Eliezer,

As a counter to my own previous argument about the risk of the simultaneous failure of AGIs, your argument is likely to be closest to being right in certain circumstances after the time dimension is taken into account.

Our previous argument has been around the black and white yes/no notion of whether simultaneous failure is likely in an AGI population.

I have argued (to my own satisfaction :)  ) that simultaneous failure in the most important areas of mentation and psychological health is likely to be very low.  ie. that failure is likely to have a normal distribution (bell curve form).

But the practical question is, even if I'm right technically, how temporally compressed is the bell curve likely to be?  Will we get enough time from when the first failures occur in a population to when the majority of the failures occur for corrective action to be taken by humans and the non-failed AGIs working together?

It seems to me that if the bell curve is compressed temporally then the message of your argument has practical significance.  So we need to look carefully at design inadequacies and early childhood education inadequacies to see where temporally bunched failures might occur (and given that AGI minds will be so complex that precise anticipation of temporally bunched failures is likely in many cases to be impossible) then we probably need to implement AGI architectures, training programs and monitoring and improvement regimes that have a precautionary preventive effect.

The people from Boeing, Airbus and NASA might have some experience in trying to make fail-safe super-complex systems - and they might be prepared to fund research into this area.  Maybe AGI researchers/developers could get some $$s to further their work through this channel.  There is an interesting loop here - AGIs might be useful entities on aircraft as part of an anti-terrorism strategy - but you would need to guard against AGI failure.  So the civil aircraft industry might be interested in general AGI development as well as the safety issue.

Cheers, Philip

Reply via email to