On 2/18/22 15:20, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 15:14 -0500, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> These should be uncontroversial:
>>
>> I intend with two objections, to shred Joevotes.
>>
>> I intend with two objections, to shred the contract Now We Nomic. [Now
>> We Nomic has been formally ended, and this contract has no legal bearing
>> on its state.]
>>
>> I intend with two objections, to shred Jumblebeam deal.
>>
>> I intend with two objections, to shred Cuddle Cabal.
>>
>> I intend with two objections, to shred Cuddlebeam's Sandwich.
>>
>>
>> These may be slightly more controversial:
>>
>> I intend with two objections, to shred Private Honour.
>>
>> I intend with two objections, to shred The Pointkeepor.
>>
>> I do not intend to resolve either of the two above intents if G. objects.
> You messed up the wording of the intents, so I don't think they work.
> You may want to repeat them.
>
You're right. Whoops. In my defense, Agora is hard.
These should be uncontroversial:
I intend, without two objections, to shred Joevotes.
I intend, without two objections, to shred the contract Now We Nomic. [Now
We Nomic has been formally ended, and this contract has no legal bearing
on its state.]
I intend, without two objections, to shred Jumblebeam deal.
I intend, without two objections, to shred Cuddle Cabal.
I intend, without two objections, to shred Cuddlebeam's Sandwich.
These may be slightly more controversial:
I intend, without two objections, to shred Private Honour.
I intend, without two objections, to shred The Pointkeepor.
I do not intend to resolve either of the two above intents if G. objects.
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason