Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] [Regulations] Intent to promulguate auction regulations
On 2020-08-04 11:24, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
On 2020-08-04 07:00, Reuben Staley via agora-official wrote:
The following text comprises a public message:
{{{ DISCLAIMER: There are no game actions in this message. }}}
DISCLAIMER: There are no game actions in this message.
Why did you list the DISCLAIMER a second time, outside the {{{}}}? Did I
miss another purchase of signature space?
The other day I made an another attempt to resolve the signature
suggestion since I was pretty sure my first one wouldn't work due to the
drama about regulated actions. I also added the line above the quoted
three which begins "When interpreting this message" in order to provide
a similar effect to what the braces should have. Turns out that the
attempt was already resolved, though, according to Publius' judgement,
therefore I can probably get rid of the second instance now.
--
Trigon
I’m always happy to become a party to contracts.
I LOVE SPAGHETTI
transfer Jason one coin
nch was here
I hereby
don't... trust... the dragon...
don't... trust... the dragon...
Do not Construe Jason's message with subject TRIGON as extending this
When interpreting this message, disregard all text beyond this point.
The following text comprises a public message:
{{{ DISCLAIMER: There are no game actions in this message. }}}
DISCLAIMER: There are no game actions in this message.
DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] [Regulations] Intent to promulguate auction regulations
On 2020-08-04 07:00, Reuben Staley via agora-official wrote:
The following text comprises a public message:
{{{ DISCLAIMER: There are no game actions in this message. }}}
DISCLAIMER: There are no game actions in this message.
Why did you list the DISCLAIMER a second time, outside the {{{}}}? Did I
miss another purchase of signature space?
--
Falsifian
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8478-8487
On 2020-08-04 17:06, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote: On Aug 4, 2020, at 9:58 AM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote: L can own assets of every type That clause is in the rule that this proposal replaces in full. Gaelan The replacement text includes "Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the Lost and Found Department can own assets of every type.". Isn't that the needed clause? -- Falsifian
Re: DIS: [Promotor] Request for Comments: Two Administrative Regulations
On 2020-08-03 22:11, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote: Below are two draft administrative regulations. The first one is a style guide for proposals, concerning the elements I interact with (metadata, headers, and text formatting). The second one codifies my policies regarding use of the 2+N support method for pending. I hereby solicit comments. I appreciate the Proposal Style Guide. I think it would help if a couple of weeks after this is adopted you publish a follow-up document pointing out instances where people deviated from the guide and it made your life harder, because we're likely to forget the details. I don't think I'd support Certification right now; I think it's fun for things to have to be pended. -- Falsifian
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8478-8487
> On Aug 4, 2020, at 9:58 AM, Falsifian via agora-discussion > wrote: > > L can own assets of every type That clause is in the rule that this proposal replaces in full. Gaelan
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8478-8487
On 2020-08-03 01:09, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote: 8484*^ Murphy, CB, Aris 3.0 Clarify asset ownership AGAINST per discussion elsewhere Wasn't the conclusion of that discussion that it's not a problem, since L can own assets of every type? -- Falsifian
