Re: [AFMUG] easy backup link failover

2017-09-02 Thread George Skorup
That's typically what I do, just make the parallel backup path one 
higher at both ends.


But I'll tell you this right now, consider a larger scale for your 
interface costs. As your OSPF domain grows into more complex rings or 
more of a mesh, shit will start to get complicated and you'll wish you 
had more granularity. What I'm moving to is interface cost based on link 
bandwidth. Kinda like Cisco's auto-cost, but not auto because MikroTik 
is stupid. Anyway.. take 100,000 ÷ link bw in Mbps. So 1G=100. An AF24 
around 770Mbps would be a cost of about 130. A 360Mbps SAF link would be 
about 277. Etc, etc. Lots of granularity for tweaking traffic flow.


On 9/2/2017 4:08 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
we are replacing two links, currently cheap 5ghz (one epmp ptp and one 
ubnt nanobridge) with mimosa 11ghz, we dont need that much bandwidth 
right now so im leaving the old links in parallel.


I just put the path cost on the interface for the 5ghz at 11 and left 
the 11ghz at 10. it seems to serve this purpose. but the other links 
in the redundancy will see that extra 1 in path cost on failover, not 
so awful a deal since it will drop capacity by 90 percent, but would i 
have been better to leave the 5ghz at 10 and drop the 11ghz to 5?






Re: [AFMUG] Wire label labelmaker recommendation

2017-09-02 Thread Jeremy
The Dymo Rhino has all sorts of tape options, and will also print on shrink
tubing

On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Jeremy  wrote:

> Dymo Rhino 5200, and I love it.  However, it permanently dies if left
> inside of a cold vehicle.  I have lost two this way now.
>
> On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Jaime Solorza 
> wrote:
>
>> Adroit , succinct!!
>>
>> Jaime Solorza
>>
>> On Sep 2, 2017 6:14 PM, "Bill Prince"  wrote:
>>
>> Jaime, you are such a talker. Once in a while, I'd like to see a response
>> that was short and concise.
>>
>>
>> bp
>> 
>>
>>
>> On 9/2/2017 5:06 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>>
>> Panduit
>>
>> Jaime Solorza
>>
>> On Sep 2, 2017 6:01 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <
>> li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've been using a brother "TZ" labelmaker for quite a while.   Works
>>> great on flat surfaces.
>>>
>>> Recently, I've been needing to label wires for the test system - I'm
>>> finding that the TZ tape likes to peel.  I'm going to get a brand new roll
>>> of the cable flexible id tape, in case I got a bad one or mistakenly
>>> used the wrong tape for some of these labels.  But... I'm pretty convinced
>>> that this is more related to the fact that these cables are
>>> inserted/removed regularly and as such the label+cable is subject to being
>>> flexed.  With the plastic tape being not as flexible as the cable, this is
>>> causing enough 'strain' on the adhesive for it to release.
>>>
>>> I've been curious about the brady and other similar labelers.
>>> Unfortunately I don't know what label is going on these cables at build
>>> time so for the most part I'm going to have to stick with some sort of
>>> adhesive label (unless there is another option other than a heatshrink
>>> tube).   The fact that brady has cloth labels makes me wonder if this would
>>> work better...
>>>
>>> What does everyone use, and what experience have you had with the labels?
>>>
>>> BTW, many of these cables are CAT5 sized.  Some are bigger/smaller
>>> though...
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
>>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
>>> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
>>> 
>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>


Re: [AFMUG] Wire label labelmaker recommendation

2017-09-02 Thread Jeremy
Dymo Rhino 5200, and I love it.  However, it permanently dies if left
inside of a cold vehicle.  I have lost two this way now.

