there is a get($selector)
https://github.com/uchikoba/YahooSponsoredSearchAPIClient_for_PHP/blob/master/V1/CampaignCriterionService.class.php#L607
function
that will allow you to filter the list of CampaignCriterion based on fields
such as *CriteriaType. *Check out how CampaignCriterionService selector
fields
https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/appendix/selectorfields#v201502-CampaignCriterionService
work.
For an example of getting CampaignCriterion by type, we have a PHP
example of getting campaign targeting criteria
https://github.com/googleads/googleads-php-lib/blob/52123a0fdf7b4e447c8893cd2b438e49d50a06cd/examples/AdWords/v201406/Targeting/GetCampaignTargetingCriteria.php.
The type you would need would be IP_BLOCK.
Cheers,
Nadine, AdWords API Team
On Thursday, April 16, 2015 at 11:01:33 AM UTC-4, Andras Kende wrote:
Hello,
I just started testing Adwords API (php)
So far I can use CampaignCriterionService for IP_BLOCK - ADD / REMOVE to
Manage
IP exclusions in a Campaign
But not finding any information how to get a list of excluded IP Addresses
listed in IP exclusions..
Thanks for any help !
Andras
--
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and Google+:
https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/
https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups AdWords API Forum group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
AdWords API Forum group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/cc447c76-a3c3-4808-8859-1a701f509ff1%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Reporting - Data for Removed artifacts
Hi Danial, Thanks for your quick response. Is there a chance that this might change in v201502? If yes, then we'd like to hold off the internal upgrade waiting for this to happen. My guess is must already be affecting scripts, and as this is pretty much a silent change, script users might not even realize that the data they are fetching is not complete anymore. Cheers, MG On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 9:08:26 AM UTC-3, Danial Klimkin wrote: Hello, Reporting filters out removed entries for the level of the report only. So, account level report will return stats for all objects (and you can't actually add CampaignStatus predicate while requesting it). In general, I see your point. We may want to take another look on how this is handled. -Danial, AdWords API Team. On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 2:59:53 PM UTC+3, AdWordsApiUser wrote: In the new version of the API, when using AdHoc reports, data for artifacts that are marked removed is not included by default, even if they had impressions, clicks etc. in the chosen date range. This makes the reports incorrect. If an entity was active in the past, its statistics should be included, irrespective of whether it is active or not now. This also makes me wonder - when I ask for an account performance report, would it not include data for campaigns that were deleted? Or, it would? Both cases create a discrepancy - the first one is obviously wrong, and in the second one, the campaign report does not add up to the account performance report, unless the special condition is included. This particular change in behavior has made the transition to the new version of the API particularly painful, and I have to remember to include WHERE CampaignStatus IN [ACTIVE, PAUSED, REMOVED] in all my awqls. It probably makes sense for most services, but not for reporting stats. -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/962894f3-7540-46dd-a96a-8f43e98fa728%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Expected volatility on TargetingIdeaService Average CPC metric
Hello Jon, This data is based on sampled information and results can vary over time, or even for two consecutive requests. As this is estimation only, we can't guarantee precise results. -Danial, AdWords API Team. On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 3:53:48 PM UTC+3, j...@clickproquo.com wrote: Hi, I retrieved the Average CPC metric from the TargetingIdeaService on April 8th and again, today, April 13th and the ACPC metric showed an average swing of 20% (either direction) with some keywords in the sample showing almost a 100% change. What is the expected volatility of this metric? How often do you recommend we re-pull? Thanks, Jon -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/8ec47d26-0112-4b35-b48f-c54c0a47ecc5%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reporting - Data for Removed artifacts
In the new version of the API, when using AdHoc reports, data for artifacts that are marked removed is not included by default, even if they had impressions, clicks etc. in the chosen date range. This makes the reports incorrect. If an entity was active in the past, its statistics should be included, irrespective of whether it is active or not now. This also makes me wonder - when I ask for an account performance report, would it not include data for campaigns that were deleted? Or, it would? Both cases create a discrepancy - the first one is obviously wrong, and in the second one, the campaign report does not add up to the account performance report, unless the special condition is included. This particular change in behavior has made the transition to the new version of the API particularly painful, and I have to remember to include WHERE CampaignStatus IN [ACTIVE, PAUSED, REMOVED] in all my awqls. It probably makes sense for most services, but not for reporting stats. -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/0bef0446-e630-443c-88a8-64ceed335091%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: ReportDownloadError.ERROR_GETTING_RESPONSE_FROM_BACKEND
Thanks for the details. Please let us know if re-ordering helped. -Danial. On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 12:17:57 PM UTC+3, Sandy B. wrote: Hi Danial, it seems that last night nothing failed. I hope its a good sign. The timezone I missed is GMT+2. We will check if we can reduce the 300 requests in any way but we see less chances for it. Actually we do the retry direct after the failed request and put it not again at the end of the queue. We will check if it would help, when we changes that behavior. So right now we will just observer it for a while if the problem will occur again. Normally its no problem for us, if some request fail, because we will get the data with the retry or one day later, but if the same account always fails, then we have a problem, because we dont get the neccessary data at all. -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/462e727c-9e3d-4f5d-8352-dc7e3e975985%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Problem with mutatejobservice because of clientlogintoken?
