Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts
Yeahbut.. it's more fun when you and Forrest make something we want and/or didn't even know we needed and we can say.. shut up and take my money. On 6/16/2017 1:33 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: Never mind. This one need to be installed in the circuit. Not sure of the advantage other than isolation. *From:* ch...@wbmfg.com *Sent:* Friday, June 16, 2017 12:32 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts https://www.sparkfun.com/products/8882 *From:* Bill Prince *Sent:* Friday, June 16, 2017 12:08 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts A Hall effect sensor would be the gold standard for a non-intrusive way to sense current. I looked at cobbling together something on my own, but it was more complicated than I anticipated. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/16/2017 11:01 AM, George Skorup wrote: All we've ever bought are the 10A version. They read accurate enough to see when a 1/2 or 1A DC-UPS is charging as well as 3-7A the other direction when the load is running on battery. Typical 24 and 48VDC systems with <200W load. And then me not paying attention with the Traco BCMU's 12VDC. Using the 2-relay/3-switch module, remotely I could see that the "Batt OK" contact was open after power came back up at the site at like 4am and still open around 8am. Since the site went down sooner than expected, I figured either the battery fuse on the BCM blew or it was sensing some other issue. So I get there and put my clamp-on ammeter on it and zero current. Two fused 20AH batteries in parallel both sitting at 13.1 volts. OK, WTF. Then it all made sense with the shunt. Another thought I had is... what about Hall effect sensors? Could you do a module for that? That would be pretty cool. On 6/16/2017 11:00 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: There will likely be a 20A shunt in our future.I'm in the process of redesigning these so that they're less expensive to build since the existing design is being sold at or possibly below cost. I'm trying to end up with a 20A shunt as a result but I don't know for sure if this will happen. On Jun 15, 2017 5:47 PM, "George Skorup" <george.sko...@cbcast.com> wrote: Forrest, Would you be willing to make a 20A shunt? Would the traces on your current design handle it? Reason I'm asking is... I'm stupid. I had a 10A shunt on the batt negative side of a Traco BCMU360. Didn't occur to me that 230 watts @ ~12VDC can get up to 20A. So the shunt went kaput after about 25 minutes and the site went down. Not a problem at most other sites with less load. This one happens to be the most heavily loaded with two Trango ApexPlus, various APs and PTPs plus the DC-DC inefficiencies.
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts
And it is limited to a 5A circuit. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/16/2017 11:33 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: Never mind. This one need to be installed in the circuit. Not sure of the advantage other than isolation. *From:* ch...@wbmfg.com *Sent:* Friday, June 16, 2017 12:32 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts https://www.sparkfun.com/products/8882 *From:* Bill Prince *Sent:* Friday, June 16, 2017 12:08 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts A Hall effect sensor would be the gold standard for a non-intrusive way to sense current. I looked at cobbling together something on my own, but it was more complicated than I anticipated. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/16/2017 11:01 AM, George Skorup wrote: All we've ever bought are the 10A version. They read accurate enough to see when a 1/2 or 1A DC-UPS is charging as well as 3-7A the other direction when the load is running on battery. Typical 24 and 48VDC systems with <200W load. And then me not paying attention with the Traco BCMU's 12VDC. Using the 2-relay/3-switch module, remotely I could see that the "Batt OK" contact was open after power came back up at the site at like 4am and still open around 8am. Since the site went down sooner than expected, I figured either the battery fuse on the BCM blew or it was sensing some other issue. So I get there and put my clamp-on ammeter on it and zero current. Two fused 20AH batteries in parallel both sitting at 13.1 volts. OK, WTF. Then it all made sense with the shunt. Another thought I had is... what about Hall effect sensors? Could you do a module for that? That would be pretty cool. On 6/16/2017 11:00 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: There will likely be a 20A shunt in our future.I'm in the process of redesigning these so that they're less expensive to build since the existing design is being sold at or possibly below cost. I'm trying to end up with a 20A shunt as a result but I don't know for sure if this will happen. On Jun 15, 2017 5:47 PM, "George Skorup" <george.sko...@cbcast.com> wrote: Forrest, Would you be willing to make a 20A shunt? Would the traces on your current design handle it? Reason I'm asking is... I'm stupid. I had a 10A shunt on the batt negative side of a Traco BCMU360. Didn't occur to me that 230 watts @ ~12VDC can get up to 20A. So the shunt went kaput after about 25 minutes and the site went down. Not a problem at most other sites with less load. This one happens to be the most heavily loaded with two Trango ApexPlus, various APs and PTPs plus the DC-DC inefficiencies.
