DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Prerogatives imply choice
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Proposal: Prerogatives imply choice (AI = 2, please) Amend Rule 2019 (Prerogatives) by replacing section b) with this text: b) Justiciar. Within three days after an appeal case comes to require a judge, the Justiciar CAN declare that case either hot or cold by announcement. If the Justiciar has not so declared, then the Clerk of the Courts SHALL NOT assign a panel to that case during this period. If the Justiciar has so declared, then the Clerk of the Courts SHALL assign a panel including (hot) or excluding (cold) the Justiciar, if possible. Upon the adoption of this proposal, the Prerogative of Justiciar is assigned to the person (if any) to whom the Prerogative of Default Justice was assigned immediately before the adoption of this proposal. In the event that it is neiter hot nor cold, it is room temperature. What is the protocal for a room temperature appeal? I assume that it need not include or exclude the Justiciar, but i just want to make sure.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Prerogatives imply choice
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Proposal: Prerogatives imply choice (AI = 2, please) Amend Rule 2019 (Prerogatives) by replacing section b) with this text: b) Justiciar. Within three days after an appeal case comes to require a judge, the Justiciar CAN declare that case either hot or cold by announcement. If the Justiciar has not so declared, then the Clerk of the Courts SHALL NOT assign a panel to that case during this period. If the Justiciar has so declared, then the Clerk of the Courts SHALL assign a panel including (hot) or excluding (cold) the Justiciar, if possible. Upon the adoption of this proposal, the Prerogative of Justiciar is assigned to the person (if any) to whom the Prerogative of Default Justice was assigned immediately before the adoption of this proposal. In the event that it is neiter hot nor cold, it is room temperature. What is the protocal for a room temperature appeal? I assume that it need not include or exclude the Justiciar, but i just want to make sure. Also, should this be a switch?
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Prerogatives imply choice
On Monday 14 July 2008 06:45:00 pm Quazie wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Proposal: Prerogatives imply choice (AI = 2, please) Amend Rule 2019 (Prerogatives) by replacing section b) with this text: b) Justiciar. Within three days after an appeal case comes to require a judge, the Justiciar CAN declare that case either hot or cold by announcement. If the Justiciar has not so declared, then the Clerk of the Courts SHALL NOT assign a panel to that case during this period. If the Justiciar has so declared, then the Clerk of the Courts SHALL assign a panel including (hot) or excluding (cold) the Justiciar, if possible. Upon the adoption of this proposal, the Prerogative of Justiciar is assigned to the person (if any) to whom the Prerogative of Default Justice was assigned immediately before the adoption of this proposal. In the event that it is neiter hot nor cold, it is room temperature. What is the protocal for a room temperature appeal? I assume that it need not include or exclude the Justiciar, but i just want to make sure. I think that in that case the normal protocol for panel assignment prevails. Can the Justiciar change eir mind? What happens with multiple declarations? Pavitra.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Prerogatives imply choice
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Ben Caplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 14 July 2008 06:45:00 pm Quazie wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] b) Justiciar. Within three days after an appeal case comes to require a judge, the Justiciar CAN declare that case either hot or cold by announcement. If the Justiciar has not so declared, then the Clerk of the Courts SHALL NOT assign a panel to that case during this period. If the Justiciar has so declared, then the Clerk of the Courts SHALL assign a panel including (hot) or excluding (cold) the Justiciar, if possible. Can the Justiciar change eir mind? What happens with multiple declarations? If there are multiple declarations, the CotC either SHALL assign a panel either excluding or including the Justiciar, or SHALL assign a panel both excluding and including in the Justiciar. In the former case, it's UNIMPUGNED either way; in the latter, it's EXCUSED either way. Unless the CotC did something stupid, like act on behalf of the Justiciar to say both. --Ivan Hope CXXVII
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Prerogatives imply choice
On Monday 14 July 2008 06:57:43 pm ihope wrote: Unless the CotC did something stupid, like act on behalf of the Justiciar to say both. Which, in the Spirit of the Game, is not at all implausible.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Prerogatives imply choice
Quazie wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Proposal: Prerogatives imply choice (AI = 2, please) Amend Rule 2019 (Prerogatives) by replacing section b) with this text: b) Justiciar. Within three days after an appeal case comes to require a judge, the Justiciar CAN declare that case either hot or cold by announcement. If the Justiciar has not so declared, then the Clerk of the Courts SHALL NOT assign a panel to that case during this period. If the Justiciar has so declared, then the Clerk of the Courts SHALL assign a panel including (hot) or excluding (cold) the Justiciar, if possible. Upon the adoption of this proposal, the Prerogative of Justiciar is assigned to the person (if any) to whom the Prerogative of Default Justice was assigned immediately before the adoption of this proposal. In the event that it is neiter hot nor cold, it is room temperature. What is the protocal for a room temperature appeal? I assume that it need not include or exclude the Justiciar, but i just want to make sure. Also, should this be a switch? Not unless an exemption from ongoing reporting is also added.
