Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Humble Agoran farmer offers wood for sheep (oh, attn Notary btw)
PSS wrote:
I like this take on this process, but it doesn’t seem to have anything stopping
the third person in line from withdrawing two cards and processing them
inefficiently in order to bump me up the order.
Inefficient processing requires Agoran consent of members ("we've been
at 3 for a while, let's just cash those out for 2 products each"), and
if you're not a member then you can become one any time. If I'm still
overlooking something, then let me know.
This also doesn’t seem to account for resets.
Oh, good catch. I intend (with Agoran consent of Collectors) to amend
this contract to read, in full:
Administrivia:
1) The name of this contract is Card Collective Contract, Agoran
(abbr. CCCA).
2) Any player CAN join or leave CCCA by announcement. Members of CCCA
are known as Collectors.
3) Any Collector CAN amend CCCA with Agoran consent of Collectors.
4) The Secretary General is Murphy.
5) A Person of Interest is a player or former player.
Balances:
1) Each type of Card has a corresponding List, which is an ordered
sequence of Persons of Interest (who may appear multiple times),
initially empty.
2) When a player transfers N instances of one type of Card to this
contract, e is added N times to the end of that type's List.
3) If at any time CCCA has no instances of a type of Card, then
that Card's List becomes empty.
Collection:
1) To perform Collection for N instances of one type of Card is to do
the following:
a) Transfer that many instances from CCCA to oneself.
b) Pay that many instances as a single set to earn Products.
c) The Comrades are the first entries (up to N) in that type's
List who are players. Transfer one Product earned in the
previous step to the first Comrade (or keep it if that Comrade
is the performer), then one to the second, etc., returning to
the last Comrade after the first, until all those Products are
transferred. Then remove those entries from that List.
Other clauses notwithstanding, Collection may only be performed if
it fully succeeds in one message and has at least one Comrade.
2) Any Collector CAN perform Collection for N instances of one type of
Card with Agoran consent of Collectors.
3) If CCCA has at least as many instances of one type of Card as the
largest single set that can be paid to earn Products, then the
Secretary General CAN and SHALL perform Collection for such a
maximal set of that type.
Non-binding notes
The Collectors SHOULD update these as needed for accuracy.
Example:
* Legislative Cards are deposited by (in order) A, B, C, A, D, E
* LC List is now {A, B, A, C, D, E}
* A performs Collection (4 LCs for 10 Pendants)
* Comrades are A, B, A, C
* A transfers those 10 Pendants as follows: keep, B, C, keep,
(back to start) keep, B, C, keep, (back to start) keep, B
* LC List is now {D, E}
If B deregistered prior to this Collection, then instead:
* Comrades are A, C, A, D
* A transfers (total of) 3 to C, 2 to D, keeps other 5
* LC List is now {B, E}
Non-players can't own assets, but remain on Lists in case they
re-register. Non-Collector players can deposit and benefit, but
can't influence the timing of voluntary payouts.
Re: BUS: Humble Agoran farmer offers wood for sheep
Oops!! I become a party
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:04 PM Rebecca wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:40 AM Edward Murphy via agora-business <
> agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> I consent to the following contract and transfer all my Cards to it.
>>
>> Administrivia:
>>
>>1) The name of this contract is Card Collective Contract, Agoran
>> (abbr. CCCA).
>>
>>2) Any player CAN join or leave CCCA by announcement. Members of CCCA
>> are known as Collectors.
>>
>>3) Any Collector CAN amend CCCA with Agoran consent of Collectors.
>>
>>4) The Secretary General is Murphy.
>>
>>5) A Person of Interest is a player or former player.
>>
>> Balances:
>>
>>1) Each type of Card has a corresponding List, which is an ordered
>> sequence of Persons of Interest (who may appear multiple times),
>> initially empty.
>>
>>2) When a player transfers N instances of one type of Card to this
>> contract, e is added N times to the end of that type's List.
>>
>>3) To perform Collection for N instances of one type of Card is to do
>> the following:
>>
>> a) Transfer that many instances from CCCA to oneself.
>>
>> b) Pay that many instances as a single set to earn Products.
>>
>> c) The Comrades are the first entries (up to N) in that type's
>>List who are players. Transfer one Product earned in the
>>previous step to the first Comrade (or keep it if that Comrade
>>is the performer), then one to the second, etc., returning to
>>the last Comrade after the first, until all those Products are
>>transferred. Then remove those entries from that List.
>>
>> Other clauses notwithstanding, Collection may only be performed if
>> it fully succeeds in one message and has at least one Comrade.
>>
>>4) Any Collector CAN perform Collection for N instances of one type of
>> Card with Agoran consent of Collectors.
>>
>>5) If CCCA has at least as many instances of one type of Card as the
>> largest single set that can be paid to earn Products, then the
>> Secretary General CAN and SHALL perform Collection for such a
>> maximal set of that type.
>>
>> Non-binding notes
>>
>>The Collectors SHOULD update these as needed for accuracy.
>>
>>Example:
>>
>>* Legislative Cards are deposited by (in order) A, B, C, A, D, E
>>* LC List is now {A, B, A, C, D, E}
>>* A performs Collection (4 LCs for 10 Pendants)
>>* Comrades are A, B, A, C
>>* A transfers those 10 Pendants as follows: keep, B, C, keep,
>>(back to start) keep, B, C, keep, (back to start) keep, B
>>* LC List is now {D, E}
>>
>>If B deregistered prior to this Collection, then instead:
>>
>>* Comrades are A, C, A, D
>>* A transfers (total of) 3 to C, 2 to D, keeps other 5
>>* LC List is now {B, E}
>>
>>Non-players can't own assets, but remain on Lists in case they
>>re-register. Non-Collector players can deposit and benefit, but
>>can't influence the timing of voluntary payouts.
>>
>>
>
> --
> From R. Lee
>
--
>From R. Lee
BUS: Humble Agoran farmer offers wood for sheep
I consent to the following contract and transfer all my Cards to it.
Administrivia:
1) The name of this contract is Card Collective Contract, Agoran
(abbr. CCCA).
2) Any player CAN join or leave CCCA by announcement. Members of CCCA
are known as Collectors.
3) Any Collector CAN amend CCCA with Agoran consent of Collectors.
4) The Secretary General is Murphy.
5) A Person of Interest is a player or former player.
Balances:
1) Each type of Card has a corresponding List, which is an ordered
sequence of Persons of Interest (who may appear multiple times),
initially empty.
2) When a player transfers N instances of one type of Card to this
contract, e is added N times to the end of that type's List.