On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Jaime Solorza 
wrote:

> Adroit , succinct!!
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
> On Sep 2, 2017 6:14 PM, "Bill Prince"  wrote:
>
> Jaime, you are such a talker. Once in a while, I'd like to see a response
> that was short and concise.
>
>
> bp
> 
>
>
> On 9/2/2017 5:06 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>
> Panduit
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
> On Sep 2, 2017 6:01 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <
> li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
>
>> I've been using a brother "TZ" labelmaker for quite a while.   Works
>> great on flat surfaces.
>>
>> Recently, I've been needing to label wires for the test system - I'm
>> finding that the TZ tape likes to peel.  I'm going to get a brand new roll
>> of the cable flexible id tape, in case I got a bad one or mistakenly
>> used the wrong tape for some of these labels.  But... I'm pretty convinced
>> that this is more related to the fact that these cables are
>> inserted/removed regularly and as such the label+cable is subject to being
>> flexed.  With the plastic tape being not as flexible as the cable, this is
>> causing enough 'strain' on the adhesive for it to release.
>>
>> I've been curious about the brady and other similar labelers.
>> Unfortunately I don't know what label is going on these cables at build
>> time so for the most part I'm going to have to stick with some sort of
>> adhesive label (unless there is another option other than a heatshrink
>> tube).   The fact that brady has cloth labels makes me wonder if this would
>> work better...
>>
>> What does everyone use, and what experience have you had with the labels?
>>
>> BTW, many of these cables are CAT5 sized.  Some are bigger/smaller
>> though...
>>
>> --
>> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
>> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
>> 
>>   
>>
>>
>
>


Re: [AFMUG] Wire label labelmaker recommendation

2017-09-02 Thread Jaime Solorza
Adroit , succinct!!

Jaime Solorza

On Sep 2, 2017 6:14 PM, "Bill Prince"  wrote:

Jaime, you are such a talker. Once in a while, I'd like to see a response
that was short and concise.


bp



On 9/2/2017 5:06 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:

Panduit

Jaime Solorza

On Sep 2, 2017 6:01 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <
li...@packetflux.com> wrote:

> I've been using a brother "TZ" labelmaker for quite a while.   Works great
> on flat surfaces.
>
> Recently, I've been needing to label wires for the test system - I'm
> finding that the TZ tape likes to peel.  I'm going to get a brand new roll
> of the cable flexible id tape, in case I got a bad one or mistakenly
> used the wrong tape for some of these labels.  But... I'm pretty convinced
> that this is more related to the fact that these cables are
> inserted/removed regularly and as such the label+cable is subject to being
> flexed.  With the plastic tape being not as flexible as the cable, this is
> causing enough 'strain' on the adhesive for it to release.
>
> I've been curious about the brady and other similar labelers.
> Unfortunately I don't know what label is going on these cables at build
> time so for the most part I'm going to have to stick with some sort of
> adhesive label (unless there is another option other than a heatshrink
> tube).   The fact that brady has cloth labels makes me wonder if this would
> work better...
>
> What does everyone use, and what experience have you had with the labels?
>
> BTW, many of these cables are CAT5 sized.  Some are bigger/smaller
> though...
>
> --
> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
>   
>   
>
>


Re: [AFMUG] Wire label labelmaker recommendation

2017-09-02 Thread George Skorup
I use a Dymo Rhino 5200 and 3/4" black on white industrial vinyl tape. 
The 5200 has presets for wire and cable, patch panels, breaker panels, 
etc. I've had the vinyl outdoors on 'Pipes and 'Boxes with a "GPS" label 
for years. None of them have came off yet. They've stayed on cables in 
outdoor cabinets that get a little on the warm side. I've pulled some 
off and transferred to another cable and they re-stick just fine.


We have several of this kit: 
https://www.amazon.com/Industrial-RHINO-Label-Maker-1756589/dp/B002M1HKLC/


On 9/2/2017 7:01 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
I've been using a brother "TZ" labelmaker for quite a while.   Works 
great on flat surfaces.


Recently, I've been needing to label wires for the test system - I'm 
finding that the TZ tape likes to peel.  I'm going to get a brand new 
roll of the cable flexible id tape, in case I got a bad one or 
mistakenly used the wrong tape for some of these labels.  But... I'm 
pretty convinced that this is more related to the fact that these 
cables are inserted/removed regularly and as such the label+cable is 
subject to being flexed.  With the plastic tape being not as flexible 
as the cable, this is causing enough 'strain' on the adhesive for it 
to release.


I've been curious about the brady and other similar labelers.   
Unfortunately I don't know what label is going on these cables at 
build time so for the most part I'm going to have to stick with some 
sort of adhesive label (unless there is another option other than a 
heatshrink tube).   The fact that brady has cloth labels makes me 
wonder if this would work better...


