Elysion wrote:
> Since I wasn't in on the discussion, could someone provide the
> context, please? Why do we think the PRS is not a contest? (I
> just looked at a Notary's report, which says it is a contest.)
It was decontestified by mistake when a Notary's Report listing
it as not a contest was ratified, and contestified by deliberate
'mistake' when a Scorekeepor's Report listing it as a contest
was ratified, allegedly. The CFJ is about whether the second of
these ratifications worked, given that the Scorekeepor is not
the recordkeepor of contestmaster.
-- 
ais523

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to