3) To perform Collection for N instances of one type of Card is to do
the following:
a) Transfer that many instances from CCCA to oneself.
b) Pay that many instances as a single set to earn Products.
c) The Comrades are the first entries (up to N) in that type's
List who are players. Transfer one Product earned in the
previous step to the first Comrade (or keep it if that Comrade
is the performer), then one to the second, etc., returning to
the last Comrade after the first, until all those Products are
transferred. Then remove those entries from that List.
Other clauses notwithstanding, Collection may only be performed if
it fully succeeds in one message and has at least one Comrade.
4) Any Collector CAN perform Collection for N instances of one type of
Card with Agoran consent of Collectors.
5) If CCCA has at least as many instances of one type of Card as the
largest single set that can be paid to earn Products, then the
Secretary General CAN and SHALL perform Collection for such a
maximal set of that type.
Non-binding notes
The Collectors SHOULD update these as needed for accuracy.
Example:
* Legislative Cards are deposited by (in order) A, B, C, A, D, E
* LC List is now {A, B, A, C, D, E}
* A performs Collection (4 LCs for 10 Pendants)
* Comrades are A, B, A, C
* A transfers those 10 Pendants as follows: keep, B, C, keep,
(back to start) keep, B, C, keep, (back to start) keep, B
* LC List is now {D, E}
If B deregistered prior to this Collection, then instead:
* Comrades are A, C, A, D
* A transfers (total of) 3 to C, 2 to D, keeps other 5
* LC List is now {B, E}
Non-players can't own assets, but remain on Lists in case they
re-register. Non-Collector players can deposit and benefit, but
can't influence the timing of voluntary payouts.
BUS: [CFJs] Plunder Partnership
Nobody called this CFJ so I will, Attn Arbitor CFJ: A contract which has no explicit mechanism for joining may still be joined by other parties in some cases. CFJ: The Plunder Partnership as it existed on June 15, 2020 could be joined by other players Argument: A contract which sets out a set of rules that COULD be binding on any player should be able to be consented to by any player by default, unless the contract says otherwise. This applies to the plunder partnership's former text which I include below. It said "any person...can become a pirate", although this doesn't provide a mechanism like "by announcement", the contract clearly intended that any player be able to consent to it, which is enough under the Consent rule for sure. Plunder Partnership as of June 15 2020 The Plunder Partnership ☠️ WHO WE BE The Plunder Partnership is also known as the Plundership. A party to this contract is known as a Pirate. Any person who is not in Davy Jones’ Locker can become a Pirate. Any Pirate can make themselves cease to be one by announcement. ☠️ NO TATTLE-TALES Any person who has objected to a transferral of coins from the Lost and Found Department to the Plundership are in Davy Jones’ Locker. A person in Davy Jones’ Locker cannot become a Pirate, and they immediately cease to be a Pirate if they already were one. ☠️ DOUBLOONS Doubloons are a destructible asset that can only belong to Pirates. When an amount of coins is transferred to the Plundership, each Pirate gains an amount of Doubloons equal to the amount transferred divided by the amount of Pirates, rounded down. A Pirate with at least 1 Doubloon can transfer 1 coin to themselves from the Plundership. Doing so destroys 1 Doubloon in their possession. ☠️ PARLEY Any Pirate can propose a Parley by announcement, which describes amendments to this contract. If at least 2/3rds (rounded up) of all Pirates consent to the Parley’s contents, this contract is amended according to the Parley. >From R. Lee
Re: BUS: DracoLotto [Card Transfer]
I got a voting card from nch. I transfer it to DracoLotto. On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:54 AM Jason Cobb via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 6/12/20 6:20 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote: > > Enter into the lottery today! Everybody wins at least one product for > > every card they put in, risk-free*! All you have to do is transfer one > > or more cards to the contract, IN THIS THREAD, before I close the > > pools (which won't be for a minimum of four days). You'll get at least > > one product back*, and may randomly get more. > > > Aris, my transfer of a voting card was INEFFECTIVE. > > I transfer one Justice Card to DracoLotto (which I believe I still have). > > -- > Jason Cobb > > -- >From R. Lee
Re: BUS: Honor among Pirates [Attn. All "Pirates"]
I join
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:18 AM Jason Cobb via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 6/16/20 4:17 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
> > I could have just let this pass and banked some MAJOR coinage but the
> > long-term consequences of having people be paranoid about my contracts
> > isn't worth it imo, I much prefer to have people's trust that I won't
> > betray them on contracts. So, the thing is that there is a bug in the
> > Plunder contract - nobody could join because there was no join mechanism.
> >
> > So nobody became a Pirate. I suggest you all rejoin. I'm also adding the
> > latest Parley patch.
> >
> > I propose the following Parley:
> >
> > {Amend the Plunder Partnership to read in full:
> >
> > The Plunder Partnership
> >
> > ☠️ WHO WE BE
> >
> > The Plunder Partnership is also known as the Plundership. A party to this
> > contract is known as a Pirate. Any person who is not in Davy Jones’
> Locker
> > can become a Pirate by announcement. Any Pirate can make themselves cease
> > to be one by announcement.
> >
> > ☠️ NO TATTLE-TALES
> >
> > Any person who has objected to a transferral of coins to the Plundership
> > are in Davy Jones’ Locker. A person in Davy Jones’ Locker cannot become a
> > Pirate, and they immediately cease to be a Pirate if they already were
> one.
> >
> > ☠️ DOUBLOONS
> >
> > Doubloons are a destructible asset that can only belong to Pirates. When
> an
> > amount of coins is transferred to the Plundership, each Pirate gains an
> > amount of Doubloons equal to the amount transferred divided by the amount
> > of Pirates, rounded down. A Pirate with at least 1 Doubloon can transfer
> 1
> > coin to themselves from the Plundership. Doing so destroys 1 Doubloon in
> > their possession.
> >
> > ☠️ PARLEY
> >
> > Any Pirate can propose a Parley by announcement, which describes
> amendments
> > to this contract. If a Parley was proposed at least 2 days ago, at least
> > 2/3rds (rounded up) of all Pirates consent to its contents, and it has
> not
> > yet been applied, then any Pirate can apply it by announcement, causing
> > this contract to be amended according to it.}
> >
> > I consent to that Parley. It's applied.
>
>
> I consent to the pirate plundership, and I become a party.
>
> --
> Jason Cobb
>
>
--
>From R. Lee
Re: BUS: [AAA] Expanding the scope of punishment
On 6/16/20 5:48 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> {
>
> Replace the last paragraph of SECTION 2 (OPT-IN) with the following:
> "Any player CAN become party to this contract by announcement. Any party
> to this contract CAN cease being party to this contract if: (1) e is not
> party to an opted-in contract and (2) e has not ceased being party to
> any other contract within the past 14 days."
