Ah, you're right. I used this in a different way last year and thought
we fixed that definition.
I favor this CFJ.
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, D. Margaux wrote:
> > On Oct 29, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> >> From the Arbitor’s Weekly:
> >>
> >>> 3672 called 15 October 2018 by D. Margaux, assigned to Trigon 20
> >>> October 2018: "Trigon, twg, D. Margaux, G., and L could win the game
> >>> by announcement under rule 2580 on the Effective Date after the
> >>> expungement of Trigon's blot."
> >>
> >> I issue a cabinet order of certiorari to assign CFJ 3672 to myself.
> >
> > Er, you need to recuse Trigon first, right? Otherwise it's not an open
> > case.
> >
> > That sort of settles this issue of competing judges. Regardless of PM
> > status, you need to act as Arbitor to recuse Trigon before you attempt
> > to assign to yourself.
>
> I think I disagree. The case open and assigned. Under Rule 991:
> > At any time, each CFJ is either open (default), suspended, or assigned
> > exactly one judgement.
>
> Certiorari doesn’t require the case to be unassigned, just that it is open:
> > Certiorari (Arbitor): The Prime Minister assigns emself as judge of a
> > specified open case.
>
>
>
