DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] A series of unfortunately-formatted reports
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:31 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 00:21 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: LEFT IN A HUFF Waggie, Gecko, Kelly (x3!), Swann, KoJen, Zefram, Vlad, Andre, G., BobTHJ, P1-P100 Warrigal* I CFJ on the statement P1 has a Patent Title. Arguments: P1 was a contract designed for a scam, and does not really model any sort of agreement. Is it, therefore, still an entity, given that contracts have been repealed? Why would it not being an agreement make it not an entity?
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] A series of unfortunately-formatted reports
On 17 July 2010 19:34, comex com...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:31 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 00:21 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: LEFT IN A HUFF Waggie, Gecko, Kelly (x3!), Swann, KoJen, Zefram, Vlad, Andre, G., BobTHJ, P1-P100 Warrigal* I CFJ on the statement P1 has a Patent Title. Arguments: P1 was a contract designed for a scam, and does not really model any sort of agreement. Is it, therefore, still an entity, given that contracts have been repealed? Why would it not being an agreement make it not an entity? In a way, it could be seen as an identity solely on the base that it is named in the Herald's report as the holder of a PT. But that maybe doesn't make much sense. -- -Tiger
DIS: Re: BUS: Things
coppro wrote:
Proposal: Waitaminute (AI=2, II=1, Distributable by fee)
{{{
Award ais523 the Patent Title Scamster.
}}}
Not that e doesn't likely deserve it, but this should cite some
notable examples of eir scams.
Proposal: They're dumb (AI=1, II=1, Distributable by fee)
{{{
Destroy all White Ribbons.
Amend Rule 2199 (Ribbons) by removing
(+W) When a first-class person becomes a player for the first
time, e earns a White Ribbon. When a first-class person
has been a player continuously for at least three months,
was never a player before that period, and names another
player as eir mentor (and has not named a mentor in this
fashion before), the named player earns a White Ribbon.
}}}
What's dumb about them?
Proposal: Ill-conceived (AI=1, II=1, Distributable by fee)
{{{
Repeal Rule 2290.
Amend Rule 2279 by replacing the first bullet with:
(1) Take the value 3.
Repeal Rule 2134.
Amend Rule 2284 by removing
- A player CAN change the chamber of an ongoing ordinary
decision for a charge of 2 ergs.
[No, I don't propose a replacement. We aren't active enough for one.]
}}}
For reference, these are
2290 Chamber and Title
2279 Voting Limits on Ordinary Decisions
2134 Win by Clout
2284 Fee-based actions
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Herald] A series of unfortunately-formatted reports
ais523 wrote: On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 00:21 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: LEFT IN A HUFF Waggie, Gecko, Kelly (x3!), Swann, KoJen, Zefram, Vlad, Andre, G., BobTHJ, P1-P100 Warrigal* I CFJ on the statement P1 has a Patent Title. Arguments: P1 was a contract designed for a scam, and does not really model any sort of agreement. Is it, therefore, still an entity, given that contracts have been repealed? Gratuitous: P1 ceased to exist (CFJ 2761). FALSE.
