Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors

2016-03-14 Thread Brandon Yuchasz 
 

That’s a good point. I am actually waiting for some feedback from Cambium on 
their 90 / 120 degree. I am assuming its 3 dBi rolloff at 90 and dBi at 120 and 
not anything mechanical or two different models. If it is infact 6 at 120 then 
I am planning to talk to KP. 

 

Best regards,

Brandon Yuchasz

GogebicRange.net

www.gogebicrange.net <http://www.gogebicrange.net/> 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ty Featherling
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 8:44 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors

 

You can ask Shane - sh...@kpperformance.ca . He should be able to tell you 
which brackets are shipping on something. 

-Ty 

On Mar 14, 2016 7:59 PM, "Brandon Yuchasz" <li...@gogebicrange.net> wrote:

That’s what I have done as well in the past. I have been avoiding buying any 
more of them because they are such a pain to get into after they are mounted. 
The cambium one is actually quite nice an allen wrench and that’s all it takes 
to swap but they are not available in as many different coverages. 

 

Best regards,

Brandon Yuchasz

GogebicRange.net

www.gogebicrange.net <http://www.gogebicrange.net/> 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 6:26 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors

 

Someone else will have to comment on that.  I found the best solution was to 
remove the two side bolts and leave the bracket mounted to the pole.  Then 
loosen the two on top and swivel the sector up to remove the cover.

 

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Brandon Yuchasz <li...@gogebicrange.net> wrote:

Without taking this one to far off track. Did they upgrade all the antennas 
brackets or if we buy one of the epmp5hz are we going to still not be able to 
open the cases when mounted on a tower?

 

Best regards,

Brandon Yuchasz

GogebicRange.net

www.gogebicrange.net <http://www.gogebicrange.net/> 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 5:24 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors

 

Glad to hear they scrapped that.  I wanted some sort of a seal, but one that 
would slide in and out would be preferable.  Nobody wants to encounter a nest 
the size of one of those boxes at the top of a tower.

 

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> wrote:

I complained about the addition of the cable glands because of the way it was 
implemented. The glands are part of the removable part of the box, not the 
stationary part. As a result to remove that cover on the box you had to loosen 
the cable glands, push enough slack through to allot you to swivel out the 
cover, and then let the cover hang with the cables going through it. Hated it. 
I talked to Shane about it and he said an engineer threw that feature in at the 
last minute and they have since removed them from the design. I said just 
redesign so that the cable glands are stationary at the bottom of the box and 
let the lid close around them. We'll see.

 

I am using the dual-5Ghzsectors and have had great results with them. I am 
swapping out 120 that are full with these dual 60s using the same mounts and 
getting more capacity.

 

-Ty




 

 

-Ty

 

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:

If you have used KP antennas before they have made some marked improvements 
over their old hardware designs.  The bracket is stronger, but also sticks out 
much further, removing the need to disconnect the sector to get the rear cover 
off.  If you are not using UBNT or EPMP, then the cover never needs to come off 
(except to connect the Type-N jumpers initially), and the 450 sectors can be 
mounted to the cover.  Having not done that, I am guessing it will be a fairly 
tight fit.  The grooves are the correct size this time, and Rockets fit without 
modifications (after a slip up in manufacturing and testing that we received on 
our last order).  The EPMP adapter also appears to work, although I haven't 
tried it personally.

 

Also, the shielded boxes used to fill up with Wasps, but now they have cable 
glands leading into the AP case.  My only complaint with this new improvement 
was that the shielded connectors do not fit through the gland.  It's a lesson 
that I should have learned long ago, but I didn'tso I had to cut the ends 
off, push them through, and then re-terminate them. 

 

We are only using the 2.4GHz/5GHz combos, and have been happy with their 
performance.  They are a huge antenna, but not as big as two antennas.

 

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications Inc 
<t...@franklinisp.net> wrote:

Good afternoon,

 

If you have deployed the KP Performance 3.65/5Ghz Dual Sectors, I am curious 
how they are working for you.

Also, if you are, did you have to modify any part of the equipment for proper 
mounting/

Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors

2016-03-14 Thread Ty Featherling 
You can ask Shane - sh...@kpperformance.ca . He should be able to tell you
which brackets are shipping on something.

-Ty
On Mar 14, 2016 7:59 PM, "Brandon Yuchasz" <li...@gogebicrange.net> wrote:

> That’s what I have done as well in the past. I have been avoiding buying
> any more of them because they are such a pain to get into after they are
> mounted. The cambium one is actually quite nice an allen wrench and that’s
> all it takes to swap but they are not available in as many different
> coverages.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Brandon Yuchasz
>
> GogebicRange.net
>
> www.gogebicrange.net
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy
> *Sent:* Monday, March 14, 2016 6:26 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors
>
>
>
> Someone else will have to comment on that.  I found the best solution was
> to remove the two side bolts and leave the bracket mounted to the pole.
> Then loosen the two on top and swivel the sector up to remove the cover.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Brandon Yuchasz <li...@gogebicrange.net>
> wrote:
>
> Without taking this one to far off track. Did they upgrade all the
> antennas brackets or if we buy one of the epmp5hz are we going to still not
> be able to open the cases when mounted on a tower?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Brandon Yuchasz
>
> GogebicRange.net
>
> www.gogebicrange.net
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy
> *Sent:* Monday, March 14, 2016 5:24 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors
>
>
>
> Glad to hear they scrapped that.  I wanted some sort of a seal, but one
> that would slide in and out would be preferable.  Nobody wants to encounter
> a nest the size of one of those boxes at the top of a tower.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I complained about the addition of the cable glands because of the way it
> was implemented. The glands are part of the removable part of the box, not
> the stationary part. As a result to remove that cover on the box you had to
> loosen the cable glands, push enough slack through to allot you to swivel
> out the cover, and then let the cover hang with the cables going through
> it. Hated it. I talked to Shane about it and he said an engineer threw that
> feature in at the last minute and they have since removed them from the
> design. I said just redesign so that the cable glands are stationary at the
> bottom of the box and let the lid close around them. We'll see.
>
>
>
> I am using the dual-5Ghzsectors and have had great results with them. I am
> swapping out 120 that are full with these dual 60s using the same mounts
> and getting more capacity.
>
>
>
> -Ty
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Ty
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If you have used KP antennas before they have made some marked
> improvements over their old hardware designs.  The bracket is stronger, but
> also sticks out much further, removing the need to disconnect the sector to
> get the rear cover off.  If you are not using UBNT or EPMP, then the cover
> never needs to come off (except to connect the Type-N jumpers initially),
> and the 450 sectors can be mounted to the cover.  Having not done that, I
> am guessing it will be a fairly tight fit.  The grooves are the correct
> size this time, and Rockets fit without modifications (after a slip up in
> manufacturing and testing that we received on our last order).  The EPMP
> adapter also appears to work, although I haven't tried it personally.
>
>
>
> Also, the shielded boxes used to fill up with Wasps, but now they have
> cable glands leading into the AP case.  My only complaint with this new
> improvement was that the shielded connectors do not fit through the gland.
> It's a lesson that I should have learned long ago, but I didn'tso I had
> to cut the ends off, push them through, and then re-terminate them.
>
>
>
> We are only using the 2.4GHz/5GHz combos, and have been happy with their
> performance.  They are a huge antenna, but not as big as two antennas.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications
> Inc <t...@franklinisp.net> wrote:
>
> Good afternoon,
>
>
>
> If you have deployed the KP Performance 3.65/5Ghz Dual Sectors, I am
> curious how they are working for you.
>
> Also, if you are, did you have to modify any part of the equipment for
> proper mounting/installations?
>
>
>
> To save tower space, I am cons

Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors

2016-03-14 Thread Brandon Yuchasz 
That’s what I have done as well in the past. I have been avoiding buying any 
more of them because they are such a pain to get into after they are mounted. 
The cambium one is actually quite nice an allen wrench and that’s all it takes 
to swap but they are not available in as many different coverages. 

