DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Blasphemy

2019-10-03 Thread Jason Cobb

On 10/2/19 6:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:

Followup:  a quick search on "candle" shows R. Lee to be the only
other member.  -G.


Looks like omd also consented in a reply to the main thread, but e may 
have never actually lit a candle.


--
Jason Cobb



DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Blasphemy

2019-10-02 Thread James Cook
On Wed., Oct. 2, 2019, 13:15 Jason Cobb,  wrote:

> I submit the following proposal:
>
>
> Title: Blasphemy
>
> AI: 1
>
> Text:
>
> {
>
> Destroy the contract that is known as the Reformed Church of the Ritual.
>
> [It's useless now.]
>
> }
>
>
> --
> Jason Cobb
>

The parties can destroy it on their own if they so desire. It owns some
coins, so I think it would be unfair to destroy it without their consent.

It does take up space in the Treasuror weekly report. I was thinking a
while ago that it would be interesting to make contracts disappear if they
are not actively maintained, e.g. by posting the full text and set of
parties every month. Another reason to do this is that I find it a bit
unsettling that I can't practically know what contracts exist, even public
ones, because they aren't tracked. It doesn't seem to have much practical
consequence, so I'm not sure it's worth adding bureaucracy.