On 2021-06-18 13:42, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, 11:03 PM Telna via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
I create the following proposal:
//
Title: Contract Chaff Cleanup
Adoption index: 2.5
Author: Telna
Co-author(s):
Amend Rule 1742 "Contracts" by appending the following as a new paragraph:
The Notary CAN destroy a contract Without 2 Objections, but SHOULD NOT
do so unless the contract no longer serves any significant purpose.
//
I grant the following promise, titled "Pendant Payment" to the Library:
Cashing conditions: The bearer has pended the proposal "Contract Chaff
Cleanup" authored by Telna, and Telna has at least 2 boatloads of coins.
I transfer 2 boatloads of coins to the bearer.
(This is currently valued at 28 coins)
Proposal 8559 adds the same mechanism, but whether the proposal worked was
under CFJ, so it hasn't appeared in a published ruleset. That will be
remedied (hopefully) within a day.
Right, I'm glad for that! Was a bit further back than I was looking.
I retract the quoted proposal and revoke the quoted promise.
