DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Revised distribution of proposals 7721-24
On Sun, 09 Nov 2014 08:00:50 + woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote: 7721 Tiger 3.0 Restricted distribution AGAINST (What is this IMPOSSIBLE for any player to distribute escape hatch for if you're pragmatizing distributability?) I think we should keep this escape hatch. For such an essential concept as proposals, I'd rather have some redundancy. However, it might be reasonable to change the requirement of Without 3 Objections to something more restrictive. -- Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC E53D 08F5 7F90 3029 B5BD
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Revised distribution of proposals 7721-24
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote: 7723 Henri 1.0 Single line feed AGAINST. I'm shocked you'd vote AGAINST. I can't even find a *hypothetical* problem with any of the changes being proposed.
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Revised distribution of proposals 7721-24
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 14:12:50 -0500 Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote: In fact, I've made another mistake; the text of Tiger's 7721 was also wrong. So here's another revision: I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote). IDAuthor(s) AI Title 7721 Tiger 3.0 Restricted distribution 7722 omd1.0 Silver Quill 7723 Henri 1.0 Single line feed 7724 Henri 2.0 Changing the Definition of in a timely fashion CoE: 7722-7724 were already distributed. -scshunt Well, I messed up by forgetting the part about the proposal distribution doesn't have anything to do with my report. I'll try and clean up the situation now. -- Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC E53D 08F5 7F90 3029 B5BD
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Revised distribution of proposals 7721-24
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote: Well, I messed up by forgetting the part about the proposal distribution doesn't have anything to do with my report. I'll try and clean up the situation now. No problem. I just needed to CoE to prevent the decisions' existences from self-ratifying. -scshunt
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Revised distribution of proposals 7721-24
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, omd wrote: On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote: 7723 Henri 1.0 Single line feed AGAINST. I'm shocked you'd vote AGAINST. I can't even find a *hypothetical* problem with any of the changes being proposed. What? _All_ of the changes have obvious disastrous side effects. Greetings, Ørjan.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Revised distribution of proposals 7721-24
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:04:21 -0500 Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote: Well, I messed up by forgetting the part about the proposal distribution doesn't have anything to do with my report. I'll try and clean up the situation now. No problem. I just needed to CoE to prevent the decisions' existences from self-ratifying. -scshunt I don't think they would have self-ratified. The only self-ratifying portion of the Promotor's official messages is the list of pending proposals; I don't find anything in the ruleset about the announcements of distributing proposals or the existence of the Agoran decisions about them being self-ratifying. -- Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC E53D 08F5 7F90 3029 B5BD