Hi I am getting the same error but during migration to v201502. Could you please help. I am not using adwords-api-properties file trace: java.lang.NullPointerException: No group found for service: v201502.CampaignServicejava.lang.NullPointerException: No group found for service: v201502.CampaignService at com.google.api.ads.adwords.lib.conf.AdWordsApiConfiguration.getServiceUrlGroup(AdWordsApiConfiguration.java:64) at com.google.api.ads.adwords.lib.client.AdWordsServiceDescriptor.getEndpointAddress(AdWordsServiceDescriptor.java:82) at com.google.api.ads.common.lib.factory.helper.BaseAdsServiceClientFactoryHelper.createAdsServiceClient(BaseAdsServiceClientFactoryHelper.java:74) at com.google.api.ads.common.lib.factory.AdsServiceClientFactory.getServiceClient(AdsServiceClientFactory.java:75) at com.google.api.ads.common.lib.factory.BaseAdsServiceClientFactory.getServiceClientAsInterface(BaseAdsServiceClientFactory.java:79) at com.google.api.ads.common.lib.factory.BaseServices.get(BaseServices.java:60) On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 at 4:03:59 AM UTC+5:30, Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team) wrote: Hi, I've seen this before when the classpath is incorrect or incomplete. Could you check the following? 1. You have updated your adwords-api.properties with the latest version https://code.google.com/p/google-api-ads-java/source/browse/modules/ads_lib/src/main/java/com/google/api/ads/adwords/lib/conf/props/adwords-api.properties 2. The classpath is the same for both your local and server processes If that does not highlight the issue, please send on your classpath information from both processes so I can investigate further. Thanks, Josh, AdWords API Team On Monday, November 18, 2013 5:20:06 AM UTC-5, F.Per wrote: Funny thing is that i dont get this error starting my application locally and not on the server?! On Sunday, November 17, 2013 2:43:31 PM UTC+1, Shaihulud wrote: Hi i am getting the following error for a code the worked for month. java.lang.NullPointerException: No group found for service: v201306.MutateJobServicejava.lang.NullPointerException: No group found for service: v201306.MutateJobService at com.google.api.ads.adwords.lib.conf.AdWordsApiConfiguration.getServiceUrlGroup(AdWordsApiConfiguration.java:63) at com.google.api.ads.adwords.lib.client.AdWordsServiceDescriptor.getEndpointAddress(AdWordsServiceDescriptor.java:77) at com.google.api.ads.common.lib.factory.helper.BaseAdsServiceClientFactoryHelper.createAdsServiceClient(BaseAdsServiceClientFactoryHelper.java:74) at com.google.api.ads.common.lib.factory.AdsServiceClientFactory.getServiceClient(AdsServiceClientFactory.java:73) at com.google.api.ads.common.lib.factory.BaseAdsServiceClientFactory.getServiceClientAsInterface(BaseAdsServiceClientFactory.java:79) at com.google.api.ads.common.lib.factory.BaseServices.get(BaseServices.java:60) The only thing ive changed is that i switched from v201302 to v201306, but i did not touch the code. the associated code is this : [code] clientLoginToken = new ClientLoginTokens.Builder() .forApi(ClientLoginTokens.Api.ADWORDS) .withEmailAndPassword(adwordsLogin, password) .build() .requestToken(); // Construct an AdWordsSession. AdWordsSession session = new AdWordsSession.Builder() .withClientLoginToken(clientLoginToken) .withDeveloperToken(developerToken) .withClientCustomerId(customerAccount.getClientId()) .withEndpoint(AdWordsSession.DEFAULT_ENDPOINT).build(); // mutate job service mutateJobService = new AdWordsServices().get(session, MutateJobServiceInterface.class); // create list of operations adGroupCriterionOperations = new ArrayListAdGroupCriterionOperation(); [/code] ClientloginTokens is deprecated but should still work right? So what seems to be the problem here? I would appreciate the help. thx -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view
Re: Get UserList by AdWordsService.v201409.AdwordsUserListService
Hi, Thanks for the feedback. I have suggested this feature for a future release and I'll post back here when I have any updates. Cheers, Josh, AdWords API Team On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 3:51:54 AM UTC-4, Radosław Pociecha wrote: Hi, We have the same problem, we need to show users only lists which are eligible for search campaigns, and new adwords api v201502 doesn't seem to have any improvements in this area. Are there any plans to add it to api in some near future ? On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 3:51:38 PM UTC+1, Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team) wrote: Hi, Unfortunately, I don't think there's a way to get the equivalent of that value using the API. I'll pass this on to the team to see if this can be added in a future version of the API. Thanks, Josh, AdWords API Team On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 2:30:28 AM UTC-5, Linh Doan Manh wrote: Hi Josh, I have a problem like as Lee I need to identify* Display Only* user list before mutate audiences for campaigns with campaign type is Search Network only. Please help me how to check *Display Only* user list? Thansk, On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 