:thonk:
I submit the following amendment proposal to AAA:
{
In SECTION 2, replace the text "any other contract within the past 14
days" with the text "any contract within the past 14 days".
}
I intend, without objection from the parties of AAA, to apply the
changes in the above Amendment Proposal to AAA.
Sorry for the list clutter, everyone.
--
Jason Cobb
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: sanity clause
On 6/16/2020 4:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On 6/16/2020 3:56 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>> On 6/16/20 6:51 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>> [I can't remember if this has been done before, sorry if it's a repeat]
>>>
>>>
>>> I consent to the following contract, the Groucho Marx Club:
>>> {G. CANNOT become a party to the Groucho Marx Club}.
>>
>> Brief gratuitous:
>> Because this contract cannot have any parties, it cannot be a contract.
>>
>
> Brief Counter:
>
> I satisfied all of the requirements of R1742 for making a one-party
> agreement (obviously I agreed with myself about it). To asset that I
> CANNOT join is to assert that a contract can take precedence over R1742 in
> this regard.
>
Further:
Similar to the precedent of CFJ 7, the contract came into existence by my
agreeing to it (i.e. the contract clauses had no force until immediatly
after I agreed). Once I agreed, they had force, but saying I CANNOT
become a party doesn't matter if I'm already a party. (phrased that way,
this might be a pretty trivial true, honestly).
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: sanity clause
On 6/16/2020 3:56 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/16/20 6:51 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>> [I can't remember if this has been done before, sorry if it's a repeat]
>>
>>
>> I consent to the following contract, the Groucho Marx Club:
>> {G. CANNOT become a party to the Groucho Marx Club}.
>
> Brief gratuitous:
> Because this contract cannot have any parties, it cannot be a contract.
>
Brief Counter:
I satisfied all of the requirements of R1742 for making a one-party
agreement (obviously I agreed with myself about it). To asset that I
CANNOT join is to assert that a contract can take precedence over R1742 in
this regard.
Re: [Notary] The Notes (revision 2) [was: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] The Notes (weekly report)]
On 6/16/20 6:55 PM, Jason Cobb wrote: > On 6/16/20 6:53 PM, ATMunn via agora-official wrote: >> "The Dragon Corporation" Warrigal, Aris, Jason > > CoE: Falsifian is party to the dragon corporation > Also, Warrigal was booted out because e didn't consent to an amendment proposal. -- Jason Cobb
Re: [Notary] The Notes (revision 2) [was: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] The Notes (weekly report)]
On 6/16/20 6:53 PM, ATMunn via agora-official wrote: > "The Dragon Corporation" Warrigal, Aris, Jason CoE: Falsifian is party to the dragon corporation -- Jason Cobb
Re: [Notary] The Notes (revision 2) [was: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] The Notes (weekly report)]
On 6/16/20 6:53 PM, ATMunn via agora-official wrote: > On 6/16/2020 4:12 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote: >> COE: Nobody joined the Plundership because there is no join mechanism >> (I'm >> working on a fix right now) > > Accepted. I publish the following revision: CoE: There are other members of the Plundership. I think the solution now would be to call a CFJ to resolve it. Contracts aren't inherently restricted by the same standards as rules, so greater inferences may be interpreted. -- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, Herald, Referee, Tailor, Pirate Champion, Badge of the Great Agoran Revival, Badge of the Salted Earth
BUS: sanity clause
[I can't remember if this has been done before, sorry if it's a repeat]
I consent to the following contract, the Groucho Marx Club:
{G. CANNOT become a party to the Groucho Marx Club}.
I transfer 10 coins to the Groucho Marx Club.
I CFJ: G. is a party to the Groucho Marx Club.
Evidence:
Rule 2519/2 (Power=3)
Consent
A person is deemed to have consented to an action if and only if,
at the time the action took place:
1. e, acting as emself, has publicly stated that e agrees to the
action and not subsequently publicly withdrawn eir statement;
2. e is party to a contract whose body explicitly and
unambiguously indicates eir consent;
3. the action is taken as part of a promise which e created; or
4. it is reasonably clear from context that e wanted the action to
take place or assented to it taking place.
Rule 1742/22 (Power=2.5)
Contracts
Any group of one or more consenting persons (the parties) may
publicly make an agreement among themselves with the intention
that it be binding upon them and be governed by the rules. Such
an agreement is known as a contract. A contract may be modified,
including by changing the set of parties, with the consent of all
existing parties. A contract may also be terminated with the
consent of all parties. A contract automatically terminates if the
number of parties to it falls below one. It is IMPOSSIBLE for a
person to become a party to a contract without eir consent.
Parties to a contract governed by the rules SHALL act in
accordance with that contract. This obligation is not impaired
by contradiction between the contract and any other contract, or
between the contract and the rules.
Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, any change that would cause
the full provisions or parties of a contract to become publicly
unavailable is canceled and does not take effect.
The portion of a contract's provisions that can be interpreted
with reference only to information that is either publicly or
generally available are known as its body; the remainder of the
provisions are known as the annex.
A party to a contract CAN perform any of the following actions as
explicitly and unambiguously permitted by the contract's body:
* Act on behalf of another party to the contract.
* By announcement, revoke destructible assets from the contract.
* By announcement, transfer liquid assets from the contract to a
specified recipient.
BUS: [Proposal] Talismans
Alright, final chance for comments. I plan to pend this in about a day.
I submit (but do not pend) the following proposal:
Title: Talismans
Adoption index: 3.0
Coauthors: nch, Falsifian, G.
{
For the purposes of this proposal, a player's prior master is eir master
before this proposal applies any effects.
Amend Rule 2532 to read, in whole:
{
A talisman is an indestructible asset, tracked by the Registrar, and
with ownership wholly restricted to players and Agora. There exists
exactly one talisman for each player, and no other talismans; if one
does not exist for a certain player, it is created in eir posession.
Talismans CAN only be transferred as explicitly specified by the rules.
The creation, destruction, and transfer of talismans is secured.
Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, a player CAN, by announcement,
transfer the talisman for em to emself. The master of a player is the
entity that possesses the talisman for em. A player who is eir own
master is active; any other player is a zombie (syn. inactive).
The master of a zombie CAN act on behalf of em, except a master CANNOT
act on behalf of a zombie to:
- initiate, support, object to, or perform a dependent action;
- act on behalf of that zombie's zombies;
- bid in a zombie auction;
- enter a contract, pledge, or other type of agreement;
- initiate a Call for Judgement;
- create blots;
- deregister.
