Re: BUS: @Treasuror focus grant

2021-06-30 Thread Falsifian via agora-business
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 12:32:34PM +1000, Rebecca Lee via agora-business wrote:
> It's a new month! My focus is  now legislation. I claim a legislative card.
> I pay 2 legislative cards and combine them into 4 pendants.
> 
> -- 
> From R. Lee

I grant myself a Victory Point.

-- 
Falsifian


BUS: [Proposal] MMI

2021-06-30 Thread Rebecca Lee via agora-business
I create and pend the following proposal.

Title: Nicer Definitions
AI: 3
Text: Amend rule 2152, "Mother May I", by replacing

"SHOULD NOT, DISCOURAGED, DEPRECATED: Before performing the
described action, the full implications of performing it should
 be understood and carefully weighed."

with


""SHOULD NOT, DISCOURAGED, DEPRECATED: Before performing the

described action, the full implications of performing it ought to be

 be understood and carefully weighed."


and also by replacing

"SHOULD, ENCOURAGED, RECOMMENDED: Before failing to perform the

 described action, the full implications of failing to perform
 it should (in the ordinary-language sense) be understood and
 carefully weighed."

with

"SHOULD, ENCOURAGED, RECOMMENDED: Before failing to perform the

 described action, the full implications of failing to perform
 it ought to be understood and
 carefully weighed."

[Explanation: The word SHOULD is currently defined as meaning the word
should. This is not technically recursive because the upper case terms are
terms of art, but it looks awful. This proposal means that it becomes
"ought to", which just looks better. I also get to remove a terribly clunky
parenthetical.]

-- 
>From R. Lee


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Propopsal] Glitter is too valuable

2021-06-30 Thread Rebecca Lee via agora-business
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 12:53 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discuss...@agoranomic.org> wrote:

>
>
> (snip)
>
> By precedent, that list item is not a paragraph, just a part of one.
> Also, first person in proposals is weird, but probably works.
>
> (snip)
> This uses singular they: "they already have", "CAN award them", "award
> them 5 boatloads".
>
> Also, I like that the current system awards more coins for rarer
> ribbons, so I think I'd be AGAINST this as-is.
>
> --
> Jason Cobb
>
> Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
>
>
In accordance with Jason's comments, I retract the proposal "Reduce Sparkle
by 50%!" and create the following proposal

Title: It's a gray, gray world.
Coauthor: Jason
AI: 3
Text:
Amend rule 2438, "Ribbons", by deleting the last list item.
[Comment: Awarding coins can be done at power 1, piggybacking off of the
Ribbon rule. No reason to have Glitter here at power 3]

Amend rule 2602, "Glitter" to read, in full:
"Each type of Ribbon has a corresponding type of Glitter with the same
name. A player qualifies for a type of Glitter when e qualifies for the
same type of Ribbon while already owning such a Ribbon. If a player has not
been awarded that type of Ribbon or e corresponding type of Glitter since e
last earned or came to qualify for that type of Ribbon, and has not
been so awarded
five or more times within the past 24 hours, any player CAN award em that
type of Glitter by announcement. When a player gains a type of Glitter, the
Tailor SHALL in an officially timely fashion and CAN once by announcement
award em N/2 boatloads of coins rounded up, where N is the number of
players that did not own the corresponding type of Ribbon at the time of
the award. The amount payable for each type of Glitter is tracked in the
Tailor's weekly report.

[comment: Nonplayer persons can currently get Glitter, they don't need to
be able to though because it does nothing. N+1 becomes N/2 because Glitter
is currently the most powerful way to get coins, by far. ]
>From R. Lee


Re: BUS: @Treasuror focus grant

2021-06-30 Thread Rebecca Lee via agora-business
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 12:33 PM Rebecca Lee via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:

> It's a new month! My focus is  now legislation. I claim a legislative card.
> I pay 2 legislative cards and combine them into 4 pendants.
>
> --
> From R. Lee
>

I assume that failed (you get 3 pendants, not 4, from 2 cards). I pay 2
legislative cards to gain 3 pendants.
-- 
>From R. Lee


Re: BUS: Trying out contacts [attn. Treasuror]

2021-06-30 Thread ais523 via agora-business
On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 22:34 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> Pursuant to my focus in Legislation, I grant myself one Legislative
> Card.