What does everyone use, and what experience have you had with the labels?

BTW, many of these cables are CAT5 sized.  Some are bigger/smaller 
though...


--
*Forrest Christian* /CEO//, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc./
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
forre...@imach.com  | 
http://www.packetflux.com 
 
 







Re: [AFMUG] Wire label labelmaker recommendation

2017-09-02 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
probably because right now it is cutting into his Tecate time ! 

:) 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 

> From: "Bill Prince" 
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Saturday, September 2, 2017 8:14:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Wire label labelmaker recommendation

> Jaime, you are such a talker. Once in a while, I'd like to see a response that
> was short and concise.

> bp
> 
> On 9/2/2017 5:06 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:

>> Panduit

>> Jaime Solorza

>> On Sep 2, 2017 6:01 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <
>> li...@packetflux.com > wrote:

>>> I've been using a brother "TZ" labelmaker for quite a while. Works great on 
>>> flat
>>> surfaces.

>>> Recently, I've been needing to label wires for the test system - I'm finding
>>> that the TZ tape likes to peel. I'm going to get a brand new roll of the
>>> cable flexible id tape, in case I got a bad one or mistakenly used the
>>> wrong tape for some of these labels. But... I'm pretty convinced that this 
>>> is
>>> more related to the fact that these cables are inserted/removed regularly 
>>> and
>>> as such the label+cable is subject to being flexed. With the plastic tape 
>>> being
>>> not as flexible as the cable, this is causing enough 'strain' on the 
>>> adhesive
>>> for it to release.

>>> I've been curious about the brady and other similar labelers. Unfortunately 
>>> I
>>> don't know what label is going on these cables at build time so for the most
>>> part I'm going to have to stick with some sort of adhesive label (unless 
>>> there
>>> is another option other than a heatshrink tube). The fact that brady has 
>>> cloth
>>> labels makes me wonder if this would work better...

>>> What does everyone use, and what experience have you had with the labels?

>>> BTW, many of these cables are CAT5 sized. Some are bigger/smaller though...

>>> --
>>> Forrest Christian CEO , PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.
>>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
>>> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com


Re: [AFMUG] Wire label labelmaker recommendation

2017-09-02 Thread Bill Prince
Jaime, you are such a talker. Once in a while, I'd like to see a 
response that was short and concise.



bp


On 9/2/2017 5:06 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:

Panduit

Jaime Solorza

On Sep 2, 2017 6:01 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" 
> wrote:


I've been using a brother "TZ" labelmaker for quite a while.  
Works great on flat surfaces.

Recently, I've been needing to label wires for the test system -
I'm finding that the TZ tape likes to peel.  I'm going to get a
brand new roll of the cable flexible id tape, in case I got a
bad one or mistakenly used the wrong tape for some of these
labels.  But... I'm pretty convinced that this is more related to
the fact that these cables are inserted/removed regularly and as
such the label+cable is subject to being flexed.  With the plastic
tape being not as flexible as the cable, this is causing enough
'strain' on the adhesive for it to release.

I've been curious about the brady and other similar labelers.  
Unfortunately I don't know what label is going on these cables at
build time so for the most part I'm going to have to stick with
some sort of adhesive label (unless there is another option other
than a heatshrink tube).   The fact that brady has cloth labels
makes me wonder if this would work better...

What does everyone use, and what experience have you had with the
labels?

BTW, many of these cables are CAT5 sized.  Some are bigger/smaller
though...

-- 
*Forrest Christian* /CEO//, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc./

Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
forre...@imach.com  |
http://www.packetflux.com 

 






Re: [AFMUG] Wire label labelmaker recommendation

2017-09-02 Thread Chuck McCown
Heatshrink label is the only thing that will stand up to that kind of abuse I 
think.  
I don’t remember how it worked, but when I was doing aviation electronics, they 
ran the wire through a machine that printed an identifier on the whole length.  
That was pretty nice.  Every single wire had a designator that matched the 
schematic.  

From: Forrest Christian (List Account) 
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2017 6:01 PM
To: af 
Subject: [AFMUG] Wire label labelmaker recommendation

I've been using a brother "TZ" labelmaker for quite a while.   Works great on 
flat surfaces. 

