Re: [AFMUG] 500 foot shot
Well, the original 1Gbps radios seem to be a bit flakey, but the new "One" version is supposed to fix that... but I don't have any personal experience with those, so I can't say how they compare to the 2.5G, but I suspect the hardware is closer to the 2.5G model than the original 1G model. But the only real reason not to just go with the 2.5G is the cost difference. On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 4:32 PM SmarterBroadband wrote: > I was leaning towards the "IgniteNet One 60-19" > But the comments make me think I should look at the 2.5G version. > > -Original Message- > From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rob Genovesi > Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 10:29 AM > To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 500 foot shot > > Same experience w/ IgniteNet - had some stability issues with the early > stuff but the newer 2.5G units have been solid. > > > -Rob > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 2:23 PM Mathew Howard > wrote: > > > > We had some issues with the original 1Gbps units - which they did > replace for free, and as I understand it, the 1 gig radios have since been > redesigned, but we've had two of the 2.5Gbps links up for close to two > years with no real problems. The Mikrotik 60ghz radios seem to work pretty > well too. > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:15 PM SmarterBroadband wrote: > >> > >> We need to put up a 100Meg link for our county. Possible they may > eventually need 500Meg. Is the IgniteNet 60Ghz solid and ready for prime > time? I would use AF24 but this link is about 4 degrees off an existing > AF24 link!!! Could use Siklu but don’t see using it anywhere else so would > need to hold a spare. However if IgniteNet worked well I could see other > uses. Other thoughts? > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> > >> > >> Adam > >> > >> -- > >> AF mailing list > >> AF@af.afmug.com > >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > -- > > AF mailing list > > AF@af.afmug.com > > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
Re: [AFMUG] 500 foot shot
I was leaning towards the "IgniteNet One 60-19" But the comments make me think I should look at the 2.5G version. -Original Message- From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rob Genovesi Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 10:29 AM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 500 foot shot Same experience w/ IgniteNet - had some stability issues with the early stuff but the newer 2.5G units have been solid. -Rob On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 2:23 PM Mathew Howard wrote: > > We had some issues with the original 1Gbps units - which they did replace for > free, and as I understand it, the 1 gig radios have since been redesigned, > but we've had two of the 2.5Gbps links up for close to two years with no real > problems. The Mikrotik 60ghz radios seem to work pretty well too. > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:15 PM SmarterBroadband wrote: >> >> We need to put up a 100Meg link for our county. Possible they may >> eventually need 500Meg. Is the IgniteNet 60Ghz solid and ready for prime >> time? I would use AF24 but this link is about 4 degrees off an existing >> AF24 link!!! Could use Siklu but don’t see using it anywhere else so would >> need to hold a spare. However if IgniteNet worked well I could see other >> uses. Other thoughts? >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> Adam >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
Re: [AFMUG] 500 foot shot
I realize we're only talking about 500', but is that going to be enough signal to deal with rain fade with those? maybe do an LHG on one end? Personally, I think I would use IgniteNet MetroLinq One 60-19's for a link like that. On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:56 AM Dan Spitler wrote: > I'd recommend the Wireless Wire/wAP version. LHG at that distance is a bit > overkill and with Mikrotik removing TX power control (grrr) I've seen some > flakiness with links that close. > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 7:11 AM Dennis Burgess via AF > wrote: > >> LGH60, MikroTik 60GHz, 1gig full duplex Done. >> >> >> >> >> >> *[image: LTI-Full_175px]* >> >> *Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer * >> >> Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition” >> >> *Link Technologies, Inc* -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services >> >> *Office*: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net >> >> Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com >> >> >> >> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of * SmarterBroadband >> *Sent:* Monday, April 29, 2019 4:15 PM >> *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] 500 foot shot >> >> >> >> We need to put up a 100Meg link for our county. Possible they may >> eventually need 500Meg. Is the IgniteNet 60Ghz solid and ready for prime >> time? I would use AF24 but this link is about 4 degrees off an existing >> AF24 link!!! Could use Siklu but don’t see using it anywhere else so would >> need to hold a spare. However if IgniteNet worked well I could see other >> uses. Other thoughts? >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> Adam >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
