DIS: Re: BUS: Space Alert (D-Proposal)
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: I submit the following proposal: Space Alert II: 3 AI: 1 General comment: The wording is not very precise, which makes the proposal more wordy and confusing than it needs to be. It seems like some good simple gameplay though.
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2805 judged TRUE by coppro
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 2:30 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: On Sun, 2010-06-13 at 15:54 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: Judge coppro's Arguments: Tiger's message clearly and unambiguously specifying that he was submitting a fragment with the following text, immediately followed by three lines of text. Per Rules 217 and 478, he did submit a Fragment containing those three lines of text; tradition is irrelevant given the explicitness of the action. TRUE. I (attempt to) submit the headers of this email as a Fragment. I call for judgement on the statement In this message, I submitted a Fragment. Arguments: I don't know the exact text of the Fragment until the email arrives. Does this mean that my action fails for lack of specificity? Gratuitous: Until I saw your arguments, I thought you were clearly referring to the headers of the *quoted* email.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Space Alert (D-Proposal)
On 14 June 2010 19:35, comex com...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: I submit the following proposal: Space Alert II: 3 AI: 1 General comment: The wording is not very precise, which makes the proposal more wordy and confusing than it needs to be. It seems like some good simple gameplay though. I know, but I really feel like I tried my best. I just hope it's not broken. -- -Tiger
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Space Alert (D-Proposal)
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 June 2010 19:35, comex com...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: I submit the following proposal: Space Alert II: 3 AI: 1 General comment: The wording is not very precise, which makes the proposal more wordy and confusing than it needs to be. It seems like some good simple gameplay though. I know, but I really feel like I tried my best. I just hope it's not broken. Well, I think it's possible to initiate a journey right before the start of a week, define a map where there is an object right in front of the shuttle with one more hit point than it, and get a Leadership Token for no work...
