Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3760 assigned to omd
On 7/24/2019 1:57 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: On 7/23/2019 11:19 PM, omd wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 9:48 AM Kerim Aydin wrote: The answer may depend on whether "response to a CoE" is an official duty (R2143): An official duty for an office is any duty that the Rules specifically assign to that office's holder in particular (regardless of eir identity). Question: Are you thinking of any particular reason it would depend on this? I checked the Rules for clauses mentioning "duty" or "duties" and I don't see anything relevant. We've got some precedents (recent-ish) that by common definition a "duty" is anything a person is REQUIRED to do, so any "the [officer] SHALL" in the rules is an official duty. (can't remember first context in CFJs I'll see if I can dig up later). Oh, but I guess you're right that's not relevant to the discussion - I may have been misremembering some rules text that didn't exist.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3760 assigned to omd
On 7/23/2019 11:19 PM, omd wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 9:48 AM Kerim Aydin wrote: The answer may depend on whether "response to a CoE" is an official duty (R2143): An official duty for an office is any duty that the Rules specifically assign to that office's holder in particular (regardless of eir identity). Question: Are you thinking of any particular reason it would depend on this? I checked the Rules for clauses mentioning "duty" or "duties" and I don't see anything relevant. We've got some precedents (recent-ish) that by common definition a "duty" is anything a person is REQUIRED to do, so any "the [officer] SHALL" in the rules is an official duty. (can't remember first context in CFJs I'll see if I can dig up later). -G.
DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3760 assigned to omd
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 9:48 AM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > The answer may depend on whether "response to a CoE" is an official duty > > (R2143): > >An official duty for an office is any duty that the Rules > >specifically assign to that office's holder in particular > >(regardless of eir identity). Question: Are you thinking of any particular reason it would depend on this? I checked the Rules for clauses mentioning "duty" or "duties" and I don't see anything relevant.
