DIS: Re: OFF: [Dep. Anarchist] Repealment proposals
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: The following proposals are made as a part of the Anarchist's weekly duties. Said duties have not been performed within the tme limit, so I hereby deputise for the office regarding this duty. Proposal: Repeal R2147 Repeal Rule 2147 (Protectorates) Proposal: Repeal R2173 Repeal Rule 2173 (The Notary) Proposal: Repeal R1922 Repeal Rule 1922 (Defined Regular Patent Titles) You need to specify the interest index of these as 0 for them to satisfy the Anarchist's duties, and the first 2 need an adoption index of 2 to satisfy the duties. I'm (well, the PNP is) treating this as submitting 3 interested proposals, 2 of which would be no-ops. IMO, this also doesn't satisfy the requirements to gain a Cyan ribbon.
DIS: Re: OFF: [Dep. Anarchist] Repealment proposals
Geoffrey Spear wrote jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: The following proposals are made as a part of the Anarchist's weekly duties. Said duties have not been performed within the tme limit, so I hereby deputise for the office regarding this duty. Proposal: Repeal R2147 Repeal Rule 2147 (Protectorates) Proposal: Repeal R2173 Repeal Rule 2173 (The Notary) Proposal: Repeal R1922 Repeal Rule 1922 (Defined Regular Patent Titles) You need to specify the interest index of these as 0 for them to satisfy the Anarchist's duties, and the first 2 need an adoption index of 2 to satisfy the duties. I'm (well, the PNP is) treating this as submitting 3 interested proposals, 2 of which would be no-ops. IMO, this also doesn't satisfy the requirements to gain a Cyan ribbon. I realised that after posting. Is there anything I could do officially to fix this? Post another message adding to that one, posting a new one declaring that one void, or nothing at all?
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Dep. Anarchist] Repealment proposals
On 2/9/09, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: I realised that after posting. Is there anything I could do officially to fix this? Post another message adding to that one, posting a new one declaring that one void, or nothing at all? I believe you can validly retract those proposals, then deputise to submit corrected ones.