 

Best regards,

Brandon Yuchasz

GogebicRange.net

www.gogebicrange.net <http://www.gogebicrange.net/> 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 6:26 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors

 

Someone else will have to comment on that.  I found the best solution was to 
remove the two side bolts and leave the bracket mounted to the pole.  Then 
loosen the two on top and swivel the sector up to remove the cover.

 

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Brandon Yuchasz <li...@gogebicrange.net> wrote:

Without taking this one to far off track. Did they upgrade all the antennas 
brackets or if we buy one of the epmp5hz are we going to still not be able to 
open the cases when mounted on a tower?

 

Best regards,

Brandon Yuchasz

GogebicRange.net

www.gogebicrange.net <http://www.gogebicrange.net/> 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 5:24 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors

 

Glad to hear they scrapped that.  I wanted some sort of a seal, but one that 
would slide in and out would be preferable.  Nobody wants to encounter a nest 
the size of one of those boxes at the top of a tower.

 

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> wrote:

I complained about the addition of the cable glands because of the way it was 
implemented. The glands are part of the removable part of the box, not the 
stationary part. As a result to remove that cover on the box you had to loosen 
the cable glands, push enough slack through to allot you to swivel out the 
cover, and then let the cover hang with the cables going through it. Hated it. 
I talked to Shane about it and he said an engineer threw that feature in at the 
last minute and they have since removed them from the design. I said just 
redesign so that the cable glands are stationary at the bottom of the box and 
let the lid close around them. We'll see.

 

I am using the dual-5Ghzsectors and have had great results with them. I am 
swapping out 120 that are full with these dual 60s using the same mounts and 
getting more capacity.

 

-Ty




 

 

-Ty

 

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:

If you have used KP antennas before they have made some marked improvements 
over their old hardware designs.  The bracket is stronger, but also sticks out 
much further, removing the need to disconnect the sector to get the rear cover 
off.  If you are not using UBNT or EPMP, then the cover never needs to come off 
(except to connect the Type-N jumpers initially), and the 450 sectors can be 
mounted to the cover.  Having not done that, I am guessing it will be a fairly 
tight fit.  The grooves are the correct size this time, and Rockets fit without 
modifications (after a slip up in manufacturing and testing that we received on 
our last order).  The EPMP adapter also appears to work, although I haven't 
tried it personally.

 

Also, the shielded boxes used to fill up with Wasps, but now they have cable 
glands leading into the AP case.  My only complaint with this new improvement 
was that the shielded connectors do not fit through the gland.  It's a lesson 
that I should have learned long ago, but I didn'tso I had to cut the ends 
off, push them through, and then re-terminate them. 

 

We are only using the 2.4GHz/5GHz combos, and have been happy with their 
performance.  They are a huge antenna, but not as big as two antennas.

 

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications Inc 
<t...@franklinisp.net> wrote:

Good afternoon,

 

If you have deployed the KP Performance 3.65/5Ghz Dual Sectors, I am curious 
how they are working for you.

Also, if you are, did you have to modify any part of the equipment for proper 
mounting/installations?  

 

To save tower space, I am considering deploying several but don’t won’t to have 
performance problems.

 

Tyson Burris, President 
Internet Communications Inc. 
739 Commerce Dr. 
Franklin, IN 46131 
  
317-738-0320 Daytime # 
317-412-1540 Cell/Direct # 
Online:  <http://www.surfici.net> www.surfici.net 

 

ICI

What can ICI do for you? 


Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones - IP 
Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure. 
  
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the 
addressee shown. It contains information that is 
confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, 
dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by 
unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly 
prohibited.

Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors

2016-03-14 Thread Jeremy 
Someone else will have to comment on that.  I found the best solution was
to remove the two side bolts and leave the bracket mounted to the pole.
Then loosen the two on top and swivel the sector up to remove the cover.

