DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: These elections are failing quorum and will soon have to have their voting periods extended if enough votes are not cast: CotC(Arnold Bros (est. 1905), Murphy, Wooble), fails by one vote. Anarchist(coppro, Quazie, Tiger), fails by one vote. Tailor (coppro, Yally), fails by six votes. There are currently at least two or three endorsements of Wooble in the Tailor election. I would ask those endorsers to vote conditionally if Wooble does not, I would encourage Wooble to vote, and I would encourage the Wielder to rubberstamp it.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: There are currently at least two or three endorsements of Wooble in the Tailor election. I would ask those endorsers to vote conditionally if Wooble does not, I would encourage Wooble to vote, and I would encourage the Wielder to rubberstamp it. OTOH, as long as I don't vote a vote endorsing me is effectively a vote for me, and maybe some of the voters no longer think I should be replaced since my horrible attempted behavior was, fortunately, IMPOSSIBLE.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: There are currently at least two or three endorsements of Wooble in the Tailor election. I would ask those endorsers to vote conditionally if Wooble does not, I would encourage Wooble to vote, and I would encourage the Wielder to rubberstamp it. OTOH, as long as I don't vote a vote endorsing me is effectively a vote for me, and maybe some of the voters no longer think I should be replaced since my horrible attempted behavior was, fortunately, IMPOSSIBLE. Ah, you're right, I was conufsing this with the Assessor election, which is regarding a vacant office and thus needs to be completed; whereas the resolution of this election is relatively immaterial.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: Ah, you're right, I was conufsing this with the Assessor election, which is regarding a vacant office and thus needs to be completed; whereas the resolution of this election is relatively immaterial. Accountor; Assessor isn't vacant.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: Ah, you're right, I was conufsing this with the Assessor election, which is regarding a vacant office and thus needs to be completed; whereas the resolution of this election is relatively immaterial. Accountor; Assessor isn't vacant. Err, right.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 11:46 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: These elections are failing quorum and will soon have to have their voting periods extended if enough votes are not cast: CotC(Arnold Bros (est. 1905), Murphy, Wooble), fails by one vote. Anarchist(coppro, Quazie, Tiger), fails by one vote. Tailor (coppro, Yally), fails by six votes. There are currently at least two or three endorsements of Wooble in the Tailor election. I would ask those endorsers to vote conditionally if Wooble does not, I would encourage Wooble to vote, and I would encourage the Wielder to rubberstamp it. I vote for Murphy for CotC, and endorse Goethe on the Anarchist vote. -- ais523 The CotC vote has already been resolved.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: These elections are failing quorum and will soon have to have their voting periods extended if enough votes are not cast: CotC(Arnold Bros (est. 1905), Murphy, Wooble), fails by one vote. Anarchist(coppro, Quazie, Tiger), fails by one vote. Tailor (coppro, Yally), fails by six votes. There are currently at least two or three endorsements of Wooble in the Tailor election. I would ask those endorsers to vote conditionally if Wooble does not, I would encourage Wooble to vote, and I would encourage the Wielder to rubberstamp it. There are 5 by my count: 3 (including Murphy) endorsed Wooble and 2 endorsed Murphy.
DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum
Yally wrote: These elections are failing quorum and will soon have to have their voting periods extended if enough votes are not cast: CotC(Arnold Bros (est. 1905), Murphy, Wooble), fails by one vote. I rubberstamp this decision. Anarchist(coppro, Quazie, Tiger), fails by one vote. I rubberstamp this decision if and only if one candidate has at least two more votes than any other individual candidate. Tailor (coppro, Yally), fails by six votes. I do not rubberstamp this decision.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Yally wrote: These elections are failing quorum and will soon have to have their voting periods extended if enough votes are not cast: CotC(Arnold Bros (est. 1905), Murphy, Wooble), fails by one vote. I rubberstamp this decision. Anarchist(coppro, Quazie, Tiger), fails by one vote. I rubberstamp this decision if and only if one candidate has at least two more votes than any other individual candidate. Tailor (coppro, Yally), fails by six votes. I do not rubberstamp this decision. You can't rubberstamp elections.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum
Yally wrote: You can't rubberstamp elections. Meh? I thought that proposal had gone through. Maybe it's in the 6238-56 batch that I need to resolve.