Recently, I've been needing to label wires for the test system - I'm finding 
that the TZ tape likes to peel.  I'm going to get a brand new roll of the 
cable flexible id tape, in case I got a bad one or mistakenly used the 
wrong tape for some of these labels.  But... I'm pretty convinced that this is 
more related to the fact that these cables are inserted/removed regularly and 
as such the label+cable is subject to being flexed.  With the plastic tape 
being not as flexible as the cable, this is causing enough 'strain' on the 
adhesive for it to release.

I've been curious about the brady and other similar labelers.   Unfortunately I 
don't know what label is going on these cables at build time so for the most 
part I'm going to have to stick with some sort of adhesive label (unless there 
is another option other than a heatshrink tube).   The fact that brady has 
cloth labels makes me wonder if this would work better...

What does everyone use, and what experience have you had with the labels?

BTW, many of these cables are CAT5 sized.  Some are bigger/smaller though...

-- 

  Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.

  Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
  forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com

 




Re: [AFMUG] Wire label labelmaker recommendation

2017-09-02 Thread Jaime Solorza
Panduit

Jaime Solorza

On Sep 2, 2017 6:01 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <
li...@packetflux.com> wrote:

> I've been using a brother "TZ" labelmaker for quite a while.   Works great
> on flat surfaces.
>
> Recently, I've been needing to label wires for the test system - I'm
> finding that the TZ tape likes to peel.  I'm going to get a brand new roll
> of the cable flexible id tape, in case I got a bad one or mistakenly
> used the wrong tape for some of these labels.  But... I'm pretty convinced
> that this is more related to the fact that these cables are
> inserted/removed regularly and as such the label+cable is subject to being
> flexed.  With the plastic tape being not as flexible as the cable, this is
> causing enough 'strain' on the adhesive for it to release.
>
> I've been curious about the brady and other similar labelers.
> Unfortunately I don't know what label is going on these cables at build
> time so for the most part I'm going to have to stick with some sort of
> adhesive label (unless there is another option other than a heatshrink
> tube).   The fact that brady has cloth labels makes me wonder if this would
> work better...
>
> What does everyone use, and what experience have you had with the labels?
>
> BTW, many of these cables are CAT5 sized.  Some are bigger/smaller
> though...
>
> --
> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
>   
>   
>
>


[AFMUG] Wire label labelmaker recommendation

2017-09-02 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
I've been using a brother "TZ" labelmaker for quite a while.   Works great
on flat surfaces.

Recently, I've been needing to label wires for the test system - I'm
finding that the TZ tape likes to peel.  I'm going to get a brand new roll
of the cable flexible id tape, in case I got a bad one or mistakenly
used the wrong tape for some of these labels.  But... I'm pretty convinced
that this is more related to the fact that these cables are
inserted/removed regularly and as such the label+cable is subject to being
flexed.  With the plastic tape being not as flexible as the cable, this is
causing enough 'strain' on the adhesive for it to release.

I've been curious about the brady and other similar labelers.
Unfortunately I don't know what label is going on these cables at build
time so for the most part I'm going to have to stick with some sort of
adhesive label (unless there is another option other than a heatshrink
tube).   The fact that brady has cloth labels makes me wonder if this would
work better...

What does everyone use, and what experience have you had with the labels?

BTW, many of these cables are CAT5 sized.  Some are bigger/smaller though...

-- 
*Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
  



Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus/powercode users, OT

2017-09-02 Thread Darin Steffl
Steve,

If you're having this much trouble, your decision tree is messed up
somewhere. We've never had them ask for any MAC address for anything. They
generally take calls well for the most part. Sometimes there's a call that
I think WTF are you doing but not many.

We love having serverplus answer calls after hours for us so we at least
know our customers get a human being if they're having trouble. Most calls
that don't go well can be fixed with an update to our decision tree.

I don't think you have your process fine tuned with them yet so I highly
suggest you work with their team to get things figured out. They're easy to
work with and Layne will do his best to make sure you're happy. Just tone
down the attitude a little bit so you don't offend them or who will want to
help you ;)

On Sep 1, 2017 2:36 PM, "Steve Jones"  wrote:

> dispatching for pc support? do you charge for service calls? I can se
> willy nilly dispatch if you charge, revenue driver.
>
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Matt Hoppes  rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
>
>> No.. that's what outsourced should have determined what the issue was.
>> Radio is up... customer has no Internet - dispatch.
>>
>> On 9/1/17 3:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> We got a call today from a customer who also was down last week.
>>> radio looks fine.Router has a connection.If This Were outsourced
>>> to tech support where they kick it back to us?
>>>
>>> Looks like we will be sending someone out there anyway it might even be
>>> an id10terror
>>>
>>> Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone
>>>
>>> - Reply message -
>>> From: "Steve Jones" 
>>> To: "af@afmug.com" 
>>> Subject: [AFMUG] Serverplus/powercode users, OT
>>> Date: Fri, Sep 1, 2017 11:39 AM
>>>
>>> youre not going to have them powercycle or verify things are plugged in
>>> correctly? that's ALOT of truck rolls
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Matt Hoppes
>>> >> > wrote:
>>>
>>> Exactly... I just signed up with SP and my decision tree is going to
>>> be extremely simple and straight forward... so easy even a cave man
>>> can do it.
>>>
>>> Is your router on?   Are you connected to your router?  Can you ping
>>> your router?  Can you ping our modem?  Can I ping our modem?  Do you
>>> get proper speeds when plugged into our modem?
>>>
>>> ESCALATE.   What else is there to troubleshoot locally?  Unless your
>>> network is @#$@#.
>>>
>>> This entire process should take sub 5 minutes to complete.
>>>
>>> END RESULT:
>>> Your computer is borked.
>>> Your router is borked.
>>> Our connection to you is borked -- dispatch.
>>>
>>> On 9/1/17 8:58 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>>
>>> I have good luck with ServerPlus.  Part of the quality you get
>>> from them
>>> depends on the quality of the decision tree you give them.
>>>
>>> *From:* Sterling Jacobson
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 31, 2017 10:22 PM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com 
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus/powercode users, OT
>>>
>>>
>>> Not surprising, but sad to hear things haven’t changed one bit
>>> with
>>> ServerPlus in the years since I swore I would never use them
>>> again, lol!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
>>> ] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 31, 2017 8:45 PM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com 
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus/powercode users, OT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Supposed to specifically state not to ask for a mac from box.
>>> Because it
>>> was an issue. But, i bet we get an accurate bill. The bills are
>>> always
>>> consistent. The level of irate i have right now excedes my bac,
>>> thats
>>> pretty high at 944 pm
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 31, 2017 9:31 PM, "Josh Luthman"
>>> >> > wrote:
>>>
>>> That idea is coming from somewhere and I too would think it
>>> comes
>>> from the DT.  None of my calls say anything about MAC (we
>>> NAT our SM).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 
>>> 
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 
>>> 
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Mike Hammett
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> What does your DT say to do?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> 

[AFMUG] easy backup link failover

2017-09-02 Thread Steve Jones
we are replacing two links, currently cheap 5ghz (one epmp ptp and one ubnt
nanobridge) with mimosa 11ghz, we dont need that much bandwidth right now
so im leaving the old links in parallel.

I just put the path cost on the interface for the 5ghz at 11 and left the
11ghz at 10. it seems to serve this purpose. but the other links in the
redundancy will see that extra 1 in path cost on failover, not so awful a
deal since it will drop capacity by 90 percent, but would i have been
better to leave the 5ghz at 10 and drop the 11ghz to 5?


Re: [AFMUG] B11 power in a pinch

2017-09-02 Thread Steve Jones
Thanks for the input guys, ended up finding it, it was in another jobs
project box, but good to know there are all these options.

