Re: BUS: partial relief
G. wrote: Actually, we've got a few hours to spare on this part, it hasn't self-ratified quite yet: Claim of Error on the ADoP Report that was published on July 2 (UTC): Distributor is an Office with an officholder of omd. Accepted, as is PSS's similar CoE. Corrected report to follow.
Re: BUS: Getting started on this land thing
(You might think this is more of running the economy into the ground on my
part, but everyone's still doing things despite the "crisis", so I can't
afford to stay behind, can I?)
I act on behalf of
天火狐
to transfer all liquid assets from the facility at (-3,0) to
天火狐, and then transfer all of these assets to me.
I transfer all liquid assets from the facility at (3,1) to me.
I
destroy 1 apple to move to (2,1).
I transfer all liquid assets from the facility at (2,1) to me.
I destroy 1 apple to move to (2,2).
I transfer all liquid assets from the facility at (2,2) to me.
I destroy 1 apple to move to (1,2).
I destroy
1 apple to move to (0,2).
I increase the rank of the refinery at (0,2) to
3 by destroying 6 coins, 4 lumber
and
4 stones
.
I increase the rank of the refinery at (0,2) to 4 by destroying 7 coins, 4
lumber, 3 stones
and
3 fabric
.
I increase the rank of the refinery at (0,2) to 5 by destroying 8 coins, 6
lumber, 6 stones
and
4 fabric
. (Ta-dah! The feared lv5 refinery is here, as I promised last week)
I transfer all my ore to the refinery at (0,2).
In each ongoing land auction, I bid 40 coins.
I transfer 22 stones, 14 coins and 2 apples to 天火狐.
I act on behalf of 天火狐 to do all of the following:{
Destroy 1 apple to move to (-4,0).
Destroy 5 stones to build an orchard at (-4,0).
Increase the rank of that orchard to 2 by destroying 3 coins and 2 stones.
Increase the rank of that orchard to 3 by destroying 4 coins and 4 stones.
D
estroy 1 apple to move to (-5,0).
Destroy 5 stones to build an orchard at (-5,0).
Increase the rank of that orchard to 2 by destroying 3 coins and 2 stones.
Increase the rank of that orchard to 3 by destroying 4 coins and 4 stones.
}
~Corona
On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 10:30 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
> I destroy the minimum required number of apples to move as follows. I
> think this is 1 apple per move. Types are advisory only.
>
> (0, 0) -> (+1, 0) (Gray -> Black)
> (+1, 0) -> (+2, 0) (Black -> Black)
> (+2, 0) -> (+3, 0) (Black -> Black)
> (+3, 0) -> (+4, 0) (Black -> Black)
> (+4, 0) -> (+5, 0) (Black -> Black)
> (+5, 0) -> (+6, 0) (Black -> Black)
> (+6, 0) -> (+6, +1) (Black -> Black)
>
> I destroy 5 lumber to create a Mine at (+6, +1).
>
> I destroy the minimum required number of apples to move as follows. I
> think this is 1 apple per move. Types are advisory only.
>
> (+6, +1) -> (+6, +2) (Black -> Black)
>
> I destroy 5 stones to create an Orchard at (+6, +2).
