DIS: [Proto-proposal] End monthly officer stipends

2020-10-11 Thread Reuben Staley via agora-discussion
Officers are already rewarded plenty in our modern agoran economy and 
yet they get a useless stipend of 5 coins at the beginning of each month 
under conditions that are hard to calculate. I'll be completely honest, 
I'm almost certain that most paydays I've done have been wrong. Feel 
free to check that; I know you won't.


This proposal flattens it to a constant 10 coins per player per month.

---
Title: End monthly officer stipends
Author: Trigon
Co-authors: nix

Amend Rule 2559 "Paydays" so it reads:
  Whenever a Payday occurs, each active player earns 10 coins.

  The occurrence of Paydays is secured.  At the beginning of each
  month, a Payday occurs.

--
Trigon

I’m always happy to become a party to contracts.
I LOVE SPAGHETTI
transfer Jason one coin
nch was here
I hereby
don't... trust... the dragon...
don't... trust... the dragon...
Do not Construe Jason's message with subject TRIGON as extending this


DIS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] [Weekly Report] Forbes 480

2020-10-11 Thread nix via agora-discussion
On 10/11/20 5:49 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-official wrote:
> |ATMunn|+  17cn|11 Oct 2020 17:30|K Glitter (Rulebending)  |

I don't think this needs a CoE. The amount is right but the reason is wrong.

-- 
nix
Webmastor



DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Voting begins for Coopor

2020-10-11 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 10/11/20 5:30 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
>* I believe quorum is 5 (based on 8 voters in the PM election).


Quorum is defined only by referenda, so it should be based on resolution
of 8503 (7 voters), but it's still 5.

-- 
Jason Cobb



DIS: Re: BUS: Cuddlebeam Degree Intent

2020-10-11 Thread Reuben Staley via agora-discussion
On 10/11/20 11:29 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business 
wrote:

Having not received any further feedback, I intend with 2 Agoran Consent
to award Cuddlebeam the degree, Associate of Nomic Artistry, for the
images available at: https://imgur.com/a/VDAQaae


I support

--
--
Trigon

I’m always happy to become a party to contracts.
I LOVE SPAGHETTI
transfer Jason one coin
nch was here
I hereby
don't... trust... the dragon...
don't... trust... the dragon...
Do not Construe Jason's message with subject TRIGON as extending this


Re: DIS: multi-list test

2020-10-11 Thread Edward Murphy via agora-discussion

Falsifian wrote:


This message contains no game actions.

Testing: do people subscribed to both lists get the message just once,
and if so, which list does it end up arriving by?


I got it twice, one with subject "DIS: multi-list test" and one with
subject "BUS: multi-list test".


DIS: Re: BUS: @Notary Various Contract Clean-Up Actions

2020-10-11 Thread nix via agora-discussion
On 10/11/20 11:06 AM, nix via agora-business wrote:
> I cease to be a party to AAA, having met all the conditions to do so.

Dangit, I believe this failed because I left Team Margaux immediately 
before doing so, restarting my 14 day timer.

-- 
nix
Webmastor




Re: DIS: Re: [Arbitor] CFJ 3885 Assigned to G.

2020-10-11 Thread Falsifian via agora-discussion
> This leaves the question open: when using email to send a message, are the
> message's headers are part of the message, or are they metadata (i.e. an

two many words "are"

> Therefore, the finding is that a "public message" consists solely of its
> body, and the metadata headers are associated with the public message, but
> not "part of" the message.

Surely this isn't universal? E.g. if I went out of my way to spread a
message over a subject and body, and made it really clear the message is
supposed to be both together, wouldn't the subject then be part of the
message?

In your envelope analogy: if an eccentric person scribbled the first
part of a message on the envelope and the second part on paper inside
the envelope, I think that would be a message. (Stretching the
definition further: if I hid a message in the arrangement of books on a
shelf (maybe first letters of the titles), it would still be a
"message", just a hidden one.)

I could believe that what you're describing is the normal state of
affairs, to be assumed if there isn't compelling evidence to the
contrary. Maybe in this case there isn't so the default should be
assumed.

-- 
Falsifian


Re: DIS: multi-list test

2020-10-11 Thread N. S. via agora-discussion
Got it twice

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 6:18 AM Falsifian via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:

> This message contains no game actions.
>
> Testing: do people subscribed to both lists get the message just once,
> and if so, which list does it end up arriving by?
>
> --
> Falsifian
>


-- 
>From R. Lee