Re: BUS: Test message
On Thu, 2023-11-23 at 21:30 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote: > This message contains no game actions. > > In fact, I object so you don't have to. I object – the "this message contains no game actions" may disclaim the objection and prevent it from working, and, well, it's tradition for *somebody* to object to these test messages :-D -- ais523
BUS: Test message
This message contains no game actions. In fact, I object so you don't have to. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
BUS: Test
Hello? This message contains no game actions.
BUS: test
Did I break the lists again?
BUS: Test
This message contains no game actions. Jason Cobb
Re: BUS: test
On 10/22/2021 15:40, madrid nomic via agora-business wrote: testerino test I object. -- ATMunn friendly neighborhood notary :)
BUS: test
testerino test
Re: BUS: Test
Ill-Formed Program wrote: I intend, without objection, to declare apathy, specifying the set [myself]. Whoever you are, I object.
Re: BUS: Test
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 01:11:47PM -0400, Ill-Formed Program via agora-business wrote: > I intend, without objection, to declare apathy, specifying the set [myself]. I object. -- Falsifian
Re: BUS: Test
On 3/17/21 1:11 PM, Ill-Formed Program via agora-business wrote: > I intend, without objection, to declare apathy, specifying the set [myself]. I object. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
Re: BUS: Test
On 3/17/21 12:11 PM, Ill-Formed Program via agora-business wrote: > I intend, without objection, to declare apathy, specifying the set [myself]. I object to omd's intent. -- nix Webmastor, Ministor, Herald
BUS: Test
I intend, without objection, to declare apathy, specifying the set [myself].
BUS: Test (@Treasuror)
I transfer one coin to omd (thanks for getting things working!) Gaelan
BUS: Test
This is only a test. This message contains no game actions. -- Jason Cobb
BUS: Test of a-b
This is a test of what happens if I don't add "BUS:" to the subject line ahead of time.
BUS: test post pls ignore
bloop
Re: BUS: Test
On Nov 14, 2017, at 2:34 AM, VJ Radawrote: > > __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ > /\ ___\ /\ \_\ \ /\ \ /\ "-.\ \ /\ \ /\ ___\ /\ ___\ > \ \___ \ \ \ __ \ \ \ \ \ \ \-. \ \ \ \ \ \ __\ \ \___ \ > \/\_\ \ \_\ \_\ \ \_\ \ \_\\"\_\ \ \_\ \ \_\ \/\_\ > \/_/ \/_/\/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ > > __ __ ____ __ __ __ __ > /\ ___\ /\ ___\ /\ \ /\__ _\ /\ \_\ \ /\ \ /\ ___\ > \ \ \ \ \ __\ _\_\ \ \/_/\ \/ \ \ __ \ \ \ \ \ \___ \ > \ \_\ \ \_\ /\_\ \ \_\ \ \_\ \_\ \ \_\ \/\_\ > \/_/ \/_/ \/_/\/_/ \/_/\/_/ \/_/ \/_/ > > __ ______ __ __ > /\ \ /\ ___\ /\ __ \ /\ ___\ /\ ___\ /\ \ > \ \ \ \ \___ \ \ \ __ \ \ \ \ \ \ __\ _\_\ \ > \ \_\ \/\_\ \ \_\ \_\ \ \_\ \ \_\ /\_\ > \/_/ \/_/ \/_/\/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ Oh, good, alt.fan.warlord is leaking again. In case the above is effective, I call for judgement (using AP to do so) on the statement “In the above message, V.J Rada called a CFJ using Shinies.” I bar V.J Rada from this CFJ. I recommend that if this CFJ is true, that it be judged by the same judge who judges V.J Rada’s CFJ above. -o signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Re: BUS: Test
I object. On Tue, Nov 14, 2017, 02:34 VJ Rada,wrote: > __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ > /\ ___\ /\ \_\ \ /\ \ /\ "-.\ \ /\ \ /\ ___\ /\ ___\ > \ \___ \ \ \ __ \ \ \ \ \ \ \-. \ \ \ \ \ \ __\ \ \___ \ > \/\_\ \ \_\ \_\ \ \_\ \ \_\\"\_\ \ \_\ \ \_\ \/\_\ > \/_/ \/_/\/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ > > __ __ ____ __ __ __ __ > /\ ___\ /\ ___\ /\ \ /\__ _\ /\ \_\ \ /\ \ /\ ___\ > \ \ \ \ \ __\ _\_\ \ \/_/\ \/ \ \ __ \ \ \ \ \ \___ \ > \ \_\ \ \_\ /\_\ \ \_\ \ \_\ \_\ \ \_\ \/\_\ > \/_/ \/_/ \/_/\/_/ \/_/\/_/ \/_/ \/_/ > > __ ______ __ __ > /\ \ /\ ___\ /\ __ \ /\ ___\ /\ ___\ /\ \ > \ \ \ \ \___ \ \ \ __ \ \ \ \ \ \ __\ _\_\ \ > \ \_\ \/\_\ \ \_\ \_\ \ \_\ \ \_\ /\_\ > \/_/ \/_/ \/_/\/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada >
