Re: [agi] Seeking CYC critiques

2008-12-10 Thread Olie Lamb
This is hardly a list of natural language shortcomings, but it provides a
(slightly amusing) example of natural language problems within a
bad-argument context:

http://atheistwiki.wikispaces.com/Why+you+can%27t+win+an+argument+about+what+the+Bible+says

-- Olie

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Mike Tintner [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

  Steve: I finally gave up on having Dr. Eliza answer questions, because
 the round trip error rate seemed to be inescapably high. This is the
 product of:

 ...

 x.5  English's shortcomings in providing a platform to accurately state the
 knowledge, question, or answer.

 Steve,

 I wonder whether you'd like to outline an additional list of
 English/language's shortcomings here. I've just been reading Gary Marcus'
 Kluge - he has a whole chapter on language's shortcomings, and it would be
 v. interesting to compare and analyse.
 --
   *agi* | Archives https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
 https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ | 
 Modifyhttps://www.listbox.com/member/?;Your Subscription
 http://www.listbox.com




---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244id_secret=120640061-aded06
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Re: [agi] Chaogate chips: Yum!

2008-11-14 Thread Olie Lamb
Mmmm... Chaoglate-chip cookie processing!

On 11/6/08, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A report about research to build chaotic logic:

 http://technology.newscientist.com/article/mg20026801.800


---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244id_secret=120640061-aded06
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Re: [agi] SOTA

2007-01-05 Thread Olie Lamb

On 1/6/07, Philip Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



The problem wasn't technological.  It was that nobody had any use for
a robot.  We never figured out what people would want the robot for.
I think that's still the problem.




Well, I for one want a job assistant who can fetch things - what apprentices
or surgical nurse-assistanty things are often called to do.

Assistant: Please get me a Phillips head screwdriver and half-a-dozen 10mm
screws

A robot that could

1) Voice recognise instructions
2) Understand simple commands like Get me X, Hold this still, Return
this...
3) Manoeuvre from your work space to your tool-store
4) Grab items from an appropriately set-up tool-store
etc

Would be pretty damn useful, and I see most of this as being feasible with
current day tech.  Sure, such an assistant would be pretty damn expensive,
and less useful than a high-school-dropout apprentice/assistant (who can
also run down the street and get you a sandwich), but this is a real,
possible application for a robot.

-- Olie

-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303


Re: [agi] SOTA

2006-10-19 Thread Olie Lamb
(Excellent list there, Matt)Although Pei Wang makes a good point that the fragmentation of AI does make it difficult to compare projects, it is interesting+ to note the huge differences in the movements in different narrow-AI fields.
As has already been mentioned, it is interesting+ to compare the way that progress is very slow in areas such as NLP and Expert Systems, whereas there is significant, albeit gradual progress in physical interaction systems.
For instance, the soccer-bots get better every year, cars can now finish DARPA grand challenge -like events in reasonable time... (I personally think that we're fast approaching a critical point where the technology is just good enough to attract more cash and hence more improvement; although meatbags will be better traffic-drivers for a while yet, physical interaction systems can now perform well enough for many applications)
Although the question What is State-of-the-Art? won't attract an incontrivertibly good answer, it prompts a lot of bloody good questions that can be answered usefully.-- Olie

This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]