5:42:19 AM UTC+7, Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team) wrote: Hi, On an API UserList https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201409/AdwordsUserListService.UserList object there are two fields each for *Search* and *Display*: - Search - SizeForSearch - SizeRangeForSearch - Display - Size - SizeRange The first field for each is a number, and the second is an enum value from the SizeRange enum https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/reference/v201409/AdwordsUserListService.SizeRange. However, the *Display only* string will not appear in either field. Thanks, Josh, AdWords API Team On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 11:47:02 PM UTC-5, Lee Lee wrote: Hi Team, I use AdWordsService.v201409.AdwordsUserListService to get UserList. But I see * No. of search users* column in Adwords editor equal - or Display only when UserList.SizeForSearch == 0. I don't understand, how to discriminate when * No. of search users* = -, when * No. of search users* = Display only Thanks -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/4503b70e-fbac-4288-9a69-13b5df3d53d3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Problem with mutatejobservice because of clientlogintoken?
Hi, Do you have the adwords-api.properties https://github.com/googleads/googleads-java-lib/blob/master/modules/ads_lib/src/main/java/com/google/api/ads/adwords/lib/conf/props/adwords-api.properties file in your classpath? That file is required by the client library at runtime. Thanks, Josh, AdWords API Team On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 7:55:40 AM UTC-4, amber.k...@sokrati.com wrote: Hi I am getting the same error but during migration to v201502. Could you please help. I am not using adwords-api-properties file trace: java.lang.NullPointerException: No group found for service: v201502.CampaignServicejava.lang.NullPointerException: No group found for service: v201502.CampaignService at com.google.api.ads.adwords.lib.conf.AdWordsApiConfiguration.getServiceUrlGroup(AdWordsApiConfiguration.java:64) at com.google.api.ads.adwords.lib.client.AdWordsServiceDescriptor.getEndpointAddress(AdWordsServiceDescriptor.java:82) at com.google.api.ads.common.lib.factory.helper.BaseAdsServiceClientFactoryHelper.createAdsServiceClient(BaseAdsServiceClientFactoryHelper.java:74) at com.google.api.ads.common.lib.factory.AdsServiceClientFactory.getServiceClient(AdsServiceClientFactory.java:75) at com.google.api.ads.common.lib.factory.BaseAdsServiceClientFactory.getServiceClientAsInterface(BaseAdsServiceClientFactory.java:79) at com.google.api.ads.common.lib.factory.BaseServices.get(BaseServices.java:60) On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 at 4:03:59 AM UTC+5:30, Josh Radcliff (AdWords API Team) wrote: Hi, I've seen this before when the classpath is incorrect or incomplete. Could you check the following? 1. You have updated your adwords-api.properties with the latest version https://code.google.com/p/google-api-ads-java/source/browse/modules/ads_lib/src/main/java/com/google/api/ads/adwords/lib/conf/props/adwords-api.properties 2. The classpath is the same for both your local and server processes If that does not highlight the issue, please send on your classpath information from both processes so I can investigate further. Thanks, Josh, AdWords API Team On Monday, November 18, 2013 5:20:06 AM UTC-5, F.Per wrote: Funny thing is that i dont get this error starting my application locally and not on the server?! On Sunday, November 17, 2013 2:43:31 PM UTC+1, Shaihulud wrote: Hi i am getting the following error for a code the worked for month. java.lang.NullPointerException: No group found for service: v201306.MutateJobServicejava.lang.NullPointerException: No group found for service: v201306.MutateJobService at com.google.api.ads.adwords.lib.conf.AdWordsApiConfiguration.getServiceUrlGroup(AdWordsApiConfiguration.java:63) at com.google.api.ads.adwords.lib.client.AdWordsServiceDescriptor.getEndpointAddress(AdWordsServiceDescriptor.java:77) at com.google.api.ads.common.lib.factory.helper.BaseAdsServiceClientFactoryHelper.createAdsServiceClient(BaseAdsServiceClientFactoryHelper.java:74) at com.google.api.ads.common.lib.factory.AdsServiceClientFactory.getServiceClient(AdsServiceClientFactory.java:73) at com.google.api.ads.common.lib.factory.BaseAdsServiceClientFactory.getServiceClientAsInterface(BaseAdsServiceClientFactory.java:79) at com.google.api.ads.common.lib.factory.BaseServices.get(BaseServices.java:60) The only thing ive changed is that i switched from v201302 to v201306, but i did not touch the code. the associated code is this : [code] clientLoginToken = new ClientLoginTokens.Builder() .forApi(ClientLoginTokens.Api.ADWORDS) .withEmailAndPassword(adwordsLogin, password) .build() .requestToken(); // Construct an AdWordsSession. AdWordsSession session = new AdWordsSession.Builder() .withClientLoginToken(clientLoginToken) .withDeveloperToken(developerToken) .withClientCustomerId(customerAccount.getClientId()) .withEndpoint(AdWordsSession.DEFAULT_ENDPOINT).build(); // mutate job service mutateJobService = new AdWordsServices().get(session, MutateJobServiceInterface.class); // create list of operations adGroupCriterionOperations = new ArrayListAdGroupCriterionOperation(); [/code] ClientloginTokens is deprecated but should still work right? So what seems to be the problem here? I would appreciate the help. thx -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Re: Reporting - Data for Removed artifacts