BUS: Test
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ /\ ___\ /\ \_\ \ /\ \ /\ "-.\ \ /\ \ /\ ___\ /\ ___\ \ \___ \ \ \ __ \ \ \ \ \ \ \-. \ \ \ \ \ \ __\ \ \___ \ \/\_\ \ \_\ \_\ \ \_\ \ \_\\"\_\ \ \_\ \ \_\ \/\_\ \/_/ \/_/\/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ __ __ ____ __ __ __ __ /\ ___\ /\ ___\ /\ \ /\__ _\ /\ \_\ \ /\ \ /\ ___\ \ \ \ \ \ __\ _\_\ \ \/_/\ \/ \ \ __ \ \ \ \ \ \___ \ \ \_\ \ \_\ /\_\ \ \_\ \ \_\ \_\ \ \_\ \/\_\ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/\/_/ \/_/\/_/ \/_/ \/_/ __ ______ __ __ /\ \ /\ ___\ /\ __ \ /\ ___\ /\ ___\ /\ \ \ \ \ \ \___ \ \ \ __ \ \ \ \ \ \ __\ _\_\ \ \ \_\ \/\_\ \ \_\ \_\ \ \_\ \ \_\ /\_\ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/\/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ -- >From V.J. Rada
BUS: Test
This isn’t part of a timing scam, but it is a test of the public fora. I apologize for the noise. -o signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Test of Confidence
I issue Aris a trust token. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 12, 2017, at 1:45 AM, Aris Merchant >wrote: > > I'm sorry. I'm in rather a bad mood today, but that's no excuse. I was > far too harsh in my message, and I apologise to you and anyone else > I've been rude to. > > I do disapprove of blanket votes for the reasons I discussed, but > there was no reason for me to be rude about it. Again, I'm very sorry > for the way I said that. > > -Aris > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:49 PM, grok (caleb vines) > wrote: >> Dunno where you got that idea. I like scams and funny business, I just was >> particularly annoyed by "funny business" that was clearly impossible. >> >> This is clearly an action I'm allowed to take, regardless of whether you >> want to shame me out of my civic duty or not. >> >> Also "arbitrary" in this case is pretty flimsy. Just because you don't know >> why I'm performing my voting procedure this way doesn't mean it wasn't >> carefully considered. >> >> But if you're really that incensed by me playing the game, I'm happy to take >> my ball and go home. Just say the word. >> >> >> >> -grok >> >> On Sep 11, 2017 11:38 PM, "Aris Merchant" >> wrote: >> >> Really? Can people cut it out with the arbitrary voting? Agora is >> supposed to a legislative nomic, which as I understand it is why >> everyone is here. The idea of the nomic is that we discuss and think >> about ideas, constantly striving for improvement. I'm used to >> CuddleBeam pulling this kind of thing, but really, grok? I thought you >> were the one who didn't like all the scams and funny business? >> >> -Aris >> >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:33 PM, grok (caleb vines) >> wrote: >>> I vote "AGAINST" on all Agoran Decisions for which it is legal for me to >>> do >>> so. >>> >>> >>> -grok >> >> signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
BUS: Test of Confidence
I vote "AGAINST" on all Agoran Decisions for which it is legal for me to do so. -grok
BUS: Test
123
Re: BUS: Test
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:26 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: 123 Well, that's weird.
BUS: test
Just testing Gmail filters. -- Charles Walker
BUS: test
test
Re: BUS: test
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote: test I object.
Re: BUS: test
Kerim Aydin wrote: test Earlier comments aside, I object.
BUS: Test test test
Test, test, test, test, test, test.
BUS: Test message
Just a test message, nothing to see here. - Benjamin Schultz KE3OM OscarMeyr
Re: BUS: Test message
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a test message, nothing to see here. Just in case, I object. -root If root objected to something in the above message, i agree to it.