If a master causes a zombie to perform an ILLEGAL action, the master
commits the Class 4+N Crime of Masterminding (where N is the class of
the illegal action).
If an active player who was a zombie has not received a Welcome Package
since e most recently ceased being a zombie, and if eir resale value was
less than 2 at any point during eir most recent time as a zombie, then
any player CAN cause em to receive a Welcome Package by announcement.
}
Amend Rule 2574 to read, in whole:
{
Any player CAN, with notice, transfer the talisman for an active player
who has not made a public announcement in the past 60 days to Agora.
Resale value is a secured natural switch for zombies, tracked by the
Registrar, with a default value of 2. Whenever the talisman for a zombie
is transferred to a player, that zombie's resale value is decreased by
1. At the end of a zombie auction, the resale value of every zombie that
is an excess lot in that auction decreases by 1.
The talisman for a zombie with zero resale value CANNOT be transferred
to any player other than that zombie.
Any player CAN, with notice:
- If a zombie has been a zombie for the past 90 days and not had
Agora for a master during any of that time, transfer the talisman for em
to Agora;
- If a player possesses more than one talisman, specify and transfer
one of those talismans to Agora;
- Deregister a zombie whose resale value is zero and whose master is
Agora.
The Registrar SHALL track the date for each zombie on which Agora was
most recently eir master. The Registrar SHALL perform all POSSIBLE
actions in the preceding paragraph in a timely fashion after first
reporting their possibility via the facts in eir weekly report.
}
Amend Rule 1885 to read, in whole:
{
Whenever a zombie has Agora for a master and has a resale value greater
than 0, and when eir talisman is not currently a lot in an auction and
has not been won as an auction lot in the past 14 days, then the
Registrar CAN put that zombie's talisman (along with any other talismans
that fulfill the same conditions) up for auction.
In a timely fashion after the beginning of each month, the Registrar
SHALL either initiate such an auction or, if no talismans meeting these
conditions existed at the beginning of the month, announce that no such
auction is necessary.
For such an auction, each lot consists of the talisman for one zombie,
ordered at the discretion of the Registrar. The Registrar is the
auctioneer, and the minimum bid is 1. The method to be used for this
auction is the zombie auction method if such a method exists, or
otherwise the default auction method.
}
Amend Rule 2575 by replacing the final sentence with
"Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the talisman for the Distributor
is possessed by emself (and is transferred to em if it ever is not), and
e CANNOT deregister or be deregistered."
For each player who is not eir own prior master, transfer the talisman
for em to eir prior master.
}
--
Jason Cobb
Re: BUS: [AAA] Expanding the scope of punishment
On 6/16/20 5:43 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following Amendment Proposal to AAA:
>
> {
>
> Replace the last paragraph of SECTION 2 (OPT-IN) with the following:
> "Any player CAN become party to this contract by announcement. Any party
> to this contract CAN cease being party to this contract if: (1) e is not
> party to an opted-in contract and (2) e has not ceased being party to
> any other contract within the past 14 days."
>
> In SECTION 6 (CASE RESOLUTION), replace the text "the alleged
> perpetrator (who is a party to that contract)" with the text "the
> alleged perpetrator (who is a party to that contract or was within the
> past 14 days)".
>
> }
>
>
> The purpose of this amendment is to allow punishment for persons who
> have ceased being party to an opted-in contract within the last 14 days.
> This is accomplished by preventing them from leaving AAA for 14 days and
> by expanding the set of possible violators of a contract to include
> those leaving up to 14 days previously.
>
> I intended, without objection from the parties of AAA, to apply the
> changes in the above Amendment Proposal to AAA.
>
Gah, typing is hard - "intended" should be "intend".
I intend, without objection from the parties of AAA, to apply the
changes in the above Amendment Proposal to AAA.
--
Jason Cobb
BUS: [AAA] Expanding the scope of punishment
I submit the following Amendment Proposal to AAA:
{
Replace the last paragraph of SECTION 2 (OPT-IN) with the following:
"Any player CAN become party to this contract by announcement. Any party
to this contract CAN cease being party to this contract if: (1) e is not
party to an opted-in contract and (2) e has not ceased being party to
any other contract within the past 14 days."
In SECTION 6 (CASE RESOLUTION), replace the text "the alleged
perpetrator (who is a party to that contract)" with the text "the
alleged perpetrator (who is a party to that contract or was within the
past 14 days)".
}
The purpose of this amendment is to allow punishment for persons who
have ceased being party to an opted-in contract within the last 14 days.
This is accomplished by preventing them from leaving AAA for 14 days and
by expanding the set of possible violators of a contract to include
those leaving up to 14 days previously.
I intended, without objection from the parties of AAA, to apply the
changes in the above Amendment Proposal to AAA.
--
Jason Cobb
BUS: [Cards] Legislative Card cashing
I should have three Legislative Cards in my possession (one from the sets proposal, one from popular proposing, and one from PSS). If I have three Legislative Cards in my possession, I use the mechanism specified in Rule 2620 to pay a set of 3 legislative cards, thus earning 6 Pendants. -- Jason Cobb
[Pledge Fulfillment] Re: [Cards] Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Promise] Legislative for Justice
On 6/16/20 5:10 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business wrote: > Okay, here's another try: If all of the following actions succeed, I > grant Jason a Justice Card and transfer a Legislative Card to em, I > transfer eir promise from the Library to myself and cash it. I believe that works. I transfer a Justice Card to PSS, thus fulfilling my pledge to do so. -- Jason Cobb
Re: [Cards] Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Promise] Legislative for Justice
On 6/16/20 5:05 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > On 6/16/20 5:00 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business > wrote: >> If all of the following actions succeed, I transfer Jason's promise from >> the Library to myself, I grant Jason a Justice Card and transfer a >> Legislative Card to em, I cash this promise, and, acting on eir behalf, >> I grant myself a Legislative Card. > > *sigh*, I'm sorry about this. Cashing the promise was the acting on my > behalf, so you couldn't act on my behalf again, which means that none of > the actions succeeded. > Okay, here's another try: If all of the following actions succeed, I grant Jason a Justice Card and transfer a Legislative Card to em, I transfer eir promise from the Library to myself and cash it. -- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, Herald, Referee, Tailor, Pirate Champion, Badge of the Great Agoran Revival, Badge of the Salted Earth
[Cards] Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Promise] Legislative for Justice
On 6/16/20 4:57 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > On 6/16/20 4:56 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business > wrote: >> I grant Jason a Justice Card and transfer a Legislative Card to em. >> Acting on eir behalf, I grant myself a Legislative Card. > > > I believe you need to explicitly say that you cash the promise. > > Rule 2618: > >> A promise's bearer CAN, by announcement, cash the promise, >> provided that any conditions for cashing it specified by its text >> are unambiguously met. By doing so, e acts on the creator of the >> promise's behalf, causing the creator to act as if e published the >> promise's text, and destroys the promise. The bearer SHOULD recite >> the promise's essential attributes in the same message e cashes >> it. > If all of the following actions succeed, I transfer Jason's promise from the Library to myself, I grant Jason a Justice Card and transfer a Legislative Card to em, I cash this promise, and, acting on eir behalf, I grant myself a Legislative Card. -- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, Herald, Referee, Tailor, Pirate Champion, Badge of the Great Agoran Revival, Badge of the Salted Earth
Re: BUS: [Promise] Legislative for Justice
On 6/16/20 4:48 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 6/13/20 12:58 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> I create the following promise:
>>
>> Title: Legislative for Justice
>>
>> Text:
>>
>> {
>>
>> Cashing conditions: {Jason CAN, under Rule 2624, by announcement grant
>> the bearer a Legislative Card; the bearer has, in the same message as
>> which e cashes this promise, granted Jason a Justice Card via Rule 2624;
>> the bearer, in the same message as which e cashes this promise,
>> transfers Jason at least one Legislative Card.}
>>
>> Using the mechanism specified in Rule 2624, I grant the bearer a
>> Legislative Card.
