Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Publish/Announce definition fix
It's probably not a bad idea, but I think there's a lot of judicial precedent on what exactly counts for messages, and I wouldn't want to accidentally nuke that. Although I'm sure you know a lot more about that than I do, so I'd love help (from anyone) codifying the precedent here. Jason Cobb On 7/20/19 12:14 AM, Nicholas Evans wrote: A person "publishes" or "announces" something by sending a public message whose body contains that thing.
DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Publish/Announce definition fix
Might be nice to add "unambiguously contains" while we're at it.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019, 11:10 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
>
> Title: No, you didn't publish that
>
> Author: Jason Cobb
>
> AI: 3
>
> Text:
>
> {
>
> Amend Rule 478 ("Fora") by replacing the text
>
> A person "publishes" or "announces" something by sending a public
> message.
>
> with the text
>
> A person "publishes" or "announces" something by sending a public
> message whose body contains that thing.
>
> }
>
>
> --
> Jason Cobb
>
>
