DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 6086-6108

2009-02-14 Thread Ed Murphy 
comex wrote:

 6099 D 1 2.0 Pavitra Clean up the deregistration mess
 AGAINT

As usual, this is invalid due to ambiguity (CFJs 1260-61).

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 6086-6108

2009-02-14 Thread comex 
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
 comex wrote:

 6099 D 1 2.0 Pavitra Clean up the deregistration mess
 AGAINT

 As usual, this is invalid due to ambiguity (CFJs 1260-61).

Really?  I seem to remember you've usually treated it as AGAINST.