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts
Never mind. This one need to be installed in the circuit. Not sure of the advantage other than isolation. From: ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 12:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts https://www.sparkfun.com/products/8882 From: Bill Prince Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 12:08 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts A Hall effect sensor would be the gold standard for a non-intrusive way to sense current. I looked at cobbling together something on my own, but it was more complicated than I anticipated. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/16/2017 11:01 AM, George Skorup wrote: All we've ever bought are the 10A version. They read accurate enough to see when a 1/2 or 1A DC-UPS is charging as well as 3-7A the other direction when the load is running on battery. Typical 24 and 48VDC systems with <200W load. And then me not paying attention with the Traco BCMU's 12VDC. Using the 2-relay/3-switch module, remotely I could see that the "Batt OK" contact was open after power came back up at the site at like 4am and still open around 8am. Since the site went down sooner than expected, I figured either the battery fuse on the BCM blew or it was sensing some other issue. So I get there and put my clamp-on ammeter on it and zero current. Two fused 20AH batteries in parallel both sitting at 13.1 volts. OK, WTF. Then it all made sense with the shunt. Another thought I had is... what about Hall effect sensors? Could you do a module for that? That would be pretty cool. On 6/16/2017 11:00 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: There will likely be a 20A shunt in our future.I'm in the process of redesigning these so that they're less expensive to build since the existing design is being sold at or possibly below cost. I'm trying to end up with a 20A shunt as a result but I don't know for sure if this will happen. On Jun 15, 2017 5:47 PM, "George Skorup" <george.sko...@cbcast.com> wrote: Forrest, Would you be willing to make a 20A shunt? Would the traces on your current design handle it? Reason I'm asking is... I'm stupid. I had a 10A shunt on the batt negative side of a Traco BCMU360. Didn't occur to me that 230 watts @ ~12VDC can get up to 20A. So the shunt went kaput after about 25 minutes and the site went down. Not a problem at most other sites with less load. This one happens to be the most heavily loaded with two Trango ApexPlus, various APs and PTPs plus the DC-DC inefficiencies.
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts
https://www.sparkfun.com/products/8882 From: Bill Prince Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 12:08 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts A Hall effect sensor would be the gold standard for a non-intrusive way to sense current. I looked at cobbling together something on my own, but it was more complicated than I anticipated. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/16/2017 11:01 AM, George Skorup wrote: All we've ever bought are the 10A version. They read accurate enough to see when a 1/2 or 1A DC-UPS is charging as well as 3-7A the other direction when the load is running on battery. Typical 24 and 48VDC systems with <200W load. And then me not paying attention with the Traco BCMU's 12VDC. Using the 2-relay/3-switch module, remotely I could see that the "Batt OK" contact was open after power came back up at the site at like 4am and still open around 8am. Since the site went down sooner than expected, I figured either the battery fuse on the BCM blew or it was sensing some other issue. So I get there and put my clamp-on ammeter on it and zero current. Two fused 20AH batteries in parallel both sitting at 13.1 volts. OK, WTF. Then it all made sense with the shunt. Another thought I had is... what about Hall effect sensors? Could you do a module for that? That would be pretty cool. On 6/16/2017 11:00 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: There will likely be a 20A shunt in our future.I'm in the process of redesigning these so that they're less expensive to build since the existing design is being sold at or possibly below cost. I'm trying to end up with a 20A shunt as a result but I don't know for sure if this will happen. On Jun 15, 2017 5:47 PM, "George Skorup" <george.sko...@cbcast.com> wrote: Forrest, Would you be willing to make a 20A shunt? Would the traces on your current design handle it? Reason I'm asking is... I'm stupid. I had a 10A shunt on the batt negative side of a Traco BCMU360. Didn't occur to me that 230 watts @ ~12VDC can get up to 20A. So the shunt went kaput after about 25 minutes and the site went down. Not a problem at most other sites with less load. This one happens to be the most heavily loaded with two Trango ApexPlus, various APs and PTPs plus the DC-DC inefficiencies.
