Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [@Promotor] The Notary's Report is too long

2021-06-17 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 6/18/21 12:37 AM, Telna via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2021-06-18 14:14, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> On 6/18/21 12:08 AM, Telna via agora-business wrote:
>>> Right, I'm glad for that! Was a bit further back than I was looking.
>>> I retract the quoted proposal and revoke the quoted promise.
>>
>> Promise revocation from the Library can only be done without objection.
>>
> Except for your own promises, which can be revoked from the Library by 
> announcement.
>
> Rule 2618 "Promises":
> ---
> The creator of a promise CAN take or revoke it from the Library by 
> announcement, unless the promise's text unambiguously designates it as 
> irrevocable.
> ---


Oh, I forgot that we changed that. My bad.

-- 
Jason Cobb

Assessor, Rulekeepor, S​tonemason



Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [@Promotor] The Notary's Report is too long

2021-06-17 Thread Telna via agora-discussion

On 2021-06-18 14:14, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:

On 6/18/21 12:08 AM, Telna via agora-business wrote:

Right, I'm glad for that! Was a bit further back than I was looking.
I retract the quoted proposal and revoke the quoted promise.



Promise revocation from the Library can only be done without objection.

Except for your own promises, which can be revoked from the Library by 
announcement.


Rule 2618 "Promises":
---
The creator of a promise CAN take or revoke it from the Library by 
announcement, unless the promise's text unambiguously designates it as 
irrevocable.

---


DIS: Re: BUS: [@Promotor] The Notary's Report is too long

2021-06-17 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, 11:03 PM Telna via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:

> I create the following proposal:
>
> //
>
> Title: Contract Chaff Cleanup
> Adoption index: 2.5
> Author: Telna
> Co-author(s):
>
>
> Amend Rule 1742 "Contracts" by appending the following as a new paragraph:
>
> The Notary CAN destroy a contract Without 2 Objections, but SHOULD NOT
> do so unless the contract no longer serves any significant purpose.
>
> //
>
> I grant the following promise, titled "Pendant Payment" to the Library:
>
> 
> Cashing conditions: The bearer has pended the proposal "Contract Chaff
> Cleanup" authored by Telna, and Telna has at least 2 boatloads of coins.
>
> I transfer 2 boatloads of coins to the bearer.
> 
>
> (This is currently valued at 28 coins)
>

Proposal 8559 adds the same mechanism, but whether the proposal worked was
under CFJ, so it hasn't appeared in a published ruleset. That will be
remedied (hopefully) within a day.

>