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Brandon Yuchasz <li...@gogebicrange.net>
wrote:

> Without taking this one to far off track. Did they upgrade all the
> antennas brackets or if we buy one of the epmp5hz are we going to still not
> be able to open the cases when mounted on a tower?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Brandon Yuchasz
>
> GogebicRange.net
>
> www.gogebicrange.net
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy
> *Sent:* Monday, March 14, 2016 5:24 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors
>
>
>
> Glad to hear they scrapped that.  I wanted some sort of a seal, but one
> that would slide in and out would be preferable.  Nobody wants to encounter
> a nest the size of one of those boxes at the top of a tower.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I complained about the addition of the cable glands because of the way it
> was implemented. The glands are part of the removable part of the box, not
> the stationary part. As a result to remove that cover on the box you had to
> loosen the cable glands, push enough slack through to allot you to swivel
> out the cover, and then let the cover hang with the cables going through
> it. Hated it. I talked to Shane about it and he said an engineer threw that
> feature in at the last minute and they have since removed them from the
> design. I said just redesign so that the cable glands are stationary at the
> bottom of the box and let the lid close around them. We'll see.
>
>
>
> I am using the dual-5Ghzsectors and have had great results with them. I am
> swapping out 120 that are full with these dual 60s using the same mounts
> and getting more capacity.
>
>
>
> -Ty
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Ty
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If you have used KP antennas before they have made some marked
> improvements over their old hardware designs.  The bracket is stronger, but
> also sticks out much further, removing the need to disconnect the sector to
> get the rear cover off.  If you are not using UBNT or EPMP, then the cover
> never needs to come off (except to connect the Type-N jumpers initially),
> and the 450 sectors can be mounted to the cover.  Having not done that, I
> am guessing it will be a fairly tight fit.  The grooves are the correct
> size this time, and Rockets fit without modifications (after a slip up in
> manufacturing and testing that we received on our last order).  The EPMP
> adapter also appears to work, although I haven't tried it personally.
>
>
>
> Also, the shielded boxes used to fill up with Wasps, but now they have
> cable glands leading into the AP case.  My only complaint with this new
> improvement was that the shielded connectors do not fit through the gland.
> It's a lesson that I should have learned long ago, but I didn'tso I had
> to cut the ends off, push them through, and then re-terminate them.
>
>
>
> We are only using the 2.4GHz/5GHz combos, and have been happy with their
> performance.  They are a huge antenna, but not as big as two antennas.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications
> Inc <t...@franklinisp.net> wrote:
>
> Good afternoon,
>
>
>
> If you have deployed the KP Performance 3.65/5Ghz Dual Sectors, I am
> curious how they are working for you.
>
> Also, if you are, did you have to modify any part of the equipment for
> proper mounting/installations?
>
>
>
> To save tower space, I am considering deploying several but don’t won’t to
> have performance problems.
>
>
>
> *Tyson Burris, President*
> *Internet Communications Inc.*
> *739 Commerce Dr.*
> *Franklin, IN 46131*
>
> *317-738-0320 <317-738-0320> Daytime #*
> *317-412-1540 <317-412-1540> Cell/Direct #*
> *Online: **www.surfici.net* <http://www.surfici.net>
>
>
>
> [image: ICI]
>
> *What can ICI do for you?*
>
>
> *Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones - IP
> Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.*
>
> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the*
> *addressee shown. It contains information that is*
> *confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,*
> *dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by*
> *unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly*
> *prohibited.*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors

2016-03-14 Thread Brandon Yuchasz 
Without taking this one to far off track. Did they upgrade all the antennas 
brackets or if we buy one of the epmp5hz are we going to still not be able to 
open the cases when mounted on a tower?

 

Best regards,

Brandon Yuchasz

GogebicRange.net

www.gogebicrange.net <http://www.gogebicrange.net/> 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 5:24 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors

 

Glad to hear they scrapped that.  I wanted some sort of a seal, but one that 
would slide in and out would be preferable.  Nobody wants to encounter a nest 
the size of one of those boxes at the top of a tower.