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts
A Hall effect sensor would be the gold standard for a non-intrusive way to sense current. I looked at cobbling together something on my own, but it was more complicated than I anticipated. bpOn 6/16/2017 11:01 AM, George Skorup wrote: All we've ever bought are the 10A version. They read accurate enough to see when a 1/2 or 1A DC-UPS is charging as well as 3-7A the other direction when the load is running on battery. Typical 24 and 48VDC systems with <200W load. And then me not paying attention with the Traco BCMU's 12VDC. Using the 2-relay/3-switch module, remotely I could see that the "Batt OK" contact was open after power came back up at the site at like 4am and still open around 8am. Since the site went down sooner than expected, I figured either the battery fuse on the BCM blew or it was sensing some other issue. So I get there and put my clamp-on ammeter on it and zero current. Two fused 20AH batteries in parallel both sitting at 13.1 volts. OK, WTF. Then it all made sense with the shunt. Another thought I had is... what about Hall effect sensors? Could you do a module for that? That would be pretty cool. On 6/16/2017 11:00 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: There will likely be a 20A shunt in our future.I'm in the process of redesigning these so that they're less expensive to build since the existing design is being sold at or possibly below cost. I'm trying to end up with a 20A shunt as a result but I don't know for sure if this will happen. On Jun 15, 2017 5:47 PM, "George Skorup" > wrote: Forrest, Would you be willing to make a 20A shunt? Would the traces on your current design handle it? Reason I'm asking is... I'm stupid. I had a 10A shunt on the batt negative side of a Traco BCMU360. Didn't occur to me that 230 watts @ ~12VDC can get up to 20A. So the shunt went kaput after about 25 minutes and the site went down. Not a problem at most other sites with less load. This one happens to be the most heavily loaded with two Trango ApexPlus, various APs and PTPs plus the DC-DC inefficiencies.
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts
All we've ever bought are the 10A version. They read accurate enough to see when a 1/2 or 1A DC-UPS is charging as well as 3-7A the other direction when the load is running on battery. Typical 24 and 48VDC systems with <200W load. And then me not paying attention with the Traco BCMU's 12VDC. Using the 2-relay/3-switch module, remotely I could see that the "Batt OK" contact was open after power came back up at the site at like 4am and still open around 8am. Since the site went down sooner than expected, I figured either the battery fuse on the BCM blew or it was sensing some other issue. So I get there and put my clamp-on ammeter on it and zero current. Two fused 20AH batteries in parallel both sitting at 13.1 volts. OK, WTF. Then it all made sense with the shunt. Another thought I had is... what about Hall effect sensors? Could you do a module for that? That would be pretty cool. On 6/16/2017 11:00 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: There will likely be a 20A shunt in our future.I'm in the process of redesigning these so that they're less expensive to build since the existing design is being sold at or possibly below cost. I'm trying to end up with a 20A shunt as a result but I don't know for sure if this will happen. On Jun 15, 2017 5:47 PM, "George Skorup"> wrote: Forrest, Would you be willing to make a 20A shunt? Would the traces on your current design handle it? Reason I'm asking is... I'm stupid. I had a 10A shunt on the batt negative side of a Traco BCMU360. Didn't occur to me that 230 watts @ ~12VDC can get up to 20A. So the shunt went kaput after about 25 minutes and the site went down. Not a problem at most other sites with less load. This one happens to be the most heavily loaded with two Trango ApexPlus, various APs and PTPs plus the DC-DC inefficiencies.