Re: [AFMUG] 500 foot shot
Same experience w/ IgniteNet - had some stability issues with the early stuff but the newer 2.5G units have been solid. -Rob On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 2:23 PM Mathew Howard wrote: > > We had some issues with the original 1Gbps units - which they did replace for > free, and as I understand it, the 1 gig radios have since been redesigned, > but we've had two of the 2.5Gbps links up for close to two years with no real > problems. The Mikrotik 60ghz radios seem to work pretty well too. > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:15 PM SmarterBroadband wrote: >> >> We need to put up a 100Meg link for our county. Possible they may >> eventually need 500Meg. Is the IgniteNet 60Ghz solid and ready for prime >> time? I would use AF24 but this link is about 4 degrees off an existing >> AF24 link!!! Could use Siklu but don’t see using it anywhere else so would >> need to hold a spare. However if IgniteNet worked well I could see other >> uses. Other thoughts? >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> Adam >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
Re: [AFMUG] 500 foot shot
I'd recommend the Wireless Wire/wAP version. LHG at that distance is a bit overkill and with Mikrotik removing TX power control (grrr) I've seen some flakiness with links that close. On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 7:11 AM Dennis Burgess via AF wrote: > LGH60, MikroTik 60GHz, 1gig full duplex Done. > > > > > > *[image: LTI-Full_175px]* > > *Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer * > > Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition” > > *Link Technologies, Inc* -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services > > *Office*: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net > > Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com > > > > *From:* AF *On Behalf Of * SmarterBroadband > *Sent:* Monday, April 29, 2019 4:15 PM > *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' > *Subject:* [AFMUG] 500 foot shot > > > > We need to put up a 100Meg link for our county. Possible they may > eventually need 500Meg. Is the IgniteNet 60Ghz solid and ready for prime > time? I would use AF24 but this link is about 4 degrees off an existing > AF24 link!!! Could use Siklu but don’t see using it anywhere else so would > need to hold a spare. However if IgniteNet worked well I could see other > uses. Other thoughts? > > > > Thanks > > > > Adam > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
Re: [AFMUG] 500 foot shot
LGH60, MikroTik 60GHz, 1gig full duplex Done. [LTI-Full_175px] Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition" Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/> Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com From: AF On Behalf Of SmarterBroadband Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 4:15 PM To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' Subject: [AFMUG] 500 foot shot We need to put up a 100Meg link for our county. Possible they may eventually need 500Meg. Is the IgniteNet 60Ghz solid and ready for prime time? I would use AF24 but this link is about 4 degrees off an existing AF24 link!!! Could use Siklu but don't see using it anywhere else so would need to hold a spare. However if IgniteNet worked well I could see other uses. Other thoughts? Thanks Adam -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
Re: [AFMUG] 500 foot shot
We had some issues with the original 1Gbps units - which they did replace for free, and as I understand it, the 1 gig radios have since been redesigned, but we've had two of the 2.5Gbps links up for close to two years with no real problems. The Mikrotik 60ghz radios seem to work pretty well too. On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:15 PM SmarterBroadband wrote: > We need to put up a 100Meg link for our county. Possible they may > eventually need 500Meg. Is the IgniteNet 60Ghz solid and ready for prime > time? I would use AF24 but this link is about 4 degrees off an existing > AF24 link!!! Could use Siklu but don’t see using it anywhere else so would > need to hold a spare. However if IgniteNet worked well I could see other > uses. Other thoughts? > > > > Thanks > > > > Adam > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
[AFMUG] 500 foot shot
We need to put up a 100Meg link for our county. Possible they may eventually need 500Meg. Is the IgniteNet 60Ghz solid and ready for prime time? I would use AF24 but this link is about 4 degrees off an existing AF24 link!!! Could use Siklu but don't see using it anywhere else so would need to hold a spare. However if IgniteNet worked well I could see other uses. Other thoughts? Thanks Adam -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
