comex wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> With the consent of Murphy and OscarMeyr, I intend to cause the panel >>> to judge AFFIRM. >> Having received the neceesary support, I cause the panel of Appeal >> 1984a to judge AFFIRM. > > I consider affirming a ruling of IRRELEVANT on a CFJ I initiated to be > a punishment to me. That is to say, this was a ruling that I should > be punished. > > Therefore, I hereby appeal it, which R101 (iii), paragraph 2 allows me to do. > > Disclaimer: This probably is ineffective.
I believe that (at least for players) the R101 (iii) right in question is fulfilled by the ability to submit a proposal on the topic in question, and thus cannot be extended to allow appeals not explicitly allowed by other rules. I'm treating this attempt as unsuccessful until/unless judgement and/or legislation indicates otherwise.