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts
... but I still like the 2 10A shunts in parallel. Even if they are not exact, it would be close enough. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/16/2017 10:34 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: The 100 mV is not a problem. .1 volt/20 amps is .005 ohms. So, 2 feet of 14 gauge will produce 100 mV at 20 amps. Just feed it into the SiteMonitor. Assuming aesthetics are not an issue. -Original Message- From: George Skorup Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 11:30 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts Because Forrest makes them in a nice little DIN rail package and designed to work on his SiteMonitor base and modules with a nominal 100mv. On 6/15/2017 8:07 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: Assuming they were EXACTLY the same resistance. Otherwise there will be an uneven division of currents. I prefer to use #10 wire. 1 foot is .001 ohms. Make your own shunt. Assuming 20 mV full scale is enough. 20 gauge (which is hard to find) is close to .01 ohms per foot. However that exceeds the ampacity. I would be OK with one foot of 14 gauge for a 20 amp shunt. .0025 ohms per foot. that would give you 50 mV full scale. Of course this assumes you have the room for and don't mind the look of a coiled up foot of wire. -Original Message- From: Bill Prince Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 4:55 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts This may be a bozo approach, but if you took two 10 amp shunts and connected them in parallel, you would get a 20 amp shunt out of the deal. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/15/2017 3:47 PM, George Skorup wrote: Forrest, Would you be willing to make a 20A shunt? Would the traces on your current design handle it? Reason I'm asking is... I'm stupid. I had a 10A shunt on the batt negative side of a Traco BCMU360. Didn't occur to me that 230 watts @ ~12VDC can get up to 20A. So the shunt went kaput after about 25 minutes and the site went down. Not a problem at most other sites with less load. This one happens to be the most heavily loaded with two Trango ApexPlus, various APs and PTPs plus the DC-DC inefficiencies.
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts
That wouldn't be too bad to coil up. 2/pi would be the diameter of a 2' loop (about 7-1/2 inches). Two loops would be about 3-3/4 inch, and so on. Three or four loops would make a nice tidy package. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/16/2017 10:34 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: The 100 mV is not a problem. .1 volt/20 amps is .005 ohms. So, 2 feet of 14 gauge will produce 100 mV at 20 amps. Just feed it into the SiteMonitor. Assuming aesthetics are not an issue. -Original Message- From: George Skorup Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 11:30 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts Because Forrest makes them in a nice little DIN rail package and designed to work on his SiteMonitor base and modules with a nominal 100mv. On 6/15/2017 8:07 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: Assuming they were EXACTLY the same resistance. Otherwise there will be an uneven division of currents. I prefer to use #10 wire. 1 foot is .001 ohms. Make your own shunt. Assuming 20 mV full scale is enough. 20 gauge (which is hard to find) is close to .01 ohms per foot. However that exceeds the ampacity. I would be OK with one foot of 14 gauge for a 20 amp shunt. .0025 ohms per foot. that would give you 50 mV full scale. Of course this assumes you have the room for and don't mind the look of a coiled up foot of wire. -Original Message- From: Bill Prince Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 4:55 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts This may be a bozo approach, but if you took two 10 amp shunts and connected them in parallel, you would get a 20 amp shunt out of the deal. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/15/2017 3:47 PM, George Skorup wrote: Forrest, Would you be willing to make a 20A shunt? Would the traces on your current design handle it? Reason I'm asking is... I'm stupid. I had a 10A shunt on the batt negative side of a Traco BCMU360. Didn't occur to me that 230 watts @ ~12VDC can get up to 20A. So the shunt went kaput after about 25 minutes and the site went down. Not a problem at most other sites with less load. This one happens to be the most heavily loaded with two Trango ApexPlus, various APs and PTPs plus the DC-DC inefficiencies.
