On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 8:20 PM Jason Cobb via agora-official <agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On 4/2/22 23:04, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote: > > > PROPOSAL 8663 (The Hexeract) > > AUTHOR: Secretsnail9 > > CLASS: ORDINARY > > FOR (1): juan [...] > > > CoE: juan's vote should have resolved to AGAINST. > > Accepted. Revision: > > PROPOSAL 8663 (The Hexeract) > AUTHOR: Secretsnail9 > CLASS: ORDINARY > FOR (0): > AGAINST (7): Aspen, G., Jason*, Murphy, Secretsnail9@, ais523, nix@ > PRESENT (1): juan > BALLOTS: 8 > AI (F/A): 0/24 (AI=1.0) > POPULARITY: -0.875 > OUTCOME: REJECTED > [ > Murphy: Endorsement of Secretsnail9 > juan: Conditional resolved: A majority of other votes were not FOR > ]
I do not believe this is sufficient. Per Rule 208(4), a correct tally of valid ballots must be provided for your resolution to be EFFECTIVE. Thus, the first attempted resolution failed. Your CoE prevented that (incorrect) resolution from ratifying. However, your second attempted resolution did not clearly state that you were resolving the proposal, and could not have met the by announcement standard of Rule 208. Thus, I do not believe any resolution of this proposal has taken effect. -Aspen