On Sep 2, 2017 2:31 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:

> yep.. including the AF24 48v or even the AF5x (48v) or Netonix Switch etc
> etc etc ... pretty much anything :)
>
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518>
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email:
> supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Mathew Howard" 
> *To: *"af" 
> *Sent: *Saturday, September 2, 2017 3:01:39 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] B11 power in a pinch
>
> I would guess an ePMP 2000 power supply would work, they'll take pretty
> much aby 48v poe punout you can throw at it.
>
> On Sep 2, 2017 1:32 PM, "Steve Jones"  wrote:
>
>> This is pinout. Im assuming epmp 2000 ap power supply wont work. I havent
>> checked packetflux website yet for the gigabit powerinjector to see if the
>> jumpers will let me do it cause im driving
>>
>> On Sep 2, 2017 1:07 PM, "Jaime Fink"  wrote:
>>
>> Yeah really any 48VDC injector, it takes 802.3at PoE.
>>
>> > On Sep 2, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Steve Jones 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > We have an awol mimosa power supply and a crew hanging radios. What can
>> i use to power one of these. I have a syncinjector and i think agigabit
>> powerinjector. Some 48v power supplies and i think a 65 volt power supply
>> from cmm4. I dont have a mimosa power supply handy to reference. I think i
>> have a couple spare af24 original power supplies too, if i recall they were
>> an odd duck.
>> > Im in a real pinch here and am driving between sites looking to see if
>> somebody dropped it.
>>
>>
>>
>


Re: [AFMUG] B11 power in a pinch

2017-09-02 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
yep.. including the AF24 48v or even the AF5x (48v) or Netonix Switch etc etc 
etc ... pretty much anything :) 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 

> From: "Mathew Howard" 
> To: "af" 
> Sent: Saturday, September 2, 2017 3:01:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] B11 power in a pinch

> I would guess an ePMP 2000 power supply would work, they'll take pretty much 
> aby
> 48v poe punout you can throw at it.

> On Sep 2, 2017 1:32 PM, "Steve Jones" < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > wrote:

>> This is pinout. Im assuming epmp 2000 ap power supply wont work. I havent
>> checked packetflux website yet for the gigabit powerinjector to see if the
>> jumpers will let me do it cause im driving

>> On Sep 2, 2017 1:07 PM, "Jaime Fink" < ja...@mimosa.co > wrote:

>>> Yeah really any 48VDC injector, it takes 802.3at PoE.

>>> > On Sep 2, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Steve Jones < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > 
>>> > wrote:

 We have an awol mimosa power supply and a crew hanging radios. What can i 
 use to
 power one of these. I have a syncinjector and i think agigabit 
 powerinjector.
 Some 48v power supplies and i think a 65 volt power supply from cmm4. I 
 dont
 have a mimosa power supply handy to reference. I think i have a couple 
 spare
>>> > af24 original power supplies too, if i recall they were an odd duck.
 Im in a real pinch here and am driving between sites looking to see if 
 somebody
>>> > dropped it.


Re: [AFMUG] B11 power in a pinch

2017-09-02 Thread Mathew Howard
I would guess an ePMP 2000 power supply would work, they'll take pretty
much aby 48v poe punout you can throw at it.

On Sep 2, 2017 1:32 PM, "Steve Jones"  wrote:

> This is pinout. Im assuming epmp 2000 ap power supply wont work. I havent
> checked packetflux website yet for the gigabit powerinjector to see if the
> jumpers will let me do it cause im driving
>
> On Sep 2, 2017 1:07 PM, "Jaime Fink"  wrote:
>
> Yeah really any 48VDC injector, it takes 802.3at PoE.
>
> > On Sep 2, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Steve Jones 
> wrote:
> >
> > We have an awol mimosa power supply and a crew hanging radios. What can
> i use to power one of these. I have a syncinjector and i think agigabit
> powerinjector. Some 48v power supplies and i think a 65 volt power supply
> from cmm4. I dont have a mimosa power supply handy to reference. I think i
> have a couple spare af24 original power supplies too, if i recall they were
> an odd duck.
> > Im in a real pinch here and am driving between sites looking to see if
> somebody dropped it.
>
>
>


Re: [AFMUG] B11 power in a pinch

2017-09-02 Thread Jaime Fink
http://backhaul.help.mimosa.co/backhaul-faq-voltage-input-specifications

Here's the specs on the inputs. It's pretty flexible on pin options it accepts.

On Sep 2, 2017, at 11:31 AM, Steve Jones 
> wrote:

This is pinout. Im assuming epmp 2000 ap power supply wont work. I havent 
checked packetflux website yet for the gigabit powerinjector to see if the 
jumpers will let me do it cause im driving

On Sep 2, 2017 1:07 PM, "Jaime Fink" > 
wrote:
Yeah really any 48VDC injector, it takes 802.3at PoE.