>
>
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport
Well, R217 does say, "Where the text is silent, inconsistent, or unclear, it is to be augmented by game custom, common sense, past judgements, and consideration of the best interests of the game." Just from the fact that we're arguing about it, the text is evidently unclear, and Officeholder not being a switch doesn't seem very sensible to me, to say nothing of the game's best interests. Though, if you really want to break things, I think another way to interpret R2162 and R1006 is that, because R1006 states (while taking precedence over R2162) that Officeholder is a switch, it implies that Officeholder meets all the requirements defined in R2162 _even if it actually doesn't_. In other words, R1006 both specifies a default value for Officeholder (because R2162 says it surely must) and simultaneously doesn't (as we can see by simply reading it). Admittedly, the above paradox is a little tongue-in-cheek, but just in case, I call the following three CFJs: - "Officeholder is a switch." - "Officeholder is a switch with a default value." - "Officeholder is a switch with a default value specified in Rule 1006." And I believe switches being accidentally set to indeterminate values is exactly what gamestate convergences were designed for. On which topic, I intend, with 3 Agoran Consent, to designate as a convergence Aris' appointment of omd as Distributor. Hopefully that absolves Murphy of the responsibility of working out exactly when omd ceased to be Distributor, or the Distributor Officeholder ceased to exist, if indeed either of those things happened. Finally, since I'm here, I vote [Publius Scribonius Scholasticus] in the ongoing Herald election and [Corona] in the ongoing Registrar election. Now I'm going to bed. Hopefully Agora will have failed to implode by the time I wake up. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On July 8, 2018 10:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > This is a very interesting case. I'm not sure your logic works > > because R2162 contains the definition of a switch, and rules that > > use terms defined elsewhere (like R1006) inherently defer to their > > definitions if the definitions are of the same power. (combo of R1030 > > and R217). > > Think about it this way, for this exact situation: what exactly has > > the Distributor officeholder switch self-ratified as? The switch rule > > states that report, by not containing "Distributor" officeholder switch, > > implies that Distributor is at its "default value". But no default is > > defined so... what did it ratify to? If you don't use the R2162 > > definition, you get some kind of indeterminate/unknown value...? > > On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > > It's rule 1006, "Offices", that says Officeholder is a switch, and it's > > rule 2162, "Switches", that (indirectly) says it's not. Rule 1030, > > "Precedence between Rules", gives a handy algorithm for resolving > > contradictions between rules: > > > > - Compare their powers (Not useful, they're both power 2.0) > > - Do they both defer to a different rule for determining precedence? (No, > > not as far as I can see) > > - Does one rule state that it defers to the other? (No) > > - Compare their ID numbers (So rule 1006 takes precedence over rule 2162.) > > > > Since the "Offices" rule takes precedence, Officeholder is a switch, > > regardless of what the "Switches" rule has to say about it. At least I > > think that's how it works. Someone should probably check my logic. > > > > (Of course, we should probably remove the contradiction - and probably > > increase the power of 2162 because this seems like a prolific source of > > loopholes - but I don't believe there's anything to immediately panic > > about.) > > > > -twg > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > On July 8, 2018 9:45 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: > > > > > Erk. > > > > > > If the July 1 ADoP Report self-ratified, then ratification beats the > > > > > > Distributor rule in ratifying the Distributor officeholder at its default > > > > > > value. > > > > > > EXCEPT. Double-erk. R1006 doesn't explicitly define a default value for > > > > > > Officeholder switches. Either we indirectly infer "vacant" as the > > > > > > default (questionable), or Officeholder isn't a Switch at all, because by > > > > > > R2162(2), a switch must designate a default value in order to be a switch. > > > > > > Dunno if I'm missing something basic ... but if Officeholder isn't > > > > > > actually a switch ---ok Aris, now that's the sort of thing you can call > > > > > > a crisis. > > > > > > On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > > > > > > CoE: The Distributor is an office. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 5:26 PM Edward Murphy emurph...@zoho.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > =Metareport= > > > > > > > > > > You can find an up-to-date version of this report at > > > > > > > > > >