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>> I transfer the above-created promise to the Library.
>>
>
> I intend, without objection, to revoke the above promise from the
> Library (since nobody's taken me up on it).
>
Actually, I'll take you up on this. All actions taken in this message
are dependent on the success of the others. If any of these actions
fail, I have taken none of them.
I grant Jason a Justice Card and transfer a Legislative Card to em.
Acting on eir behalf, I grant myself a Legislative Card.
--
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, Herald, Referee, Tailor, Pirate
Champion, Badge of the Great Agoran Revival, Badge of the Salted Earth
Re: BUS: DracoLotto [Card Transfer]
On 6/12/20 6:20 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote: > Enter into the lottery today! Everybody wins at least one product for > every card they put in, risk-free*! All you have to do is transfer one > or more cards to the contract, IN THIS THREAD, before I close the > pools (which won't be for a minimum of four days). You'll get at least > one product back*, and may randomly get more. Aris, my transfer of a voting card was INEFFECTIVE. I transfer one Justice Card to DracoLotto (which I believe I still have). -- Jason Cobb
Re: BUS: [Promise] Legislative for Justice
On 6/13/20 12:58 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I create the following promise:
>
> Title: Legislative for Justice
>
> Text:
>
> {
>
> Cashing conditions: {Jason CAN, under Rule 2624, by announcement grant
> the bearer a Legislative Card; the bearer has, in the same message as
> which e cashes this promise, granted Jason a Justice Card via Rule 2624;
> the bearer, in the same message as which e cashes this promise,
> transfers Jason at least one Legislative Card.}
>
> Using the mechanism specified in Rule 2624, I grant the bearer a
> Legislative Card.
>
> }
>
>
> I transfer the above-created promise to the Library.
>
I intend, without objection, to revoke the above promise from the
Library (since nobody's taken me up on it).
--
Jason Cobb
Re: BUS: [Dragon] Faster Ordinary Proposals
On 6/16/20 4:45 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following Corporate Proposal for the Dragon Corporation.
>
> {
>
> Replace "If a Corporate Proposal was submitted more than 4 but fewer
> than 21 days ago, and the proposal has approval" with "If a Corporate
> Proposal was submitted fewer than 21 days ago and has approval".
>
> After "An Amendment Proposal has approval if" insert "it was submitted
> more than 4 days ago,".
>
> In Bylaw 4, replace the second sentence of the first paragraph with:
>
> A player is Unsupportive of an Ordinary Proposal if e eir current
> vote is AGAINST, or if e has no current vote and the proposal was
> submitted fewer than 4 days ago. An Ordinary Proposal has approval
> if the number of shares owned by members voting FOR it is greater
> than the number of Unsupportive players.
>
> }
>
> I vote FOR it.
>
> - Falsifian
I vote FOR and consent to this change.
--
Jason Cobb
BUS: [Dragon] Faster Ordinary Proposals
I submit the following Corporate Proposal for the Dragon Corporation.
{
Replace "If a Corporate Proposal was submitted more than 4 but fewer
than 21 days ago, and the proposal has approval" with "If a Corporate
Proposal was submitted fewer than 21 days ago and has approval".
After "An Amendment Proposal has approval if" insert "it was submitted
more than 4 days ago,".
In Bylaw 4, replace the second sentence of the first paragraph with:
A player is Unsupportive of an Ordinary Proposal if e eir current
vote is AGAINST, or if e has no current vote and the proposal was
submitted fewer than 4 days ago. An Ordinary Proposal has approval
if the number of shares owned by members voting FOR it is greater
than the number of Unsupportive players.
}
I vote FOR it.
- Falsifian
Re: BUS: [Cleaning] Cleaning
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 17:03, James Cook via agora-business wrote: > I intend to, without objection, amend Rule 2125 by replacing > "proscribed" with "proscribe". > > - Falsifian Seeing no objection, I do so. - Falsifian
Re: BUS: Honor among Pirates [Attn. All "Pirates"]
On 6/16/20 4:17 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
> I could have just let this pass and banked some MAJOR coinage but the
> long-term consequences of having people be paranoid about my contracts
> isn't worth it imo, I much prefer to have people's trust that I won't
> betray them on contracts. So, the thing is that there is a bug in the
> Plunder contract - nobody could join because there was no join mechanism.
>
> So nobody became a Pirate. I suggest you all rejoin. I'm also adding the
> latest Parley patch.
>
> I propose the following Parley:
>
> {Amend the Plunder Partnership to read in full:
>
> The Plunder Partnership
>
> ☠️ WHO WE BE
>
> The Plunder Partnership is also known as the Plundership. A party to this
> contract is known as a Pirate. Any person who is not in Davy Jones’ Locker
> can become a Pirate by announcement. Any Pirate can make themselves cease
> to be one by announcement.
>
> ☠️ NO TATTLE-TALES
>
> Any person who has objected to a transferral of coins to the Plundership
> are in Davy Jones’ Locker. A person in Davy Jones’ Locker cannot become a
> Pirate, and they immediately cease to be a Pirate if they already were one.
