If I did use PSS, there would have been 10 voters and the quorum would be 8.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Ned Strange <edwardostra...@gmail.com> wrote: > I call a CFJ with the statement "If an Agoran Decision were now > initiated, the quorum would be 8". > > The official Assessment recently published listed 9 voters on the most > recent proposal, which would make the quorum 7. However, I contended > that I used PSS to vote FOR that proposal. The language I used was "I > also have PSS vote as I do".The question is whether that language runs > afoul of rule 2466 which institutes a "requirement that the agent > must, in the message in which the action is performed, uniquely > identify the principal and that the action is being taken on behalf of > that person. > > -- > From V.J. Rada -- >From V.J. Rada
