BUS: Pointing out short comings in the community
1. I point a finger at Jason for the crime of Tardiness for failing to publish the Stonemason's weekly report on the week of 21 Feb 2022 I would like to quickly mention that under a more Duck influenced system this would have never occurred
Re: BUS: The Duck Initiative
On 3/11/22 23:07, Skull cat via agora-business wrote: > I intend, with Agoran Consent, to award the patent title "Duck Badge" to > Trigon, Jason, and myself. > > >1. I cause myself to receive a welcome package >2. I consent to, create, and join a contract with title "The Duck Fund" >( Duck, and only duck, can join or leave this contract at any time by >announcement. ) >3. > > RWO: The Duck Fund has 1 coins I object to each intent in the above message. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
BUS: The Duck Initiative
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to award the patent title "Duck Badge" to Trigon, Jason, and myself. 1. I cause myself to receive a welcome package 2. I consent to, create, and join a contract with title "The Duck Fund" ( Duck, and only duck, can join or leave this contract at any time by announcement. ) 3. RWO: The Duck Fund has 1 coins
Re: BUS: registration of duck
On 3/11/22 21:04, Skull cat via agora-business wrote: > I register. please call me duck For the benefit of anybody wondering: I affirm, under penalty of No Faking, that this is not me. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
BUS: hehe Trigon
Ducks are neat
BUS: registration of duck
I register. please call me duck
BUS: (@Treasuror) Wealthing the Wield Stone
I wield the Wealth Stone. -- secretsnail
Re: BUS: (@arbitor) finger-pointing
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 2:20 PM ais523 via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > I point a finger at G. for violating rule 2478, committing the Crime of > Unjustified Gesticulation, by pointing a finger that was subsequently > found to be Shenanigans. > I issue a warning to G. for the above violation. Please take care when copying and pasting. -- secretsnail
Re: BUS: (@arbitor) finger-pointing
On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 13:37 -0600, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote: > On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 6:12 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business < > agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > I point a finger at Aspen for violating Rule 2143 by failing to > > publish a notary's report in the week of Feb 28 (that's second > > missed report in a row I think - despite earlier conversation not > > personally pointing at single missing weeks). > > I find the above finger point to be shenanigans. I point a finger at G. for violating rule 2478, committing the Crime of Unjustified Gesticulation, by pointing a finger that was subsequently found to be Shenanigans. -- ais523
Re: OFF: [CFJ 3948: G.] [CFJ 3949: Murphy] Re: BUS: [DoV?] Apathy resolution
On 3/8/2022 1:59 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote: > I number the CFJ on the statement [Jason's purported apathy intent was sent > to all players.] CFJ 3948 and assign it to G. Judgement: The relevant rules text in question (Rule 478/40): A public message is a message sent via a public forum, or sent to all players and containing a clear designation of intent to be public. Determining whether a message was "sent to all players" is not defined in the rules, and is explicitly separate from sending via public fora. So common definitions/common sense apply. Further, as suggested by CFJ 3884, the use of definitions around communication may be medium-dependent. So what would constitute "sending to" a player in the https://discord.gg/JCC6YGc discussion forum? First, the sole fact that the message was entered in a chat-based discussion forum is not sufficient for a message posted there to be considered "sent to" another player, even if that player is a frequent participant in that forum. Players are not required to monitor/respond in discussion forums (CFJ 1888), and in the chat medium, it would be unreasonable to expect a potential recipient to have received a message from amongst a stream of generally-unrelated chat based on the message contents alone. At a bare minimum, the message (to be considered "sent to" a player) would need to use the medium-dependent metadata associated with @mentioning a player in Discord, which provides a generally-persistent flag to the receiving player that something has been addressed directly to them, which persists until they view the message. This changes the effort of the recipient finding the message from "unreasonable" to "at least somewhat reasonable." Requiring this as a bare minimum is a very minor hurdle for the sender, so it doesn't remove flexibility of the sender in choosing how to send the message via that medium (R478, in part, allows for Agoran actions to be taken even if all public fora are inoperative, and in such situations some flexibility in interpretation might be needed e.g. to prevent ossification). I'll note this would be a bare minimum. For example, if a player was a member of the forum (capable of being messaged), but hadn't logged in for some months, this (sending a ping) might still be unreasonable, as there is no duty to monitor a DIS forum for any length of time, even while being a member. That's for future edge cases to decide. In this case, since the message in question didn't meet the bare minimum requirement for "sending to" that would be appropriate for that communication medium, I judge FALSE.
Re: BUS: (@arbitor) finger-pointing
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 6:12 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I point a finger at ATMunn for violating Rule 2143 by failing to publish a
> notary's report in the week of Feb 21.
>
I levy a fine of 2 Blots on ATMunn for the above crime.
> I point a finger at ATMunn for violating Rule 2143 by failing to publish a
> notary's report in the week of Feb 28.
>
I levy a fine of 2 Blots on ATMunn for the above crime.
> I point a finger at Aspen for violating Rule 2143 by failing to publish a
> notary's report in the week of Feb 28 (that's second missed report in a
> row I think - despite earlier conversation not personally pointing at
> single missing weeks).
>
I find the above finger point to be shenanigans.
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 6:20 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I point a finger at Aspen for violating Rule 2143 by failing to publish a
> promotor's report in the week of Feb 28.
I levy a fine of 1 Blot on Aspen for the above crime. I specify that this
crime is forgivable, and specify the following words to be included in an
apology:
{
a
it
the
rule
crime
sorrow
promote
forgiven
hopefully
tongueless
}
--
secretsnail
(@Rulekeepor) BUS: Re: OFF: [Mad Engineer] Intent to Invent
On Sun, 2022-03-06 at 17:06 +, ais523 via agora-official wrote:
> The Device is on.
>
> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause rule 2655 to amend the rule
> "The Device" by appending the following as a list item to the "When the
> device is off:" list:
> {{{
> A player CAN once a month grant eir Ministry Focus' Device to a
> specified player by announcement.
> }}}
With Agoran Consent, I do so. (Jason supported; there were no
objections.)
--
ais523
Mad Engineer