>
> ☠️ DOUBLOONS
>
> Doubloons are a destructible asset that can only belong to Pirates. When an
> amount of coins is transferred to the Plundership, each Pirate gains an
> amount of Doubloons equal to the amount transferred divided by the amount
> of Pirates, rounded down. A Pirate with at least 1 Doubloon can transfer 1
> coin to themselves from the Plundership. Doing so destroys 1 Doubloon in
> their possession.
>
> ☠️ PARLEY
>
> Any Pirate can propose a Parley by announcement, which describes amendments
> to this contract. If a Parley was proposed at least 2 days ago, at least
> 2/3rds (rounded up) of all Pirates consent to its contents, and it has not
> yet been applied, then any Pirate can apply it by announcement, causing
> this contract to be amended according to it.}
>
> I consent to that Parley. It's applied.
I consent to the pirate plundership, and I become a party.
--
Jason Cobb
Re: BUS: Honor among Pirates [Attn. All "Pirates"]
On 6/16/20 4:17 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
> I could have just let this pass and banked some MAJOR coinage but the
> long-term consequences of having people be paranoid about my contracts
> isn't worth it imo, I much prefer to have people's trust that I won't
> betray them on contracts. So, the thing is that there is a bug in the
> Plunder contract - nobody could join because there was no join mechanism.
>
> So nobody became a Pirate. I suggest you all rejoin. I'm also adding the
> latest Parley patch.
>
> I propose the following Parley:
>
> {Amend the Plunder Partnership to read in full:
>
> The Plunder Partnership
>
> ☠️ WHO WE BE
>
> The Plunder Partnership is also known as the Plundership. A party to this
> contract is known as a Pirate. Any person who is not in Davy Jones’ Locker
> can become a Pirate by announcement. Any Pirate can make themselves cease
> to be one by announcement.
>
> ☠️ NO TATTLE-TALES
>
> Any person who has objected to a transferral of coins to the Plundership
> are in Davy Jones’ Locker. A person in Davy Jones’ Locker cannot become a
> Pirate, and they immediately cease to be a Pirate if they already were one.
>
> ☠️ DOUBLOONS
>
> Doubloons are a destructible asset that can only belong to Pirates. When an
> amount of coins is transferred to the Plundership, each Pirate gains an
> amount of Doubloons equal to the amount transferred divided by the amount
> of Pirates, rounded down. A Pirate with at least 1 Doubloon can transfer 1
> coin to themselves from the Plundership. Doing so destroys 1 Doubloon in
> their possession.
>
> ☠️ PARLEY
>
> Any Pirate can propose a Parley by announcement, which describes amendments
> to this contract. If a Parley was proposed at least 2 days ago, at least
> 2/3rds (rounded up) of all Pirates consent to its contents, and it has not
> yet been applied, then any Pirate can apply it by announcement, causing
> this contract to be amended according to it.}
>
> I consent to that Parley. It's applied.
>
I join.
--
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, Herald, Referee, Tailor, Pirate
Champion, Badge of the Great Agoran Revival, Badge of the Salted Earth
BUS: Honor among Pirates [Attn. All "Pirates"]
I could have just let this pass and banked some MAJOR coinage but the
long-term consequences of having people be paranoid about my contracts
isn't worth it imo, I much prefer to have people's trust that I won't
betray them on contracts. So, the thing is that there is a bug in the
Plunder contract - nobody could join because there was no join mechanism.
So nobody became a Pirate. I suggest you all rejoin. I'm also adding the
latest Parley patch.
I propose the following Parley:
{Amend the Plunder Partnership to read in full:
The Plunder Partnership
☠️ WHO WE BE
The Plunder Partnership is also known as the Plundership. A party to this
contract is known as a Pirate. Any person who is not in Davy Jones’ Locker
can become a Pirate by announcement. Any Pirate can make themselves cease
to be one by announcement.
☠️ NO TATTLE-TALES
Any person who has objected to a transferral of coins to the Plundership
are in Davy Jones’ Locker. A person in Davy Jones’ Locker cannot become a
Pirate, and they immediately cease to be a Pirate if they already were one.
☠️ DOUBLOONS
Doubloons are a destructible asset that can only belong to Pirates. When an
amount of coins is transferred to the Plundership, each Pirate gains an
amount of Doubloons equal to the amount transferred divided by the amount
of Pirates, rounded down. A Pirate with at least 1 Doubloon can transfer 1
coin to themselves from the Plundership. Doing so destroys 1 Doubloon in
their possession.
☠️ PARLEY
Any Pirate can propose a Parley by announcement, which describes amendments
to this contract. If a Parley was proposed at least 2 days ago, at least
2/3rds (rounded up) of all Pirates consent to its contents, and it has not
yet been applied, then any Pirate can apply it by announcement, causing
this contract to be amended according to it.}
I consent to that Parley. It's applied.
