DIS: Re: BUS: Enforcement Enforcement
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote: If a player violates a Rule by failing to meet the requirements of an office, such as performing eir weekly or monthly duties, then the IADoP SHALL initiate a valid criminal case on the matter as soon as possible afterwards. Cases initiated in this manner do not count towards the IADoP's excess case limit, Rules to the contrary notwithstanding. This will cause a lot of frivolous cases.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Enforcement Enforcement
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 12:35 -0400, omd wrote: On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote: If a player violates a Rule by failing to meet the requirements of an office, such as performing eir weekly or monthly duties, then the IADoP SHALL initiate a valid criminal case on the matter as soon as possible afterwards. Cases initiated in this manner do not count towards the IADoP's excess case limit, Rules to the contrary notwithstanding. This will cause a lot of frivolous cases. Replace the IADoP with Wooble, and I'd be in favour of it. -- ais523
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Enforcement Enforcement
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, ais523 wrote: On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 12:35 -0400, omd wrote: On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote: If a player violates a Rule by failing to meet the requirements of an office, such as performing eir weekly or monthly duties, then the IADoP SHALL initiate a valid criminal case on the matter as soon as possible afterwards. Cases initiated in this manner do not count towards the IADoP's excess case limit, Rules to the contrary notwithstanding. This will cause a lot of frivolous cases. Replace the IADoP with Wooble, and I'd be in favour of it. I submit the following proposal, might as well: Enact a Rule with the following text: Wooble is the Pariah.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Enforcement Enforcement
- Original Message - From: Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu To: Agora Discussion agora-discussion@agoranomic.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 7:31 PM Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Enforcement Enforcement On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, ais523 wrote: On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 12:35 -0400, omd wrote: On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote: If a player violates a Rule by failing to meet the requirements of an office, such as performing eir weekly or monthly duties, then the IADoP SHALL initiate a valid criminal case on the matter as soon as possible afterwards. Cases initiated in this manner do not count towards the IADoP's excess case limit, Rules to the contrary notwithstanding. This will cause a lot of frivolous cases. Replace the IADoP with Wooble, and I'd be in favour of it. I submit the following proposal, might as well: Enact a Rule with the following text: Wooble is the Pariah. --- I object.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Enforcement Enforcement
omd wrote: On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote: If a player violates a Rule by failing to meet the requirements of an office, such as performing eir weekly or monthly duties, then the IADoP SHALL initiate a valid criminal case on the matter as soon as possible afterwards. Cases initiated in this manner do not count towards the IADoP's excess case limit, Rules to the contrary notwithstanding. This will cause a lot of frivolous cases. Nothing prevents the IADoP from retracting a case after e initiates it, but still, yes, there's enough churn with CotC as it is. (I'll likely get everything caught up on Saturday.)