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts
The 100 mV is not a problem. .1 volt/20 amps is .005 ohms. So, 2 feet of 14 gauge will produce 100 mV at 20 amps. Just feed it into the SiteMonitor. Assuming aesthetics are not an issue. -Original Message- From: George Skorup Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 11:30 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts Because Forrest makes them in a nice little DIN rail package and designed to work on his SiteMonitor base and modules with a nominal 100mv. On 6/15/2017 8:07 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: Assuming they were EXACTLY the same resistance. Otherwise there will be an uneven division of currents. I prefer to use #10 wire. 1 foot is .001 ohms. Make your own shunt. Assuming 20 mV full scale is enough. 20 gauge (which is hard to find) is close to .01 ohms per foot. However that exceeds the ampacity. I would be OK with one foot of 14 gauge for a 20 amp shunt. .0025 ohms per foot. that would give you 50 mV full scale. Of course this assumes you have the room for and don't mind the look of a coiled up foot of wire. -Original Message- From: Bill Prince Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 4:55 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts This may be a bozo approach, but if you took two 10 amp shunts and connected them in parallel, you would get a 20 amp shunt out of the deal. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/15/2017 3:47 PM, George Skorup wrote: Forrest, Would you be willing to make a 20A shunt? Would the traces on your current design handle it? Reason I'm asking is... I'm stupid. I had a 10A shunt on the batt negative side of a Traco BCMU360. Didn't occur to me that 230 watts @ ~12VDC can get up to 20A. So the shunt went kaput after about 25 minutes and the site went down. Not a problem at most other sites with less load. This one happens to be the most heavily loaded with two Trango ApexPlus, various APs and PTPs plus the DC-DC inefficiencies.
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts
Because Forrest makes them in a nice little DIN rail package and designed to work on his SiteMonitor base and modules with a nominal 100mv. On 6/15/2017 8:07 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: Assuming they were EXACTLY the same resistance. Otherwise there will be an uneven division of currents. I prefer to use #10 wire. 1 foot is .001 ohms. Make your own shunt. Assuming 20 mV full scale is enough. 20 gauge (which is hard to find) is close to .01 ohms per foot. However that exceeds the ampacity. I would be OK with one foot of 14 gauge for a 20 amp shunt. .0025 ohms per foot. that would give you 50 mV full scale. Of course this assumes you have the room for and don't mind the look of a coiled up foot of wire. -Original Message- From: Bill Prince Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 4:55 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts This may be a bozo approach, but if you took two 10 amp shunts and connected them in parallel, you would get a 20 amp shunt out of the deal. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/15/2017 3:47 PM, George Skorup wrote: Forrest, Would you be willing to make a 20A shunt? Would the traces on your current design handle it? Reason I'm asking is... I'm stupid. I had a 10A shunt on the batt negative side of a Traco BCMU360. Didn't occur to me that 230 watts @ ~12VDC can get up to 20A. So the shunt went kaput after about 25 minutes and the site went down. Not a problem at most other sites with less load. This one happens to be the most heavily loaded with two Trango ApexPlus, various APs and PTPs plus the DC-DC inefficiencies.
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts
But what would the typical tolerance be? 10%. So what would be the big deal if one had 10% more resistance? Effectively an 18A shunt? bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/15/2017 6:07 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: Assuming they were EXACTLY the same resistance. Otherwise there will be an uneven division of currents. I prefer to use #10 wire. 1 foot is .001 ohms. Make your own shunt. Assuming 20 mV full scale is enough. 20 gauge (which is hard to find) is close to .01 ohms per foot. However that exceeds the ampacity. I would be OK with one foot of 14 gauge for a 20 amp shunt. .0025 ohms per foot. that would give you 50 mV full scale. Of course this assumes you have the room for and don't mind the look of a coiled up foot of wire. -Original Message- From: Bill Prince Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 4:55 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts This may be a bozo approach, but if you took two 10 amp shunts and connected them in parallel, you would get a 20 amp shunt out of the deal. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/15/2017 3:47 PM, George Skorup wrote: Forrest, Would you be willing to make a 20A shunt? Would the traces on your current design handle it? Reason I'm asking is... I'm stupid. I had a 10A shunt on the batt negative side of a Traco BCMU360. Didn't occur to me that 230 watts @ ~12VDC can get up to 20A. So the shunt went kaput after about 25 minutes and the site went down. Not a problem at most other sites with less load. This one happens to be the most heavily loaded with two Trango ApexPlus, various APs and PTPs plus the DC-DC inefficiencies.