Re: [Notary] The Notes (revision 1) [was: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Notary] The Notes (weekly report)]
COE: Nobody joined the Plundership because there is no join mechanism (I'm working on a fix right now) On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:33 AM ATMunn via agora-official < agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 6/14/2020 8:25 PM, nch via agora-business wrote: > > On 6/14/20 7:15 PM, ATMunn via agora-official wrote: > >> "Needlessly Abstract Exchange"nch, P.S.S.[2], ATMunn > > > > Thank you for so earnestly assuming this office. It's a big one right > now. > > > > CoE: Jason is a member of the NAX. > > > > > https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2020-June/043286.html > > > > Oops, I had eir registration listed in the contract history but not in > the party list. I accept this CoE and publish the following revision > (this revision also removes the pledges I just destroyed): > > > ██ ██ ███ ███ ██ █ ███ ██ > ████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ > █████ █ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ > ████ ██ ████ ██ ██████ ██ > ████ ██ ███ ██ ███ █ █████ ██ > > -~= Notary's weekly report =~- > > > > All times and dates in this report are given in Coordinated Universal > Time (UTC). > > Date of last report: 15 Jun 2020 > Date of this report: 4 Jun 2020 > > > > === SHORT LIST OF CONTRACTS > > Title Parties > "The Dragon Corporation" Warrigal, Aris, Jason > "GRBaSTttPF"[1] Gaelan, twg, Warrigal, Falsifian > "Needlessly Abstract Exchange" nch, P.S.S.[2], ATMunn, Jason > "The Mystical Menagerie" Cuddlebeam > "Humble Agoran Moral Tripwire"Cuddlebeam > "TPP"[3]CB[5], nch, R. Lee, PSS[2], G., Jason, Bögtil, Falsifian > "DracoLotto" Aris, R. Lee, Falsifian, Jason > "AAA"[4]Jason, P.S.S.[2] > "LoAFER"[6] Trigon, Jason, R. Lee, ATMunn, P.S.S.[2] > "Co Dependents" nch, R. Lee > "Cuddlebeam's Locker" Cuddlebeam > > [1] Gaelan's Really Bad At Sending Things To The Public Forum > [2] Also known as Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > [3] The Plunder Partnership > [4] The Agoran Arbitration Association > [5] Cuddlebeam > [6] League of Agorans Facilitating Effective Recordkeeping > > > > > == FULL TEXT AND HISTORY OF CONTRACTS == > > > The following contracts exist: > > > "The Dragon Corporation" (revision 2) > Parties: Warrigal, Aris, Jason > > -- > > ## Bylaw 1: Definition > > This contract is named "the Dragon Corporation". The purpose of the > Dragon Corporation is to earn as much money as possible for its > shareholders. > > All other provisions of this contract notwithstanding, this contract > does not permit any entity to act on behalf of any other entity. > > Shares of Dragon stock (also known as "shares of DRGN", or, in this > contract, "shares") are a currency whose purpose is to represent > ownership of the Dragon Corporation. An entity which owns at least one > share is known as a shareholder. > > If, at any time, the Dragon Corporation or the Lost and Found Department > owns any shares, then those shares are destroyed. > > Any person CAN, by announcement, become a party to this contract or > cease to be a party to this contract. A shareholder who is a party to > this contract is known as a member. > > Wherever this contract states that an entity becomes a party to this > contract or ceases to be a party to this contract, all parties to this > contract are considered to consent to this change. > > ## Bylaw 2: Proposals > > Any member CAN, by announcement, submit a Corporate Proposal. A > Corporate Proposal must have exactly one of the types defined by this > contract. Thereafter, any member CAN vote FOR or AGAINST that proposal > by announcement, or retract such a vote, which causes the vote to become > null and void. Whenever a member votes, all of eir previous votes on the > same proposal are implicitly retracted. > > If a Corporate Proposal was submitted more than 4 but fewer than 21 days > ago, and the proposal
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer now has a pegleg and an eyepatch
I object, because there's a bug, hold on.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 9:55 PM James Cook via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 18:12, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
> > On 6/15/2020 10:57 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 12:19, nch via agora-business
> > > wrote:
> > >> On 6/14/20 10:32 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I propose the following Parley:
> >
> > {
> >
> > Replace the last sentence (under PARLEY) with:
> >
> > If a Parley was proposed at least 2 days ago, at least 2/3rds
> (rounded
> > up) of all Pirates consent to its contents, and it has not yet been
> > applied, then any Pirate can apply it by announcement, causing this
> > contract to be amended according to it.
> >
> > }
> >
> > (Motivation: give players a chance to escape if 2/3 try to bind the
> > remaining 1/3 to unfavourable terms. I'd prefer 4 days, but starting
> > with 2 since it's closer to the current situation.)
> >
> > - Falsifian
> > >>> My tally so far:
> > >>>
> > >>> Consented:
> > >>> Jason, P.S.S., Falsifian, R. Lee
> > >>>
> > >>> Not consented:
> > >>> Cuddlebeam, nch, G.
> > >>>
> > >>> I think if one more party consents (and nobody joins) the Parley will
> > >>> be enacted.
> > >>>
> > >>> - Falsifian
> > >>
> > >> I consent to the above parley
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> nch
> > >> Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager, Pirate
> > >
> > > I forgot to count Bögtil, who joined in another thread, so we're only
> > > at 5/8, not enough.
> >
> > aye, says I.
>
> That should do it.
>
> I intend to ratify the following document without objection.
>
> {{
>
> The text of the contract "The Plunder Partnership" is as follows
> (delimited by {}).
>
> {
>
> The Plunder Partnership
>
> ☠️ WHO WE BE
>
> The Plunder Partnership is also known as the Plundership. A party to this
> contract is known as a Pirate. Any person who is not in Davy Jones’ Locker
> can become a Pirate. Any Pirate can make themselves cease to be one by
> announcement.
>
> ☠️ NO TATTLE-TALES
>
> Any person who has objected to a transferral of coins from the Lost and
> Found Department to the Plundership are in Davy Jones’ Locker. A person in
> Davy Jones’ Locker cannot become a Pirate, and they immediately cease to be
> a Pirate if they already were one.
>
> ☠️ DOUBLOONS
>
> Doubloons are a destructible asset that can only belong to Pirates. When an
> amount of coins is transferred to the Plundership, each Pirate gains an
> amount of Doubloons equal to the amount transferred divided by the amount
> of Pirates, rounded down. A Pirate with at least 1 Doubloon can transfer 1
> coin to themselves from the Plundership. Doing so destroys 1 Doubloon in
> their possession.
>
> ☠️ PARLEY
>
> Any Pirate can propose a Parley by announcement, which describes amendments
> to this contract. If a Parley was proposed at least 2 days ago, at least
> 2/3rds (rounded up) of all Pirates consent to its contents, and it has not
> yet been applied, then any Pirate can apply it by announcement, causing
> this contract to be amended according to it.
>
> }
>
> }}
>
> - Falsifian
>
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer now has a pegleg and an eyepatch
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 18:12, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
> On 6/15/2020 10:57 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 12:19, nch via agora-business
> > wrote:
> >> On 6/14/20 10:32 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> I propose the following Parley:
>
> {
>
> Replace the last sentence (under PARLEY) with:
>
> If a Parley was proposed at least 2 days ago, at least 2/3rds (rounded
> up) of all Pirates consent to its contents, and it has not yet been
> applied, then any Pirate can apply it by announcement, causing this
> contract to be amended according to it.
>
> }
>
> (Motivation: give players a chance to escape if 2/3 try to bind the
> remaining 1/3 to unfavourable terms. I'd prefer 4 days, but starting
> with 2 since it's closer to the current situation.)
>
> - Falsifian
> >>> My tally so far:
> >>>
> >>> Consented:
> >>> Jason, P.S.S., Falsifian, R. Lee
> >>>
> >>> Not consented:
> >>> Cuddlebeam, nch, G.
> >>>
> >>> I think if one more party consents (and nobody joins) the Parley will
> >>> be enacted.
> >>>
> >>> - Falsifian
> >>
> >> I consent to the above parley
> >>
> >> --
> >> nch
> >> Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager, Pirate
> >
> > I forgot to count Bögtil, who joined in another thread, so we're only
> > at 5/8, not enough.