Thanks for your explanation. I have a couple of questions/comments: 1. Thanks for clarifying the bit about what level removed artifacts are filtered. For reports such as Search Terms Report, or Placement Performance Report etc. - do they contain data for Removed Campaigns/AdGroups/Keywords/Ads, or the condition needs to be explicitly added for any artifact that could be in removed state? 2. For scripts, the version is optional. Unfortunately most people I've seen write scripts, do not include this parameter, leading to auto-upgrade. TGIF :) MG On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 11:44:54 AM UTC-3, Danial Klimkin wrote: Hello MG, We normally avoid making changes into launched API versions. Scripts users (those specifying API version) should not be affected, unless they didn't read the release notes when migrated to v201502. Please note while we are going to discuss this issue, I can't promise this change will be implemented. -Danial. On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 4:57:31 PM UTC+3, AdWordsApiUser wrote: Hi Danial, Thanks for your quick response. Is there a chance that this might change in v201502? If yes, then we'd like to hold off the internal upgrade waiting for this to happen. My guess is must already be affecting scripts, and as this is pretty much a silent change, script users might not even realize that the data they are fetching is not complete anymore. Cheers, MG On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 9:08:26 AM UTC-3, Danial Klimkin wrote: Hello, Reporting filters out removed entries for the level of the report only. So, account level report will return stats for all objects (and you can't actually add CampaignStatus predicate while requesting it). In general, I see your point. We may want to take another look on how this is handled. -Danial, AdWords API Team. On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 2:59:53 PM UTC+3, AdWordsApiUser wrote: In the new version of the API, when using AdHoc reports, data for artifacts that are marked removed is not included by default, even if they had impressions, clicks etc. in the chosen date range. This makes the reports incorrect. If an entity was active in the past, its statistics should be included, irrespective of whether it is active or not now. This also makes me wonder - when I ask for an account performance report, would it not include data for campaigns that were deleted? Or, it would? Both cases create a discrepancy - the first one is obviously wrong, and in the second one, the campaign report does not add up to the account performance report, unless the special condition is included. This particular change in behavior has made the transition to the new version of the API particularly painful, and I have to remember to include WHERE CampaignStatus IN [ACTIVE, PAUSED, REMOVED] in all my awqls. It probably makes sense for most services, but not for reporting stats. -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/cf4db23d-d184-4d6e-9244-5e6473590d6a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Testing Upgraded URLs
Fair point. What I can try to do is to publish some external info on how exactly to construct an entity's fully resolved URL. Will that work? Cheers, Anash On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 10:39:32 AM UTC-4, mm wrote: Realistically, a UI is not particularly useful at scale - it would be more useful to have an api for retrieving an entity's fully resolved URL On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 1:47:10 PM UTC-5, Anash P. Oommen (AdWords API Team) wrote: Hi Hans, That's a UI feature request; could you open a thread on the product forum https://www.en.adwords-community.com/? Cheers, Anash P. Oommen, AdWords API Advisor. On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 12:28:32 PM UTC-4, HK wrote: Hi, Anash Getting your ads to serve with a live account isn't always that easy when you are developing. It means you need a live account with everything set up correctly and you have to pay Google for every click you make while testing. I really hope Google will consider building a test UI soon where developers can force ads to serve without going through all the before mentioned work. Especially now that the simplicity of destination URLs is gone and many more factors come into play in building the URL the user ends up triggering. Thanks, Hans -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/29ba4233-c270-453e-a09d-950dea08b1c0%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: ValueTrack and demographics