Re: BUS: Election update
In the Herald election, I vote on behalf of myself and my zombie, for Publius Scribonius Scholasticus. In the Registrar election, I vote on behalf of myself and my zombie, for myself. ~Corona On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 11:08 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I vote [P.S.S] for Herald. I vote [Corona] for Registrar. > > -Aris > > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 2:05 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > In the Herald election, I vote on behalf of myself and my zombie, for > > myself. > > > > In the Registrar election, I vote on behalf of myself and my zombie, for > > Corona. > > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 4:06 PM Edward Murphy wrote: > > > > > > I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Herald > > > election. The vote collector is the ADoP (me), the valid options are > > > Corona and G. and PSS and anyone else who becomes a candidate before > > > voting ends, and the voting method is instant runoff. Note that Corona > > > and G. attempted to withdraw as candidates, which is not directly > > > supported, but probably counts as lack of consent and thus would block > > > their installation (Rule 1006). > > > > > > I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Registrar > > > election. The vote collector is the ADoP (me), the valid options are > > > Corona and PSS and anyone else who becomes a candidate before voting > > > ends, and the voting method is instant runoff. And I think quorum > > > is N. > > > > > > Proposal 8057 had 6 to 8 players vote on it (two attempts were > > > ambiguously effective), so I think quorum for these elections is > > > 2 less than whatever that number was. > > > > > > Rulekeepor election ends with no candidates. > > > > > >
BUS: partial relief
Actually, we've got a few hours to spare on this part, it hasn't self-ratified quite yet: Claim of Error on the ADoP Report that was published on July 2 (UTC): Distributor is an Office with an officholder of omd.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport
I intend, without objection, to make omd Distributor. If officeholder isn't a switch, then we need to make it one, and adjust the gamestate to what it would have been if it had been a switch for as long as we thought it was. I might also suggest removing the default value requirement for switches, and replacing it with a strong recommendation, since this seems to be a common source of bugs. See, I know how to respond to crises. :) Vote Aris for PM! -Aris On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 2:45 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > Erk. > > If the July 1 ADoP Report self-ratified, then ratification beats the > Distributor rule in ratifying the Distributor officeholder at its default > value. > > EXCEPT. Double-erk. R1006 doesn't explicitly define a default value for > Officeholder switches. Either we indirectly infer "vacant" as the > default (questionable), or Officeholder isn't a Switch at all, because by > R2162(2), a switch must designate a default value in order to be a switch. > > Dunno if I'm missing something basic ... but if Officeholder isn't > actually a switch ---ok Aris, now *that's* the sort of thing you can call > a crisis. > > On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > CoE: The Distributor is an office. > > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 5:26 PM Edward Murphy wrote: > > > > > > =Metareport= > > > You can find an up-to-date version of this report at > > > http://zenith.homelinux.net/adop/report.php > > > > > > Date of last report: 2018-07-02 > > > Date of this report: 2018-07-08 > > > > > > > > > MISCELLANEOUS INFO > > > > > > > > > > Filled offices: 10/13 (76.92%) > > > Total officers: 7 > > > Consolidation[1]: 1.43 > > > Late reports: 3/10 (30.00%) > > > > > > > [1] This is the number of filled offices divided by the number of > > > officers. At 1, this means that all offices are filled by different > > > players; if it reached the number of filled offices, that would mean > > > that all offices are filled by one player. > > > > > > > > > OFFICES > > > > > > Office Holder[1] Since Last Election > > > - > > > ADoP Murphy 2018-01-182018-01-18 > > > ArbitorMurphy 2018-01-282018-01-28 > > > Assessor G. 2018-02-062018-02-27 > > > Cartographor Trigon 2018-02-24(never) > > > Herald*G. 2018-06-25(ongoing) > > > Prime Minister*(vacant) 2018-07-05[2] (ongoing) > > > Promotor Aris 2016-10-212017-09-21 > > > RefereeVJ Rada2018-07-022018-07-02 > > > Registrar *(vacant) 2018-07-01[2] (ongoing) > > > Rulekeepor*(vacant) 2018-07-01[2] 2018-07-08 > > > SpeakerG. 