> On Sep 2, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Steve Jones 
> > wrote:
>
> We have an awol mimosa power supply and a crew hanging radios. What can i use 
> to power one of these. I have a syncinjector and i think agigabit 
> powerinjector. Some 48v power supplies and i think a 65 volt power supply 
> from cmm4. I dont have a mimosa power supply handy to reference. I think i 
> have a couple spare af24 original power supplies too, if i recall they were 
> an odd duck.
> Im in a real pinch here and am driving between sites looking to see if 
> somebody dropped it.

<20170902_131452.jpg>


Re: [AFMUG] B11 power in a pinch

2017-09-02 Thread Jaime Fink
Yeah really any 48VDC injector, it takes 802.3at PoE. 

> On Sep 2, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Steve Jones  wrote:
> 
> We have an awol mimosa power supply and a crew hanging radios. What can i use 
> to power one of these. I have a syncinjector and i think agigabit 
> powerinjector. Some 48v power supplies and i think a 65 volt power supply 
> from cmm4. I dont have a mimosa power supply handy to reference. I think i 
> have a couple spare af24 original power supplies too, if i recall they were 
> an odd duck.
> Im in a real pinch here and am driving between sites looking to see if 
> somebody dropped it.


Re: [AFMUG] B11 power in a pinch

2017-09-02 Thread Bill Prince

Pretty sure you can use an 802.3af injector on Mimosa.


bp


On 9/2/2017 10:53 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
We have an awol mimosa power supply and a crew hanging radios. What 
can i use to power one of these. I have a syncinjector and i think 
agigabit powerinjector. Some 48v power supplies and i think a 65 volt 
power supply from cmm4. I dont have a mimosa power supply handy to 
reference. I think i have a couple spare af24 original power supplies 
too, if i recall they were an odd duck.
Im in a real pinch here and am driving between sites looking to see if 
somebody dropped it.




[AFMUG] B11 power in a pinch

2017-09-02 Thread Steve Jones
We have an awol mimosa power supply and a crew hanging radios. What can i
use to power one of these. I have a syncinjector and i think agigabit
powerinjector. Some 48v power supplies and i think a 65 volt power supply
from cmm4. I dont have a mimosa power supply handy to reference. I think i
have a couple spare af24 original power supplies too, if i recall they were
an odd duck.
Im in a real pinch here and am driving between sites looking to see if
somebody dropped it.


Re: [AFMUG] Comcast just coughed up customer data

2017-09-02 Thread Rory Conaway
Oops, Charter.

Rory

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Saturday, September 2, 2017 6:46 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Comcast just coughed up customer data

Charter*


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]
Midwest Internet Exchange
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]
The Brothers WISP
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png]




From: "Rory Conaway" >
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 5:02:24 PM
Subject: [AFMUG] Comcast just coughed up customer data
https://gizmodo.com/millions-of-time-warner-customer-records-exposed-in-thi-1798701579

Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO
4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040
602-426-0542
r...@triadwireless.net
www.triadwireless.net

“A hot dog at the game beats roast beef at the Ritz.” — Humphrey Bogart




Re: [AFMUG] Frontier Pole Attachment contact

2017-09-02 Thread Mike Hammett
Sent offlist. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




- Original Message -

From: "Adam Moffett"  
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 3:21:15 PM 
Subject: [AFMUG] Frontier Pole Attachment contact 

Maybe a long shot, but does anyone here have a contact at Frontier Telephone 
for pole attachment or joint use of plant? 


Thanks, 
Adam 




Re: [AFMUG] Comcast just coughed up customer data

2017-09-02 Thread Mike Hammett
Charter* 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




- Original Message -

From: "Rory Conaway"  
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 5:02:24 PM 
Subject: [AFMUG] Comcast just coughed up customer data 



https://gizmodo.com/millions-of-time-warner-customer-records-exposed-in-thi-1798701579
 

Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO 
4226 S. 37 th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040 
602-426-0542 
r...@triadwireless.net 
www.triadwireless.net 

“A hot dog at the game beats roast beef at the Ritz.” — Humphrey Bogart