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts
There will likely be a 20A shunt in our future.I'm in the process of redesigning these so that they're less expensive to build since the existing design is being sold at or possibly below cost. I'm trying to end up with a 20A shunt as a result but I don't know for sure if this will happen. On Jun 15, 2017 5:47 PM, "George Skorup"wrote: Forrest, Would you be willing to make a 20A shunt? Would the traces on your current design handle it? Reason I'm asking is... I'm stupid. I had a 10A shunt on the batt negative side of a Traco BCMU360. Didn't occur to me that 230 watts @ ~12VDC can get up to 20A. So the shunt went kaput after about 25 minutes and the site went down. Not a problem at most other sites with less load. This one happens to be the most heavily loaded with two Trango ApexPlus, various APs and PTPs plus the DC-DC inefficiencies.
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts
Assuming they were EXACTLY the same resistance. Otherwise there will be an uneven division of currents. I prefer to use #10 wire. 1 foot is .001 ohms. Make your own shunt. Assuming 20 mV full scale is enough. 20 gauge (which is hard to find) is close to .01 ohms per foot. However that exceeds the ampacity. I would be OK with one foot of 14 gauge for a 20 amp shunt. .0025 ohms per foot. that would give you 50 mV full scale. Of course this assumes you have the room for and don't mind the look of a coiled up foot of wire. -Original Message- From: Bill Prince Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 4:55 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts This may be a bozo approach, but if you took two 10 amp shunts and connected them in parallel, you would get a 20 amp shunt out of the deal. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/15/2017 3:47 PM, George Skorup wrote: Forrest, Would you be willing to make a 20A shunt? Would the traces on your current design handle it? Reason I'm asking is... I'm stupid. I had a 10A shunt on the batt negative side of a Traco BCMU360. Didn't occur to me that 230 watts @ ~12VDC can get up to 20A. So the shunt went kaput after about 25 minutes and the site went down. Not a problem at most other sites with less load. This one happens to be the most heavily loaded with two Trango ApexPlus, various APs and PTPs plus the DC-DC inefficiencies.
Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts
This may be a bozo approach, but if you took two 10 amp shunts and connected them in parallel, you would get a 20 amp shunt out of the deal. bpOn 6/15/2017 3:47 PM, George Skorup wrote: Forrest, Would you be willing to make a 20A shunt? Would the traces on your current design handle it? Reason I'm asking is... I'm stupid. I had a 10A shunt on the batt negative side of a Traco BCMU360. Didn't occur to me that 230 watts @ ~12VDC can get up to 20A. So the shunt went kaput after about 25 minutes and the site went down. Not a problem at most other sites with less load. This one happens to be the most heavily loaded with two Trango ApexPlus, various APs and PTPs plus the DC-DC inefficiencies.
[AFMUG] PacketFlux shunts
Forrest, Would you be willing to make a 20A shunt? Would the traces on your current design handle it? Reason I'm asking is... I'm stupid. I had a 10A shunt on the batt negative side of a Traco BCMU360. Didn't occur to me that 230 watts @ ~12VDC can get up to 20A. So the shunt went kaput after about 25 minutes and the site went down. Not a problem at most other sites with less load. This one happens to be the most heavily loaded with two Trango ApexPlus, various APs and PTPs plus the DC-DC inefficiencies.