2018-07-022014-04-21 > > > Tailor ATMunn 2018-05-092018-05-09 > > > Treasuror twg2018-06-242018-06-24 > > > > > > > [1] * = Interim office (vacant or holder not elected) > > > [2] Vacant since this date > > > [3] Currently imposed > > > > > > > > > WEEKLY REPORTS > > > > > > Office ReportLast Published Late[1] > > > > > > > ADoP Offices 2018-07-02[2] > > > ArbitorJudicial matters 2018-07-08 > > > Cartographor Land of Arcadia 2018-07-02 > > > Herald Matters of Honour 2018-07-05 > > > Promotor Proposal pool 2018-07-05 > > > RefereeRule violations 2018-06-24 ! > > > Registrar Players, Fora 2018-06-24 > (vacant) > > > Rulekeepor Short Logical Ruleset 2018-06-12 > (vacant) > > > Treasuror Coins, other currencies 2018-07-04 > > > > > > > [1] ! = 1 period missed, !! = 2, !!! = 3+ > > > [2] Not including this report > > > > > > MONTHLY REPORTS > > > > > > Office ReportLast Published Late > > > > > > > Herald Patent titles 2018-06-10 > > > Registrar Player history2018-06-12 > (vacant) > > > Rulekeepor Full Logical Ruleset 2018-06-06 > (vacant) > > > Tailor Ribbons 2018-06-12 > > > > > > > > > > > > > ELECTIONS > > > > > > Office Initiated Phase Candidates > > > > > > > Herald 2018-07-02
BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport
CoE: The Distributor is an office. On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 5:26 PM Edward Murphy wrote: > > =Metareport= > You can find an up-to-date version of this report at > http://zenith.homelinux.net/adop/report.php > > Date of last report: 2018-07-02 > Date of this report: 2018-07-08 > > > MISCELLANEOUS INFO > > > Filled offices: 10/13 (76.92%) > Total officers: 7 > Consolidation[1]: 1.43 > Late reports: 3/10 (30.00%) > > [1] This is the number of filled offices divided by the number of > officers. At 1, this means that all offices are filled by different > players; if it reached the number of filled offices, that would mean > that all offices are filled by one player. > > > OFFICES > > Office Holder[1] Since Last Election > - > ADoP Murphy 2018-01-182018-01-18 > ArbitorMurphy 2018-01-282018-01-28 > Assessor G. 2018-02-062018-02-27 > Cartographor Trigon 2018-02-24(never) > Herald*G. 2018-06-25(ongoing) > Prime Minister*(vacant) 2018-07-05[2] (ongoing) > Promotor Aris 2016-10-212017-09-21 > RefereeVJ Rada2018-07-022018-07-02 > Registrar *(vacant) 2018-07-01[2] (ongoing) > Rulekeepor*(vacant) 2018-07-01[2] 2018-07-08 > SpeakerG. 2018-07-022014-04-21 > Tailor ATMunn 2018-05-092018-05-09 > Treasuror twg2018-06-242018-06-24 > > [1] * = Interim office (vacant or holder not elected) > [2] Vacant since this date > [3] Currently imposed > > > WEEKLY REPORTS > > Office ReportLast Published Late[1] > > ADoP Offices 2018-07-02[2] > ArbitorJudicial matters 2018-07-08 > Cartographor Land of Arcadia 2018-07-02 > Herald Matters of Honour 2018-07-05 > Promotor Proposal pool 2018-07-05 > RefereeRule violations 2018-06-24 ! > Registrar Players, Fora 2018-06-24 (vacant) > Rulekeepor Short Logical Ruleset 2018-06-12 (vacant) > Treasuror Coins, other currencies 2018-07-04 > > [1] ! = 1 period missed, !! = 2, !!! = 3+ > [2] Not including this report > > MONTHLY REPORTS > > Office ReportLast Published Late > > Herald Patent titles 2018-06-10 > Registrar Player history2018-06-12 (vacant) > Rulekeepor Full Logical Ruleset 2018-06-06 (vacant) > Tailor Ribbons 2018-06-12 > > > > ELECTIONS > > Office Initiated Phase Candidates > > Herald 2018-07-02 Voting Corona, G., PSS > Prime Minister 2018-07-05 Nominating Aris, Corona > Registrar 2018-07-02 Voting Corona, PSS > > > UPCOMING ELECTIONS[1] > > Office Days Until Last Election > > Promotor 00 Days 2017-09-21 > ADoP 00 Days 2018-01-18 > Arbitor00 Days 2018-01-28 > Assessor 00 Days 2018-02-27 > Tailor 29 Days 2018-05-09 > > [1] Anyone can start an election (with 2 support and also becoming a > candidate) 90 days after the previous one (or if it's interim and no > election is ongoing). This section shows the 5 elected offices with the > most time passed since the last election. > > > ABBREVIATIONS > - > ADoP Associate Director of Personnel > PSS Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > > RECENT EVENTS (all times UTC) > > Fri, Jun 01 2018 (07:39:12) - Trigon made a CoE on the Cartographor's > weekly report > Fri, Jun 01 2018 (07:43:38) - Trigon published the Cartographor's weekly > report > Fri, Jun 01 2018 (17:13:04) - Trigon made a CoE on the Cartographor's > weekly report > Fri, Jun 01
BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8058-8065
8058* V.J. Rada 1.0 Medal of Honour Auctions V.J. Rada AGAINST 8059* G. 1.0 honour is its own reward G. PRESENT 8060* V.J. Rada 1.8 Notary-B-Gone V.J. Rada FOR 8061+ Aris 1.0 Free ProposalsAris PRESENT 8062* Trigon 3.0 The End of the World, Again Trigon PRESENT 8063* V.J. Rada 2.0 IAR Writs Repeal V.J. Rada PRESENT 8064* G. 1.0 Land Grants G. FOR 8065* twg2.0 No undead courts twg FOR
BUS: Reassignments
3633 called by Aris 5 Apr 2018: "Saying "x on y", where x is an integer and y is a number corresponding to an ongoing auction, is a sufficiently clear announcement of a bid." I remove the judge, assign myself and judge TRUE. 3638 called by Cuddle Beam 23 May 2018: "The above is a notice of honor." I remove the judge and assign Corona. Details will be included in the upcoming Court Gazette.
Re: BUS: Re: DIS: missing an ACORN [attn. Aris]
Aris wrote: CFJ: The Herald may amend the tournament regulations without objection. CFJ: At least one Agoran regulation exists. These are CFJs 3650 and 3651. I assign them to G.
Re: BUS: Election update
I vote [P.S.S] for Herald. I vote [Corona] for Registrar. -Aris On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 2:05 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > In the Herald election, I vote on behalf of myself and my zombie, for > myself. > > In the Registrar election, I vote on behalf of myself and my zombie, for > Corona. > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 4:06 PM Edward Murphy wrote: > > > > I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Herald > > election. The vote collector is the ADoP (me), the valid options are > > Corona and G. and PSS and anyone else who becomes a candidate before > > voting ends, and the voting method is instant runoff. Note that Corona > > and G. attempted to withdraw as candidates, which is not directly > > supported, but probably counts as lack of consent and thus would block > > their installation (Rule 1006). > > > > I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Registrar > > election. The vote collector is the ADoP (me), the valid options are > > Corona and PSS and anyone else who becomes a candidate before voting > > ends, and the voting method is instant runoff. And I think quorum > > is N. > > > > Proposal 8057 had 6 to 8 players vote on it (two attempts were > > ambiguously effective), so I think quorum for these elections is > > 2 less than whatever that number was. > > > > Rulekeepor election ends with no candidates. > > >
Re: BUS: Election update
In the Herald election, I vote on behalf of myself and my zombie, for myself. In the Registrar election, I vote on behalf of myself and my zombie, for Corona. On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 4:06 PM Edward Murphy wrote: > > I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Herald > election. The vote collector is the ADoP (me), the valid options are > Corona and G. and PSS and anyone else who becomes a candidate before > voting ends, and the voting method is instant runoff. Note that Corona > and G. attempted to withdraw as candidates, which is not directly > supported, but probably counts as lack of consent and thus would block > their installation (Rule 1006). > > I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Registrar > election. The vote collector is the ADoP (me), the valid options are > Corona and PSS and anyone else who becomes a candidate before voting > ends, and the voting method is instant runoff. And I think quorum > is N. > > Proposal 8057 had 6 to 8 players vote on it (two attempts were > ambiguously effective), so I think quorum for these elections is > 2 less than whatever that number was. > > Rulekeepor election ends with no candidates. >
BUS: Getting started on this land thing
I destroy the minimum required number of apples to move as follows. I think this is 1 apple per move. Types are advisory only. (0, 0) -> (+1, 0) (Gray -> Black) (+1, 0) -> (+2, 0) (Black -> Black) (+2, 0) -> (+3, 0) (Black -> Black) (+3, 0) -> (+4, 0) (Black -> Black) (+4, 0) -> (+5, 0) (Black -> Black) (+5, 0) -> (+6, 0) (Black -> Black) (+6, 0) -> (+6, +1) (Black -> Black) I destroy 5 lumber to create a Mine at (+6, +1). I destroy the minimum required number of apples to move as follows. I think this is 1 apple per move. Types are advisory only. (+6, +1) -> (+6, +2) (Black -> Black) I destroy 5 stones to create an Orchard at (+6, +2).