Thanks, we are actually looking for information at the instance of the click to do some things programmatically on the target/landing page On Apr 17, 2015 3:21 PM, Justin Coon jus...@campaignium.com wrote: Is demographics (age, gender, etc) information available with ValueTrack? -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/adwords-api/ISxd0IuTUjs/unsubscribe. To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/ac7aa3c9-c134-4b9e-824a-f094f1b0db6b%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/ac7aa3c9-c134-4b9e-824a-f094f1b0db6b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/CAEtEPZv37HkGOABL6OtN991OBHbtRW0-f_T0wRgSP3ourSx2Tw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: ValueTrack and demographics
Hi Justin, No, demographics information is not available with ValueTrack. If your ad is on the Display Network, you can get aggregate information https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/2580383?hl=en about gender and age. Cheers, Nadine, AdWords API Team On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 4:21:06 PM UTC-4, Justin Coon wrote: Is demographics (age, gender, etc) information available with ValueTrack? -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/8cd15b40-e3b8-499f-83ff-8e419a425a62%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Google Analytics data in Search Query Performance Report
Hi David, The only reports with Google Analytics columns are the ones listed on the *Google Analytics* tab at the top of the Report Types page https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/appendix/reports#analytics-reports . That being said, since your use case involves modifying the match type of keywords and excluding specific keywords, could you use the KEYWORDS_PERFORMANCE_REPORT https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/appendix/reports#keywords instead? That report *does* include GA columns. Thanks, Josh, AdWords API Team On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 9:50:00 AM UTC-4, David Midgley wrote: Hi all Can I assume as the GA columns are not available in the search query report it's impossible to get bounce rate, etc for a search query? I can see there is conversion data, which is great but it would be even better to get GA data. If you're looking for a use case, I have a couple: 1. Search query addition: If a search query has a lower bounce rate, more time on site, etc then the query will be updated to an exact match keyword 2. Negative addition: If a search query has a high bounce rate. less time on site, etc the keyword will be suggested as a negative The reason why conversion on its own may not be good enough is if the site has a low conversion rate or conversion tracking is not implemented. Even if conversion tracking was implemented, the GA data would help raise the confidence level for the decision. If anyone has found a workaround, let me know! A potential solution could be to use the GA API but I'm hoping to avoid that. Cheers David -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/bdeaa62d-59b7-4068-804b-ffe974d576bc%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Change Campaign Status [OperatorError.OPERATOR_NOT_SUPPORTED @ operations[0]
Yes you are right. Im trying to change the status of a removed campaign. So its not possible to change the status of a removed campaign back to paused or enabled? But this is what fiddler gives me. There is no operation in it. POST https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201409/CampaignService HTTP/1.1 User-Agent: Mono Web Services Client Protocol 4.0.50524.0 Authorization: Bearer ya29.x SOAPAction: Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8 Content-Length: 658 Host: adwords.google.com ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8? soap:Envelope xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance; xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema; xmlns:soap=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/; soap:Header RequestHeader xmlns=https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201409; clientCustomerIdXX/clientCustomerId developerTokenXXX/developerToken userAgentAdWordsChangeCampaign/userAgent /RequestHeader /soap:Header soap:Body mutate xmlns=https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201409; operations operatorSET/operator operand id270327786/id /operand/operations /mutate /soap:Body /soap:Envelope -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/dc5ab833-4941-4a30-b64b-473392f8f10e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
History load approach
Hi, I want to load adwords reports history data for last two years. Currently report download is done through a spring batch application. Date range is given as parameters(Start and Date). When i tried for one month data, i was getting error response with error code * ReportDownloadError.ERROR_GETTING_RESPONSE_FROM_BACKEND* Is there any other approach for downloading history data from adwords -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and Google+: https://googleadsdeveloper.blogspot.com/ https://plus.google.com/+GoogleAdsDevelopers/posts =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups AdWords API Forum group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adwords-api/6e94174d-e215-4ffb-9b4b-01d68ef56067%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