Using my Focus, I grant myself one Legislative Card.

-- 
ais523



BUS: [Propopsal] Glitter is too valuable

2021-06-30 Thread Rebecca Lee via agora-business
There was a consensus on discord that glitter is too valuable. For example,
judging a CFJ gets you like 11 boatloads in addition to the regular reward
boatloads. How's that fair? I propose making all glitter grant 5 boatloads
of coins.

I create the following proposal.

Title: Reduce Sparkle by 50%!
AI: 3
Text
Amend rule 2438, "Ribbons' by removing the last paragraph (for clarity, I
mean the list item beginning with "- Otherwise")
[there's no reason for the part about glitter to be in the Ribbons rule.
The power 1 glitter rule can grant coins and it can take the definition of
what  ribbons are from the higher power rule]

Amend rule 2602, "Glitter", so that it reads, in full
{Each type of Ribbon has a corresponding type of Glitter with the same
name. When a person qualifies for a Ribbon of a type they already have, any
player CAN award them the corresponding type of Glitter by announcement.
That notwithstanding, a person cannot receive glitter if e has already
received it five times in the last 24 hours, or if e has not come to earn
or qualify for that Glitter since the last time e received that type of
Glitter. When a player receives a type of Glitter, the Tailor CAN and in an
officially timely fashion SHALL once award them 5 boatloads of coins]
-- 
>From R. Lee


Re: BUS: Player Continuity + Registration (ATTN: Treasuror)

2021-06-30 Thread Telna via agora-business

On 2021-06-14 17:18, Telna via agora-business wrote:

On 2021-06-14 17:09, Telna wrote:
I Plan to Flip my Ministry Focus to Ministry of Compliance.

I grant 1 Justice Card (my Ministry Focus' Grant) to myself.


BUS: Trying out contacts [attn. Treasuror]

2021-06-30 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-business
Pursuant to my focus in Legislation, I grant myself one Legislative Card.

I pay a fee of 4 Legislative Cards in order to earn 10 Pendants.

-- 
Jason Cobb

Assessor, Rulekeepor, S​tonemason



BUS: @Treasuror focus grant

2021-06-30 Thread Rebecca Lee via agora-business
It's a new month! My focus is  now legislation. I claim a legislative card.
I pay 2 legislative cards and combine them into 4 pendants.

-- 
>From R. Lee


BUS: Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2021-06-30 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-business


On 6/30/2021 2:02 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 01:30 -0700, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> The proposal pool currently contains the following proposal(s):
>> The proposal pool is currently empty.
> 
> You might want to fix this before posting your official report.
> 

eh, no need.

I withdraw "a new rule" from the proposal pool.

-G.



Re: BUS: Re: [Registrar] Deregistrations of Inactive Players

2021-06-30 Thread Aris Merchant via agora-business
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 2:00 PM Aris Merchant via agora-business
 wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 1:40 AM Aris Merchant
>  wrote:
> >
> > Five players were inactivated on April 10. As it has now been 60 days
> > since then, it is time to deregister them. In accordance with the
> > rules, this message is being sent both to agora-business and to the
> > email address of each involved player.
> >
> > I intend, with notice, to deregister lucidot.
> >
> > I intend, with notice, to deregister JTAC.
> >
> > I intend, with notice, to deregister Ubercrow.
> >
> > I intend, with notice, to deregister Noah.
> >
> > I intend, with notice, to deregister Slam_Joe_Jr_Supreme.
> >
> > To the players listed: We hope you have enjoyed your time in Agora,
> > and that you will consider returning in the future. You may prevent
> > your deregistration by sending a message in reply to this one,
> > addressed to agora-business, stating "I become active."
>
> Whoops. This should have been without 3 objections, rather than with
> notice. I'm going to do it again. Since all of the people have already
> received emails on the subject, and I don't want to spam them if they
> have arranged to no longer receive mail for the lists, this is sent
> solely to a-b.
>
> I intend, without 3 objections, to deregister lucidot.

Without 3 objections, I do so.

> I intend, without 3 objections, to deregister JTAC.

Without 3 objections, I do so.

> I intend, without 3 objections, to deregister Noah.

Without 3 objections, I do so.

-Aris