BUS: Election update
I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Herald election. The vote collector is the ADoP (me), the valid options are Corona and G. and PSS and anyone else who becomes a candidate before voting ends, and the voting method is instant runoff. Note that Corona and G. attempted to withdraw as candidates, which is not directly supported, but probably counts as lack of consent and thus would block their installation (Rule 1006). I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Registrar election. The vote collector is the ADoP (me), the valid options are Corona and PSS and anyone else who becomes a candidate before voting ends, and the voting method is instant runoff. And I think quorum is N. Proposal 8057 had 6 to 8 players vote on it (two attempts were ambiguously effective), so I think quorum for these elections is 2 less than whatever that number was. Rulekeepor election ends with no candidates.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Initiating elections
I withdraw mine too, if possible (unfortunately I think we discovered a couple weeks ago that it's another one of those broken things, and not possible...?) On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, Corona wrote: > I withdraw my candidacy for Herald. > > ~Corona > > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 3:04 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If I become Herald, I do not plan to do anything especially > > interesting with Karma. I might as well be up front about that. > > However, I plan to start using more patent titles. I also plan to > > begin a more organized process of collecting and organizing Agoran > > records from the various websites across the internet and from current > > and former players. I hope that this will allow a greater level of > > historical knowledge and thus fuel scholarship and more insightful > > play. > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 10:40 AM Kerim Aydin > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I nominate myself for Herald. -G. > > > > > > Nomination statement: It's time to revive a few good titles. > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 1 Jul 2018, Edward Murphy wrote: > > > > For each of the following interim offices, as ADoP, I initiate an > > > > election for it: > > > > > > > > Herald (G. deputised to propose Birthday Tournament Regulations) > > > > Registrar (vacant) > > > > Rulekeepor (vacant) > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Initiating elections
I withdraw my candidacy for Herald. ~Corona On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 3:04 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > If I become Herald, I do not plan to do anything especially > interesting with Karma. I might as well be up front about that. > However, I plan to start using more patent titles. I also plan to > begin a more organized process of collecting and organizing Agoran > records from the various websites across the internet and from current > and former players. I hope that this will allow a greater level of > historical knowledge and thus fuel scholarship and more insightful > play. > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 10:40 AM Kerim Aydin > wrote: > > > > > > > > I nominate myself for Herald. -G. > > > > Nomination statement: It's time to revive a few good titles. > > > > > > On Sun, 1 Jul 2018, Edward Murphy wrote: > > > For each of the following interim offices, as ADoP, I initiate an > > > election for it: > > > > > > Herald (G. deputised to propose Birthday Tournament Regulations) > > > Registrar (vacant) > > > Rulekeepor (vacant) > > > > > > > > >
Re: BUS: re-decoration
It has now been over 7 days since I last owned the below ribbons, but less than 7 days since I earned them, so I reward myself each of the Ribbons indicated below (in the order below). On Mon, 2 Jul 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Also, in the previous 7 days: > I earned an Ultraviolet Ribbon (champion). > I earned a Cyan Ribbon (deputized for Prime Minister). > I earned an Orange Ribbon (Proposal 8053). > I earned a Lime Ribbon (Proposals 8054, 8055, 8056). > I earned a Blue Ribbon (CFJ 3644).