 

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> wrote:

I complained about the addition of the cable glands because of the way it was 
implemented. The glands are part of the removable part of the box, not the 
stationary part. As a result to remove that cover on the box you had to loosen 
the cable glands, push enough slack through to allot you to swivel out the 
cover, and then let the cover hang with the cables going through it. Hated it. 
I talked to Shane about it and he said an engineer threw that feature in at the 
last minute and they have since removed them from the design. I said just 
redesign so that the cable glands are stationary at the bottom of the box and 
let the lid close around them. We'll see.

 

I am using the dual-5Ghzsectors and have had great results with them. I am 
swapping out 120 that are full with these dual 60s using the same mounts and 
getting more capacity.

 

-Ty




 

 

-Ty

 

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:

If you have used KP antennas before they have made some marked improvements 
over their old hardware designs.  The bracket is stronger, but also sticks out 
much further, removing the need to disconnect the sector to get the rear cover 
off.  If you are not using UBNT or EPMP, then the cover never needs to come off 
(except to connect the Type-N jumpers initially), and the 450 sectors can be 
mounted to the cover.  Having not done that, I am guessing it will be a fairly 
tight fit.  The grooves are the correct size this time, and Rockets fit without 
modifications (after a slip up in manufacturing and testing that we received on 
our last order).  The EPMP adapter also appears to work, although I haven't 
tried it personally.

 

Also, the shielded boxes used to fill up with Wasps, but now they have cable 
glands leading into the AP case.  My only complaint with this new improvement 
was that the shielded connectors do not fit through the gland.  It's a lesson 
that I should have learned long ago, but I didn'tso I had to cut the ends 
off, push them through, and then re-terminate them. 

 

We are only using the 2.4GHz/5GHz combos, and have been happy with their 
performance.  They are a huge antenna, but not as big as two antennas.

 

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications Inc 
<t...@franklinisp.net> wrote:

Good afternoon,

 

If you have deployed the KP Performance 3.65/5Ghz Dual Sectors, I am curious 
how they are working for you.

Also, if you are, did you have to modify any part of the equipment for proper 
mounting/installations?  

 

To save tower space, I am considering deploying several but don’t won’t to have 
performance problems.

 

Tyson Burris, President 
Internet Communications Inc. 
739 Commerce Dr. 
Franklin, IN 46131 
  
317-738-0320 Daytime # 
317-412-1540 Cell/Direct # 
Online:  <http://www.surfici.net> www.surfici.net 

 

ICI

What can ICI do for you? 


Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones - IP 
Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure. 
  
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the 
addressee shown. It contains information that is 
confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, 
dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by 
unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly 
prohibited.

Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors

2016-03-14 Thread Ty Featherling 
I complained about the addition of the cable glands because of the way it
was implemented. The glands are part of the removable part of the box, not
the stationary part. As a result to remove that cover on the box you had to
loosen the cable glands, push enough slack through to allot you to swivel
out the cover, and then let the cover hang with the cables going through
it. Hated it. I talked to Shane about it and he said an engineer threw that
feature in at the last minute and they have since removed them from the
design. I said just redesign so that the cable glands are stationary at the
bottom of the box and let the lid close around them. We'll see.

I am using the dual-5Ghzsectors and have had great results with them. I am
swapping out 120 that are full with these dual 60s using the same mounts
and getting more capacity.

-Ty



-Ty

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Jeremy  wrote:

> If you have used KP antennas before they have made some marked
> improvements over their old hardware designs.  The bracket is stronger, but
> also sticks out much further, removing the need to disconnect the sector to
> get the rear cover off.  If you are not using UBNT or EPMP, then the cover
> never needs to come off (except to connect the Type-N jumpers initially),
> and the 450 sectors can be mounted to the cover.  Having not done that, I
> am guessing it will be a fairly tight fit.  The grooves are the correct
> size this time, and Rockets fit without modifications (after a slip up in
> manufacturing and testing that we received on our last order).  The EPMP
> adapter also appears to work, although I haven't tried it personally.
>
> Also, the shielded boxes used to fill up with Wasps, but now they have
> cable glands leading into the AP case.  My only complaint with this new
> improvement was that the shielded connectors do not fit through the gland.
> It's a lesson that I should have learned long ago, but I didn'tso I had
> to cut the ends off, push them through, and then re-terminate them.
>
> We are only using the 2.4GHz/5GHz combos, and have been happy with their
> performance.  They are a huge antenna, but not as big as two antennas.
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications
> Inc  wrote:
>
>> Good afternoon,
>>
>>
>>
>> If you have deployed the KP Performance 3.65/5Ghz Dual Sectors, I am
>> curious how they are working for you.
>>
>> Also, if you are, did you have to modify any part of the equipment for
>> proper mounting/installations?
>>
>>
>>
>> To save tower space, I am considering deploying several but don’t won’t
>> to have performance problems.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Tyson Burris, President*
>> *Internet Communications Inc.*
>> *739 Commerce Dr.*
>> *Franklin, IN 46131*
>>
>> *317-738-0320 <317-738-0320> Daytime #*
>> *317-412-1540 <317-412-1540> Cell/Direct #*
>> *Online: **www.surfici.net* 
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: ICI]
>>
>> *What can ICI do for you?*
>>
>>
>> *Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones -
>> IP Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.*
>>
>> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the*
>> *addressee shown. It contains information that is*
>> *confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,*
>> *dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by*
>> *unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly*
>> *prohibited.*
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors

2016-03-14 Thread Jeremy 
If you have used KP antennas before they have made some marked improvements
over their old hardware designs.  The bracket is stronger, but also sticks
out much further, removing the need to disconnect the sector to get the
rear cover off.  If you are not using UBNT or EPMP, then the cover never
needs to come off (except to connect the Type-N jumpers initially), and the
450 sectors can be mounted to the cover.  Having not done that, I am
guessing it will be a fairly tight fit.  The grooves are the correct size
this time, and Rockets fit without modifications (after a slip up in
manufacturing and testing that we received on our last order).  The EPMP
adapter also appears to work, although I haven't tried it personally.

Also, the shielded boxes used to fill up with Wasps, but now they have
cable glands leading into the AP case.  My only complaint with this new
improvement was that the shielded connectors do not fit through the gland.
It's a lesson that I should have learned long ago, but I didn'tso I had
to cut the ends off, push them through, and then re-terminate them.

We are only using the 2.4GHz/5GHz combos, and have been happy with their
performance.  They are a huge antenna, but not as big as two antennas.

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications
Inc  wrote:

> Good afternoon,
>
>
>
> If you have deployed the KP Performance 3.65/5Ghz Dual Sectors, I am
> curious how they are working for you.
>
> Also, if you are, did you have to modify any part of the equipment for
> proper mounting/installations?
>
>
>
> To save tower space, I am considering deploying several but don’t won’t to
> have performance problems.
>
>
>
> *Tyson Burris, President*
> *Internet Communications Inc.*
> *739 Commerce Dr.*
> *Franklin, IN 46131*
>
> *317-738-0320 <317-738-0320> Daytime #*
> *317-412-1540 <317-412-1540> Cell/Direct #*
> *Online: **www.surfici.net* 
>
>
>
> [image: ICI]
>
> *What can ICI do for you?*
>
>
> *Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones - IP
> Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.*
>
> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the*
> *addressee shown. It contains information that is*
> *confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,*
> *dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by*
> *unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly*
> *prohibited.*
>
>
>

[AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors

2016-03-14 Thread Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications Inc 
Good afternoon,

 

If you have deployed the KP Performance 3.65/5Ghz Dual Sectors, I am curious
how they are working for you.

Also, if you are, did you have to modify any part of the equipment for
proper mounting/installations?  

 

To save tower space, I am considering deploying several but don't won't to
have performance problems.

 

Tyson Burris, President 
Internet Communications Inc. 
739 Commerce Dr. 
Franklin, IN 46131 
  
317-738-0320 Daytime # 
317-412-1540 Cell/Direct # 
Online: www.surfici.net 

 



What can ICI do for you? 


Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones - IP
Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure. 
  
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the 
addressee shown. It contains information that is 
confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, 
dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by 
unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly 
prohibited.