DIS: Re: BUS: The Subgame
Yay, wrong forum. On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 10:23 AM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RFC 12: Every player has a number of AP, which is initially 7 and never more than 7. Every midnight UTC, every player gets an AP, unless this would put them above 7 AP. Subgame actions generally require a certain number of AP to perform.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The Subgame
Which game is that? On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 7:26 AM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yay, wrong forum. On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 10:23 AM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RFC 12: Every player has a number of AP, which is initially 7 and never more than 7. Every midnight UTC, every player gets an AP, unless this would put them above 7 AP. Subgame actions generally require a certain number of AP to perform. -- Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you. -- Unknown
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The Subgame
On 11 Oct 2008, at 20:14, Taral wrote: Which game is that? http://groups.google.com/group/nomic-217 -- ehird
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The Subgame
ehird wrote: On 11 Oct 2008, at 20:14, Taral wrote: Which game is that? http://groups.google.com/group/nomic-217 H. Ambassador BobTHJ, I suggest flipping recognitions as follows: PerlNomic - Friendly Normish - Friendly Nomic 217 - Neutral Civ3Democracy - Neutral NooPolis - Neutral Dragonomic- Abandoned PTomic also appears to have diverged into aPTomic, PTwomic, The Meme Game, and One New Rule Per Post. Proto-Proposal: Embassies Amend Rule 2200 (Nomic Definitions) by appending this text: An embassy is a partnership player whose contract designates itself as representing a specific foreign nomic whose rules explicitly allow it to so designate.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The Subgame
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: H. Ambassador BobTHJ, I suggest flipping recognitions as follows: PerlNomic - Friendly Normish - Friendly Nomic 217 - Neutral Civ3Democracy - Neutral NooPolis - Neutral Dragonomic- Abandoned Can Civ3Democracy be considered a single game? And what about Civ4Democracy? -root
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The Subgame
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Proto-Proposal: Embassies Amend Rule 2200 (Nomic Definitions) by appending this text: An embassy is a partnership player whose contract designates You mean registered partnership? --Ivan Hope CXXVII
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The Subgame
On Saturday 11 October 2008 03:38:32 pm Elliott Hird wrote: On 11 Oct 2008, at 21:05, Ed Murphy wrote: H. Ambassador BobTHJ, I suggest flipping recognitions as follows: Normish - Friendly Nomic 217 - Neutral I agree, but with Normish - Neutral and Nomic 217 - Friendly. Normish is better-established, and has an Agoran face partnership. Objectively, Murphy's way makes more sense.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The Subgame
ehird wrote: On 11 Oct 2008, at 21:05, Ed Murphy wrote: H. Ambassador BobTHJ, I suggest flipping recognitions as follows: PerlNomic - Friendly Normish - Friendly Nomic 217 - Neutral Civ3Democracy - Neutral NooPolis - Neutral Dragonomic- Abandoned I agree, but with Normish - Neutral and Nomic 217 - Friendly. Why Normish - Neutral? It's voluntarily represented by a partnership, that seems friendly to me.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The Subgame
Ivan Hope wrote: On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Proto-Proposal: Embassies Amend Rule 2200 (Nomic Definitions) by appending this text: An embassy is a partnership player whose contract designates You mean registered partnership? Yes, thank you.