>
> aye, says I.
That should do it.
I intend to ratify the following document without objection.
{{
The text of the contract "The Plunder Partnership" is as follows
(delimited by {}).
{
The Plunder Partnership
☠️ WHO WE BE
The Plunder Partnership is also known as the Plundership. A party to this
contract is known as a Pirate. Any person who is not in Davy Jones’ Locker
can become a Pirate. Any Pirate can make themselves cease to be one by
announcement.
☠️ NO TATTLE-TALES
Any person who has objected to a transferral of coins from the Lost and
Found Department to the Plundership are in Davy Jones’ Locker. A person in
Davy Jones’ Locker cannot become a Pirate, and they immediately cease to be
a Pirate if they already were one.
☠️ DOUBLOONS
Doubloons are a destructible asset that can only belong to Pirates. When an
amount of coins is transferred to the Plundership, each Pirate gains an
amount of Doubloons equal to the amount transferred divided by the amount
of Pirates, rounded down. A Pirate with at least 1 Doubloon can transfer 1
coin to themselves from the Plundership. Doing so destroys 1 Doubloon in
their possession.
☠️ PARLEY
Any Pirate can propose a Parley by announcement, which describes amendments
to this contract. If a Parley was proposed at least 2 days ago, at least
2/3rds (rounded up) of all Pirates consent to its contents, and it has not
yet been applied, then any Pirate can apply it by announcement, causing
this contract to be amended according to it.
}
}}
- Falsifian
[Contract] Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Who is aiming for Victory Cards/Points?
Flagging for the notary: Cuddlebeam destroyed Voidbridge. - Falsifian On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 19:48, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote: > Not the whole economy? It doesn’t reset Coins or cross-reset debts in > Contracts > > I destroy the Voidbridge Contract. I’ll redo it later once I fix it better. > > On Sunday, June 14, 2020, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion < > agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > > > On 6/14/2020 12:15 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote: > > > Small survey for who is aiming for Victory Cards/Points because barring a > > > scam surprising us, it’s going to be way harder to win if someone has to > > > compete with someone else to get that 20 VP margin. > > > > > > I personally would like to aim for VPs, but if anyone else is, I don’t > > mind > > > making a deal with them or just conceding the race in exchange for coins > > or > > > other stuff. > > > > > > > The fact that a VP win resets the whole economy means there may be > > significant pressure to stop it even from those who aren't trying to win. > > "Winning" by VPs is effectively economic revolution (destroys any existing > > oligarchy and makes everyone equal again). > > > > (I'm not committing to any strategy personally right now, just pointing > > that out - far to early to commit to a particular strategy). > > > > -G. > > > >
Re: BUS: DracoLotto
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 20:36, James Cook wrote: > > I amend this contract to read as follows (just a few bug fixes): > > > > DracoLotto > > I join DracoLotto and transfer to it one card of each of the four types. > > - Falsifian I transfer one Legislative Card to DracoLotto. - Falsifian
Re: [Cards] Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PPPPPowerup
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 19:24, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:17 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via > agora-business wrote: > > > > On 6/14/20 3:06 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion > > wrote: > > > On 6/14/20 3:00 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > > >> > > >> By Rule 2623/1, I earn one Legislative Card for the adoption of Proposal > > >> 8407. > > I forgot to claim mine as well. For Proposal 8422, I earn a Legislative > > Card. > > For Proposal 8415, I earn a Legislative Card. > > -Aris I earn a Legislative Card for Proposal 8416. - Falsifian
BUS: [Glitter] Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8409-8430
> // > ID: 8416 > Title: Identity theft protection act v1.1 > Adoption index: 3.1 > Author: Falsifian > Co-authors: G., Publius Scribonius Scholasticus I award myself red glitter and orange glitter. - Falsifian
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Tarot
I transfer 50 coins to my locker. I then Fortunetell each of these cards! Here is your fortune, R.Lee! (The hashes are SHA-256, done with this: https://emn178.github.io/online-tools/sha256.html) I - THE PLAYER: you will have good luck with proposals II - THE ANNOUNCEMENT: if you are smart about it you will earn a lot of money III - THE JUDGE: a scam is looming close to you so be careful or take the opportunity IV - THE SCAM: fortune will smile upon you if you do what needs to be done V - THE RIBBON: you are forgetting something important On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:53 PM Rebecca via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > I transfer 50 coins to cuddlebeam in order to do so. > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 9:26 PM Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion < > agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > I think you need to make an explicit transfer > > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:25 PM Rebecca via agora-business < > > agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > > > I buy each of the first five listed tarot cards in Cuddlebeam's > > > mystical contract > > > > > > -- > > > From R. Lee > > > > > > > > -- > From R. Lee On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:53 PM Rebecca via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > I transfer 50 coins to cuddlebeam in order to do so. > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 9:26 PM Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion < > agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > I think you need to make an explicit transfer > > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:25 PM Rebecca via agora-business < > > agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > > > I buy each of the first five listed tarot cards in Cuddlebeam's > > > mystical contract > > > > > > -- > > > From R. Lee > > > > > > > > -- > From R. Lee >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Tarot
I transfer 50 coins to cuddlebeam in order to do so. On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 9:26 PM Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion < agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > I think you need to make an explicit transfer > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:25 PM Rebecca via agora-business < > agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > I buy each of the first five listed tarot cards in Cuddlebeam's > > mystical contract > > > > -- > > From R. Lee > > > -- >From R. Lee
Re: BUS: Attempt To Amend Codependancy Contract
On 6/15/20 10:59 PM, Rebecca via agora-business wrote: > I want to amend (if nch agrees) the contract Co Dependants by adding on the > end > > "All members to this contract shall be members of and be bound by the > Agoran Arbitration Association contract" > > I consent to this amendment and become a party to the AAA > > -- > From R. Lee I consent to this change and become a party to the AAA. -- nch Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager, Pirate
BUS: Tarot
I buy each of the first five listed tarot cards in Cuddlebeam's mystical contract -- >From R. Lee
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fine, I destroy "Combinotron"
Well that's quite the interesting proposition but here's my counter-offer. I intend to transfer 510 coins from the Lost and Found Department to the Plunder Partnership, without objection. On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:35 AM Edward Murphy via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > Cuddlebeam wrote: > > > I intend, without objection, to transfer an amount of coins equal to the > > current amount of coins in the Lost and Found Department from the Lost > and > > Found Department to the Plunder Partnership. > > I object to all intents to transfer assets from the Lost and Found > Department. I'm open to withdrawing this objection on a case-by-case > basis, though. >
